ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

Reaper16 10-22-2011 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8036193)
The decision has been made, they are not still trying to decide. This is their third effort to try and find some other conference that wants them.
They are milking this, keeping everyone else hanging.

Like the article said, they are neither South, nor East. But good luck to them, now get going please.

Parts of the state are pretty Southern. There is significant Southerness to Missouri.

Mr. Plow 10-22-2011 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8036193)
The decision has been made, they are not still trying to decide. This is their third effort to try and find some other conference that wants them.
They are milking this, keeping everyone else hanging.

Like the article said, they are neither South, nor East. But good luck to them, now get going please.



Man you're jealous....

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 8034130)
I was talking about where the conference power lies. It is a Southwest conference. Texas and Oklahoma completely control everything.

What, you think you're going to a conference where you're going to get exactly 1/14 of the power?! What a stupid argument. Conferences are ruled by football prowess. If KU, KSU and ISU were football powerhouses, it wouldn't make it any more "midwest" than it is. Now you're going to a conference where the powere is all "deep south" rather than "southwest". Why you think this is going to be better for you I have no idea. Your major cities border B!G and Big XII states. But, if you want to think of yourself as "southern", you go right ahead.

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8035924)
Don't be so dense yourself. Do you actually think that having the tournament in KC increases Mizzou's funding? If the tournament leaves, is Mizzou's funding level going to be cut? I don't think so. Most of that tax money stays locally and you know it.

Let me put it this way: KU is not interested in helping the Missouri economy directly or indirectly if they want to be an SEC state. We're not interested in improving your schools, your roads, or your hotels. We're not interested in bringing national attention to your state, it doesn't benefit us in any way other than convenience.

Al Bundy 10-22-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036235)
What, you think you're going to a conference where you're going to get exactly 1/14 of the power?! What a stupid argument. Conferences are ruled by football prowess. If KU, KSU and ISU were football powerhouses, it wouldn't make it any more "midwest" than it is. Now you're going to a conference where the powere is all "deep south" rather than "southwest". Why you think this is going to be better for you I have no idea. Your major cities border B!G and Big XII states. But, if you want to think of yourself as "southern", you go right ahead.

I am from the south. I have no ties to MU at all. I was just pointing out the KU AD's misuse of the term "Midwest conference."

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 8036254)
I am from the south. I have no ties to MU at all. I was just pointing out the KU AD's misuse of the term "Midwest conference."

It isn't a "misuse". You decided to articifially limit how a conference's regionality is determined. Iowa, Kansas and even Oklahoma are all "midwest". There are other sports than football. "Southwest" teams still have to travel to the "North-Midwest" schools to play them every other year. Texas is in the "middle" of the country and in the "central" time zone. You just made up a limitation and want to call that the universal reason for labeling.

Reaper16 10-22-2011 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036266)
It isn't a "misuse". You decided to articifially limit how a conference's regionality is determined. Iowa, Kansas and even Oklahoma are all "midwest". There are other sports than football. "Southwest" teams still have to travel to the "North-Midwest" schools to play them every other year. Texas is in the "middle" of the country and in the "central" time zone. You just made up a limitation and want to call that the universal reason for labeling.

My definition of Midwest is among the broadest acceptable definitions, and even it doesn't consider Oklahoma a Midwestern state.

SPchief 10-22-2011 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036250)
Let me put it this way: KU is not interested in helping the Missouri economy directly or indirectly if they want to be an SEC state. We're not interested in improving your schools, your roads, or your hotels. We're not interested in bringing national attention to your state, it doesn't benefit us in any way other than convenience.

Who is going to be Ku's next head coach?

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 8036269)
Who is going to be Ku's next head coach?

Who knows? Who's gonna be Mizzou's rival next year?

SPchief 10-22-2011 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036270)
Who knows? Who's gonna be Mizzou's rival next year?

You spoke so definative about ku's stance on not playing in arrowhead I thought you were a KU spokesperson.

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 8036273)
You spoke so definative about ku's stance on not playing in arrowhead I thought you were a KU spokesperson.

Sorry, its a carry over from speaking as a person often in a position of authority. If you want someone more "connected", maybe you can divine for yourself what the AD and Coach Self have intimated, what the city of KC fears. I can only speak as someone who lived in Kansas at one time and attended KU. I don't think my sentiment is out on much of an island, but you are free to conclude what you want.

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8036268)
My definition of Midwest is among the broadest acceptable definitions, and even it doesn't consider Oklahoma a Midwestern state.

It was an original Big 8, so I do.

Reaper16 10-22-2011 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036288)
It was an original Big 8, so I do.

Colorado is Midwestern too, then?

HolyHandgernade 10-22-2011 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8036289)
Colorado is Midwestern too, then?

Certainly eastern Colorado has more in common than the mountain region. Some states don't fit neatly into any one definition, but yes, when they were Big 8, I considered them midwest.

Reaper16 10-22-2011 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 8036291)
Certainly eastern Colorado has more in common than the mountain region. Some states don't fit neatly into any one definition, but yes, when they were Big 8, I considered them midwest.

Agreed that some states aren't easily defined as far as region goes.

Which states are Midwestern to you?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.