ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs BREAKING: Nick Foles starting against Jags (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303330)

Mr. Plow 11-02-2016 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12524035)
Nickfoleon could go 265 yards, 2 TDs on 65% completion against the Jags and Reid still wouldn't think twice about switching quarterbacks.

Reid is the football guru, the rest of you are just managing your 8th place fantasy football teams

Image: Not Safe for Work
NSFW Image

The Franchise 11-02-2016 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12524018)
Notice the people who are amped about the idea that Foles is the long term player are the same ones who were begging for Geno, murray, Daniels, and also defended Bowes lackluster play

Notice that most of the Smith supporters were 49ers fans before he came here.

wazu 11-02-2016 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12524084)
To me, the question is not whether Alex is our starter this year. It's whether we would be should remotely consider letting Alex go next year in order to save $5 million with the five-years-younger Foles.

A bargain at the QB spot allows teams to stack up and make a legitimate run.

jjchieffan 11-02-2016 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 12523980)
You would prefer that over a blowout with Foles throwing 5TDs? :spock: That would possibly mean that Foles is a better QB. Maybe not but it would sure look like it. So you're saying you wouldn't want a possibly better QB because of the controversy? :shake:

Andy isn't going to bench a healthy Smith no matter how good Foles looks. This team has a lot of potential and a guy that can step in and keep us winning if Smith Goes down. We don't need a quarterback controversy. So yes. I would rather us barely win on a mediocre performance by Foles.

Reerun_KC 11-02-2016 01:21 PM

So this move begs the question, "Does the gameplan change?"

Will Reid still call the same plays but they will be executed differently? We have seen tons of footage open guys running free (See Pitt game) and the play results in a dump off or check down to a higher % play..

How will Reid handle this type of adjustment with Foles? Open up and let them hang out like a man? Or reign him in and play an even more controlled game?

The Franchise 11-02-2016 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12524099)
So this move begs the question, "Does the gameplan change?"

Will Reid still call the same plays but they will be executed differently? We have seen tons of footage open guys running free (See Pitt game) and the play results in a dump off or check down to a higher % play..

How will Reid handle this type of adjustment with Foles? Open up and let them hang out like a man? Or reign him in and play an even more controlled game?

He already said that he didn't change anything in the gameplan at Indy last week.

The Franchise 11-02-2016 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12524098)
Andy isn't going to bench a healthy Smith no matter how good Foles looks. This team has a lot of potential and a guy that can step in and keep us winning if Smith Goes down. We don't need a quarterback controversy. So yes. I would rather us barely win on a mediocre performance by Foles.

Then don't call Clay's post about him hoping that the defense gives up 24 points out.

ARROW2 11-02-2016 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 12524098)
Andy isn't going to bench a healthy Smith no matter how good Foles looks. This team has a lot of potential and a guy that can step in and keep us winning if Smith Goes down. We don't need a quarterback controversy. So yes. I would rather us barely win on a mediocre performance by Foles.




ROFLROFLROFLROFL




Come on MAN!!!!

Reerun_KC 11-02-2016 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12524102)
He already said that he didn't change anything in the gameplan at Indy last week.

Didnt see or hear that...

Hog's Gone Fishin 11-02-2016 01:25 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VScSEXRwUqQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

FloridaMan88 11-02-2016 01:26 PM

Thank God we don't have to witness the shit show that would have been Aaron Murray or Tyler Bray starting as Alex Smith's back-up... even against a bad Jacksonville team.

The Franchise 11-02-2016 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12524110)
Didnt see or hear that...

There you go.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303268

Quote:

Q: You were asked whether you had to cut back the game plan when Foles came in and you said no. Did he allow you to expand the game plan, maybe do some things that you couldn’t do with Smith?

Reid: No. Alex, I’m not sure we realize how good he is. We’ve opened this thing up further than maybe we’ve ever opened it up. He does a tremendous job. It’s a shame he didn’t have a chance to finish off the game plan because he would’ve had a ton of success with it. Not to take anything away from Nick. We didn’t have to cut a thing out for Nick coming in. That was a win-win for both guys. To think one would’ve done better than the other, I don’t believe that. If Alex would’ve been in, we would’ve done the same thing.

wazu 11-02-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12524110)
Didnt see or hear that...

Yeah, also claimed Alex would have made the same throws.

ARROW2 11-02-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12524114)




Bullshit Walrus man. I ain't mad at ya though. What else could you say in that situation?

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:28 PM

FREE!!!

http://i.imgur.com/QaO0ZVcl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/FlEvS0Yl.jpg

ARROW2 11-02-2016 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 12524115)
Yeah, also claimed Alex would have made the same throws.




We ALL know better than that. No he wouldn't have and I know that is a FACT!!! I have seen enough.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12524018)
Notice the people who are amped about the idea that Foles is the long term player are the same ones who were begging for Geno, murray, Daniels, and also defended Bowes lackluster play

I didn't want anything to do with those sacks of shit Murray or Daniels.

Eat shit non-Chiefs fan.

jjchieffan 11-02-2016 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12524103)
Then don't call Clay's post about him hoping that the defense gives up 24 points out.

I don't guess that I will. Especially since I hadn't seen it. Is it in this thread?

eDave 11-02-2016 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12524117)

So you went through and just got the free taco? You are the worst.

Great Expectations 11-02-2016 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 12523796)
Tom Petty - or - Nick Foles?



http://i63.tinypic.com/24npmye.jpg

Is that Ronnie 'Sunshine' Bass?

Beef Supreme 11-02-2016 01:31 PM

https://media.giphy.com/media/YI6rLbCp7ITlu/giphy.gif

Simply Red 11-02-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 12524125)
Is that Ronnie 'Sunshine' Bass?

HAHA - no!

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12524035)
Nickfoleon

Not a Chiefs fan. Right here.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12524123)
So you went through and just got the free taco? You are the worst.

I went to two different taco bells so I could get two.

Perineum Ripper 11-02-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 12524125)
Is that Ronnie 'Sunshine' Bass?

Actor from NCIS LA

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...L3ahw-JmM_CGt7

ToxSocks 11-02-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12524131)
I went to two different taco bells so I could get two.

Enjoy your welfare tacos, free loader.

Get a job. Lazy ass.

Reerun_KC 11-02-2016 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524134)
Enjoy your welfare tacos, free loader.

Get a job. Lazy ass.

Just think he could of went to 3 Taco Bells and got 3 free ones...

Or maybe 6?

Dunerdr 11-02-2016 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 12523826)
Not a bad get for a 1 week Fantasy Football bye week/injury replacement fix.

Brady on a bye and ware out I picked up Foles and west for the week

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524134)
Enjoy your welfare tacos, free loader.

Get a job. Lazy ass.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12524139)
Just think he could of went to 3 Taco Bells and got 3 free ones...

Or maybe 6?

LMAO LMAO LMAO

At some point there is a point of diminishing returns with the gas involved.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:40 PM

What was funny is the drive thru lady misheard me and thought I wanted three of them. I was like NO! FREE! FREE!

Mr. Laz 11-02-2016 01:40 PM

I fully expect 60 pts, 150 yard each for Conley,Kelce and Maclin.

Defense should pitch a shutout

Now that we've gotten rid of the only problem on our entire team, should be a cake walk.

TripleThreat 11-02-2016 01:47 PM

So happy about the Foles hire..

Hes a great back-up to have for Alex Smith, and gives alex smith in a sense a free week to rest up to make our push for the 2nd half of the season run, and playoff run. Great hire.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 01:53 PM

Here's the list of backup QBs who took over for the regular-season starter and won the SB:

Earl Morrall
Jim Plunkett
Doug Williams
Kurt Warner
Trent Dilfer
Tom Brady

Will Nick Foles be added to this list? Stay tuned!

threebag 11-02-2016 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go Royals (Post 12523876)
Will Smith ballwashers get banned from the gameday thread for talkin shit on Foles?

LMAO you lame one who sucks the penis. They seem more knowledgeable about the concept of football than most of the trolls that ride Alex's nuts. Like this ^^^ dipshit posting above.

Mr. Plow 11-02-2016 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12524183)
LMAO you lame one who sucks the penis. They seem more knowledgeable about the concept of football than most of the trolls that ride Alex's nuts.

Yes. That's it.

pugsnotdrugs19 11-02-2016 01:57 PM

Foles will have to absolutely shred the Jags for me to even consider a controversy being necessary, and he'll need to get the ball out at a decent time too.

If he can get it out quick, that would somewhat negate my worries about him going against a good pass rush.

SAUTO 11-02-2016 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12523864)
No more scared then dudes like JC and Houston, really. Top paid players don't feel like they can go, then they won't. No problem. Smith has taken a beating behind KC lines, and has earned the money and rest.

If Foles lights shit up, then Smith will be a great depth QB2 for his final season as he hangs em up early next year.

Don't know why some are acting jilted or troubled about the decision. It's not like they wanted him out there anyway.

WHAT? houston and charles have TORN their ACLs not not gotten a concussion and decided not to play over not it.

The Franchise 11-02-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12524193)
Foles will have to absolutely shred the Jags for me to even consider a controversy being necessary, and he'll need to get the ball out at a decent time too.

If he can get it out quick, that would somewhat negate my worries about him going against a good pass rush.

We have more sacks then them. They're 25th in sacks.

ToxSocks 11-02-2016 02:11 PM

Like i said, all Foles has to do is not turn the ball over and he'll come out of this looking like a damn hero.

We need Foles to do well so we can flip him for a pick....

RunKC 11-02-2016 02:12 PM

So important question here:

If Foles tears it up again this week and Andy shuts that shit down and starts Alex the following week, will there be a thread about what banner will fly?

Simply Red 11-02-2016 02:12 PM

we'll be fine.

The Franchise 11-02-2016 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524240)
So important question here:

If Foles tears it up again this week and Andy shuts that shit down and starts Alex the following week, will there be a thread about what banner will fly?

Ummm no. We aren't flying banners if we're still winning. But you better believe that if Smith comes back in and this offense goes back to where it was....people will start calling for Smith to get benched.

Sandy Vagina 11-02-2016 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524240)
So important question here:

If Foles tears it up again this week and Andy shuts that shit down and starts Alex the following week, will there be a thread about what banner will fly?

You kidding?

If Foles even has a stat line of 17-25 - 200 yds passing - 1 TD - 1 INT .. and KC wins...


- there will be several or a dozen here that will be roaring every day.. for the remainder of the yr.. that they need to cut Smith in the offseason.


So yeah. Foles tears it up? Banner is coming. ROFL

Discuss Thrower 11-02-2016 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524238)
Like i said, all Foles has to do is not turn the ball over and he'll come out of this looking like a damn hero.

We need Foles to do well so we can flip him for a pick....

You can't trade a player that's not under contract..

New World Order 11-02-2016 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524240)
So important question here:

If Foles tears it up again this week and Andy shuts that shit down and starts Alex the following week, will there be a thread about what banner will fly?


https://media.giphy.com/media/nNrkgR4Z7RHDW/giphy.gif

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524238)

We need Foles to do well so we can flip Alex for a pick....

FYP

Simply Red 11-02-2016 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12524258)
FYP

now you're being 'ASS11'inine

New World Order 11-02-2016 02:23 PM

He is ocming

RunKC 11-02-2016 02:23 PM

Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points

Simply Red 11-02-2016 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524268)
Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points

You know how to finish your quote, bud. Let's get that edit done!

In58men 11-02-2016 02:27 PM

Reid WILL NOT let Foles play his own game. He doesn't want QB controversy, expect a mediocre underwhelming performance.

ThaVirus 11-02-2016 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524268)
Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points


And we've already seen what the defense can do against some of the top offenses in the league.

Should be a fun ride.

oaklandhater 11-02-2016 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524268)
Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points


already prepared for the Alex smith excuse machine to come roaring in when are scores look like blow outs cause our defense keeps bailing Alex out it was pathetic last year and it will be pathetic this year.

RINGLEADER 11-02-2016 02:28 PM

This is so similar to what happened in San Fran...

Hmm...

Simply Red 11-02-2016 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 12524282)
This is so similar to what happened in San Fran...

Hmm...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cJZfeTX8jTQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

eDave 11-02-2016 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12524278)
already prepared for the Alex smith excuse machine to come roaring in when are scores look like blow outs cause our defense keeps bailing Alex out it was pathetic last year and it will be pathetic this year.

Similar to this one:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=291

Should be a fun GDT!

The Franchise 11-02-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524268)
Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points

Get those excuses in early folks!

DJ's left nut 11-02-2016 02:35 PM

I expect Foles will play quite well.

Honestly, I really wish he'd get some run against a stout front. If you're really interested in knowing if he's a possible improvement on Smith, you have to play him against the caliber of defenses he'll have to perform against to be successful.

Kicking the shit out of the Jags won't tell us much. Like I said, I think these kinds of teams are 'get fat' games and they're right in the wheelhouse of an aggressive quarterback. I expect something in the neighborhood of 22/32 for 275 yards and 2 TDs.

oaklandhater 11-02-2016 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 12524282)
This is so similar to what happened in San Fran...

Hmm...

Letz hope reid has balls to admit the alex smith mistake.

Molitoth 11-02-2016 02:36 PM

Holy shit, I'm actually super pumped to watch a Chiefs game!

Andy better not be a conservative twat. Foles, now is your time... don't be an idiot.

oaklandhater 11-02-2016 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 12524311)
Holy shit, I'm actually super pumped to watch a Chiefs game!

Andy better not be a conservative twat. Foles, now is your time... don't be an idiot.

This I haven't been pumped to see the chiefs offense in along time it's a nice feeling.

DaFace 11-02-2016 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12524308)
I expect Foles will play quite well.

Honestly, I really wish he'd get some run against a stout front. If you're really interested in knowing if he's a possible improvement on Smith, you have to play him against the caliber of defenses he'll have to perform against to be successful.

Kicking the shit out of the Jags won't tell us much. Like I said, I think these kinds of teams are 'get fat' games and they're right in the wheelhouse of an aggressive quarterback. I expect something in the neighborhood of 22/32 for 275 yards and 2 TDs.

I pretty much agree with all parts of this.

BigCatDaddy 11-02-2016 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12524268)
Important note here from Twitter:

Final 9 games of the #Chiefs season: Every team in the bottom half of the NFL in scoring defense, except DEN

Doesn't matter what QB is playing. We should put up points

Tigers already made excuse for when Foles kicks ass.

MMXcalibur 11-02-2016 02:38 PM

My body is ready for the Nick Foles experience.

(Get well soon, Alex.)

oaklandhater 11-02-2016 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12524319)
Tigers already made excuse for when Foles kicks ass.

All tiger ever does is make excuses and complain about the defense craziest fan on here.

ToxSocks 11-02-2016 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12524308)
I expect Foles will play quite well.

Honestly, I really wish he'd get some run against a stout front. If you're really interested in knowing if he's a possible improvement on Smith, you have to play him against the caliber of defenses he'll have to perform against to be successful.

Kicking the shit out of the Jags won't tell us much. Like I said, I think these kinds of teams are 'get fat' games and they're right in the wheelhouse of an aggressive quarterback. I expect something in the neighborhood of 22/32 for 275 yards and 2 TDs.

And if he goes something like 19/26 for 205 and 1 TD, that still won't tell us if he's better than Alex or not, since that's what you'd expect from Alex Smith.

If Foles doesn't turn the ball over he'll be equally as effective as Alex.

ARROW2 11-02-2016 02:50 PM

I may have to go to ER on Sunday after having an erection lasting more than 3 hours...

hitchief 11-02-2016 02:50 PM

This site should be split into 2:

1. people who watch football for the sake of football.

2. people who play Madden and Fantasy football.

The 2 don't mix and are completely separate realities.

Another way of putting it, adults and children.

that is all

BigCatDaddy 11-02-2016 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12524335)
All tiger ever does is make excuses and complain about the defense craziest fan on here.

He is a fan of a man, not a team.

ARROW2 11-02-2016 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitchief (Post 12524351)
This site should be split into 2:

1. people who watch football for the sake of football.

2. people who play Madden and Fantasy football.

The 2 don't mix and are completely separate realities.

Another way of putting it, adults and children.

that is all



FOLES BABY! And I don't play madden or fantasy football.

TimBone 11-02-2016 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz (Post 12523586)
This game has trap written all over it

Wbf

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitchief (Post 12524351)
This site should be split into 2:

1. people who watch football for the sake of football.

2. people who play Madden and Fantasy football.

The 2 don't mix and are completely separate realities.

Another way of putting it, adults and children.

that is all

This site should be split into 2:

1. Join Date: Apr 2013 Alex Smith Ballwasher

2. Actual Chiefs fan

DJ's left nut 11-02-2016 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524339)
And if he goes something like 19/26 for 205 and 1 TD, that still won't tell us if he's better than Alex or not, since that's what you'd expect from Alex Smith.

If Foles doesn't turn the ball over he'll be equally as effective as Alex.

Agreed.

About the only thing he could do that would color my outlook much either way is just go complete reerun and chuck 3 interceptions to a defense that's looking to roll over and die.

That's why I say I'd rather see him facing at least an average defense. I think this is pretty much like fighting a crippled kid - best case scenario is you beat up a gimp and there's still a chance that you trip over your dick somehow and get beat up by an invalid.

If Smith had played this game you'd probably be looking at 18/26 for 225 yards and a TD. And in the end, I just don't give much of a shit either way; this just isn't any kind of measuring stick game.

hitchief 11-02-2016 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12524361)
This site should be split into 2:

1. Join Date: Apr 2013 Alex Smith Ballwasher

2. Actual Chiefs fan

Oh boy, you got me!

Guess Andy, Alex or any player traded to this team cant be a chief fan either, what a tool and you just proved my point about adults/children.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12524363)
That's why I say I'd rather see him facing at least an average defense.

The Jags defense isn't nearly as bad as people think.

13th in yards allowed
8th least passing yards allowed
8th in net yards gained per pass attempt
5.2 yards per play (less than the Chiefs)
18th overall DVOA
13th overall DVOA vs the pass

This isn't New Orleans or Indy.

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitchief (Post 12524366)
Oh boy, you got me!

Guess Andy, Alex or any player traded to this team cant be a chief fan either, what a tool and you just proved my point about adults/children.

sour grapes, bitch! foles is going to take your precious widdle Alex's job and never give it back. just like 2012. mwahahahaha.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 11-02-2016 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12524134)
Enjoy your welfare tacos, free loader.

Get a job. Lazy ass.

ROFL

Baby Lee 11-02-2016 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12524361)
This site should be split into 2:

1. Join Date: Apr 2013 Alex Smith Ballwasher

2. Actual Chiefs fan

So you're not on the site at all?

Hammock Parties 11-02-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12524377)
So you're not on the site at all?

http://i.imgur.com/O1rAjxK.jpg

TimBone 11-02-2016 03:05 PM

I'm not against Foles starting, but I will say that his pocket presence and movement was lacking a bit in that Colts game. I'd bet there's at least one Sack/fumble this week.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.