Lol hold on….what?

Ingram had 22 pressures and 2 sacks in 15 games
Clark had 29 pressures and 4.5 sacks in 14 games

This isn't being fair. Ingram wasn't playing much in Pittsburgh, which is why he wanted out.

Don't kill the messenger, it's just why Sapho posted that

I see what you did there

Bradberry to Philly 10 milly deal

I looked it up - he played a higher percentage of snaps in Pittsburgh, and his stats were split exactly even between the two teams. 11 pressures and 1 sack.

I think his value has been overblown because it coincided with a healthy Jones returning and loving back to DT.

I’ve always said he ****ing sucks anyway.






No need to check my previous posts. I’m consistent on these things and don’t change my opinions on players if the Chiefs do/don’t sign them.

I have also always hated this steaming pile of aids cum shit! **** him hes a scrap heap player anyway!

I think this is somewhat of a fair argument, as well as the schedule point you or someone else made. But Clark was a hot sack of s**t and was far, far worse. PFF is much closer on this evaluation.

Genuinely did not want Bradberry, delighted we didn't spend that on him.

Burt Vatch is a mf’ing moron. A curse on his goldfish! Skull **** him! He’s the worst GM in the history of the NFL. Bradberry was our only hope of seeing another Super Bowl. A pox on the Chiefs’ front office! Aaaaaaaarrrrrrrggggghhhhh!

First in :)

My point in saying Clark outplayed Ingram is not to celebrate Clark, but to pump the brakes on Ingram.

Fair enough, I've no issue with that. Think we strongly disagree on Ingram's value but I can appreciate the argument he's not exactly the final piece of the jigsaw. As long as we all agree Frank Clark is f***ing awful.

Get additional pressure with Chenal for kicks