ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2018 Free Agents (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=313128)

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:28 AM

Nick Jacobs says we have $7.3 million in cap space after Damien Williams.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jacobs71/...46811790446593

O.city 03-27-2018 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491683)
Yea, but it’s a different story if we’re using them to trade up for a defensive player.

But with all the holes, wouldn't you say we need more picks not less?

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491676)
Your reading comprehension ****ing sucks.

Yeah I definitely missed that...

O.city 03-27-2018 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491675)
Was this supposed to be English?

Yeah, sorry.

Just saying everyone now is against trading picks. But when they trade picks in the draft, it'll be ok.

Seems off to me.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:35 AM

I do agree wit RunKC in that the Bears could have the best weapons if all works out well.

Theres a few teams I'd take over them right now, but in the future maybe no.

I'd say the top line the CHiefs can put up there is right there with anyone right now.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491688)
But with all the holes, wouldn't you say we need more picks not less?

Yea, but we’d be trading up to plug one of those holes, presumably with a 1st round talent, as opposed to trading a draft pick for a WR, so I’d be fine with that.

If we traded up for a LG, I’d be pissed.

Mother****erJones 03-27-2018 10:36 AM

Keep that cap room for draft and rollover next year

O.city 03-27-2018 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491700)
Yea, but we’d be trading up to plug one of those holes, presumably with a 1st round talent, as opposed to trading a draft pick for a WR, so I’d be fine with that.

If we traded up for a LG, I’d be pissed.

I'm just not sure about trading up due to the cost or likely cost.

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491661)
We just gave a brand new contract to a dude that can't stay on the field and produce.

Watkins has missed 12 games to injury. OBJ has missed 16.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

If I were the Browns, I'd offer 4 and 33 to the Giants for Odell.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13491707)
Watkins has missed 12 games to injury. OBJ has missed 16.

Now lets look at their production.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491703)
I'm just not sure about trading up due to the cost or likely cost.

Same here, but if we do, I get it.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491713)
Same here, but if we do, I get it.

Depends on the cost.

If it's not terrible, do it.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491699)
I do agree wit RunKC in that the Bears could have the best weapons if all works out well.

Theres a few teams I'd take over them right now, but in the future maybe no.

I'd say the top line the CHiefs can put up there is right there with anyone right now.

My thing is, let’s learn from the past. We get a brash of injuries every year. Look at who we have put out there as depth to cover for those injuries.

Frank Zombo, Kenneth Acker, Philip Gaines, Justin Hamilton, Incompletrious Harris, Orson Charles.

Really want Veach to work on that. It’s been a big problem IMO

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491709)
If I were the Browns, I'd offer 4 and 33 to the Giants for Odell.

Wut? Dudes super talented but there's way too many ?s about him to invest that much draft capital into him.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.