ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2013 Kansas City Royals Repository Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267564)

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 07:46 PM

In other news, The Royals are currently scouting the Padres...

The Royals board seems to think we're after Forsythe (with some hoping for Blanks). Thoughts?

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/.../#article-copy

DeezNutz 06-24-2013 07:47 PM

I understand what you're saying, but the QB analogy doesn't quite work because a great position player is > a great pitcher, so Myers is essentially the QB here.

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9773398)
I understand what you're saying, but the QB analogy doesn't quite work because a great position player is > a great pitcher, so Myers is essentially the QB here.

If that assessment were true, the Royals teams in the late 90's/early 2000's would have been powerhouses.

DeezNutz 06-24-2013 07:51 PM

Finally, let's remember that we didn't have to keep Myers and do nothing; the Royals were allowed to use FA.

Santana has been pitching like an ace. + FA + Guthrie (smoke and mirrors, but whatever) + Chen (who is basically Davis) + Mendoza.

I'll take the above formula.

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9773404)
Finally, let's remember that we didn't have to keep Myers and do nothing; the Royals were allowed to use FA.

Santana has been pitching like an ace. + FA + Guthrie (smoke and mirrors, but whatever) + Chen (who is basically Davis) + Mendoza.

I'll take the above formula.

The FA you're coveting likely didn't exist.

/inb4 Anibal.

SAUTO 06-24-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9773401)
If that assessment were true, the Royals teams in the late 90's/early 2000's would have been powerhouses.

?
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 06-24-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9773401)
If that assessment were true, the Royals teams in the late 90's/early 2000's would have been powerhouses.

You still have to field a defense. I'm not advocating for the '03 Chiefs here, so we have to keep common sense in view.

DeezNutz 06-24-2013 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9773407)
?
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah. This why a lot of mothers have been told to get ****ed.

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9773407)
?
Posted via Mobile Device

?

SAUTO 06-24-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9773410)
Yeah. This why a lot of mothers have been told to get ****ed.

Another perfect post
Posted via Mobile Device

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9773409)
You still have to field a defense. I'm not advocating for the '03 Chiefs here, so we have to keep common sense in view.

Bleergh, I'm done debating this. The deal is done, I was angry about it as well, but there is nothing we can do about it at this point.

Myers has hit two home runs (Again, let me point to the dominant starts that Hosmer and Moose both had. Myers still has an exuberant K rate, once pitchers figure him out, he could be in trouble)

We would have likely been the 2002 Royals if we had kept Myers. No valuable Free Agent was going to sign with us, and we would have lost Santana by the middle of the season.

Moore is an idiot, he mentioned that Moose could have been the highlight of the deal, but opted to go with Myers to avoid the latter's "growing pains."

I also disagree with your assessment of hitters v. pitchers. The last three world series championships were not won by teams with powerful lineups.

I'm done.

Nightfyre 06-24-2013 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9773406)
The FA you're coveting likely didn't exist.

/inb4 Anibal.

I was all aboard the Anibal Sanchez bandwagon. If we had not traded for Shields and dealt Frenchy to the Yankees (whom they may have taken over Vernon Wells) we would have spent 2MM less on payroll and had Myers ready and waiting/developing further. Gordon/Cain/Myers/Dyson/Lough in the OF. Stacked lineup. Not to mention depriving Detroit of a 3 WAR player is as good as adding a 3 WAR player in the regular season.

Chiefspants 06-24-2013 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9773425)
I was all aboard the Anibal Sanchez bandwagon. If we had not traded for Shields and dealt Frenchy to the Yankees (whom they may have taken over Vernon Wells) we would have spent 2MM less on payroll and had Myers ready and waiting/developing further. Gordon/Cain/Myers/Dyson/Lough in the OF. Stacked lineup.

He signed a 5 yr/90m contract with the team that just won the AL pennant.

He likely would have required much more to sign with the Royals.

Anibal was never an option.

Nightfyre 06-24-2013 08:07 PM

5/80 is what he signed - with a 16MM club option tacked on the end. (5MM buyout so I guess the deal is really 6/96 or 5/85)

Reaper16 06-24-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9773430)
He signed a 5 yr/90m contract with the team that just won the AL pennant.

He likely would have required much more to sign with the Royals.

Anibal was never an option.

Reports were that Anibal got that much from Detroit because Detroit felt pressure to make a move after the Royals traded for James Shields.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.