To get maximum value if this is the idea, I think you have to get him healed up....you get him on the field and prove that he still has the juice and then move him to a team in need for a rapey price.


I don't know that I want to see it happen, but it does seem to be the kind of move winning teams make...to maximize value and know when is the right time to move on.

Exactly my point. Bill Bellichek.

It'll never happen.

No one will trade for a 30 year old RB.

Forte has better numbers than Charles and the Bears couldn't get anything for him.

You guys are being extremely unrealistic.

No team is a running back "away" from the playoffs or Super Bowl.

....also......you said log jam.

LMAO. indeed good sir, indeed.

Idk. When I think Jaamal Charles the second name to pop in my head isn't Matt Forte.

Yes, this team needs a draft pick more than Charles.

/no one. ever

That's because you don't follow the entire NFL.

Forte has 1,000 more rushing yards in his career than Charles.

And it only took him 700 more attempts.

:shrug: if you could swing DAT and JC to the niners for a 3rd (#68) and a 5th (#130) you wouldn't swing that?

Maybe one way we get that 3rd rd pick back. Nobody will part with a 1st maybe a 2nd and more likely a 3rd for someone long in the tooth with previous ACL issues in both knees that can take it to the house. I think it's doable and we would be letting him go at the right time. IMO he will not be the JC of old that we are used to seeing.

LMAO

Yes I do follow the entire NFL Dane.

While never tearing an ACL, let alone, both.

The bottom line is that no team is giving up a draft pick for Charles, let alone, a 1st or 2nd.

Then why would you expect a high draft pick for a 29 year old back coming off a torn ACL?

That doesn't make any sense.

Didn't they try to move him last offseason? Or maybe 2 years ago at the deadline? Anyway, I seem to remember someone offering a 6th.

Nopbody is getting stupid for Charles.