duncan_idaho |
07-07-2014 10:02 AM |
Didn't get a chance to respond to this before I left for the weekend at the lake but wanted to finish the discussion since good points were being made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch
(Post 10732208)
Fine, they have Dyson at 2.4. Still much higher than Byrd given how there's another half of baseball to play.
I have no earthly idea why you keep saying that. Because of Jeremy Guthrie? Every serious mathematician focuses on repeatable experiements and datasets that hold trends. What should have happened is far more telling than what actually did. Focusing on outliers is seriously ancient thinking.
|
It's not about Jeremy Guthrie (though I do have issues with the way they figure their WAR for pitchers, which is incredibly dependent on FIP and strikeouts... Wade Davis was nearly 2 WAR starting pitcher according to Fangraphs, and his WAR stayed flat even after being moved to the bullpen last year). It's about their formula in general. I just tend to find Baseball Reference to be a little more reliable and less likely to make me go "Wait, that makes no sense."
Fangraphs only has Marlon Byrd - who has the 10th-most HR in MLB and is 26th in MLB in slugging - as being 7 runs above average offensively on the season. That's incredibly low for a player with those profiles. His baserunning is not THAT bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch
(Post 10732208)
You should apply this logic to Gordon then, since he's hit the shitter offensively. 2-41 slump? As you say, you can stop runs or create them. Hopefully both. Dyson stops them - Byrd creates them. A wash.
|
There's a difference between a proven everyday day hitter going through a long slump and a part-time guy like Dyson. Dyson has never proven he can hold up a high level of production when given more PT (in fact, he has shown that more PT=lower offensive numbers).
If Dyson could play everyday, with a day off against lefties, and put up .300/.350/.350, I'd take that all day long. That's basically what I was hoping for from Nori Aoki. Just haven't seen him prove he can be that type of guy yet. With a guy that would likely rip off 50 bags in that situation, I can live with a .350 SLG. Because I look at SB as a way to adjust SLG - basically, I add those stolen bases - and subtract caught stealings- to the total bases used to derive the slugging percentage... Don't know if anyone else uses that statistical measure, but I think of it as Total Base Percentage, and I think it's a way to compare the extra offensive value a speed guy offers with his ability to swipe bags. .300 BA with a .350 SLG would normally be looked at as an empty .300, but if you have the speed to turn 30 of the singles you're using to get to that average in 2Bs (or 2Bs into 3Bs, etc), that's just as good for run creation as hitting a 2B in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch
(Post 10732208)
Here's the meat of the argument: creating value by replacing X player. And that X is clearly Fat-Ass at DH. Get rid of Dyson and you gain nothing. Get rid of Fat-Ass, and you probably pick up 2 wins. Is that enough? It might be.
|
There's really no argument in support of Butler at this time. His juice is gone, his ability to get on base is gone, and he's hurting the team. He's been better offensively than Hosmer, but that's not saying much (and Hosmer at least is a run-preventer at 1B.
|