![]() |
Quote:
This fan base has become ridiculously entitled and unrealistic. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Blessed to see another year 🙏🏾🙏🏾 <a href="https://t.co/HNxW6FzSsB">pic.twitter.com/HNxW6FzSsB</a></p>— darrel williams (@darrelwilliams_) <a href="https://twitter.com/darrelwilliams_/status/1515157670340308993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course I’m pleased with the winning culture that has been established, but that does not mean organizational decisions and coaching cannot come under scrutiny. This current version of the Chiefs could arguably have appeared in the last four Superbowls but it only won one. The Hill trade is also a sign not everything is as peachy keen as fans would like to believe. Apparently Hill’s price tag was not prohibitive to KC but he left a winning culture and elite QB to go to Miami? It will be interesting to see the approach the remainder of the offseason. Questioning decisions and losses in clutch moments doesn't make me less of a fan. Blindly drinking the kool aid has never ended well for any fanbase either. |
Quote:
|
I actually don't have a problem with our free agency obviously other than a big problem with the Tyreek trade. I like the Reid signing and really liked signing Juju as a #2.
I'm hoping we trade for a DE or something because if not that means Frank Clark is going to be a starter again which is just flat out terrible. But I think we make a trade for a DE or CB because otherwise restructuring Thuney makes no sense and as good of a drafter as Veach is, finding a starting DE, CB, and WR in the same draft is an impossible task. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
When you lose like that a message needs to be sent to the team. No more Tyran, Tyreek, Robinson, Pringle, or Williams. That's a strong message. Hats off to Veach again. Now watch him go kill this draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But it does get silly when people can't accept any mistakes have been made. I mean, all GMs make mistakes. If someone is saying he flat out sucks, then fine, that's silly. If someone is saying "I don't think CEH was a good pick" or "Frank Clark's contract was a mistake" or "I'm not 100% convinced the Hill trade will work out" - it is odd how personally some people seem to take this, they're hardly indefensible positions to take. In terms of this FA it's obviously slower than last year's. A lot of people liked his decisiveness last year and now apparently think a slower/"build it through the draft" approach is right. I think that's actually reasonable, simply because this FA I've not seen a whole load of realistic options out there for us. There's no-one that's been brought in that I'm that excited about, but equally I could see all of them work out. But I also agree, at this point there's a lot of holes and we've definitely not used FA to fill ALL needs. Thank God we have a million draft picks. |
Knowmo knows his nitch
|
Quote:
The people who want to fire everybody because a draft pick didn't work out are not offering thoughtful criticism. The people who want to fire Andy Reid for any of his shortcomings are not offering thoughtful criticism because ALL coaches have shortcomings and there's literally not a better coach in football for Patrick Mahomes-so maybe people should cool their jets. This team, as it was constructed, was in a phase of diminishing returns. I was shocked we traded Hill. After looking at the numbers, and looking at the haul of picks, I get it, and I'm on board with the idea of a new phase. We're zigging while everyone else zags in an attempt to catch up to where we WERE. Only the people inside Arrowhead know what we will BE in September. It's going to look different. I'm excited. I have theories, as do you all I'm sure about what we're doing, but I can't wait to see it for myself. |
Quote:
But OK isn't the standard anymore. I want another championship. I'm not writing off the offense yet. But I am very nervous. As of now we are too easy to defend. I want one of Burks/Olave and a Shakir added in the draft if we don't trade for a vet. We can't afford another Mecole with our highest pick this year if we want to win the Superbowl. |
Quote:
The offense is too easy to defend? I would argue that. I would argue that it BECAME too easy to defend LAST season. Hill averaged what, like 11 ypc? That negates him, really. If I can do that as a defense playing KC, I'm real pleased with myself. Other than Hill's otherwordly ability to track a deep ball, Hardman can do many of the things Hill could do. All of the jet sweep stuff, WR screen stuff-Hardman can threaten a defense in the same way. We've added MVS, who is a big, fast deep threat that you have to account for. We've added Juju, a physical YAC machine who must be accounted for. And we still have Kelce. If we actually run the ball enough to be a threat there, this offense as it stands can threaten every blade of grass-and there's NO WAY Veach and Reid are done yet. I'm excited, but I'm unconcerned. It's entirely possible that this offense may be more EFFICIENT if less EXPLOSIVE. Although last season, it was often NEITHER for long stretches. And as I said, I fully expect at least one if not two WR's in the draft. Only MVS is on the roster for '23. That tells me that Veach is targeting guys in this draft. We have EIGHT picks in the first four rounds. EIGHT shots in the chamber to restock the talent on this team. I think this is going to be a LOT of fun. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.