I can ****ing say **** all I ****ing want because I ****ing don't have a ****ing word filter ****ing on. **** YEAH!

I'm ****ing sorry about this ****ing post... just ****ing ignore it.

An hour and a half and 45 replies later and no discussion in the thread that you started. You may not mean to come off as a troll, but you are one.

My thoughts of Herm hire was best case senario, he builds a team gets fired and the next year we win a Super Bowl! Just like the Tampa Bay Bucaneers fired Tony Dungy and hired Jon Grueden. That was just wishfull thinking though.

It's not just wins and loses. It's the way the team plays and how prepared they are week in and week out. It's coaching decisions too. For instance bringing in a player from the practice squad to under center so we can run the option. Playing Thigpen over Huard because we want to "see what he can do". It's starting all these young guys except at two positions that everyone can identify as a huge weekness. We continue to start the vets even though we have some young guys who could step in and get the reps and improve. The vets aren't going to improve. As much as Herm talks about sticking to the plan he's not sticking to it across the board. If Herm had his team better prepared and the team was remotely competetive I think alot of fans would be more patient. But we don't seem prepared and we have not been competetive in half of the games we've played in. With things the way they are I don't see the fans calling for Herms head as hypocrites.

PhilFree:arrow:

Brodie Croyle to Mark Bradley! Get used to hearing it :p

He spent the night at Holiday Inn Express?

Herm defenders?

Where?

I haven't read this whole thread, but Herm could indirectly bring one to KC. He won the fight with the front office to build a team correctly, and if we win one it'll be because he gave King Carl a f8tality.

Carl only hires people he knows and whom he knows will not give him any trouble.

Best post EVAR!!!

It's not about winning, it's about improving. People were all for rebuilding because it needed to be done. It was the only thing we could do. We needed to get younger, and since the goal was to go from a completely one-sided team to at least a balanced team and at most a conservative offense with a good defense, the best thing for the Chiefs was to get young asap. The Chiefs couldn't just hang onto what was there, because what was there wasn't all that great anyway.

The problem is that we have the most inf***ingcompetent coach in the history of the NFL, AFL, NFLE, CFL, USFL, XFL, NCAA CFB, and high school powder-puff. Part of the optimism of rebuilding was Chan Gailey... but how stupid were we to think Herm would leave him alone so he could run his own offense? As long as Herm has his hands all over the offense, the rebuild on that side of the ball is at a standstill. What about the defense? I thought Herm was good at that part of his job?

Yeah, I guess we're all hypocrites for wanting the rebuild done well. We're all hypocrites for having an ounce of faith that, with a new coordinator, something would change. It never changes with Herm. That's kind of a bad thing when you're trying to rebuild... ahem, you know, CHANGE and get better.

Might as well complete the rebuild. We should fire Herm today so Gailey can get control of the offense and Croyle and company can spend the rest of the year in his offense instead of Herm's. The players will get better, but Herm never will. He got left behind years ago.

The case is not that difficult to make. His resume is similar to Belichick's before he got Brady, and to Tony Dungy's before he got Peyton Manning. Look it up. Both of those coaches showed they were very good in Tampa and Cleveland (considering the talent they had), but people were too stupid to notice it.

And no one was making the case for either of those 2 to make a Super Bowl either. In fact, many many many people said that they could not win a Super Bowl because of their approach on offense (Dungy) or their lack of ability to motivate players (Belichick).

ROFL

I'm not even going to address the Belichick comparison, because it's quite obviously ludicrous. Not that any of Belichick's teams were this god awful, anyway.

But Tony Dungy has never had two losing seasons in a row. Unless there's a miraculous turnaround, Herm is about to be a losing head coach three out of the last four years.

The Herm Edwards era in Kansas City is an utter failure. I'm looking forward to see your reaction when he's fired.

Heck, Marty knows all about that crap.

Herm is qualified to be President.