ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Browns sign Kareem Hunt (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=321263)

IowaHawkeyeChief 08-11-2019 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 14387842)
Who cares? He is a kid. People make mistakes. Girl was being a bitch. No way in hell should he have been released. Chiefs clearly made a mistake, only an idiot would think otherwise.

Come on man... Get the story straight. The media was wrong on Tyreek and never corrected the facts. You are wrong here. You should take time to know the story on the Kareem situation, you may feel differently. The girl wasn't bring a "bitch"... Hunt told her to **** his friend, she refused, they kicked her out of the room, but they HAD HER PHONE... She had no way of calling for a ride and obviously, most people, wouldn't leave without their phone anyway. If he would have just given back her phone, he wouldn't have been in that situation. However, based on his activities at the time, it wouldn't have been long before he screwed up again. Can you imagine the last 5 games last year with Hunt on the team and the distraction and the Hill 2014 situation brought back up endlessly... No way we make the AFCCG if Hunt isn't cut.

baitism 08-11-2019 03:26 PM

Who?

kysirsoze 08-11-2019 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MephistophelesJanx (Post 14389927)
Unless he just changed it... Kermit isn't a turtle but a frog.

It's really not fair to question this guy's intelligence when you don't have an avatar to critique.

DRM08 08-11-2019 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14390577)
They were punished. They have to go 8 games without him. Why should they lose a draft pick?

That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs.

limested 08-11-2019 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 14390547)
Hes not a thug. But yes, hes made some mistakes and deserved to be cut.

Bullshit. He has multiple instances where he was violent towards someone else.

srvy 08-11-2019 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 14387842)
Who cares? He is a kid. People make mistakes. Girl was being a bitch. No way in hell should he have been released. Chiefs clearly made a mistake, only an idiot would think otherwise.

Doesn't matter as has been said 1000s of time here and elsewhere it was the lie not the incident. He swore to Clark and Andy that he wasn't there. Then the video came out and he was there. He lied to the organization and the team owner. That left the organization and the NFL to investigate and get on top of it. The lying not the incident sealed his fate with the Chiefs.

Pitt Gorilla 08-11-2019 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 14390633)
Doesn't matter as has been said 1000s of time here and elsewhere it was the lie not the incident. He swore to Clark and Andy that he wasn't there. Then the video came out and he was there. He lied to the organization and the team owner. That left the organization and the NFL to investigate and get on top of it. The lying not the incident sealed his fate with the Chiefs.

Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could **** Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable.

Pitt Gorilla 08-11-2019 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14390624)
That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs.

Why should they be punished for being smart/actually good at their jobs?

FAX 08-11-2019 04:51 PM

Actually, I don't think anybody could have sex with Clark's wife and daughter on the 50-yard line and get away with it.

The chalk on the dress is a dead giveaway.

FAX

DRM08 08-11-2019 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14390682)
Why should they be punished for being smart/actually good at their jobs?

Browns clearly don’t care about doing the morally right thing. But the NFL should care about it.

Pitt Gorilla 08-11-2019 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14390698)
Browns clearly don’t care about doing the morally right thing. But the NFL should care about it.

The Browns care about winning: See: All their moves since Dorsey took over.

The NFL cares about money. Why should the NFL care about the "morally right thing", whatever that is in this case.

What do you want the Chiefs to care about?

BryanBusby 08-11-2019 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14390679)
Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could **** Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable.

Hm, wonder why

-King- 08-11-2019 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14390624)
That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs.

Would you have used that same argument if Hill got suspended? That he would be fresh at the end of the season?

And again why did the browns have to be punished?

-King- 08-11-2019 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14390698)
Browns clearly don’t care about doing the morally right thing. But the NFL should care about it.

ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-11-2019 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14390679)
Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could **** Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable.

A running back in a fully stacked West coast offense with the league MVP at quarterback?
Of course they viewed him as replaceable and rightly so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.