ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:13 PM

If they do that Longhorn network thing it's going to be far more than 2 or 3 mill...

Texas biggest problem is schools either hate them and are sick of dealing with their shit or basically blow them and expect Texas to help them out in turn, generally those are shitty schools like say Baylor.

The Pac 10 wants them because with 16 teams Texas won't be able to be the it team or control anything, if the Big 12 does return in some incarnation with Texas leading it the advantage they have now is going to seem like a warm summer breeze in comparison to what they'll have then.

But I guess right now if you're a KU, Kstate, Baylor or ISU fan you'd rather take the Texas ass raping than be in a crappy conference.

ArrowheadHawk 06-09-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6810997)
That's what I'm saying. There are a ton of football programs that could save and help the Big 12. Add TCU and Houston to the south and move OU and OSU to the north. Or add Boise and Utah/BYU.

Honestly, I don't care about the "Texas rules us all" shit right now. The discrepancy is not that much (2 or 3 million in terms of 10 or 12 million) compared to losing BCS qualification and a historic basketball program.

We'll soon know what Texas really wants to do. This whole thing hinges on them.

Reaper16 06-09-2010 10:14 PM

Not entirely unrelated sincere there has been Pac-10 talk in this thread:

@BFeldmanESPN USC has been hit with a two-year post-season ban in addition to the loss of scholarships, among other penalties from NCAA. 34 minutes ago via Echofon

ArrowheadHawk 06-09-2010 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811001)
If they do that Longhorn network thing it's going to be far more than 2 or 3 mill...

Texas biggest problem is schools either hate them and are sick of dealing with their shit or basically blow them and expect Texas to help them out in turn, generally those are shitty schools like say Baylor.

The Pac 10 wants them because with 16 teams Texas won't be able to be the it team or control anything, if the Big 12 does return in some incarnation with Texas leading it the advantage they have now is going to seem like a warm summer breeze in comparison to what they'll have then.

But I guess right now if you're a KU, Kstate, Baylor or ISU fan you'd rather take the Texas ass raping than be in a crappy conference.

Most definitely this. Unless of course some kind of miracle opportunity comes along.

ArrowheadHawk 06-09-2010 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6811004)
Not entirely unrelated sincere there has been Pac-10 talk in this thread:

@BFeldmanESPN USC has been hit with a two-year post-season ban in addition to the loss of scholarships, among other penalties from NCAA. 34 minutes ago via Echofon

Is that BB or FB?

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:17 PM

I figured that's what they were going to get...I accepted that penalty was coming about a month ago, it is what it is.

Basileus777 06-09-2010 10:17 PM

Sounds like the Trojans' 04 season will be wiped out too, making them the best zero-peat dynasty of all time.

Does that mean OU can claim a NC?

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6811007)
Is that BB or FB?

It's the football one, the basketball one might be worse....

USC is in a pretty s3rious transition period, hopefully it won't hurt recruiting to bad since it's not a death penalty ban.

alnorth 06-09-2010 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6810997)
Honestly, I don't care about the "Texas rules us all" shit right now. The discrepancy is not that much (2 or 3 million in terms of 10 or 12 million) compared to losing BCS qualification and a historic basketball program.

At this point, I'd be fine with just moving the needle. It's half equal and half slightly unequal right now? How about we move to 2/3 and 1/3?

When you consider the athletic department income for most of these schools is way above 50-60 million total from all sources, What is 2 or 3 million, really?

I think that issue is just an irritation to Nebraska, its not why they are apparently leaving. It's simply because the Big 10 is rich right now, and the Big 12 is locked into a lousy contract through 2015 or whenever it expires.

Sure the Big 12 might eventually get a lot closer, but thats a long time to wait and they probably are also concerned that if they let this opportunity close and the Big 12 falls apart in a couple years for some other reason, they are screwed.

GordonGekko 06-09-2010 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 6811012)
At this point, I'd be fine with just moving the needle. It's half equal and half slightly unequal right now? How about we move to 2/3 and 1/3?

this has nothing to do with the topic but can you explain your avatar? is it a Canadian dude jumping off a boat into a shark's mouth? amirite

teedubya 06-09-2010 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811010)
It's the football one, the basketball one might be worse....

USC is in a pretty s3rious transition period, hopefully it won't hurt recruiting to bad since it's not a death penalty ban.


And we know why Pete Carroll bailed when he did. This ****ing guy ends up smelling like roses.

**** up a team.. then move on. Sooo shitty.

Reaper16 06-09-2010 10:36 PM

Holy ****, it's a loss of 20 football scholarships. Wow.

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:36 PM

Whoa if these reported sanctions are true this is ****ed up, it says loss of 20+ scholarships...

Looks to me like the NCAA is going over the top to appease people who wanted SC to be punished. Expect a serious appeal on this and some of it to be overturned in court if true because some of this is WAY over the top.

alnorth 06-09-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 6811024)
this has nothing to do with the topic but can you explain your avatar? is it a Canadian dude jumping off a boat into a shark's mouth? amirite

I have no idea. I saw it somewhere, cropped it to fit Chiefsplanet size and KB standards, and used it. It is apparently a popular avatar because I see it occasionally on other boards.

It is like my signature, it has no point except I think its funny. A lot of people dress up their signature and avatar to mean something profound or unique to them. My signature and avatar mean nothing to me, other than just something to amuse myself.

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6811034)
Holy ****, it's a loss of 20 football scholarships. Wow.

It's so excessive you'd think there was video of Carroll handing guys envelopes of money.

It's incredibly ridiculously over the top, so here comes the appeal and legal fight..

Ultra Peanut 06-09-2010 10:45 PM

Uh.... whoa.

teedubya 06-09-2010 10:46 PM

Peanut sighting. Holy shit.

ChiefsCountry 06-09-2010 10:47 PM

If UCLA every wanted to live up to his potential as a football school, now would be the time.

Iowanian 06-09-2010 10:48 PM

I knew SC was over the salary cap...

Ultra Peanut 06-09-2010 10:51 PM

By the by, Memphis + Louisville + Cincinnati are available and bring awesome basketball, top 50 markets, and improving football programs. Just, you know. Just saying.

Colorado, Nebraska, and Mizzou bolting was kind of my dream scenario, but if the even crazier stuff happens this might be too enormous a shakeup to really end up benefiting Memphis much at this point.

Frazod 06-09-2010 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 6811047)
Uh.... whoa.

Where the hell have you been?

alnorth 06-09-2010 10:52 PM

20 scholarships? That almost makes the postseason ban look irrelevant, what is that, over 1/3 of your team gone?

I haven't been following the details at all, because I don't care about NCAA violations from PAC-10 schools, but what the holy hell did USC do? Thats one of the worst punishments in NCAA history, short of only the death penalty.

Ultra Peanut 06-09-2010 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6811056)
Where the hell have you been?

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...hangsFront.jpg

Also, why did the college sports world have to implode the day before I have a ten hour drive through the freaking midwest ahead of me?

Oh well. I wasn't going to get any sleep anyways.

Reaper16 06-09-2010 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 6811059)

LMAO

Mecca 06-09-2010 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 6811057)
20 scholarships? That almost makes the postseason ban look irrelevant, what is that, over 1/3 of your team gone?

I haven't been following the details at all, because I don't care about NCAA violations from PAC-10 schools, but what the holy hell did USC do? Thats one of the worst punishments in NCAA history, short of only the death penalty.

The only thing remotely reported about it is the Yahoo stuff about Reggie Bush which begs the question did yahoo journalist actually help the NCAA in this which then opens a whole new bag.

There's also supposedly "secret evidence" all of this just tells me this is going to end up in court, the NCAA knew it so they went over the top to look good at 1 point in a cover your ass type of move.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6810997)
That's what I'm saying. There are a ton of football programs that could save and help the Big 12. Add TCU and Houston to the south and move OU and OSU to the north. Or add Boise and Utah/BYU.

Honestly, I don't care about the "Texas rules us all" shit right now. The discrepancy is not that much (2 or 3 million in terms of 10 or 12 million) compared to losing BCS qualification and a historic basketball program.

That's what I'm sayin. It's not like Texas dominates everyone in sports. Kansas beats them routinely in basketball and OU takes them out all the time in football.

So what if they have the biggest endowment and money.

At this point it's worth them sticking around if it means KSU, KU and MU have somewhere to play.

Nebraska can be replaced. Move OU to the North. Done.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811001)
If they do that Longhorn network thing it's going to be far more than 2 or 3 mill...

Texas biggest problem is schools either hate them and are sick of dealing with their shit or basically blow them and expect Texas to help them out in turn, generally those are shitty schools like say Baylor.

The Pac 10 wants them because with 16 teams Texas won't be able to be the it team or control anything, if the Big 12 does return in some incarnation with Texas leading it the advantage they have now is going to seem like a warm summer breeze in comparison to what they'll have then.

But I guess right now if you're a KU, Kstate, Baylor or ISU fan you'd rather take the Texas ass raping than be in a crappy conference.

uhhh. Missouri is in your grouping there too. Sorry

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 6811051)
I knew SC was over the salary cap...

haha...

The Lakers of college football are done.

No wonder Larry Scott has been pushing this expansion.

That conference is about to go into the toilet.

What's the use in having a lot of TVs when there are no good teams playing on them?

Texas knows this. Sorry Pac-10

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:09 PM

I've never seen this wickedson guy post before but he's already hit elite territory, like Como level.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 6811057)
20 scholarships? That almost makes the postseason ban look irrelevant, what is that, over 1/3 of your team gone?

I haven't been following the details at all, because I don't care about NCAA violations from PAC-10 schools, but what the holy hell did USC do? Thats one of the worst punishments in NCAA history, short of only the death penalty.

Apparently a lot.

Reggie Bush's family was living in a house they didn't pay for or something.

And OJ Mayo was straight up getting paid.

Tiger's Fan 06-09-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811064)
The only thing remotely reported about it is the Yahoo stuff about Reggie Bush which begs the question did yahoo journalist actually help the NCAA in this which then opens a whole new bag.

There's also supposedly "secret evidence" all of this just tells me this is going to end up in court, the NCAA knew it so they went over the top to look good at 1 point in a cover your ass type of move.

You do know the success rate of appeals of NCAA decisions is about nil, right?

healthpellets 06-09-2010 11:09 PM

http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com...onjecture.html

Quote:

Mizzou board to huddle amid Big Ten conjecture
June 9, 2010 11:50 PM | No Comments
Tribune News Services

Amid bubbling uncertainty about its future conference affiliation, heightened by reports that the University of Nebraska is about to leave the Big 12 for the Big Ten, the University of Missouri Board of Curators will convene for two days of regularly scheduled meetings Thursday in Columbia, Mo.

Although the topic is not on the public agenda, the board is expected to discuss the rapidly changing college athletic scene in closed session today -- including the matter of where Missouri will end up.

The school, considered a prospective expansion target of the Big Ten, faces a June 17 deadline to pledge its loyalty to the Big 12, which is trying to solidify its future with the potential loss of Nebraska and a pending offer from the Pac-10 Conference to six of its members, including Texas and Oklahoma.
Whether Mizzou's prolonged silence on the prospect of joining the Big Ten -- and thereby substantially enhancing its athletic revenue and academic standing -- is a reflection of discretion or of having nothing in hand to discuss remains a matter of conjecture to all but a select few. The chancellor's office and athletic department declined to comment again Wednesday.

But the meetings come as months of expansion speculation, spurred by the Big Ten's announcement in December that it was exploring doing so, seem to be yielding to actual developments.

Just three weeks after Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said a decision on expansion was months away, Nebraska apparently intends to accept an offer to join the Big Ten in what may prove the catalyst to the dismantling of the Big 12.

Nebraska's departure could prompt Texas, Oklahoma and other Big 12 South schools to accept an offer from the Pac-10, which is "locked and loaded" to act, according to the Los Angeles Times.

But one well-connected college administrator questioned why those schools wouldn't stand pat rather than accept the offer, which while potentially lucrative because of a bigger television contract for football could pose significant logistical challenges in the non-revenue/Olympic sports.

Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione said Wednesday that his school has not met with the Pac-10, has no offer to go and continues "to work diligently to keep our conference strong."

Castiglione, formerly athletic director at Missouri, also questioned the logic of domino theories that college football is headed toward four 16-team super conferences.

"I'm still trying to get my mind around why that's better than what we already have," said Castiglione, who laughed and added, "I've never understood why people don't see that if super teams come together to make a super conference, they don't all stay super every year."

The Big 12 could hold steady with 11 schools and petition to maintain a championship game in football, or it could seek to add one or more schools.

But with Colorado's regents having met Tuesday to discuss legal issues pertaining to a potential move to the Pac-10, and Texas and Texas A&M holding a joint meeting to discuss their future Thursday, the stability of the Big 12 figures to be a question for months to come.

And if the conference ultimately splinters and Mizzou has no Big Ten offer, Missouri would be left in limbo.

As unlikely as that scenario seems, there is no definitive way to see the Big 12's future or handicap MU's Big Ten candidacy.

In many ways, the school has a similar profile to Big Ten institutions, including being a member of the 63-school Association of American Universities. And MU's most high-profile sports, football and men's basketball, apparently would be competitive fits in the conference.

Lending further cause for optimism for MU fans, a source involved with past Big Ten expansion studies said he would "find it hard to believe the Big Ten would take Nebraska by itself."

Some believe the 11-team league would need to increase to 14 schools to add enough value to generate enough additional revenue to justify the extra mouths to feed. Delany told the Post-Dispatch on Sunday that the league could do its expansion in phases. So the reported invitation of Nebraska could just be the first step.

The Big Ten's overall revenue and philosophy of dividing it equally are appealing to Missouri, which received less than $10 million from the Big 12 last year in contrast to the $19.9 million Illinois got from the Big Ten.

The uneven revenue sharing in the Big 12, as well as perceived Big 12 slights in several of MU's football bowl assignments, are at the core of MU's displeasure with the Big 12.

That in turn has created rancor with MU in the Big 12, with several sources expressing anger at Mizzou for letting it be known it was interested in the Big Ten -- which some in the Big 12 don't believe is reciprocating.

"Now Missouri potentially has burned bridges in two places," said one conference source, though noting that there's no reason there can't be reconciliation.

Although Delany mentioned the possibility of expanding in "stages," the question becomes if not now, when for Missouri?

One way or another, it's all certain to be a topic for the curators, who would have to approve any conference change.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811079)
I've never seen this wickedson guy post before but he's already hit elite territory, like Como level.

We'll see.

healthpellets 06-09-2010 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6811080)

And OJ Mayo was straight up getting paid.

was Mayo the QB that year? i don't recall...

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:12 PM

I really could give 2 shits about OJ Mayo or the basketball shit, the football shit is over the top.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by healthpellets (Post 6811086)
was Mayo the QB that year? i don't recall...

Yes. He was the one Reggie Bush tried to lateral it to during the Rose Bowl.

ChiefsCountry 06-09-2010 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811079)
I've never seen this wickedson guy post before but he's already hit elite territory, like Como level.

He has some comedy gold in this thread.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811090)
I really could give 2 shits about OJ Mayo or the basketball shit, the football shit is over the top.

Well are the sanctions against the football team due to all the athletic dept violations?

Or just what the football team did?

Tiger's Fan 06-09-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6811092)
He has some comedy gold in this thread.

He was pretty right on about MU being left holding their own dick, like they are.

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:16 PM

The basketball team is getting separate sanctions..

I expected 10 scholarships and maybe a post season ban 1 year, this is rather ridiculous.

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:18 PM

I don't have a horse in this KU MU thing but to watch KU fans say "look MU sucks" for possibly being in the same spot they are is really moronic.

What is this argument now that if Missouri doesn't get a big 10 offer they're as pathetic as KU?

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6811098)
He was pretty right on about MU being left holding their own dick, like they are.

It's become pretty obvious that facts don't mean much around here.

luv 06-09-2010 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6811084)
We'll see.

Como level isn't a compliment.

vailpass 06-09-2010 11:20 PM

Pete Carroll = get while the gettings good
Lane Kiffin = left holding the bag

vailpass 06-09-2010 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6811102)
It's become pretty obvious that facts don't mean much around here.

Like math facts?
Like 17 and 15?

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811101)
I don't have a horse in this KU MU thing but to watch KU fans say "look MU sucks" for possibly being in the same spot they are is really moronic.

What is this argument now that if Missouri doesn't get a big 10 offer they're as pathetic as KU?

No one's been jumping on MU after it's becoming obvious they aren't getting an invite.

Please don't try and start it.

We're all pretty nervous about what's going to happen with the Big 12 North minus Nebraska.

I think most likely Tex stays, TCU gets added, and OU moves to the North. But my theory is about as worthless as everyone elses.

I just never thought that MU fit in academically with the Big 10. Neither does Nebraska, neither does KU. Neb is perhaps getting an invite because they are a national brand I suppose, but now after reading that last "report" it seems like Neb to the Big 10 is not a finished deal either.

But nothing would surprise me at this point.

healthpellets 06-09-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6811106)
Like math facts?
Like 17 and 15?

damn it. a touch faster than i.

Tiger's Fan 06-09-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811100)
The basketball team is getting separate sanctions..

I expected 10 scholarships and maybe a post season ban 1 year, this is rather ridiculous.

They're being looked at as repeat violators since they were also sanctioned in 2001.

It's called lack of institutional control. All these penalties will stick.

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angele...=ESPNHeadlines

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6811106)
Like math facts?
Like 17 and 15?

tired.

get some new material plz

Reaper16 06-09-2010 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6811098)
He was pretty right on about MU being left holding their own dick, like they are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6811102)
It's become pretty obvious that facts don't mean much around here.

And we don't know that MU is left holding their dick, either. That is as much speculation as anything.

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:24 PM

The Big 12 is dead, I know many in this area are going to hold onto it because of teams like KU...but it's ****ed.

The landscape of college football is massively changing. It's pretty obvious you'll eventually get 4 super conferences, which results in those 4 playing the winners playing and then that giving you your national champion.

healthpellets 06-09-2010 11:26 PM

since we're talking about USC for a minute, this is funny...

AaronRodgers12: Looking forward to getting my PAC-10 championship ring from the '04 season. Thanks @claymatthews52

Tiger's Fan 06-09-2010 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6811114)
And we don't know that MU is left holding their dick, either. That is as much speculation as anything.

MU to the Big Ten was never more than speculation.

It was always about ND and Nebraska. Period.

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811117)
The Big 12 is dead, I know many in this area are going to hold onto it because of teams like KU...but it's ****ed.

The landscape of college football is massively changing. It's pretty obvious you'll eventually get 4 super conferences, which results in those 4 playing the winners playing and then that giving you your national champion.

Nope. Jim Delany is perhaps the biggest BCS guy on the planet.

This 4 superconference thing will not result in a playoff. It makes it even worse in that regard.

Why? Cause this is all about tv contracts. And tv contracts are their most valuable because they are tied into Bowl games and the conference contracts with those bowl games.

4 Superconferences is quite possibly the worst thing for college football imaginable.

alnorth 06-09-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811101)
I don't have a horse in this KU MU thing but to watch KU fans say "look MU sucks" for possibly being in the same spot they are is really moronic.

What is this argument now that if Missouri doesn't get a big 10 offer they're as pathetic as KU?

Sort of like: you may be shot in the chest with 4 rounds, bleeding out, hanging off a bridge of a canyon barely clutching on the railing, and on fire with your flesh roasting off, but all thats all right as long as Missouri slips and falls off too.

Mecca 06-09-2010 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by healthpellets (Post 6811120)
since we're talking about USC for a minute, this is funny...

AaronRodgers12: Looking forward to getting my PAC-10 championship ring from the '04 season. Thanks @claymatthews52

Matthews responds:


@AaronRodgers12 U can have it... I got 5 more!!

Atleast u cant take away the a$$ whoppin we put on @AaronRodgers12 and his bears and @Ryangrant25 and his domers!! haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

healthpellets 06-09-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6811126)
Nope. Jim Delany is perhaps the biggest BCS guy on the planet.

This 4 superconference thing will not result in a playoff. It makes it even worse in that regard.

Why? Cause this is all about tv contracts. And tv contracts are their most valuable because they are tied into Bowl games and the conference contracts with those bowl games.

4 Superconferences is quite possibly the worst thing for college football imaginable.

the real upshot here is the disappearance of the NCAA as a regulatory body governing the new superconferences.

alnorth 06-09-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6811117)
The Big 12 is dead, I know many in this area are going to hold onto it because of teams like KU...but it's ****ed.

The landscape of college football is massively changing. It's pretty obvious you'll eventually get 4 super conferences, which results in those 4 playing the winners playing and then that giving you your national champion.

perhaps.

Quote:

Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione said Wednesday that his school has not met with the Pac-10, has no offer to go and continues "to work diligently to keep our conference strong."

Castiglione, formerly athletic director at Missouri, also questioned the logic of domino theories that college football is headed toward four 16-team super conferences.

"I'm still trying to get my mind around why that's better than what we already have," said Castiglione, who laughed and added, "I've never understood why people don't see that if super teams come together to make a super conference, they don't all stay super every year."

Bambi 06-09-2010 11:32 PM

Wonder what the Pac-10 (Stanford) will think of this.

NCAA hands down penalties to Colorado, Syracuse for academics

PRINT EMAIL RSS ADD THIS
5 comments »
Updated Jun 9, 2010 4:12 PM ET
INDIANAPOLIS (AP)
The NCAA's big boys are beating up on the smaller schools in the classroom, too.

Only seven of the 137 teams sanctioned Wednesday for poor scores on the Academic Progress Rate come from BCS conferences. One squad, Portland State's men's basketball team, will be banned from next season's NCAA tournament.

Colorado and Syracuse were the only power conference schools to make the list in the three highest-profile sports - football or men's and women's basketball. The men's basketball teams at both schools and the Colorado football team all were sanctioned for falling short of the NCAA's Academic Progress Rate cutline of 925.

The APR measures the classroom performance of every Division I team and is based on data collected from 2005-06 through 2008-09.

Colorado will lose one scholarship in men's basketball and up to four scholarships in football. The Buffaloes scored 920 in football and 897 in basketball. The Orange's basketball team scored 912 and could lose up to two basketball scholarships if academically ineligible players leave school before next season.

Colorado was one of 10 schools to be sanctioned in both sports, though the other nine all compete in the Football Championship Subdivision. And four of those 10 are Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

Clearly, school size matters.

Only four BCS teams, other than those at Colorado and Syracuse, face penalties: men's outdoor track teams at Auburn and Cincinnati, the men's indoor track team at Auburn and the women's rowing team at West Virginia.

The other 130 teams, including 20 football and men's basketball teams that face scholarship losses, a reduction in practice time or both, come from smaller conferences.

The APR is billed as a real-time academic measure of every Division I team. Each athlete receives one point per semester for remaining academically eligible and another point each semester for remaining at that school or graduating.

A mathematical formula is then used to calculate a final team score with 1,000 points being perfect. Teams falling below 925 can face conditional scholarship losses. Teams consistently falling below 900 can be penalized more harshly.

Florida International and Southeastern Louisiana each had seven teams penalized, the most in Division I.

The other schools with more than two teams on the list are McNeese State with six; Cal State-Fullerton, Chicago State, Delaware State, Howard and Nicholls State with four; Georgia Southern, Portland State, Southern University, Southern Utah, Tennessee-Chattanooga and Texas-San Antonio with three.

Tennessee-Chattanooga avoided a second straight postseason ban in football despite scoring 885 because the team showed "demonstrated improvement'' over last year's score of 870.

teedubya 06-10-2010 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 6811054)
By the by, Memphis + Louisville + Cincinnati are available and bring awesome basketball, top 50 markets, and improving football programs. Just, you know. Just saying.

Colorado, Nebraska, and Mizzou bolting was kind of my dream scenario, but if the even crazier stuff happens this might be too enormous a shakeup to really end up benefiting Memphis much at this point.

Yep... well, here is my dream scenario...

ACC East

Duke
UNC
Maryland
NC State
Boston College
Wake Forest
Virginia
Virginia Tech

ACC West

Memphis
Louisville
West Virginia
Pittsburgh
UConn
Kentucky
Kansas
Kansas State

beer bacon 06-10-2010 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6811123)
MU to the Big Ten was never more than speculation.

It was always about ND and Nebraska. Period.

It was always about ND. It is still all about ND.

Titty Meat 06-10-2010 01:43 AM

Great article


http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13501955


Dear Big Ten: Roll out the red carpet for the Big Red


They're special, Jim, so be kind. In fact, a red carpet of some kind wouldn't be considered over the top.

They are the Big Red. The only Big Red that matters. Nebraska. A program that forged its reputation playing walk-ons from the state's cornfields. It was recruiting New Jersey before Rutgers had a clue. At one time, its coaches used to know California better than The Governator.



It is a national program with incredibly deep local roots so be gentle, Jim, because Nebraska football isn't a "brand" or "inventory" as you like to call the games you sell to networks. Nebraska football isn't just something to fill air time on the Big Ten Network. It is a culture. It is brawn. It is Outlands, Heismans.

It is the Great Plains version of Michigan -- with its pride still intact.

Now it's all yours, Jim. Don't mess it up. Don't make Nebraska football into ... Purdue, something lost in the haze of a 16-team conference. I'm talking to you, Jim Delany. This is on you, the Big Ten commissioner. You didn't just invite a school or a team or a program. You invited a state, its people, its past, its future, its ethic.

You invited 45 percent of Notre Dame Stadium. That's the percentage of red that showed up in the Irish's football shrine when the teams met in 2000. You invited one half of the Game of the Century. You invited those thousands of balloons that are released into the Lincoln sky after the home team's first touchdown. You invited Devaney, Osborne, Gill, Rozier, Alberts, Wistrom and Suh.


You invited the Corn Belt to the Rust Belt. Will the fit be more comfortable than Nebraska's long-distance relationship with Texas? We'll see. Nebraska AD/legend Tom Osborne didn't want to leave the Big 12. He really didn't. Nebraska would have been fine staying in the conference if Texas hadn't taken over the league in everything from academics to finances.

Once Texas issued that "ultimatum" last week, it was over. Nebraska knew it couldn't go back to a league where one of the members was issuing deadlines.

It is sad because the Huskers have played members of the old Big Eight for a century. It usually beat the hell out of Missouri, Kansas and Kansas State but that's beside the point. Back then, they were all partners who genuinely liked each other. Now a school like Kansas suddenly finds itself reduced to second-class citizen status. At least KU has basketball to perhaps save it. Where is Kansas State going to end up?

Where is Kansas City going to end up? If the dominoes topple as projected, the ancestral home of the Big Eight/Big 12 is diminished. The city hosted multiple Big Eight/Big 12 tournaments and those leagues' championship games. The city built the Sprint Center just so the Big 12 wouldn't move the basketball tournament. Now what does it do? Nebraska's in the Big Ten, Missouri might be headed there. Iowa State will end up in the Mountain West, if it's lucky.

It's all collateral damage and it's only the beginning. The way it looks, Jim, this isn't going to be expansion, it's going to be waterboarding for the affected fans. Nebraska today, Notre Dame tomorrow, Syracuse on Monday. It's all so torturous and tawdry.

Nebraska is not a domino to be tipped over, Jim, it is a tradition. Before there was Tim Tebow, there was Tommie Frazier. Florida State and Miami showed Osborne and Huskers how to win during a series of beatdowns in the 1980s and 1990s. Osborne calmly took the knowledge, retooled and ended his coaching career with a flourish -- winning three out of four national championships.

Will it happen in the Big Ten? That's a key question. With 14 or 16 teams, there is the danger that Nebraska will become Purdue, a middling program with a diminished pedigree. Nebraska is at a tenuous point in its history. Football is strong, but not back -- not all the way. How will that comeback be affected by a Big Ten schedule?



Nebraska's history is filled with legendary players such as quarterback Tommy Frazier. (US Presswire)
Or does matter? Twenty million per year is 20 million for Big Ten schools. The figure reportedly will double in coming years if Delany does this expansion right. If not? Well, there is a chance that Nebraska will never be itself again. For all its greatness, the program does not have a recruiting base. The hire of Bill Callahan showed just how close Nebraska could be to ruin.

Now it is changing everything. Without Nebraska football, the state would be a slightly warmer South Dakota. With Nebraska football, the Big Ten has inherited a jewel that had better not be damaged.

These are humble, proud people who have created their own "brand." That goofy overalled mascot who roams the sidelines might be a stereotype but so is Osborne. He is a solid rock of a man who, for better or worse, has gotten to Nebraska to this point. It might be the high point of the school's history. Nebraska certainly is going to make money and make history, but it's also going to lose part of itself.

So when you officially admit Nebraska into the Big Ten, Jim, avert your eye from the bottom line for a second. The Huskers' decision didn't come lightly. Osborne probably told you at some point that Nebraska liked the Big 12 -- it loved the Big Eight even more. This Big Ten is going to take some getting used to.

All those great Oklahoma games? Relegated to the media guide for good unless the Sooners agree to a non-conference matchup.

All those Orange Bowls? Thank God for DVDs.

All those dollars? Nebraska just couldn't say no.

We ask just one thing, Jim. Treat them right. Roll out the red carpet for the Big Red. They're special.

Ultra Peanut 06-10-2010 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6811214)
We ask just one thing, Jim. Treat them right. Roll out the red carpet for the Big Red. They're special.

http://i48.tinypic.com/358nnn6.gif

TrickyNicky 06-10-2010 05:56 AM

http://dvdmedia.ign.com/dvd/image/ar...534237-000.jpg

I hope you all FAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL!

DaKCMan AP 06-10-2010 07:18 AM

Quote:

A Knoxville, Tenn., radio station reported the SEC told CBS that if the Big 10 expands to 16 teams, the SEC will keep pace by inviting FSU and Clemson, plus Texas and Texas A&M if they haven't changed leagues -- or UM and Georgia Tech otherwise.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/0...on-blasts.html

Reerun_KC 06-10-2010 07:25 AM

I still like this and wouldnt cry if this happened... Football would be average to best, Nothing special. But the basketball would be insane, Just freaking off the charts! Hell take out Marshall and replace them with Kentucky. You would have the makings of hoops heaven all in one conference...


MEGA EAST
Western Division
Kansas
Kansas State
Iowa State
Cincinnati
Louisville
Memphis
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
Marshall
<O></O>
Eastern Division<O></O>
Connecticut
Syracuse
West Virginia
Boston College
Maryland
Virginia
Duke
North Carolina
North Carolina State

DaKCMan AP 06-10-2010 07:46 AM

Quote:

A Beautiful Move: Texas A&M to SEC?
Clay Travis
Senior NCAA Writer

In the conference expansion race, the University of Texas is the hot chick at the bar whose dad is a multimillionaire. Everyone wants her. Texas A&M is her less attractive younger sister who you would think was really hot if she wasn't the sister of the hot chick, a solid eight who is invisible standing next to a spectacular 10. Meanwhile, Baylor and Texas Tech are the ugly, cross-eyed step-sisters, they'd have no pull if it weren't for their proximity to the attractive sisters. Presently it appears that the Pac-10 is so in love with Texas that they're willing to take all four schools to get into the rich Texas television market. But let's not kid anyone: without Texas no one is coming after Baylor and Texas Tech and asking them to join a new conference.

At all.

So far, most speculation has focused on the four Texas schools as a package deal. And lost amid all the posturing associated with whether Baylor or Colorado will get the final offer to join the Big 12 has been this question: What if Southeastern Conference commissioner Mike Slive pulled a fast one and managed to recruit away Texas A&M from the three other Texas schools leaving for the Pac-16 (or whatever name you like best)?

Think that's far-fetched?

I don't.
Here's why: Mike Slive is smart.

While he refused to address what schools, if any, he'd had expansion conversations with, it's no secret that the SEC has long sought to enter the lucrative Texas market in the past. But Slive would be aware that the last time the SEC tried to expand into Texas, the state legislature raised issues with the move. He would know that adding Texas and Texas A&M by themselves, as every conference would prefer, wasn't likely to happen due to political pressure. He'd know the price for those two schools would be much steeper.

When I asked Slive whether the Pac-10's move to woo the six Big 12 schools surprised him, he said it did not.

So you have to assume that's he's seen some version of this scenario playing out.

Now let's channel the Oscar winning film A Beautiful Mind and return to our analogy about the girls at the bar. In the movie, you'll recall that the the genius scientist, John Nash, uses game theory to create an optimal pick-up situation for he and his friends. Let's put Slive in the John Nash role now at the bar. If you know you can't get Texas, the perfect 10, alone, and you know you can't get Texas and her sister, Texas A&M, the solid 8, alone, those options are out the window. What's more, you definitely wouldn't want Texas Tech and Baylor, the cross-eyed step-sisters of Texas football, but because you know your offer to Texas will be rejected without those two schools, could you make a creative move and approach Texas A&M, the attractive younger sister of the knockout, and make her yours all by herself?

Maybe.

Let's examine why this could be the perfect game theory move in the event the SEC wants to expand into Texas.

1. Texas A&M might well benefit from joining the SEC over the Pac-16.

Why?

Because nothing really changes for A&M in the Pac-16. It is still lost in the penumbra of Texas' hotness, always playing second fiddle. A&M in the SEC would be able to market itself as the SEC team in Texas, the lone opportunity for hotshot Texas recruits to play football in the best football conference in America.

Right now, what distinguishes A&M from Texas?

Not much, right?

But could Texas A&M plus the conference cachet of the SEC challenge Texas for state superiority?

I think so.

Wouldn't entering a recruit's living room and selling him on an experience that no one else in Texas can have -- that is, stay in the state close to home but play in the most football mad schools in the country on a regular basis -- be incredibly beneficial to the school?

Plus, it would open up the fertile recruiting fields of the South to A&M.

I think entering the SEC offers A&M the only chance it may have for generations to truly challenge Texas for state superiority.

2. The Pac-16 would grit its teeth and proceed because it allows them to take Colorado and Baylor.

Politically, the new conference would be unlikely to fight the move of Texas A&M to the SEC.

Why?

Because it eliminates the need for the conference to make a tough choice between Colorado, the school it wants, and Baylor, the school it's being forced to take.

This way they'd get both schools.

Ultimately the Pac-16 wants A&M, but losing the school wouldn't end the deal.

3. Slive raises the price for the Pac-16's pursuit of Texas.

Instead of waltzing into the state and splitting away the state's two premier football programs, the Pac-16 gets one major addition and the two weaker programs.

Putting these schools into context, Texas is overall the No. 1 highest revenue athletic department in the country while Texas A&M is right around 20.

Both are incredibly strong additions to any conference in America.

Meanwhile, Baylor and Texas Tech are 56th and 58th in total athletic revenues meaning both schools fall beneath Vanderbilt in total athletic revenues.

So Slive could swoop into the lucrative Texas television market while upping the price for the addition of Texas.

It's brilliant.

4. The other three Texas schools would all be moving to better conference situations as well, so they wouldn't mind splitting up.

The idea that the Texas schools are sticking together out of loyalty is crap. The reason Baylor and Texas Tech want to be with Texas and Texas A&M is because the two premier programs in the state offer each the best route to a new destination.

If the SEC or the Big Ten offered Baylor tomorrow, do you think Baylor is staying in a tenuous Big 12 position uncertain of a Pac-16 offer or leaping?

It is leaping.

With this move, three schools to the Pac-16 and one to the SEC, everyone is in a more lucrative financial position than they were in before expansion.

If everybody is winning, all four schools don't have to go the same place.

The schools only have to go to the same place to keep a school from losing.

5. A&M could still play Texas on the Friday before Thanksgiving, only now it would be an out-of-conference game.

Stop with these rivalry ending e-mails before they even start.

The game at the end of the year would still happen, it would just be an out-of-conference tilt. Honestly, the brand new Pac-16 vs. the SEC would probably make it a bigger national game than it already is.

And the game would retain all of the regional hate that it already has. There's already a template for these out-of-conference rivalry games in the SEC since Florida plays Florida State and South Carolina plays Clemson on the same weekend.

What's more, since the yearly Texas A&M vs. Arkansas game would now become a conference event, there's an easy slot to allow the out-of-conference game to fit into.

The SEC would then have the option of adding one ACC team from Florida, likely Florida State, and sticking at 14 or raiding the southern ACC schools and ending the ACC as we know it.

Only one question remains: does the man who has kept more quiet than any conference commissioner throughout this entire process have a plan to squire away the state of Texas's solid eight?

I think Mike Slive just might.

ArrowheadHawk 06-10-2010 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6811312)

A&M to SEC would be funny as shit. FU UT.

DaKCMan AP 06-10-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

The new conference would be split into divisions with Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Colorado forming an Eastern Division with Arizona and Arizona State opposite the former Pac-8 (USC, UCLA, Stanford, Washington, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) in the Western Division.

The coach said it's possible the Pac-16 would push for two automatic bids to the BCS, one for each division champion. That potential bonanza could open the possibility of the two division champs from one league playing for the national title, and it would eliminate the need for a conference championship game.

"The Pac-10 doesn't believe in a championship game," the coach said. "And coaches in the Big 12 don't like it anyway."
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5270048

Translation: We want to get 2 teams from our conference in a Championship game so we don't have to play a team from the SEC and can, therefore, get a guaranteed NC.

Having a 16 team conference with 2 8-team divisions with an auto-bid from each division and NO conference championship game? BS. I don't see the other conferences ever agreeing to that garbage.

ChiTown 06-10-2010 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6811297)
I still like this and wouldnt cry if this happened... Football would be average to best, Nothing special. But the basketball would be insane, Just freaking off the charts! Hell take out Marshall and replace them with Kentucky. You would have the makings of hoops heaven all in one conference...


MEGA EAST
Western Division
Kansas
Kansas State
Iowa State
Cincinnati
Louisville
Memphis
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
Marshall
<O></O>
Eastern Division<O></O>
Connecticut
Syracuse
West Virginia
Boston College
Maryland
Virginia
Duke
North Carolina
North Carolina State

Substitute Missouri for Marshall and that's a damn fine league. At this point, I personally think Mizzou will NOT have an invite to the B10.

ChiTown 06-10-2010 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6811214)
We ask just one thing, Jim. Treat them right. Roll out the red carpet for the Big Red. They're special - as in reerunED.

FYA(rticle)

Reerun_KC 06-10-2010 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6811327)
Substitute Missouri for Marshall and that's a damn fine league. At this point, I personally think Mizzou will NOT have an invite to the B10.

That would be okay as well. I was figuring that MU would land else where, since they are a traditional national championship type power in football year in and out.

healthpellets 06-10-2010 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6811343)
That would be okay as well. I was figuring that MU would land else where, since they are a traditional national championship type power in football year in and out.

jfc.

healthpellets 06-10-2010 08:28 AM

oh, this is rich.

http://www.rockchalktalk.com/2010/6/...-join-sec-west

i didn't know the "SEC West" is a conference.

Quote:

Kansas to Join SEC West
by The Dr. on Jun 9, 2010 7:40 PM CDT 55 comments

I am well connected in the KU athletic department. Ku is in negotiation to join the SEC West. This will be huge upgrade fro the doomed Big 12. KU will stack up well against Arkansas, Kentucky, Tenn, LSU, Alabama, Miss, and the rest. We will create a serious basketball conference and will immediately occupy the middle of the field in SEC football. It is a good regional fit and will be a good start i allowing the SEC to keep pace with the fat Pac 16. The big 10 wll get more average. It seem likely the ACC will be the next prey to the SEC East.

Editors Note: I'm noticing we've gotten a good bit of traffic on this and I just wanted to clarify to those from any outside sites that this is a post by an independent fan who registered for the site last night and this is and has been the only post. Take this with a HUGE grain of salt as I think most hopefully have.

That said, I'm leaving the post up because it does make for some interesting discussion, but by no means should this be considered some sort of factual or inside information at this point. If "The Dr." turns out to be right...well hell I guess we were all wrong, but until then...keep in perspective what this most likely is.

- Denver, Managing Editor

58-4ever 06-10-2010 08:28 AM

What I don't understand is why anyone would want Missouri. They haven't been to a major bowl game in forty years, never been to a final four, no real baseball success, their women's teams stink. I just don't see the appeal. No disrespect intended to you Tigers.

DaKCMan AP 06-10-2010 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by healthpellets (Post 6811353)
oh, this is rich.

http://www.rockchalktalk.com/2010/6/...-join-sec-west

i didn't know the "SEC West" is a conference.

LMAO

ArrowheadHawk 06-10-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by healthpellets (Post 6811353)
oh, this is rich.

http://www.rockchalktalk.com/2010/6/...-join-sec-west

i didn't know the "SEC West" is a conference.

Not yet it aint. LOL why are you posting wild speculation?

ArrowheadHawk 06-10-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever (Post 6811354)
What I don't understand is why anyone would want Missouri. They haven't been to a major bowl game in forty years, never been to a final four, no real baseball success, their women's teams stink. I just don't see the appeal. No disrespect intended to you Tigers.

Come on now. Didn't I see their softball team in the CWS.

healthpellets 06-10-2010 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58-4ever (Post 6811354)
What I don't understand is why anyone would want Missouri. They haven't been to a major bowl game in forty years, never been to a final four, no real baseball success, their women's teams stink. I just don't see the appeal. No disrespect intended to you Tigers.

if you can't figure out the economics, then there's nothing i can help you with.

-King- 06-10-2010 08:33 AM

Kevin Kuglar(sp?) is on 810 now. He said the deal with Missouri to the Big10 is pretty much done also.
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.