![]() |
Yeah, but the Royals will never be taken seriously or "realistically" expected to win anything, until they do. If the Tigers were 7 games behind the Royals everyone would expect them to come back and win the division. Might as well just quit and fold up shop.
|
Quote:
These prospects don't mean shit. Minor-league Gordon wouldn't wipe his ass with the trading card of any of these guys. We're talking minor-league gods when discussing Gordon and Hosmer. Sal Perez, on the other hand, is a real-life beast. Don't disrespect him by comparing him to a #2 pitcher like Shields. |
Quote:
|
Must be a big year for trolls when Tardinals fans to start infesting Royals threads.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
HAHAHA! SUCK ITZ, CARDHNALS FAND!
Spoiler!
|
Quote:
And Sal Perez and his OPS+ of 96 isn't beastly. Furthermore, he said he wouldn't trade the Cardinals' entire system for Perez. There isn't a GM in baseball who doesn't take that package for Salvador Perez. |
Moose wasn't a hack either... although it's easy to pick on him now. His last full minor league season he played 118 games and put up 94 runs, 36 HR and 124 RBI. Massive numbers, hard to argue otherwise.
|
Moustakas, Hosmer, and Gordon were all elite prospects, but they aren't prospects anymore. Perhaps getting burned by their underachieving has soured Royals fans on the ability of prospects to project.
|
Quote:
Hosmer in AAA: .439/.525/.582 (and don't even think about "sample sizing" me, because he ****ing owned AA, too) Gordon in the minors in '06: .325/.427/.588 No need for creative interpretation here; these guys looked like ****ing monsters, far more than anything on the current Cardinals radar. And I'm pretty confident in standing by Perez and his value now and in the future. |
Quote:
Player A: .325/.427/.588 29HR, 111 R, 101 RBI, .373 BABIP in 577 PA Player B: .300/.357/.566 32 HR 80 R, 100 RBI, .308 BABIP in 513 PA Both age 22 seasons. Both at AA. Where is the "far more" part other than the hype? And this isn't to discredit those guys as prospects, but to provide perspective on projection based upon performance. |
I dunno what happened here, but I dig it.
|
Moose looks like a bust. Hosmer will at least be Willie Aikens
|
http://www.baseball-reference.com/mi...d=tavera001osc
In terms of minor league metrics, I'll take OBP over BABIP, and Gordon and Hosmer were definitely more highly-regarded prospects, though Taveras is no slouch. The original point, and one that still holds true, is that prospect status means, ultimately, jack and shit. We've been there and done that, and it doesn't necessarily translate immediately, and I don't think that KC did anything "to ruin" either Gordon or Hosmer. |
Player B was Matt Adams, not Taveras.
BABIP is a measure of fortune, IMO, which is why I threw it in there. I think that OBP and ISO are the two most important stats for a hitter. One measures your ability to get on base, the other is your extra base power, which is rarely the result of luck the way that BABIP alone can be. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.