ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 6 123 4 56
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Here is what I think is going to happen. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306558)

Tribal Warfare 03-12-2017 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12780157)
Maybe it would cost a lot. But if you wind up with the franchise QB, it could be cheap. We have 11 picks. You could move 5 of them and still have 6. Our 1st, 2nd, one 3rd, 4th, and one 5th puts us close on points.

Still leaves #10, a 3rd, a 5th, 2 6ths, and a 7th. Dorsey has done some good work with late picks.
Don't forget dark horse elements involved like trading Kelce to move up

spanky 52 03-12-2017 03:58 PM
I fully expect the Chiefs to try and trade down again. When they do pick first it will be defense. Just a thought.

Chiefshrink 03-12-2017 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanky 52 (Post 12780323)
I fully expect the Chiefs to try and trade down again. When they do pick first it will be defense. Just a thought.
That's my guess unless their guy is right there for the taking.:hmmm:

Spott 03-12-2017 04:15 PM
We will sign someone else's castoff to be our backup QB.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-12-2017 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 12780025)
The Chiefs will never ever draft a first round QB. The earth will fall into the sun before that happens.
Dumbass, simpleton, ChiefPlanet train of thought. The Cubs will never win a World Series either, right?

SAUTO 03-12-2017 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12780322)
Don't forget dark horse elements involved like trading Kelce to move up
What?:shake: did you just make that up?

Mr. Laz 03-12-2017 04:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanky 52 (Post 12780323)
I fully expect the Chiefs to try and trade down again. When they do pick first it will be defense. Just a thought.
Most likely

Although when a draft is strong is one area, Dorsey seems to like to poach another area to get a guy that would normally get picked higher.

I would guess tightend but Reid seems to have a hardon for Harris.


Wide Receiver?

Mr. Laz 03-12-2017 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12780322)
Don't forget dark horse elements involved like trading Kelce to move up
Why in the **** would we trade arguably our best player?

Hill and Kelce are the guys that make our offense go, little that it does.


Adding an explosive RB would give us a triple threat which would be more helpful that trading one of our key guys away.

Tribal Warfare 03-12-2017 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12780398)
Why in the **** would we trade arguably our best player?

Hill and Kelce are the guys that make our offense go, little that it does.


Adding an explosive RB would give us a triple threat which would be more helpful that trading one of our key guys away.
I was expecting this repose if the Chiefs want a player they believe can play at a high level at the most important position in all of sports ithen it's logical to do whatever it takes. Added to that the derth of talent at the TE position is pretty deep

Chief Roundup 03-12-2017 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12780457)
I was expecting this repose if the Chiefs want a player they believe can play at a high level at the most important position in all of sports ithen it's logical to do whatever it takes. Added to that the derth of talent at the TE position is pretty deep
You don't seem to understand a couple of things. We would have to give up all of our top picks that would put us in a position to be able to HOPEFULLY replace Kelce. Since this draft is deep at the position it diminishes the value that Kelce possesses.
Dumb idea is dumb.

Coogs 03-12-2017 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12780308)
I'm still shocked that Carson Palmer is still in the league.
Me too! Kinda why I think Cards would grab one of the top 3 at #13. See the Saints, and possibly Pats after they hose the Browns, doing the same.

Chief Roundup 03-12-2017 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12780515)
Me too! Kinda why I think Cards would grab one of the top 3 at #13. See the Saints, and possibly Pats after they hose the Browns, doing the same.
I think the Saints are trying to make another run for the SB before Brees is gone. So I don't think that a QB makes sense.

Coogs 03-12-2017 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12780523)
I think the Saints are trying to make another run for the SB before Brees is gone. So I don't think that a QB makes sense.
That's fine. You could be right. I just think if we want one of the top QB's we are going to have to go in front of those 3 teams to guarantee getting one. Yes it will be expensive, but if we hit it will be worth it IMO.

Now if we are not interested in a QB, stay put. Trade down. Whatever.

Chief Roundup 03-12-2017 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12780535)
That's fine. You could be right. I just think if we want one of the top QB's we are going to have to go in front of those 3 teams to guarantee getting one. Yes it will be expensive, but if we hit it will be worth it IMO.

Now if we are not interested in a QB, stay put. Trade down. Whatever.
Exactly. :thumb:

Mother****erJones 03-12-2017 07:38 PM
So glad I have that clown Tiger on ignore. What an assclown


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.
Page 4 of 6 123 4 56
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.