Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 11503001)

The only thing that is dumb is you and your continued display of ignorance on something you clearly have no ****ing clue of which you speak. Do you even know what technical analysis is? Don't answer, that was rhetorical. You clearly have no ****ing idea, whatsoever.

I offered to explain the concepts and theories to you and instead you chose to continue to spew your jizz flavored breath all over your screen instead of taking the opportunity to learn something.

So have an antifreeze cocktail on me and go **** yourself. :thumb:

Originally Posted by SPATCH (Post 11503006)

You really trying to act like you need a background in financial market forecasting to interpret that stupid ****ing graph?
Tell me, why didn't breaking past +8 result in a "strong winning streak"?

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 11502906)

Here is a chart I put together of our net wins. You can see why I said this was a breakout game. We broke through the +9 level which had been acting as resistance. Additionally our support level moved up to +8 games over .500. Meaning in the near future we shouldn't break down below +8 and if we do then we are most likely heading for a losing streak.

But the momentum is obviously to the up side. Since +9 had been tested 3 times and now we finally broke through it, it should signal a stronger winning streak. At least that is the stock market\technical analysis take on the matter.

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 11503019)

It is truly sad that pete's insane chart is buried at the end of game thread that very few people will likely see.

It really deserves the full-throated mockery of a broad CP audience.

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 11502906)

Here is a chart I put together of our net wins. You can see why I said this was a breakout game. We broke through the +9 level which had been acting as resistance. Additionally our support level moved up to +8 games over .500. Meaning in the near future we shouldn't break down below +8 and if we do then we are most likely heading for a losing streak.

But the momentum is obviously to the up side. Since +9 had been tested 3 times and now we finally broke through it, it should signal a stronger winning streak. At least that is the stock market\technical analysis take on the matter.

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 11503020)

Don't you have an Obama doll to inflate???

I gotta hear this...why does Cosmobama think this is insane??

Or is it you just saw someone disagreeing with me and being your usual, pillowbiter stain self, you felt you needed to pile on?

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 11503022)

:LOL:
The win streak is at 2. A "stronger" won streak would be 3.

The Royals have the best record in the AL. They are playing at home.
Just knowing that and predicting they will "probably" win tomorrow is a more meaningful analysis than "we'll probably win since +9 had been tested 3 times before and we finally broke through it."

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 11503023)

The dumb and desperate Obama references indicate that you realize just how stupid your "analysis" is.

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 11503026)

pete, start a thread with your "analysis" where people might see it.

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 11503030)

:facepalm:
Ignore pitching matchups, the opponent, the site, etc., when making a prediction.

Focus on how many times a certain win level above .500 has been reached. LMAO

And you're not just predicting the next game, you're predicting the next several--based on that a certain win level above .500 has been reached a certain number of times.

It's completely moronic.