ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

eazyb81 10-19-2011 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 8007262)
Is this something one of the DeArmonds claimed? Didn't someone let it slip out that MU really wanted B1G but would have to settle for the SEC?

Could be. We all know how wrong the Dearmonds have been about Mizzou to the SEC. Maybe KK could fill us in on the details.

Mr. Plow 10-19-2011 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8007254)
So we want to use 80's and 90's results to interpret how relevant or competitive a team is in the present? No one on the current staff was even with the program then. How exactly would that be a reliable indicator instead of just using our current staff's results?

You are trying way too hard.

We can use Pinkel's tenure at MU if you want. Minus the first 5 years and this year depending on how it ends up of course.

|Zach| 10-19-2011 04:06 PM

BEHOLD THE FUTURE OF COLLEGE ATHLETICS: THE SUNBEAST

http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday....s-the-sunbeast

http://cdn2.sbnation.com/imported_as...onf_medium.jpg

eazyb81 10-19-2011 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8007273)
We can use Pinkel's tenure at MU if you want. Minus the first 5 years and this year depending on how it ends up of course.

By all means, keep the tough early years. Just goes to show how impressive the build was. Very comparable to what Radio is doing at ku, minus the numerous 40+ blowouts and starting out 1-10 in conference.

Pants 10-19-2011 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8007273)
We can use Pinkel's tenure at MU if you want. Minus the first 5 years and this year depending on how it ends up of course.

LMAO LMAO LMAO

eazyb81 10-19-2011 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 8007276)

ROFLROFLROFL

eazyb81 10-19-2011 04:10 PM

Even ESPN acknowledges how well Radio is doing at ku.

Quote:

No. 11 Kansas State at Kansas (Noon, Fox Sports Net): Last year's Sunflower Showdown was a 59-7 laugher, but the Jayhawks could build on last week's strong performance against Oklahoma with a win that would put a lot of faith from fans into coach Turner Gill. K-State, though, looks like a team of destiny through six games.
You guys only lost by 30 points at home! That's one the players will tell their grandkids about some day. LMAO

Saul Good 10-19-2011 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8007269)
Since 1991, Alabama has a record of 173-77....of those wins, 30 were vacated. MU in all their dominance is 2 games above .500 at 119-117.

I can see what you're saying.

2011-15=1996

I can see that you're not good at math.

Pants 10-19-2011 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8007267)
Link?

You don't need links for stuff like that.

KU snubbed the SEC when they came calling.

Frazod 10-19-2011 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8007288)
Even ESPN acknowledges how well Radio is doing at ku.



You guys only lost by 30 points at home! That's one the players will tell their grandkids about some day. LMAO

Baby steps.... baby steps.

Someday, God willing, they'll only lose by 29. LMAO

Pants 10-19-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8007288)

You guys only lost by 30 points at home! That's one the players will tell their grandkids about some day. LMAO

I was surprised the score was 27-17 in the 3rd. Oklahoma has a beastly defense, there's no denying that. Our boys who have been letting everyone march down the field the whole season did step up. You can only hold for so long when your offense is constantly going 3 and out though.

Saul Good 10-19-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8007288)
Even ESPN acknowledges how well Radio is doing at ku.



You guys only lost by 30 points at home! That's one the players will tell their grandkids about some day. LMAO

They should really use that momentum to show up strong against K-State. Oklahoma only outgained KU 317-216 in the second half. Of course, Oklahoma's 317 were yards, and KU's 216 were inches.

eazyb81 10-19-2011 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8007306)
They should really use that momentum to show up strong against K-State. Oklahoma only outgained KU 317-216 in the second half. Of course, Oklahoma's 317 were yards, and KU's 216 were inches.

:LOL: Oh wow.

Reaper16 10-19-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid (Post 8007130)
'Bama was one of the holdouts, but are "all-in" as long as Missouri is in the East (which I think will happen).

Never associate an Auburn catchphrase with the University of Alabama again. That's the kind of rookie mistake that will get you laughed off of SEC boards.

Sannyasi 10-19-2011 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8007212)
Minus this year.

Yeah, its a shame that we had to have a down year after losing 2 NFL top 10 picks, but that kind of stuff happens. Well, I guess not if you are Kansas.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.