Correct Fax, but they will point to a team with completely different players, and say "why didn't we do that?" "because they are ****in morons that's why"

^Winner^

^Loser^

See how that works?

It's the same tautological argument ad nauseum.

You do "X" because that's what I want to be true, therefore it is so.

The Chiefs are on the right track because I want it to be true, therefore it is so.

Deez is a clinger (all-time dumbass statement, BTW) because I want it to be true, therefore it is.

Why?

Bitching is just a part of some people's nature. Accept their nature people, thats all you can do. Bitching about it doesn't make things better? It only fuels their fire even more. No matter what happens, or what moves are made the 4 horsemen would bitch....lol it's downright hilarious...Better to laugh about it than be angry about it.

Bull shit.

Dane completely pissed all over that new dude TigerPig earlier for saying something completely reasonable, and if he were to act an ass like that to me or anyone else in person, he'd probably get to stare at his ass after getting his face slapped towards the south.

Honestly, I don't recall you ever taking it to the level that Dane does, but I do bartend in a sportsbar, on Sundays, and know that people don't "discuss" football the way some around here do.

Sorry, but that's a strawman argument.
That doesn't at all mean there have not been good decisions made or improvement.

How's that moving the goalposts?
God knows what you mean. I know what you type.

Dorsey sucks
<hr style="color: rgb(204, 204, 204);" size="1"> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> Plain and simple.

Another bust of a DT:cuss:

JWhit is right about everything he said about Dorsey. I thought he was supposed to be the centerpiece around the DLine? "Supposively" supposed to be that difference maker?

Yeah:rolleyes:

Not even close.


Who said that?

Yeah. That one-time assumption qualifies me as a hypocrite.
:rolleyes:

We'll forget the fact that I said I was wrong.

AND that later a poster reinforces the idea that you're a 4H poser running behind them.

Simmah.

I've expressed concern about Cassel. I'm unconvinced that he has what it's going to take, so don't bother arguing with me about that. As for the DE you mention, I have taken no stand on him whatsoever since you can't judge a DE in his first year ... not if you have the brains of a gnat, anyhow.

Now ... where were we? Ah, yes ... what have they done? Not much that the casual fan would notice. Haley promotes some improvement in core stats which is typical of a head coach trying to keep his job. But, I think the main thing they've done is establish a very disciplined approach to the franchise in general that will serve them well going forward.

Again, you appear to think that there should have been greater strides made. Why else would you complain? But honestly, this is unreasonable and seems to reflect an unrealistic view of the team. We were and are horrible. We had and have very little talent. There was a very serious leadership void. It isn't going to change overnight ... and never was ... that was never a serious goal. To try and convince people that Pioli and Haley have failed in their first year (as rookies in their respective positions) appears, therefore, kind of foolish, unfortunately.

FAX

We can agree to disagree.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

I haven't even read this thread, but let me guess:

The same ol' Pioli ballwashers are in here bitching about the Four Horsemen? Carry on, men. Carry on.

A statement that was only made by you.
I never called him a clinger.
I actually think he has much more to add than the horsemen do, but that doesn't mean he doesn't throw in a "Yeah" on a pretty consistent basis.