ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rashee Rice [legal issues megathread] (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=353018)

GeorgeZimZam 04-15-2024 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 493rd (Post 17482852)
Maybe these people are scamming for $$$. Hell, it’s probably even likely, but my God, let’s not forget they’re the victims here who were simply driving safely to arrive at their destination when Rashee Rice and his clown crew ruined their day.

These so-called "victims" might not be so innocent. Can't rule out the possibility they were committing one or even multiple hate crimes: scoffing at Rashee Rice's neck tattoo and/or disparaging his durag. Likely they met the definition of that's rayciss! according to the esteemed Jewish Rabbi. Even the black mother, and especially her 4-year-old son.

https://i.postimg.cc/RVCY10gZ/honk-honk-gif.gif

Marcellus 04-15-2024 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 17482589)
Or is it that he was street racing with drugs in the car and almost killed people?


STFU

From the video I saw, he didn't almost kill anyone. Not even remotely close. This is getting sort of ridiculous at this point.

Was it really dumb? Yea. Lets cool the jets here a bit though.

BigRedChief 04-15-2024 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17482902)
From the video I saw, he didn't almost kill anyone. Not even remotely close. This is getting sort of ridiculous at this point.

Was it really dumb? Yea. Let’s cool the jets here a bit though.

yeah that’s BS. Of course the minor injuries became insufferable damage but if you give me a million bucks, we will call it even.

He has no choice. He wants to plead these down he has to make satisfactorily restitution to the “victims” before they plead anything down.

TwistedChief 04-15-2024 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 17482644)
I have no problem with Rice getting a very light punishment and of course staying with the Chiefs. But let's be clear, this isn't just some regular "kid" stuff. This is a sign of MASSIVE immaturity and frankly low low low IQ. This is some sub 80 IQ behavior.

He's a moron. He's OUR moron but he's still a moron.

He left his playbook in the car as he walked away in broad daylight with people taking pictures as anyone would do after an accident of that type.

I don't think he deserves to die or be released or suspended more than 2 (maybe 4) games, but damn, it's holistically still dumb, dangerous, and immature.

I don't think we need to defend every ounce of this. "Well, these high performance cars accelerate so fast and he innocently didn't understand that..." Come on.

TwistedChief 04-15-2024 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17482902)
From the video I saw, he didn't almost kill anyone. Not even remotely close. This is getting sort of ridiculous at this point.

Was it really dumb? Yea. Lets cool the jets here a bit though.

You also saw 2 seconds of their racing and had that continued for another 10 or 30 seconds it could've killed someone, no? Or is there a reason you think that was clearly the peak of their interaction and the race was going to end immediately?

Katipan 04-15-2024 04:55 PM

I think losing control of a vehicle at that speed constitutes almost killing himself and anyone in his car.

At least that's the lecture I get when I'm talking my way out of a speeding ticket.

bigjosh 04-15-2024 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 17482935)
yeah that’s BS. Of course the minor injuries became insufferable damage but if you give me a million bucks, we will call it even.

He has no choice. He wants to plead these down he has to make satisfactorily restitution to the “victims” before they plead anything down.


Civil court and criminal court arent a one stop shop.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bowser 04-15-2024 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katipan (Post 17482950)
when I'm talking my way out of a speeding ticket.

*the sound of the Bullshit Alarms blasting loudly*

https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.0567974d...pid=ImgRaw&r=0

Easy 6 04-15-2024 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17482946)
He left his playbook in the car as he walked away in broad daylight with people taking pictures as anyone would do after an accident of that type.

I don't think he deserves to die or be released or suspended more than 2 (maybe 4) games, but damn, it's holistically still dumb, dangerous, and immature.

I don't think we need to defend every ounce of this. "Well, these high performance cars accelerate so fast and he innocently didn't understand that..." Come on.

Yeah the homers are out of line no doubt, this thing could go sideways any number of ways... excusing his bullshit actions away isnt a good look, a four game suspension is the best outlook I can see

Marcellus 04-15-2024 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17482947)
You also saw 2 seconds of their racing and had that continued for another 10 or 30 seconds it could've killed someone, no? Or is there a reason you think that was clearly the peak of their interaction and the race was going to end immediately?

You really don't know the difference between what actually happened and what could have happened?

He didn't almost kill anyone because he didn't almost kill anyone. Had it gone on for 30 seconds longer he may have cleared any traffic or he may have run himself into a wall harmlessly or the exact same thing could have happened.


The statement was "almost killing someone" when there is zero evidence "he almost killed someone."

COULD someone have died in a car accident, well no shit sherlock. Nobody came remotely close to dying though and that's simply the facts.

His worst action here was leaving the scene, that's more egregious than the accident in my mind.

Some of you just want to argue this just to argue.

-King- 04-15-2024 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17482997)
You really don't know the difference between what actually happened and what could have happened?

He didn't almost kill anyone because he didn't almost kill anyone. Had it gone on for 30 seconds longer he may have cleared any traffic or he may have run himself into a wall harmlessly or the exact same thing could have happened.


The statement was "almost killing someone" when there is zero evidence "he almost killed someone."

COULD someone have died in a car accident, well no shit sherlock. Nobody came remotely close to dying though and that's simply the facts.

His worst action here was leaving the scene, that's more egregious than the accident in my mind.

Some of you just want to argue this just to argue.

Lolwut.

Marcellus 04-15-2024 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17483003)
Lolwut.

This is going to blow your mind but the law feels the same way. That's why the penalty for leaving the scene is generally greater than the penalty for the accident.

Katipan 04-15-2024 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 17482981)
*the sound of the Bullshit Alarms blasting loudly*

https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.0567974d...pid=ImgRaw&r=0

One time during a sobriety check I told the officer it was really scary and hard to concentrate because he was just so large and intimidating.

He told me to go home. 🥰 And to not forget my shoes.

TwistedChief 04-15-2024 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17482997)
You really don't know the difference between what actually happened and what could have happened?

He didn't almost kill anyone because he didn't almost kill anyone. Had it gone on for 30 seconds longer he may have cleared any traffic or he may have run himself into a wall harmlessly or the exact same thing could have happened.


The statement was "almost killing someone" when there is zero evidence "he almost killed someone."

COULD someone have died in a car accident, well no shit sherlock. Nobody came remotely close to dying though and that's simply the facts.

His worst action here was leaving the scene, that's more egregious than the accident in my mind.

Some of you just want to argue this just to argue.

I am simply responding to the video where you claimed he wasn't "remotely close" to killing anyone. Are you serious about that? Do you really think within 5-10 seconds of that interaction he couldn't have had a let's say 5-10% chance of killing someone versus the normal 0.001% chance of killing someone in the lane next to you?

We're talking about probabilities. Anyone can die in a traffic accident. He raised that possibility by leaps and bounds. I am well aware it didn't end up in a fatality, and I don't think he shouldn't be punished as if it did or almost did. But I also think it's absurd to ignore what happened.

If you drive drunk and no one dies, is it totally fine that you just drove drunk? Because kids will be kids and no one suffered the consequences even if you were pulled over by the police?

Pasta Little Brioni 04-15-2024 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17482997)
You really don't know the difference between what actually happened and what could have happened?

He didn't almost kill anyone because he didn't almost kill anyone. Had it gone on for 30 seconds longer he may have cleared any traffic or he may have run himself into a wall harmlessly or the exact same thing could have happened.


The statement was "almost killing someone" when there is zero evidence "he almost killed someone."

COULD someone have died in a car accident, well no shit sherlock. Nobody came remotely close to dying though and that's simply the facts.

His worst action here was leaving the scene, that's more egregious than the accident in my mind.

Some of you just want to argue this just to argue.

Exactly


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.