ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dorsey gone? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308394)

Hog's Gone Fishin 06-22-2017 04:38 PM

We still got Tyreek and Mahommy so our future is bright

petegz28 06-22-2017 04:39 PM

Scenario that must be considered:

Reid had the most say on every draft pick.
It was Dorsey's job to scout for Reid and work the $'s. But the picks were Reid.
Dorsey ****ed up the handling of the $'s.
Clark says: Reid is the man behind the picks so why am I diking with Dorsey if he can't manage the $'s right and won't even commit to KC?
Reid gets handed full control
Dorsey gets fired
We're in the same boat we were yesterday, no Maclin, no Charles.

This cannot be ruled out and in Clark's eyes is probably viewed as a wash. If Reid was more of the man behind the talent and Dorsey was smoke and mirrors with it while ****ing up the $'s then yeah,....I see this happening.

mdchiefsfan 06-22-2017 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12927225)
We still got Tyreek and Mahommy so our future is bright

Depends on who wanted Mahomes more: Reid or Dorsey.

Rain Man 06-22-2017 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 12927218)
Maybe because more power was part of Reid's contract extension that just happened.

This is a theory worth exploring.

I just want to stomp right now. If I was wearing shoes with a more rigid sole, I would.

NJChiefsFan 06-22-2017 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12927222)
He was busy discovering Tyreek Hill and Chris Jones. He was about to get to those other issues.

Dorsey wasn't perfect but he was damn good.

DaneMcCloud 06-22-2017 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 12927218)
Maybe because more power was part of Reid's contract extension that just happened.

Except it wasn't

TEX 06-22-2017 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12927214)
Didn't go through the whole thread, but my take on this is that perhaps Dorsey wanted some sort of "out" in his contract should something open up at GB. Clark wanted a long term commitment. And, in the end, they could not agree. So, Clark decided to go find him a long term answer....now.

Yep. I thought the same thing.

Tribal Warfare 06-22-2017 04:40 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...148435184.html

IMO, I could see the loyalty issue with JC and Maclin but Reid vouched for PMII.

The salary cap issue was the sticking point with all things considered.

Halfcan 06-22-2017 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12927214)
Didn't go through the whole thread, but my take on this is that perhaps Dorsey wanted some sort of "out" in his contract should something open up at GB. Clark wanted a long term commitment. And, in the end, they could not agree. So, Clark decided to go find him a long term answer....now.

Trump...I mean Clark demanded loyalty..., when Dorsey declined, Clark said YOU ARE FIRED, You have ten minutes to clean out your shit. Get the **** out of here. :cuss:

Rain Man 06-22-2017 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12927226)
Scenario that must be considered:

Reid had the most say on every draft pick.
It was Dorsey's job to scout for Reid and work the $'s. But the picks were Reid.
Dorsey ****ed up the handling of the $'s.
Clark says: Reid is the man behind the picks so why am I diking with Dorsey if he can't manage the $'s right and won't even commit to KC?
Reid gets handed full control
Dorsey gets fired
We're in the same boat we were yesterday, no Maclin, no Charles.

This cannot be ruled out and in Clark's eyes is probably viewed as a wash. If Reid was more of the man behind the talent and Dorsey was smoke and mirrors with it while ****ing up the $'s then yeah,....I see this happening.

What was Reid's situation in Philadelphia? Did he have GM powers there, or was there a GM in place?

Anyong Bluth 06-22-2017 04:42 PM

because Chiefs.

Only true answer.

NJChiefsFan 06-22-2017 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12927226)
Scenario that must be considered:

Reid had the most say on every draft pick.
It was Dorsey's job to scout for Reid and work the $'s. But the picks were Reid.
Dorsey ****ed up the handling of the $'s.
Clark says: Reid is the man behind the picks so why am I diking with Dorsey if he can't manage the $'s right and won't even commit to KC?
Reid gets handed full control
Dorsey gets fired
We're in the same boat we were yesterday, no Maclin, no Charles.

This cannot be ruled out and in Clark's eyes is probably viewed as a wash. If Reid was more of the man behind the talent and Dorsey was smoke and mirrors with it while ****ing up the $'s then yeah,....I see this happening.

Don't the Chiefs moves of this era seem a lot more GBish than PHI? I think hoping that Reid was the guy picking the talent and Dorsey was along for the ride is wishful thinking.

Hammock Parties 06-22-2017 04:43 PM

When you play the Game of Thrones you either win or you get fired by Clark Hunt

http://i.imgur.com/woPwWoG.jpg

mdchiefsfan 06-22-2017 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12927240)
Don't the Chiefs moves of this era seem a lot more GBish than PHI? I think hoping that Reid was the guy picking the talent and Dorsey was along for the ride is wishful thinking IMO.

Agreed

Halfcan 06-22-2017 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd Quarter 38-10 (Post 12927224)
Scott Pioli has been successful everywhere he has been except...

There is another problem in KC!

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.