Saul Good |
04-30-2010 09:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
(Post 6728683)
I agree. To be clear, I don't begrudge MU or NU for the decision at all; seriously. I just think it could be pretty short-sighted, but Lord knows I've been wrong before. If the money is better at the moment....cool. I just wonder down the road though, if whatever remains of the Big 12 will actually do better. I wouldn't bet against it. Guess we'll see.
|
There will be no Big XII left once Missouri leaves. There are 3 major markets in the Big XII outside of Texas (Kansas City, St. Louis, and Denver). If Missouri leaves, especially if Nebraska leaves, Colorado is long gone to the Pac 10. There is no way in hell that the Longhorns are going to want to subsidize a bunch of other schools without major markets.
Texas will go independent and sign a larger TV contract than Notre Dame.
Oklahoma and possibly Oklahoma State might be forced to join the Pac 10 or possibly form a new conference with schools like BYU, Utah, TCU, A&M, Texas Tech, Nevada, Baylor, and UNLV.
I just don't think that the Big XII would be viable by trying to replace Mizzou, Nebraska, and Colorado with schools like BYU, Memphis, TCU, etc. Texas just needs any excuse to leave. This would be more than enough for them to bolt.
|