Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 17248092)

Are you honestly expecting ANYONE to go full homer, when CLYDE EDWARDS HELAIRE is called upon to run UP THE MIDDLE on the mother ****ing GOAL LINE, when Isaiah Pacheco has not broken both of his legs and is available to run that play instead?

You're REALLY going to bitch about someone pointing out the hilariously awful personnel choice, and then not freaking out, but simply saying, hey, give it to the right guy here, and we're in? That's what you consider NEGATIVE?

Honestly, just fist yourself. You're obviously ****ed in half upstairs beyond reason, and your fingertip grip on reality has failed, plunging you into an abyss of irreversible stupidity if you think calling for Pacheco to run the football instead of Clyde is a negative.

It's not a negative, it's just simple common ****ing sense.

If shit could shit, it still wouldn't be as shitty as Clyde runs the football. That's fact. Call it whatever you want and I'm sure you, and reeruns like Rasputin who called Clyde " The next Priest Holmes" are rabidly smashing that thumbs down over it, but it changes nothing.

Clyde should NEVER run the football if ANYONE else is conscious and can take a handoff.

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 17248092)

Clyde should NEVER run the football if ANYONE else is conscious and can take a handoff.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17248129)

Why would you TRUST someone who orchestrated a Chicago Bears SHITSHOW?

Ever think that MAYBE that's how you get a SHITSHOW in KANSAS CITY where the receivers drop half their targets and the LEAST talented skill position player on offense gets MEANINGFUL carries in close games that LOSE those games?

How can you LEAD a team by telling the WORST players to play more?

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17248160)

Do YOU think you’re responsible for CEH being on the FIELD in light of the fact that you played SOME role in EB’s getting shoved out with your faux editorial piece?

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 17248092)

Are you honestly expecting ANYONE to go full homer, when CLYDE EDWARDS HELAIRE is called upon to run UP THE MIDDLE on the mother ****ing GOAL LINE, when Isaiah Pacheco has not broken both of his legs and is available to run that play instead?

You're REALLY going to bitch about someone pointing out the hilariously awful personnel choice, and then not freaking out, but simply saying, hey, give it to the right guy here, and we're in? That's what you consider NEGATIVE?

Honestly, just fist yourself. You're obviously ****ed in half upstairs beyond reason, and your fingertip grip on reality has failed, plunging you into an abyss of irreversible stupidity if you think calling for Pacheco to run the football instead of Clyde is a negative.

It's not a negative, it's just simple common ****ing sense.

If shit could shit, it still wouldn't be as shitty as Clyde runs the football. That's fact. Call it whatever you want and I'm sure you, and reeruns like Rasputin who called Clyde " The next Priest Holmes" are rabidly smashing that thumbs down over it, but it changes nothing.

Clyde should NEVER run the football if ANYONE else is conscious and can take a handoff.

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 17248147)

This is by far the most reasonable take I've ever heard on here regarding Clyde.

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17248208)

So who's going to spell Pacheco with McKinnon hurt? He's getting 1-3 carries a game, and on his last 7 carries, minus the goal line carry, he is averaging over 7 yards a carry and looks better than he has in the last 2 years. He's going to get some carries every game or do you want to just load up Pacheco so he's spent in January? Reasonable... LMAO

The goal line carry was on first down after Clyde nearly scored on the play before... give me a ****ing break. If Andy had trotted him out there again on 2nd down, start ****ing whining...

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 17248283)

Do you ever shut the **** up?

It's remarkable how you spend so much of your time scraping at the bottom of the barrel to find one or two nice things to say about the two shittest players on our team in CEH and Skyy. They both ****ing suck.

There's being positive and then there's what you are which is being disconnected to the point of autism. There's so many things to be happy about as a Chiefs fan and yet you're here getting all pissy that people aren't seeing the positives in these two crap players.

Now be a good boy and get back to licking those windows clean.

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17248774)

So let me get this straight you soccer loving fair weather football fan...

Saying CEH needs to spell Pacheco for 2 series and 2-3 carries a game with McKinnon out and recognizing in that role the last 3 games he is averaging over 7 yards a carry is being too positive? **** OFF! I'm not advocating for him to get more carries you reerun, but fact, he's been above average in this role the last 3 games.

Saying I'm disappointed in Skyy this year, but recognizing he made some improvement on Sunday, while being skeptical it may not continue is being overly positive? Yea, you are a clueless reerun.

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17248774)

So let me get this straight you soccer loving fair weather football fan...

Saying CEH needs to spell Pacheco for 2 series and 2-3 carries a game with McKinnon out and recognizing in that role the last 3 games he is averaging over 7 yards a carry is being too positive? **** OFF! I'm not advocating for him to get more carries you reerun, but fact, he's been above average in this role the last 3 games.

Saying I'm disappointed in Skyy this year, but recognizing he made some improvement on Sunday, while being skeptical it may not continue is being overly positive? Yea, you are a clueless reerun.

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 17248283)

Do you ever shut the **** up?

It's remarkable how you spend so much of your time scraping at the bottom of the barrel to find one or two nice things to say about the two shittest players on our team in CEH and Skyy. They both ****ing suck.

There's being positive and then there's what you are which is being disconnected to the point of autism. There's so many things to be happy about as a Chiefs fan and yet you're here getting all pissy that people aren't seeing the positives in these two crap players.

Now be a good boy and get back to licking those windows clean.

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17248786)

Yeah, no clue how people don't understand that if you can win handing it off to CEH and not giving Pacheco a ton of carries, or not give Toney a bunch of touches, etc.... then ****ing do it until the playoffs start and you really need those guys.

And guess what... they got down early and changed up their strategy. It's almost like they know what they're doing even if some fans don't have the mental capacity to understand it.

People act like they need to implement the Bills strategy of running up the score on shit teams and going balls to the wall all season, since that's worked out so well for them. :spock:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 17248816)

ROFL :clap:
That's some truthful funny shit right there.

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17248826)

Congrats Womble, you have TEX on your side. LMAO

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 17248822)

I feel you're missing the point that this guy is the most obsessive poster when it comes down to crying about how others should post, whilst simultaneously being overly positive about our most sigh inducing players. Imagine watching that game and instead of focusing on Rice's 100 yard contribution you decide blog about the supposed improvements Skyy Moore and CEH have made. They are shit and the majority of us don't want to see them get meaningful snaps in the playoffs. The guy must be trolling or insane if the 'positive contributions' of these two in Las Vegas is one of his main takeaways from that game.