ChiefsPlanet
Page 39 of 114 « First 2935363738 39 404142434989 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Is it time to start Foles over Smith? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302115)

stevieray 10-30-2016 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12517475)
Herm Edwards is respected around the league. Just saying.
He's also unemployed.

Reerun_KC 10-30-2016 06:11 PM
Gammons said on the radio that Indy had no answer for Foles. Foles puts pressure on secondaries where Alex can't.

Reerun_KC 10-30-2016 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 12517484)
He's also unemployed.
Touché

Reerun_KC 10-30-2016 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12517482)
ROFL


I was thinking 'Nick-Folean Dynamite' after all the imbeciles proclaiming him as as the second coming of Joe Montana.
https://media3.giphy.com/media/NYffb...8o/200.gif#106
He better suit up and play next week.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 10-30-2016 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12517473)
Alex Smith is the clear starter barring some monster performance from foles. Foles was effective but he still showed some warts.

But anyone who is OK with Alexs performance this season because of his stat line after watching today's game needs to get their head examined. What we saw today is we have exceptionally talented receivers who will get the ball if you give them opportunities to make plays. It's literally the one small element of Alexs game that would elevate him immediately. Hopefully Alex sits out one game as a precaution and Alex can see foles successfully take shots downfield.
Yes but the O-line is finally coming together for the first time in 3 years. Last 3 games we actually have O-line stability. we aired out the ball more today because the running game got shut down. Both quarterbacks got adequate time in the pocket which is a foreign concept for us. Smith is slowly returning to 2012 form where he was 70%, QB rating 106 with the Niners and didn't have to run the ball to get first downs.

eDave 10-30-2016 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12517485)
Gammons said on the radio that Indy had no answer for Foles. Foles puts pressure on secondaries where Alex can't.
Like I said, Foles did well because Indy planned for Smith.

New World Order 10-30-2016 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12517495)
Yes but the O-line is finally coming together for the first time in 3 years. Last 3 games we actually have O-line stability. we aired out the ball more today because the running game got shut down. Both quarterbacks got adequate time in the pocket which is a foreign concept for us. It really looked like Smith was returning to 2012 form where he was 70%, QB rating 106 with the Niners

And Foles looked much better.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 10-30-2016 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12517485)
Gammons said on the radio that Indy had no answer for Foles. Foles puts pressure on secondaries where Alex can't.
I don't care what Gammons thought. I just re-watched the game without commercials and Foles simply hit guys who were wide open because Indy is pitiful. Only one throw that really impressed me but Kelce didn't complete the catch .

His biggest completion of the day was actually an underthrown ball caught by a smart receiver who tracked the ball.

Move along..

jspchief 10-30-2016 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12517485)
Gammons said on the radio that Indy had no answer for Foles. Foles puts pressure on secondaries where Alex can't.
No question that a team that prepared for Smith wouldn't be ready for Foles. Completely different qbs.

Mr. Flopnuts 10-30-2016 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12517411)
Got ya. I'm actually quite happy that I don't have a facebook, despite being of the age that I should.
You should be. It's a waste of time that I divulge in less and less.

BigCatDaddy 10-30-2016 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12517458)
How do figure that? He's never even ranked the top half.
Most QB rankings usually have him bottom half to bottom third as well.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-30-2016 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12517466)
But should we get excited even if it were....against the Jags?
Any time that a fan of the Chiefs is no longer subjected to the pedestrian ways of Alex Smith, it is very much a time to get excited.

If they start Foles next week, I may actually watch a Chiefs football game this year.

chiefzilla1501 10-30-2016 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12517495)
Yes but the O-line is finally coming together for the first time in 3 years. Last 3 games we actually have O-line stability. we aired out the ball more today because the running game got shut down. Both quarterbacks got adequate time in the pocket which is a foreign concept for us. Smith is slowly returning to 2012 form where he was 70%, QB rating 106 with the Niners and didn't have to run the ball to get first downs.
You've got to be kidding me. This isn't a protection issue. Its a mental issue and always has. The ol has been fine for 2 years. Much better than what most qbs deal with. In fact, if Alex Smith took actual chances, he could get rid of the ball faster.

Mr. Laz 10-30-2016 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12517498)
And Foles looked much better.
shut the **** up


all this post is was "bait"

people complain about blackbob etc all the time

guess what ... all the stupid ass "bait" posts by other people are just as annoying.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 10-30-2016 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12517422)
3rd place at present is fair because the Raiders and Donkeys actually have one more win with the same amount of losses. More wins, same losses, higher win percentage overall.

An extra game would decide things more definitively, but as it stands they've done more positive than us [more opportunity, for better or worse].
Yes and no.
Raiders have a loss to us and their difficult games are back loaded this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 AM.
Page 39 of 114 « First 2935363738 39 404142434989 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.