ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

eazyb81 10-05-2011 05:11 PM

Tier 1 and 2 revenue applies to conference TV contracts only. If UT left they could use LHN to air their games and increase the size and scope of the network, similar to Notre Dame's contract with NBC. They wouldn't care about potential Tier 1 and 2 losses because they would make it up with their own contract.

tk13 10-05-2011 05:15 PM

I think theoretically the Big XII could be stable for 10 more years for all anyone knows. But at the same time, it wasn't two about weeks ago that the teams driving the "stability" of the conference would've jumped ship for another conference had the other conferences not found them arrogant beyond belief. So that's a real fine line to walk.

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7970349)
The vaunted pledging of media rights only keeps the rest of the teams in place, not UT or OU.

This should be your sig in order to remind the jilted.

Dr. Gigglepants 10-05-2011 05:28 PM

I for one welcome our new Southern football overlords, but so help me God, if there ever comes a day when you can only find sweet tea at a Missouri restaurant, someone will burn.

talastan 10-05-2011 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 7970464)
I for one welcome our new Southern football overlords, but so help me God, if there ever comes a day when you can only find sweet tea at a Missouri restaurant, someone will burn.

Avoid Springfield then bro....;)

kstater 10-05-2011 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7970053)
SEC teams made $18.5MM in tier 1 and 2 football revenue last year, and the Big 12 will make around $14MM with the new deal.

Of course this assumes that the SEC only gets equal payouts for A&M and Mizzou instead of renegotiating the entire contracts like Slive has said they have the legal power to do.

Too bad your information is incorrect.

Quote:

The revenue-sharing plan approved Sunday by the Big 12 board of directors -- a move designed to keep Missouri and other potential stray members in the fold -- would give each school an estimated $20 million in June.
And that figure is expected to grow by 2013 when the league's new 13-year contract with Fox Sports kicks in, according to two people with knowledge of the deal and ties to the Big 12. They spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the revenue-sharing plan.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/st...en-invite-most

eazyb81 10-05-2011 05:45 PM

What in the world do you think that link disproves?

kstater 10-05-2011 05:46 PM

You said the Big 12 gets 14 million, they look to be getting 20 million plus.

Crush 10-05-2011 05:48 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hank-k..._b_995487.html

Missouri Tigers Should Let Big 12 Die

University of Missouri Chancellor Brady Deaton should do everything possible to find an avenue from which to exit the Big 12.

The University of Missouri Board of Curators unanimously voted Tuesday to grant Deaton the power to explore conference alignment options. Deaton should use that power to do everything possible to lead his school to a conference with a more stable long-term future.

No matter how comfortable the flight was, passengers on the Hindenburg eventually started scrambling to find parachutes once the airship went up in flames. Deaton undoubtedly needs to find the Tigers a parachute as quickly as possible before the Big 12 is swallowed by flames of a burnt orange hue.

The Big 12's imminent collapse can be traced directly to the University of Texas' brief summer flirtation with the Pac-10 (soon to be named the Pac-12) after Colorado and Nebraska both agreed to leave the Big 12 last year. In order to woo Texas into staying in the conference, the Big 12 allowed Texas to keep the rights to operate its own local television station.

Acquiescing to Texas' television demands was intended as a panacea for the Big 12's woes, but the cure was short-lived. Texas' television rights delivered a kiss of death to the conference in January, when the university reached a 20-year deal with ESPN to launch a 24-hour, year-round television network of UT sports coverage.

The monolithic presence of the Longhorn Network opened Pandora's Box, and all hell broke loose in the conference as the start of college football season approached. Texas A&M entered a bizarre courtship with the SEC that ended in the Aggies' exodus from the Big 12.

With the Big 12 reduced to nine teams, the Pac-10 attempted to lure Texas, Oklahoma, Texas Tech and Oklahoma State to officially create college sports' first 16-team super-conference. The deal fell apart quickly, with the Pac-12 announcing it was no longer planning on expanding.

All eyes then fell on the University of Missouri and the possibility of the Tigers becoming the SEC's 14th team. At a September 22 press conference, Deaton announced the University was not leaving the Big 12, but was reluctant to offer any long-term commitment to the conference.

"Our primary responsibility is to our home institution," Deaton said. "The University of Missouri is going to continue to work with what is best for the University of Missouri."

Deaton was meticulously careful throughout the press conference to avoid expressing any explicit commitment to the Big 12. The unspoken message was that Missouri is staying with the Big 12, but only until a better opportunity arises.

The outcome of Tuesday's board of curators meeting makes Missouri's departure even more likely. Deaton resigned as the chairman of the Big 12's board of directors Tuesday to avoid a potential conflict of interest. Missouri is poised to deal a deathblow to the Big 12, and the conference deserves it.

The Big 12 bent over backwards to keep Texas last summer, and in doing so alienated the rest of the conference by allowing conditions that led to the Longhorn Network's creation. Fear of the Longhorn Network creating a recruiting and revenue advantage for Texas spurred Texas A&M to defect to the SEC, and Missouri is in position to follow A&M out of the Big 12.

From a football standpoint, Missouri wouldn't be as bad of a fit in the SEC as fans and analysts seem to think. The Tigers' run defense is stellar but the secondary struggles to contain Big 12 spread attacks. Missouri's defense would be better suited for playing in the SEC, where running is more of a priority and passing doesn't feature as many four- and five-wide formations.

On offense, coordinator David Yost would have to change some aspects of the playbook, especially when he got near the goal line. However, the emergence of running back Henry Josey and the running skills of quarterback James Franklin will make such an offensive transition very smooth. The Tigers would play much tougher opponents than normal, but would remain competitive.

In terms of basketball, Missouri would also easily survive a transition to the SEC. The level of competition in basketball in the SEC is nowhere near as tough as it is in the Big 12, and even the Tigers, who have faced turmoil in the basketball offseason, could easily compete for a SEC title.

Missouri could move to the SEC and remain competitive in both major revenue-producing sports. The Tigers don't need to fear being crushed if they leave the Big 12.

For a conference with a future currently contingent on Missouri's membership, the Big 12 hasn't placed anywhere near as much of a priority on keeping Missouri as it did Texas last year.

Columbia Daily Tribune reporter Dave Matter reported Tuesday the University of Missouri's Homecoming game against Iowa State will not be televised. The Big 12 offered to broadcast the game at either 11 a.m. or 6 p.m. on Fox College Sports, but Missouri declined in favor of starting at the traditional 1 p.m. start time, according to Matter.

The Big 12's inability to find room for Missouri's Homecoming game on the national Fox Sports Net instead of the regional Fox College Sports is inexplicable. The University of Missouri created the tradition of Homecoming, and is celebrating its 100th-ever Homecoming this year.

At such a sensitive time when Missouri holds the key to the entire Big 12's future, a conference that valued Missouri's membership would have done everything possible to accommodate such an enormous part of the school's history.

Interim Big 12 Commissioner Chuck Neinas has said the Big 12 wants to keep Missouri, but actions speak louder than words. If the Big 12 cannot even be bothered to televise the 100th anniversary of Missouri's first Homecoming, the conference doesn't want the Tigers' membership badly enough for Missouri to justify staying despite the turmoil.

The Big 12's failure to televise the 100th anniversary of Missouri's first Homecoming is exactly what Missouri football coach Gary Pinkel called the entire Big 12 realignment situation: embarrassing.

To stay in the Big 12 is to submit to embarrassment by association with a conference that cannot get its affairs in order. Deaton knows his school is better than that. It is time for Missouri to find a new conference.

Reaper16 10-05-2011 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7970199)
I don't give a shit about KCMO

You're dead to me.

Crush 10-05-2011 05:54 PM

ESPN updated their story.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/st...en-invite-most

A source with direct knowledge of the Big 12's expansion plans told ESPN.com's Andy Katz that Missouri's indecision has put the expansion committee and the conference in a tough position as it waits to see how many teams it will seek to add to the conference.

The source said the five-person expansion committee expects to have a second conference call sometime within a week. The committee still doesn't know if Deaton will recuse himself since he's one of the five members of the committee with Kansas State president Kirk Schulz, the chair, as well as Oklahoma State president Burns Hargis, Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione and Texas athletic director DeLoss Dodds.

The source said that the top choices remain BYU, Louisville, West Virginia and TCU, but a new school was discussed recently that hasn't been mentioned publicly: Tulane out of Conference USA. The source said the Big 12 has been contacted by a number of other schools about possible inclusion, as well.

The source said that Tulane would become a viable option for the Big 12 if it were to grab four schools to beef up the membership to 12, in a situation where BYU decides it doesn't want to leave its football independence or its new tie to the WCC in all other sports. Tulane is interesting to the Big 12 because of its location in New Orleans and in a state, Louisiana, where the Big 12 is absent, as well as the school's renewed commitment to sports and facilities after Hurricane Katrina.

A source with knowledge of Tulane's situation told ESPN.com that the Green Wave have privately been making overtures to the Big East and Big 12 about possible membership but didn't want to upset Conference USA as that league looks to form a partnership with the Mountain West.

Tulane is also a member of the Association of American Universities -- the only AAU member listed as a possible addition. The prestigious AAU tag is something that the SEC has looked at as an important criterion for expansion as evidenced by the league promoting Texas A&M as one of three AAU members in the SEC in a news release announcing the Aggies' addition. Florida and Vanderbilt are the other two in the SEC.

A Missouri addition would make four for the SEC, and take away one from the Big 12. The Big 12 would be down to three AAU schools after the departure of Texas A&M, and down to two (Texas and Iowa State) if Missouri leaves.

The source cited the improved academics at TCU and Louisville as important aspects to possible inclusion in the Big 12.

University of Oklahoma president David Boren told ESPN.com Wednesday he believes it's "50-50" Missouri leaves the Big 12 for the SEC.

"We'll be fine either way," said Boren, reaffirming Oklahoma's position of committing to the Big 12.

Asked about a timetable for adding new members to the Big 12, Boren said it could happen in a "week to 10 days."

"There are 3 or 4 good choices out there," he said.

Bowser 10-05-2011 06:00 PM

There's been too many veiled threats from both sides for Mizzou to remain. They're as good as gone.

Mosbonian 10-05-2011 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7969530)
Why are you so ****ing stupid all the time?

The argument has nothing to do with football vs basketball.

MU fans are sitting around crying about "conference stability" and thats what they want. Do I blame them? no...How do you get conference stability?

By standing with your conference!

MU is doing exactly what they are claiming is what they are running from.

Bill Self knows that. All he's doing is calling MU out on it.

He's a Champion for a reason.

MU should take some notes.


I am sure once I read further someone will have already called you out on this but this is the biggest POS post I have seen you post in a while.

Bill Self is acting like a spurned girlfriend...and he's pissed that for once he isn't in the drivers seat. Sounds like an ego that's getting stepped on.

If he isn't man enough to schedule MU as a non-conference then quit bitching.

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 06:39 PM

Tulane? Wow.

Pitt Gorilla 10-05-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7970663)
Tulane? Wow.

Just saw that.

CoMoChief 10-05-2011 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 7970678)
Just saw that.

ROFL what?

They call that stability....I thought the idea was to make the conference STRONGER....meaning better institutions/programs like maybe L'ville, PIT, TCU, etc.

But Tulane? ROFL

MU needs to go to the SEC.

Pinkel has that program going in the right direction. He's been able to produce a good crop of 1st rounders in recent years..he can at least recruit...and besides getting the TX players that are overlooked....now he can dip into the LA, FL, BAMA, GA pipelines as well. I think moving to the SEC helps his recruiting if anything.

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 06:55 PM

Louisville and TCU are damn near as pathetic as Tulane.

Bewbies 10-05-2011 07:05 PM

Why in the hell would you stay in a conference that thinks it gets stronger by adding Tulane? LMAO

DaKCMan AP 10-05-2011 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 7970464)
I for one welcome our new Southern football overlords, but so help me God, if there ever comes a day when you can only find sweet tea at a Missouri restaurant, someone will burn.

No fear, I only drink unsweet tea. Sweet tea is gross. Unsweet tea is Awesome.

DaKCMan AP 10-05-2011 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7970322)
Here's a list of the teams that have played in the SEC title game in the past 10 years:

East Division
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
South Carolina

West Division
Auburn
Alabama
LSU
Arkansas
LSU

Nine of the 12 teams in that conference have played in the title game. 75 percent. Much more parity in that league than the Big 12, which has seen only six teams in the Big 12 title game over the past 10 years. 50 percent.

The SEC also has great teams at the top. But the four super elites do go through cycles.

Florida is currently in a bit of a down cycle after a long run with Urban Meyer (that followed an extreme down cycle under Zook)

Alabama is riding high under Saban, but the guy is 60. There's no guarantee they'll get it right when he retires. They didn't with Shula, Price, etc.

LSU was a pretty middling school in football before Saban (their history looks a little like Missouri's - big dark period in the 80s and early 90s) and Miles rolled in. Miles is 58.

Auburn is a classic up-and-down program.

My point: If you look at the past 25 years, the SEC has always been great, but programs have cycled up and down. They've moved from the second tier to the first tier and vice versa. Some have even had years where they cycle into the third tier, fighting just to make a bowl.

Yes, the SEC is tough as hell. But what makes it tough is the depth, not that the super powers are that much more super than anyone else.

With the right coach and commitment to football, a team can find great success down there.

Solid post. I posted something similar last night. There have been 8 different SEC teams in the conference championship game in the last 10 years. 7 of those 8 have made it at least twice.

SEC Conf. Champ. Game Appearances
LSU 4
Florida 3
Tennessee 3
Georgia 3
Arkansas 2
Auburn 2
Alabama 2
South Carolina

Further..

In the last 10 years the Big XII has had 2 teams who have been to 2 or more BCS games. In the same time period the SEC has had 5 teams with 2 or more BCS game appearances.

WilliamTheIrish 10-05-2011 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 7970756)
No fear, I only drink unsweet tea. Sweet tea is gross. Unsweet tea is Awesome.

Turkish ( to Bricktop) sugar? (for Bricktop's tea)

Bricktop: No thank you Turkish.....I'm sweet enough.

One of the all time great lines in Snatch.

Crush 10-05-2011 07:22 PM

bobfescoe Bob Fescoe
There is NO truth to the rumor that the Busch Stadium Squirrel has applied for membership to the Big 12.

Saulbadguy 10-05-2011 07:32 PM

This is going to be hilarious.

Saulbadguy 10-05-2011 07:35 PM

http://texas.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1275023

Quote:

According to multiple sources, Texas, after talking to ESPN, has agreed not to air any content involving high school athletics, not even the news-style highlights that had been approved by the NCAA, sources told Orangebloods.com Wednesday night.

It's the latest attempt to reach peace in the Big 12 as part of an agreement in principle for schools to grant their Tier 1 and 2 TV rights to the conference for six years.

The "compromise" deal was struck Wednesday after Big 12 interim commissioner Chuck Neinas gave Texas a 24-hour deadline to consider the Tier 3 content concessions, which impact Texas the most because of its Longhorn Network, sources said.

The question is if this agreement will be enough to keep Missouri in the Big 12.

Missouri was more interested in a proposal that would grant rights for the 13 years remaining on the Fox television deal struck with the Big 12 in April, sources said.

Missouri and Oklahoma pushed for high school content restrictions on Tier 3 (that would impact the Longhorn Network) as part of the 13-year proposal, sources said.

But talks about granting rights for 13 years broke off after negotiations started Sunday night and went into Monday, sources said.

The talks broke off, in part, because Texas was hesitant to commit to granting rights for more than a decade while also having to make concessions on content impacting the Longhorn Network.

So Texas agreeing to restrict any and all high school content for the next six years, while also granting rights for that length ended up as the compromise, sources said.

Some schools in the Big 12 were wary of allowing more than one football game, including conference games, to be aired at the Tier 3 level. But that was not part of the compromise.

Big 12 presidents and chancellors are expected to talk early Thursday to formally finalize an agreement. It remains to be seen how Missouri will react. But multiple officials across the Big 12 are hoping Mizzou reacts favorably by joining the agreement and staying put.

Stay tuned.

Saul Good 10-05-2011 07:42 PM

Too little too late

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7970811)

That's great.

What about agreeing to sign over rights for more than six years, and agreeing that they won't buy other Big 12 games from Fox to display on their network?

beer bacon 10-05-2011 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7970848)
That's great.

What about agreeing to sign over rights for more than six years, and agreeing that they won't buy other Big 12 games from Fox to display on their network?

The only thing that makes financial sense for the entire conference is to eliminate the LHN and start a Big 12 Network. The conference was foolish to let Texas start the LHN in the first place.

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon (Post 7970854)
The only thing that makes financial sense for the entire conference is to eliminate the LHN and start a Big 12 Network. The conference was foolish to let Texas start the LHN in the first place.

Texas has blocked a league-wide network for years. They've been planning the LHN for a while, and it has prevented a Big 12 network from ever forming.

Weiser wanted to do it before the Big Ten ever talked about it seriously. If the Big 12 creates a network when he wanted to, this whole thing probably shakes out differently.

digger 10-05-2011 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon (Post 7970854)
The only thing that makes financial sense for the entire conference is to eliminate the LHN and start a Big 12 Network. The conference was foolish to let Texas start the LHN in the first place.

This is the problem with the big 12..11..10..9..8.. the TLN!!!

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7970801)
This is going to be hilarious.

No idea why anyone would care at this point; you have Tulane ready to step in to fill the void.

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7970866)
No idea why anyone would care at this point; you have Tulane ready to step in to fill the void.

Don't forget BYU.

Crush 10-05-2011 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7970873)
Don't forget BYU.


...and Louisville and TCU.

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush (Post 7970881)
...and Louisville and TCU.

They aren't hillbillies.

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 08:19 PM

No worries, Tulane generally can get its stadium to 83% capacity. LMAO. Sorry, I'm really having a tough time with this one.

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7970894)
No worries, Tulane generally can get its stadium to 83% capacity. LMAO. Sorry, I'm really having a tough time with this one.

Dude, they're freaking Tulane.

They aren't some dumb hillbilly school.

They are Tu****inglane.

DeezNutz 10-05-2011 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7970898)
Dude, they're freaking Tulane.

They aren't some dumb hillbilly school.

They are Tu****inglane.

Simply a testament to how easily replaceable Missouri is to the Big XII.

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7970900)
Simply a testament to how easily replaceable Missouri is to the Big XII.

Somehow Tulane joining the Big XII will help the state of Missouri out.

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 08:27 PM

Did you all know...

Tulane was a founding member of the Southeastern Conference? As was Georgia Tech?

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7970907)
Did you all know...

Tulane was a founding member of the Southeastern Conference? As was Georgia Tech?

So they once were hillbillies, but then saw the light and headed for greener pastures.

Like Conference USA.

mnchiefsguy 10-05-2011 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7970893)
They aren't hillbillies.

Louisville KY is about as hillbilly as you get. Don't know about TCU.

Nothing wrong with hillbillies anyways. Would rather have Mizzou hang out with some hillbillies as oppose to those assholes in Texas.

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7970909)
So they once were hillbillies, but then saw the light and headed for greener pastures.

Like Conference USA.

I think they suffered from a Babs Uehling-like incident... school admin(s) who decided collegiate athletics should not be a focus and did everything in power to kill them.

Rams Fan 10-05-2011 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7970911)
Louisville KY is about as hillbilly as you get. Don't know about TCU.

Nothing wrong with hillbillies anyways. Would rather have Mizzou hang out with some hillbillies as oppose to those assholes in Texas.

You must have missed what Stewie said.

Any member of the SEC is a hillbilly.

mnchiefsguy 10-05-2011 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7970914)
You must have missed what Stewie said.

Any member of the SEC is a hillbilly.

Was wondering what your obsession with hillbillies was. I probably did read what Stewie said, but he has been so bitter and out in left field it probably did not register.

Crush 10-05-2011 08:36 PM

sptwri Mike DeArmond
LHN concessions will please Stoops MT@TravHaney But Texas backtracks on term of six years. This won't keep MU; Tigers just distrust Texas

digger 10-05-2011 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush (Post 7970924)
sptwri Mike DeArmond
LHN concessions will please Stoops MT@TravHaney But Texas backtracks on term of six years. This won't keep MU; Tigers just distrust Texas

And so did TAM and NU and CU, OU doesn't trust UT. No one should trust them. They are looking out for them self, but when anyone else does.

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 7970642)
I am sure once I read further someone will have already called you out on this but this is the biggest POS post I have seen you post in a while.

Bill Self is acting like a spurned girlfriend...and he's pissed that for once he isn't in the drivers seat. Sounds like an ego that's getting stepped on.

If he isn't man enough to schedule MU as a non-conference then quit bitching.

He's not acting like a "spurned girlfriend".

He's saying, "If they're not gonna give a **** about us then why should we bother with them?"

The longer this drags out the more I agree with him.

Texas is more on KU's level anyway as a rival.

|Zach| 10-05-2011 08:47 PM

ptwri Mike DeArmond
Texas gives in on HS highlights smells of realization it was going to be ruled against anyway. Meanwhile, Texas (cont)


sptwri Mike DeArmond
pulls back on length of TV rights signoff to original six years. That isn't compromise. That is bait and switch.
2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

Saulbadguy 10-05-2011 08:48 PM

:facepalm:

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7970811)

As they should.

A completely insane proposal to begin with...

Crush 10-05-2011 08:50 PM

sptwri Mike DeArmond
Texas gives in on HS highlights smells of realization it was going to be ruled against anyway. Meanwhile, Texas (cont)

sptwri Mike DeArmond
pulls back on length of TV rights signoff to original six years. That isn't compromise. That is bait and switch.

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970941)
He's not acting like a "spurned girlfriend".

He's saying, "If they're not gonna give a **** about us then why should we bother with them?"

The longer this drags out the more I agree with him.

Texas is more on KU's level anyway as a rival.

How do you figure that? Because you're better than them at one sport?

UT crushes KU (And everybody in the Big 12, really) as an overall athletic department.

dirk digler 10-05-2011 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7970944)
ptwri Mike DeArmond
Texas gives in on HS highlights smells of realization it was going to be ruled against anyway. Meanwhile, Texas (cont)


sptwri Mike DeArmond
pulls back on length of TV rights signoff to original six years. That isn't compromise. That is bait and switch.
2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

That doesn't sound like stability

Crush 10-05-2011 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7970959)
That doesn't sound like stability

Texas-flavored stability.

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7970944)
ptwri Mike DeArmond
Texas gives in on HS highlights smells of realization it was going to be ruled against anyway. Meanwhile, Texas (cont)


sptwri Mike DeArmond
pulls back on length of TV rights signoff to original six years. That isn't compromise. That is bait and switch.
2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

Does DeArmond post ANYTHING that is supportive of the people who want MU to stay in the Big 12?

dirk digler 10-05-2011 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush (Post 7970960)
Texas-flavored stability.

tastes like shit

mnchiefsguy 10-05-2011 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970941)
He's not acting like a "spurned girlfriend".

He's saying, "If they're not gonna give a **** about us then why should we bother with them?"

The longer this drags out the more I agree with him.

Texas is more on KU's level anyway as a rival.

Texas a better rival? This is the dumbest thing you have said all day, and that is saying something.

|Zach| 10-05-2011 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970964)
Does DeArmond post ANYTHING that is supportive of the people who want MU to stay in the Big 12?

I don't think Dearmond works to make Kansas fans try and feel better.

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7970958)
How do you figure that? Because you're better than them at one sport?

UT crushes KU (And everybody in the Big 12, really) as an overall athletic department.

We were discussing Bill Self. So yes, basketball.

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7970970)
I don't think Dearmond works to make Kansas fans try and feel better.

So no Missouri fans want to stay and play with teams they've played with for 100 years?

If you say so. You seem to have your finger on the pulse of the situation.

Bambi 10-05-2011 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7970969)
Texas a better rival? This is the dumbest thing you have said all day, and that is saying something.

ummm, okay?

DaKCMan AP 10-05-2011 08:58 PM

Join us.

http://www.secdigitalnetwork.com/Por...oaches2011.jpg

dirk digler 10-05-2011 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970978)
So no Missouri fans want to stay and play with teams they've played with for 100 years?

If you say so. You seem to have your finger on the pulse of the situation.

I would like to continue to play KU in football and basketball other than that I could give a shit

Saulbadguy 10-05-2011 09:00 PM

DeArmond has no clue what is going on, he only reports his opinion.

|Zach| 10-05-2011 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970978)
So no Missouri fans want to stay and play with teams they've played with for 100 years?

If you say so. You seem to have your finger on the pulse of the situation.

A very strong majority support the move.

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 09:00 PM

Most Missouri fans would prefer to continue playing KU and possibly OU, don't give a rats ass about ISU and KSU, and want to give UT the middle finger.

If there was a way to make this work with KU remaining in the same conference as Mizzou, I'd be all for it. I'd been anti-SEC until this week. But with everything that's going on, I don't think that's possible any more. The fears I had about the move have been blunted. The Big 12 is not tenable unless the LHN dies/is morphed into what the Big 12 needs (a league-wide network that is shared revenue). UT isn't going to make that happen. It's Deloss Dodds' legacy.

There are Mizzou fans who want to stay (My Dad is one of them), but they mostly are more casual fans who don't know all the details of the situation.

|Zach| 10-05-2011 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7970991)
DeArmond has no clue what is going on, he only reports his opinion.

He has been tuned in much better than most. He was conveying more certainty about the SEC possibility when a lot of folks thought the tide turned to Missouri being a happy member of the Big 12.

Even Mellinger sees it. http://twitter.com/#!/mellinger/stat...78196385050624

duncan_idaho 10-05-2011 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7970991)
DeArmond has no clue what is going on, he only reports his opinion.

You have Mike confused for Kevin Kietzmann.

Al Bundy 10-05-2011 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970941)
Texas is more on KU's level anyway as a rival.

C'mon.. you're smarter than that, right?

Crush 10-05-2011 09:07 PM

DanBeebe Fake Dan Beebe
REALLY DELOSS? CHUCK NAYNAY TELLS YOU WHATS UP? AND YOU LISTEN? ARGHGHGHEIHADKBSKJFABFLBKJD

Bambi 10-05-2011 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7970993)
Most Missouri fans would prefer to continue playing KU and possibly OU, don't give a rats ass about ISU and KSU, and want to give UT the middle finger.

If there was a way to make this work with KU remaining in the same conference as Mizzou, I'd be all for it. I'd been anti-SEC until this week. But with everything that's going on, I don't think that's possible any more. The fears I had about the move have been blunted. The Big 12 is not tenable unless the LHN dies/is morphed into what the Big 12 needs (a league-wide network that is shared revenue). UT isn't going to make that happen. It's Deloss Dodds' legacy.

There are Mizzou fans who want to stay (My Dad is one of them), but they mostly are more casual fans who don't know all the details of the situation.

I respect this opinion.

But you're not going to force Bill Self's hand. If he sees his conference change dramatically over the course a few quick months he will reevaluate everything he does with his basketball team. And scheduling is a big part of that.

Most KU fans will fall in line with what Self wants to do. If you bring in a Louisville, Memphis or whoever that has a bball program that will create excitement within the fanbase you can't just expect him to go out of his way to schedule Mizzou.

That's when the whole "100 year decision" really sets in.

MU has it good in the Big 12 right now and from what everyone can see it is getting better. The SEC is bright and beautiful on those late Saturday afternoons under the lights but are you sure that MU is going to be the team shining in them?...or are they going to be the Washington Generals aka Ole Miss. Someone has to be on the other side of those games.

There is no going back. just sayin

Frazod 10-05-2011 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 7971004)
C'mon.. you're smarter than that, right?

You must be new here. LMAO

mnchiefsguy 10-05-2011 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7971011)
I respect this opinion.

But you're not going to force Bill Self's hand. If he sees his conference change dramatically over the course a few quick months he will reevaluate everything he does with his basketball team. And scheduling is a big part of that.

Most KU fans will fall in line with what Self wants to do. If you bring in a Louisville, Memphis or whoever that has a bball program that will create excitement within the fanbase you can't just expect him to go out of his way to schedule Mizzou.

That's when the whole "100 year decision" really sets in.

MU has it good in the Big 12 right now and from what everyone can see it is getting better. The SEC is bright and beautiful on those late Saturday afternoons under the lights but there are you sure that MU is going to be the team shining in them...or are they going to be the Washington Generals aka Ole Miss.

There is no going back. just sayin

If Mizzou is willing to play KU, and KU is not willing to schedule them, then KU is the asshole and is responsible for the rivalry dieing....just sayin`

DaKCMan AP 10-05-2011 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7971011)
The SEC is bright and beautiful on those late Saturday afternoons under the lights but are you sure that MU is going to be the team shining in them?...or are they going to be the Washington Generals aka Ole Miss. Someone has to be on the other side of those games.

There is no going back. just sayin

You seem to be happy with KU being the Ole Miss of the Big XII in football.

Crush 10-05-2011 09:09 PM

Why are KU and KSU fans worried about Mizzou getting crushed in the SEC? That is Mizzou's prerogative. Remember, little insignificant Mizzou is easily replaceable with BYU or "the and only" mother****ing Tulane. The Big XII is in good shape for the next six years until Texas decides to go independent with a matured LHN.

Brock 10-05-2011 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7970978)
So no Missouri fans want to stay and play with teams they've played with for 100 years?

If you say so. You seem to have your finger on the pulse of the situation.

Why would they care about that? Tradition is dead, get used to it. The old Big 8 is dead and buried. It's every school for itself.

dirk digler 10-05-2011 09:12 PM

Wickedson, do you trust Texas to do what is right for the Big 12?

Bambi 10-05-2011 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 7971004)
C'mon.. you're smarter than that, right?

You don't think KU-UT is a basketball rivalry?

KU and Texas have met four times in the Big 12 title game.

Texas has challenged KU for the regular season title many times tying each other twice (2006 and 2008).

yea, its a rivalry...

Crush 10-05-2011 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7971028)
Wickedson, do you trust Texas to do what is right for the Big 12?

Anyone that trusts Texas deserves his or her fate.

Bambi 10-05-2011 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7971016)
If Mizzou is willing to play KU, and KU is not willing to schedule them, then KU is the asshole and is responsible for the rivalry dieing....just sayin`

Why should they?

MU is the one leaving.

Like others are saying. Who gives a **** about tradition?

We're MU, we're going to the SEC.

KU is saying, "have fun".

/end

Saulbadguy 10-05-2011 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7971003)
You have Mike confused for Kevin Kietzmann.

They are both clueless. Mellinger, even more so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.