ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs SCHEFTER- Crennel to Chiefs Imminent (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221244)

Mr_Tomahawk 01-12-2010 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437454)
#3) Yet another guy from the Pats.

So....what's the problem here?

He is also from the Giants, Jets, and Browns....

Micjones 01-12-2010 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437454)
I have no problem with the Weis hire. Never claimed that I did. I don't think he's the perfect hire, but he's not the best, IMO. But the Crennel hire is troubling on three fronts.

#1) Belichick had his hand in really deep on those defense, planning and scheming
#2) Crennel's Ds in Cleveland were miserable
#3) Yet another guy from the Pats.

Which apparently means that Crennel cannot coach the 3-4 without Belichick's assistance.

The 2005 Browns were the 11th best Scoring Defense in the league. Does Crennel get no credit for that?
They were a middle of the pack defense (in terms of scoring) his last season in Cleveland.

And, the fact that he previously coached in New England should be the dealbreaker and the reason why we DON'T hire one of the best available candidates for coaching the 3-4 scheme here in Kansas City?

Okay.

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6437486)
If you think it matters that you really haven't been in this thread, you're wrong.

That's why he's avoiding the question.

He realized something was up, did a quick search and found that I've said next to nothing about Crennell, (nothing more than that I'm not as excited as I am about Weis) and am actually pretty pleased about the Weis hire.

Another classic case of lumping people together instead of actually reading and comprehending what people have to say.

BigChiefFan 01-12-2010 12:05 PM

Why get experienced coordinators, when you can wallow in mediocrity?

It's a good move, especially considering the 2009 coaching staff. The idea is to IMPROVE, these coordinators, should help us in that area.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-12-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6437501)
Why get experienced coordinators, when you can wallow in mediocrity?

It's a good move, especially considering the 2009 coaching staff. The idea is to IMPROVE, these coordinators, should help us in that area.

Spot on.

ForeverChiefs58 01-12-2010 12:06 PM

Seymour may just walk through that door:


Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on January 12, 2010 11:26 AM ET
After a year spent in Oakland, Richard Seymour is headed for unrestricted free agency.

He's open to playing for just about any team. Except the one that drafted him.

"There's probably about 31 teams I'd consider going to," Seymour said in a conversation with Tom Curran of Comcast Sports New England. TC asked him if he'd take a call from the Patriots if they approached him.

"That isn't something I'm looking to do at all," Seymour said. "But there's no ill will. I wish them the best. I really mean that. . . . I think it could have ended in a more respectful way, but that's just my personal opinion."

Seymour certainly isn't at his career peak, but he'll be an attractive, experienced starting option for the many 3-4 teams in the league. (The Chiefs and Broncos come to mind.)

Hammock Parties 01-12-2010 12:07 PM

Signing Seymour and trading Dorsey seems like something the current regime would do.

Marco Polo 01-12-2010 12:09 PM

According to NFL.com's Jason LaCanfora, ex-Browns head coach Romeo Crennel is talking with the Chiefs about the defensive coordinator position, but no deal has been worked out yet.

There had been reports that Crennel would be joining the Chiefs' coaching staff, but it wasn't certain that he'd be taking over as defensive boss. Expect him to be signed shortly while Clancy Pendergast remains in limbo.

http://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/7675155481

Micjones 01-12-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6437499)
That's why he's avoiding the question.

He realized something was up, did a quick search and found that I've said next to nothing about Crennell, (nothing more than that I'm not as excited as I am about Weis) and am actually pretty pleased about the Weis hire.

Another classic case of lumping people together instead of actually reading and comprehending what people have to say.

I'm not at all avoiding the question. Nor have I done any searches (I don't care enough to).
It's an obvious answer.

I was referring to the Four Horsemen (you, Hamas, Mecca and Dane).
The not-so-merry bunch of bitchfesters who despise just about everything this organization does.

I'm not alone. There are dozens of posters who smell it on you.

But point taken. You're happy with the hires.

Mr. Laz 01-12-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6437506)
Signing Seymour and trading Dorsey seems like something the current regime would do.

they better get something really good for Dorsey

The Franchise 01-12-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6437521)
I'm not at all avoiding the question.
It's an obvious answer.

I was referring to the Four Horsemen (you, Hamas, Mecca and Dane).
The not-so-merry bunch of bitchfesters who despise just about everything this organization does.

I'm not alone. There are dozens of posters who smell it on you.

But point taken. You're happy with the hires.

Dane McCloud actually rejoiced at the news of Weis being hired.

Micjones 01-12-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6437527)
Dane McCloud actually rejoiced at the news of Weis being hired.

Well slap me and call me Susan.

Bill Lundberg 01-12-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6437505)
Seymour may just walk through that door:


Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on January 12, 2010 11:26 AM ET
After a year spent in Oakland, Richard Seymour is headed for unrestricted free agency.

He's open to playing for just about any team. Except the one that drafted him.

"There's probably about 31 teams I'd consider going to," Seymour said in a conversation with Tom Curran of Comcast Sports New England. TC asked him if he'd take a call from the Patriots if they approached him.

"That isn't something I'm looking to do at all," Seymour said. "But there's no ill will. I wish them the best. I really mean that. . . . I think it could have ended in a more respectful way, but that's just my personal opinion."

Seymour certainly isn't at his career peak, but he'll be an attractive, experienced starting option for the many 3-4 teams in the league. (The Chiefs and Broncos come to mind.)

He won't leave Oakland - They will use a franchise tag on him

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6437527)
Dane McCloud actually rejoiced at the news of Weis being hired.

Pest, it's easier to just assume, than to actually get the facts.

Notice how even when mic was proven wrong, he still had to cling to his schtick?

DeezNutz 01-12-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6437527)
Dane McCloud actually rejoiced at the news of Weis being hired.

Quiet.

Stereotypes are more comforting.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.