It's secondary, but it matters to basketball fans. Mizzou doesn't lose anything even in basketball by moving to the SEC. That's the funniest part. The beaks don't even get to crow about that. There are better teams in the SEC than in the Big XII, and those schools couldn't give a shit about basketball.

They won national championships in 1988 and 2008. Other than that, they never won anything.

1952?

So Kentucky has 5 National Championships, not 8...correct?

Yes, KU is the only basketball school in the Big 12 and the SEC is better in basketball even though nobody pays any attention to it. Spot on analysis.

The NCAA tournament was a secondary tournament back then, similar to what the NIT is now. That's not a direct comparison because it had a little more prestige, but it wasn't the national championship.

ROFL

Awesome.

Who is better in the Big XII? Arkansas has won a NC and played in another in the last 20 years. Kentucky has won 2 since then, played in another, and been in the Final Four 5 times in that span. Florida has won 2 national championships since then.

Who in the Big XII can compete with that? Kansas would be the second best program in the SEC. Who else in the Big XII even holds a candle to Florida?

Hope we issue a press release on Sunday after the OSU game.

So Kentucky has 3 National Championships?

How does this work? When did the NCAA Tournament get real?

bobfescoe Bob Fescoe
Being told #mizzou waiting on a counter offer from big 12. These talks r intense a Lotta cash at stake


haha

Oh yeah, the NCAA tournament was for conference and regional champions while the NIT was for 6 teams invited by a committee. I see your point. Before the tournaments, there were obviously no champions. Good call, man.

CCNY won the NIT in 1950.

They are the Champions.

MU is the Brett Favre of collegiate athletics right now.

What a moron.