so you're saying the SEC doesn't date her because she's pretty, but because she does anal?

Wait, so the fans want to keep it at the Sprint Center? Is that what you are saying?

If you don't think that's a product of playing in the Big XII North for many years, then you keep sucking that pacifier. Anyone knows a dynamic playmaker at QB can lift any team, and you had a good run of them. Its fool's gold to believe that type of player will always be there for you.

'Bama was one of the holdouts, but are "all-in" as long as Missouri is in the East (which I think will happen).

Last I had heard, we had at least 9 votes - but maybe you have better inside sources than I do. I suppose one of us will "right" in the next couple of weeks.

for my own selfish reasons I like the Sprint Center, it's close, and all.

But I'd be totally fine with it in OKC as well. But I don't expect it will stay there, no.

3 games seems like a large enough sample size. You got us! :thumb:

Pure domination.

You're losing me - so now we're competing, but only because we were in the North?

I thought we didn't "compete" at all?

Oh hey! Welcome back.

I'm saying the SEC's is making them marry her because she has "huge tracts of 'TV Markets'". :evil:

Get used to this moving of the goal posts. It is a long and winding road of rationalizations.

MU in the east is a joke, but when you're the cowering puppy I guess it's as good as anything.

It's a money deal from both sides. Mizzou brings two major television markets, solid athletic programs, with exceptional facilities, and a strong academic reputation.

In many ways, A&M and Mizzou are comparable entities.

Hey, I can only go with the #'s I see in front of me. I'm sure things will turn around though and you'll dominate your way to middle of the pack by end of year.

How did you do against the South those years? The Big XII South that is, you know, OU and Texas?