ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs on verge of a deal with Andy Reid (merged) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268357)

Titty Meat 01-03-2013 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9272279)
Andy Reid chatted today for nine hours with a contingent from the Chiefs that included Clark Hunt, Mark Donovan and reportedly, Scott Pioli.

They enjoyed each other's company so much that lunch out was cancelled and food catered in. Reid postponed his scheduled meeting with the Arizona Cardinals until and will reportedly chat with the Chiefs again tomorrow.

Do you think we get him Dane?

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2013 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272276)
Who gives a **** who was taken before him?

Before him? You're a ****ing reerun.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272276)
We took him, get over it.

"We" didn't take him. Oh, and go **** yourself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272276)
I don't care if he never lives up to his draft status, he's a playmaker and he's pretty ****ing effective from any position on the field, and you'd have to be a complete idiot to deny that.

He'll have a place in whatever offense we run next season, no doubt about that.

I hope you've been neutered.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272272)
That was 2010.

In 2012, McCluster doesn't come out of the backfield.

Poopdick.

You didn't say in 2012 jerkoff.

And he did come out of the backfield this year, you need to go watch a few Chiefs games again :P

Then again, with half the receivers not suiting up, injured, MIA, or presumed dead (Breaston), are you really surprised that he wasn't utilized out of the backfield as much in 2012 as 2010/2011? I'm not.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272276)
Who gives a **** who was taken before him?

We took him, get over it.

I don't care if he never lives up to his draft status, he's a playmaker and he's pretty ****ing effective from any position on the field, and you'd have to be a complete idiot to deny that.

He'll have a place in whatever offense we run next season, no doubt about that.

What has McCluster done that has been "effective" during his career in KC thus far?

The only thing "effective" about McCluster's career is that it has effectively sucked.

BossChief 01-03-2013 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272273)
Don't ruin this thread by talking about ****ing McCluster.

this

We are about to have the first coach/1st overall pick quarterback combo in Chiefs history. The most exciting offseason in team history. Something we have all dreamed about and talked about for years on here...its about to happen and we can wait till its absolutely necessary to talk about guys like dexter.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272284)
You didn't say in 2012 jerkoff.

And he did come out of the backfield this year, you need to go watch a few Chiefs games again :P

Then again, with half the receivers not suiting up, injured, MIA, or presumed dead (Breaston), are you really surprised that he wasn't utilized out of the backfield as much in 2012 as 2010/2011? I'm not.

HE'S A WIDE RECEIVER, NOT A RUNNING BACK.

HE CAUGHT 99 PERCENT OF HIS PASSES AS A WR THIS YEAR.

STOP DEFENDING SHIT TALENT

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272281)
LMAO ***ing dumbass.

He is, and you are a reerun. Congrats!

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9272283)
Before him? You're a ****ing reerun.



"We" didn't take him. Oh, and go **** yourself.



I hope you've been neutered.

After him, before him, it doesn't matter, we took him. You can't sit back and play Armchair gm with "Would haves". Bottom line is we got him. And if you are a Chiefs fan "we" definitely took him. So lick my non-neutered balls and cry in some cocoa puffs.

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2013 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9272282)
Do you think we get him Dane?

I have absolutely no idea. I sent out a few emails to some agents I know just a few minutes ago but it's late and I've heard nothing yet.

I think he'd be a great hire and would immediately re-energize the fan base. If the front office "Does the right thing" and immediately re-signs Bowe and Albert, then kills it in the draft, Arrowhead will be rocking, regardless of whether Pioli's along for the ride.

That's his deal anyway. Coattails.

Jerm 01-03-2013 12:35 AM

None of it matters, Reid is just gonna eat McCluster at the intro PC anyways...

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2013 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272290)
He is, and you are a reerun. Congrats!

After him, before him, it doesn't matter, we took him. You can't sit back and play Armchair gm with "Would haves". Bottom line is we got him. And if you are a Chiefs fan "we" definitely took him. So lick my non-neutered balls and cry in some cocoa puffs.

You're ****ing stupid.

Do us all all a favor and go away.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9272285)
What has McCluster done that has been "effective" during his career in KC thus far?

The only thing "effective" about McCluster's career is that it has effectively sucked.

Don't quote me on this, but he might be the only player not named Charles, Bowe, or Moeaki to convert a first down this season. TO THE TAPE!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272289)
HE'S A WIDE RECEIVER, NOT A RUNNING BACK.

HE CAUGHT 99 PERCENT OF HIS PASSES AS A WR THIS YEAR.

STOP DEFENDING SHIT TALENT

He runs the ball, and he catches the ball. Dexter is both, and he's been listed as a Running Back and as a Receiver, I'm not sure what the point you are trying to make is.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272294)
He runs the ball, and he catches the ball. Dexter is both, and he's been listed as a Running Back and as a Receiver, I'm not sure what the point you are trying to make is.

The point is, he caught less than 10 passes out of the backfield this year.

That's not his role anymore.

His role is sucking shit as a WR. He catches lots of passes that turn into NOTHING.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9272293)
You're ****ing stupid.

Do us all all a favor and go away.

Not going away, ever. Live with it.


Let me ask you a question, are we capable of trading in our Dexter Pick for Gronkowski right now?

Because if we aren't, I'm pretty sure that means we are stuck with the Dexter selection and can no longer change it. Which means we chose him, and we get to stick with him. If he doesn't have a role in this offense, he won't be on the roster. IF he isn't a playmaker, he doesn't stay on the roster.

My god people, are you so pissed off still about where he was drafted that you deny his ability to play this game?

Really? You're just being argumentative and petty now.

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272290)
He is, and you are a reerun. Congrats!



After him, before him, it doesn't matter, we took him. You can't sit back and play Armchair gm with "Would haves". Bottom line is we got him. And if you are a Chiefs fan "we" definitely took him. So lick my non-neutered balls and cry in some cocoa puffs.

Name me a single play he's made since he's been here, besides the punt return against San Diego two years ago (which was more about the Chargers shitty punt coverage than McCluster's playmaking ability).

Anyway, back to Reid; it'll be interesting to see who he would hire as DC, and if he'd stick to the 3-4.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272295)
The point is, he caught less than 10 passes out of the backfield this year.

That's not his role anymore.

His role is sucking shit as a WR. He catches lots of passes that turn into NOTHING.

So you're saying HE DID catch passes out of the backfield, and that you are wrong?

Thought so.

My point is, I believe thanks to some injuries and questionable roster choices this year, Dexter's role in the backfield became limited because he was having to lineup in the slot, which actually turned out to work somewhat for us, as just about every time he touched the ball it ended up as a first down, or him getting nothing because Cassel cannot place a ball properly.

We can't seriously sit here and say Dexter is unproductive when Matt Cassel and Brady 48 yards a game Quinn are your starting QB's.

Do you realize how dumb you sound?

Titty Meat 01-03-2013 12:43 AM

I figured the Chiefs would go for Reid when Clark spoke the other day. It makes sense you get to keep Donovan around who's the best businessman in the league.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272300)
Name me a single play he's made since he's been here, besides the punt return against San Diego two years ago (which was more about the Charger's shitty punt coverage than McCluster's playmaking ability).

Anyway, back to Reid; it'll be interesting to see who he would hire as DC, and if he'd stick to the 3-4.

49ers in 2010, right after the san diego game if I"m not mistaken.

Sorter 01-03-2013 12:44 AM

Why the **** are we talking about mcbuster? Jesus, I leave for a couple hours and this thread goes to shit. ROFL

hawkchief 01-03-2013 12:44 AM

Dexter needs to be playing Pop Warner. He's simply not an NFL player - that's pretty obvious at this point.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272295)
His role is sucking shit as a WR. He catches lots of passes that turn into NOTHING.

Out of the 139 players who met the minimum # of catches to be counted in the average yards per receptions stat category (complied by Elias Sports Bureau), McCluster had the lowest yards per reception average (8.7 yards per reception) of any WR on the list.

McCluster was 119th out of the 139 players who had the minimum # of receptions to qualify. The 20 players below him on the list were TE's and RB's.

DaneMcCloud 01-03-2013 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272298)
Not going away, ever. Live with it.


Let me ask you a question, are we capable of trading in our Dexter Pick for Gronkowski right now?

Because if we aren't, I'm pretty sure that means we are stuck with the Dexter selection and can no longer change it. Which means we chose him, and we get to stick with him. If he doesn't have a role in this offense, he won't be on the roster. IF he isn't a playmaker, he doesn't stay on the roster.

My god people, are you so pissed off still about where he was drafted that you deny his ability to play this game?

Really? You're just being argumentative and petty now.

****ing stupid

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 9272308)
Dexter needs to be playing Pop Warner. He's simply not an NFL player - that's pretty obvious at this point.

His yards per touch disagree with you, or are we seriously calling one of our only productive offensive players a guy who can't play in the NFL? Because there are 31 teams out there that would probably sign him in a heartbeat and use him just the same as we have.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9272310)
****ing stupid

You're just pissed I keep proving you wrong over and over ROFL

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272302)
Dexter's role in the backfield became limited because he was having to lineup in the slot?

No, that's because he was a WR from DAY ONE IN TRAINING CAMP.

He was moved because HE SUCKS as a RB.

Jesus.

Quote:

just about every time he touched the ball it ended up as a first down,
LMAO

The guy had 64 touches this year. Guess how many went for first downs?

24.

PATHETIC.

HE SUCKS. HE DOES SHIT WITH THE BALL IN HIS TINY HANDS.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272311)
His yards per touch disagree with you, or are we seriously calling one of our only productive offensive players a guy who can't play in the NFL? Because there are 31 teams out there that would probably sign him in a heartbeat and use him just the same as we have.

Wrong dumbshit.

McCluster has the lowest yards per catch average of any WR who had the minimum # of catches to qualify for the average yards per catch stat category (compiled by Elias Sports).

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272311)
His yards per touch disagree with you

He was among the lowest rated players in yards per route run.

His yards per catch was a pathetic 8.7.

At the BOTTOM of the WR rankings.

You think this is a sign of a good player...

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 12:51 AM

No point even talking to this ****ing dumbass. The only playmaking ability McCluster has is for the other team with his fumbling.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:52 AM

McCluster had 8 turnovers this year and also made 5 guys miss tackles.

Great player.

RunKC 01-03-2013 12:53 AM

I'm sure Dexter didn't suffer from a slapdick QB who can't throw and a dumbass OC or anything.

Sheesh. Give the guy a chance with Reid. The Walrus wanted to trade up for him for a reason.

He looks bad? We cut him. Win/Win for us.

themanwithnoname 01-03-2013 12:54 AM

So if they get Reid, any clues on who might be potential DC? I think Rivera would be nice, but obviously he's not available yet.

Dylan 01-03-2013 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272313)
You're just pissed I keep proving you wrong over and over ROFL

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5hfYJsQAhl0?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

^ My thoughts after reading a couple of your posts on NFL quarterbacks ...

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272315)
No, that's because he was a WR from DAY ONE IN TRAINING CAMP.

He was moved because HE SUCKS as a RB.

Jesus.



LMAO

The guy had 64 touches this year. Guess how many went for first downs?

24.

PATHETIC.

HE SUCKS. HE DOES SHIT WITH THE BALL IN HIS TINY HANDS.

From day one every single year, he's bounced around from WR to RB and back, he's used anywhere on the field, quit arguing against that, or you'll uncover the fact that you've never actually watched a Chiefs game since he was drafted.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9272316)
Wrong dumbshit.

McCluster has the lowest yards per catch average of any WR who had the minimum # of catches to qualify for the average yards per catch stat category (compiled by Elias Sports).

And yet I never made an argument that he had a high YPC as a receiver, because he's not a receiver, he's a scatback, he does everything. His YPC does not suck from any position on the field.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272320)
He was among the lowest rated players in yards per route run.

His yards per catch was a pathetic 8.7.

At the BOTTOM of the WR rankings.

You think this is a sign of a good player...

See previous point again, Dexter is not a Wide Receiver.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272323)
No point even talking to this ****ing dumbass. The only playmaking ability McCluster has is for the other team with his fumbling.

Really? Because I'm pretty sure this guy has a Rushing Touchdown, Receiver Touchdown, and Punt Return Touchdown.

That to me say he's a playmaker.

Sorter 01-03-2013 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272324)
McCluster had 8 turnovers this year and also made 5 guys miss tackles.

Great player.

Clay stop with your logic. It's hurting the mongoloid brains.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:57 AM

Dexter played almost every snap as a wide receiver this year. You're wrong. Look at the tape.

24 first downs in 64 touches is ****ing awful. Get past that, shitbird.

KCrockaholic 01-03-2013 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272330)

Really? Because I'm pretty sure this guy has a Rushing Touchdown, Receiver Touchdown, and Punt Return Touchdown.

That to me say he's a playmaker.

Wow. :facepalm:

Exoter175 01-03-2013 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272324)
McCluster had 8 turnovers this year and also made 5 guys miss tackles.

Great player.

Because we had the best team in the NFL this season right? With a QB who never put him into a bad situation, right? Jesus Christ, you guys are acting like Cassel is an MVP, just to argue that McCluster is bad.

IT IS THE OTHER WAY AROUND you dumb shits, McCluster is one of few people on this team who gave us any bright moments on offense, my god.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9272325)
I'm sure Dexter didn't suffer from a slapdick QB who can't throw and a dumbass OC or anything.

Sheesh. Give the guy a chance with Reid. The Walrus wanted to trade up for him for a reason.

He looks bad? We cut him. Win/Win for us.

Thank you jesus, someone isn't an idiot and gets it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 9272327)

^ My thoughts after reading a couple of your posts on NFL quarterbacks ...

Because I've discussed NFL Quarterbacks that didn't involve me slamming Cassel......

You are a little delusional there buddy.

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 12:58 AM

Can we get back to walrus gifs?

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272330)
Really? Because I'm pretty sure this guy has a Rushing Touchdown, Receiver Touchdown, and Punt Return Touchdown.
.

He had one TD this year that counted for exactly SHIT in garbage time.

He's a terrible football player who lacks the most basic ability a 5-7, 170 pound slapdick should have: to make people miss.

He made exactly 5 players miss a tackle this year.

Defend that.

Hammock Parties 01-03-2013 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272339)
McCluster is one of few people on this team who gave us any bright moments on offense, my god.

Name one from this season.

What was his signature big play.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

splatbass 01-03-2013 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272295)
The point is, he caught less than 10 passes out of the backfield this year.

That's not his role anymore.

His role is sucking shit as a WR. He catches lots of passes that turn into NOTHING.

Not to defend him, just needed to point out that none of them currently have a role, since they don't have a coach. What Crennel/Daboll did with him in 2012 is irrelevant now.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272334)
Dexter played almost every snap as a wide receiver this year. You're wrong. Look at the tape.

24 first downs in 64 touches is ****ing awful. Get past that, shitbird.

Now where does he rank for the Chiefs in terms of most first downs?

ARE YOU FORGETTING HOW BAD WE WERE THIS YEAR? 24/64 is ****ing AMAZING for us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9272338)
Wow. :facepalm:

:spock:

Care to argue against? Because it looks to me like he's been utilized from every position on the field, including QB. Guess what? You don't do that unless he's a playmaker.

BossChief 01-03-2013 01:00 AM

Dont let BlackBobs uncle derail such a great thread...

RunKC 01-03-2013 01:00 AM

Love it that Andy Reid will be aggressive in FA.

I hope he gets the pass rush back on the DL. That's the biggest thing this team needs after QB.

Sorter 01-03-2013 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272342)
Name one from this season.

What was his signature big play.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

Getting his elbow dislocated via Cassel.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272330)
Dexter is not a Wide Receiver.
Because I'm pretty sure this guy has a Rushing Touchdown, Receiver Touchdown, and Punt Return Touchdown.

That to me say he's a playmaker.

You can't change his position just to prop up your argument. He's listed on the Chiefs roster as a WR. That is his position. And he is mediocre at it.

In 3 seasons McCluster has 4 TDs and 8 fumbles.

When you have twice the # of turnovers as TDs that tells anyone with half a brain that McCluster is not a reliable playmaker.

Keep going with your dumbshit statements. You are on quite the roll.

KCrockaholic 01-03-2013 01:02 AM

http://i.imgur.com/Y7MlV.gif

RealSNR 01-03-2013 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 9272327)

My thoughts after reading a couple of your posts on NFL quarterbacks ...

Dylan, you've had to live with Reid in the division for years. What do you think of him as a future head coach for any team? And do you think he could be a great match for KC?

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272340)
Can we get back to walrus gifs?

Yes we can.

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4577792256/hC79BFC10/

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272341)
He had one TD this year that counted for exactly SHIT in garbage time.

He's a terrible football player who lacks the most basic ability a 5-7, 170 pound slapdick should have: to make people miss.

He made exactly 5 players miss a tackle this year.

Defend that.

This wasn't the only year he played, and I'm pretty sure 5 outperforms half the skill position guys on this team.

Defended, NEXT!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9272342)
Name one from this season.

What was his signature big play.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

Converting 3rd and 5-8's into first downs, so we could drive on with our excellent QB play and kick field goals.

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 01:04 AM

Reid thought he knew about some Chocolate Penii when he was in Philly. But wait until he gets Geno...

Sorter 01-03-2013 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272360)
Yes we can.

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4577792256/hC79BFC10/



This wasn't the only year he played, and I'm pretty sure 5 outperforms half the skill position guys on this team.

Defended, NEXT!



Converting 3rd and 5-8's into first downs, so we could drive on with our excellent QB play and kick field goals.

That is not a walrus...

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9272350)
Getting his elbow dislocated via Cassel.

RIGHT? lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9272351)
You can't change his position just to prop up your argument. He's listed on the Chiefs roster as a WR. That is his position. And he is mediocre at it.

In 3 seasons McCluster has 4 TDs and 8 fumbles.

When you have twice the # of turnovers as TDs that tells anyone with half a brain that McCluster is not a reliable playmaker.

Keep going with your dumbshit statements. You are on quite the roll.

Matt Cassel had how many passing TD's and how many turnovers?

NEXT DUMBSHIT STATEMENT PLEASE

KCrockaholic 01-03-2013 01:05 AM

That's a ****ing sea lion you stupid shit.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9272366)
That is not a walrus...

I know, but I couldn't find an Abandon thread Walrus, a seal is close enough. Although, if you look at Romeo's face, he reminds you of a Seal, does it not?

We're going from a Seal to a Walrus.

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 01:06 AM

Dude doesn't even know what a walrus is. No need to respond to him anymore.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9272368)
That's a ****ing sea lion you stupid shit.

My god man, humor, sarcasm, and trolling is so lost on you............Are you 50? Do you know what the internet is?

BossChief 01-03-2013 01:06 AM

RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272370)
Dude doesn't even know what a walrus is. No need to respond to him anymore.

Pretty sure my first pic/gif in any thread revolving around Andy Reid was the Ihasbucket walrus.

Did you not get the message in the gif? Or do I have to draw it in crayons for you.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272367)
RIGHT? lol



Matt Cassel had how many passing TD's and how many turnovers?

NEXT DUMBSHIT STATEMENT PLEASE

ROFL FAIL.

You are defeated you epic piece of shit.

Your "McCluster is a playmaker" argument DESTROYED.

4 career TDs vs 8 career Turnovers

That is a WORSE TD to Turnover ratio than Matt Cassel.

FAIL. FAIL. FAIL.

Keep trying dumbshit.

Titty Meat 01-03-2013 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9272373)
RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

Going to the 4-3 would be stupid.

KCrockaholic 01-03-2013 01:08 AM

McCluster's not a WR, and a Walrus is now a Sea Lion. This was a great thread for about 50 pages.

Sorter 01-03-2013 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9272373)
RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

Bailey is best playing the 3-tech and that alone.

BossChief 01-03-2013 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272370)
Dude doesn't even know what a walrus is. No need to respond to him anymore.

ROFL

true

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9272376)
ROFL FAIL.

You are defeated you epic piece of shit.

Your "McCluster is a playmaker" argument DESTROYED.

4 career TDs vs 8 career Turnovers

That is a WORSE TD to Turnover ratio than Matt Cassel.

FAIL. FAIL. FAIL.

Keep trying dumbshit.

How does Matt's TD:TO ratio compare to Dexter's this year?

Eat a bag of dicks.

Sassy Squatch 01-03-2013 01:09 AM

We are ****ed on the OLB though. Who would fill those holes?

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9272378)
McCluster's not a WR, and a Walrus is now a Sea Lion. This was a great thread for about 50 pages.

McCluster is a WR/RB aka scatback, he's like a PS3, he only does everything.

And apparently you guys are too serious to have fun with, if you didn't even read the .gif ROFL

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9272373)
RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

jd1020 01-03-2013 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272385)
You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

Shutup, idiot.

KCrockaholic 01-03-2013 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272385)
You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

http://members.greenpeace.org/gpblog...1746651/ul.jpg

Sorter 01-03-2013 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272385)
You would not ****ing have Hali AND Houston at DE's..........

So, by this are you saying that keeping Houston at DE and moving Tamba to either the Will or Sam pos is plausible?

Because it isn't. Houston is a SAM in the 4-3 for most philosophies.

KC Hawks 01-03-2013 01:13 AM

I would prefer we stayed with the 3-4 (more agressive, of course), but our defense isn't good enough for me to be too bothered if we switched to a 4-3.

TimeForWasp 01-03-2013 01:13 AM

4 Attachment(s)
I love me some McCluster

RunKC 01-03-2013 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9272373)
RDE Houston/ draft pick
LDE Hali/Bailey
RDT Dorsey (re-signed...maybe a one year deal. Reid values DTs as evidenced by his draft history)/Powe
LDT Poe/Smith

Thats a pretty good 4-3 DL.

If we go to the 4-3 I would like to see Justin Houston play the same position Von Miller does. I think he'd be a good fit.

I'd like to see us sign a guy like Cliff Avril or go after Osi Umenyiora.

I think the 4-3 could be good for Tyson Jackson and Dontari Poe. Those guys can be good run stuffers and I think lining those guys up in the A gap would bring good results up the middle.

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272381)
How does Matt's TD:TO ratio compare to Dexter's this year?

Eat a bag of dicks.

ROFL So your argument is that because McCluster has a better TD to TO ratio than Matt Cassel this year, McCluster is a "playmaker" and a keeper?

The only way you can spin McCluster as a "playmaker" is to compare him to Matt Freaking Cassel? Why don't you compare him to Mark Sanchez??

ROFLROFLROFL

And for the record McCluster had 1 TD and 2 Turnovers this year.

That would again be consistent with his career ratio of having twice the # of turnovers as TD's.

Another fail on your part.

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9272389)
Shutup, idiot.

Eat a bag of dicks inbred.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9272393)
So, by this are you saying that keeping Houston at DE and moving Tamba to either the Will or Sam pos is plausible?

Because it isn't. Houston is a SAM in the 4-3 for most philosophies.

No, Tamba is the only one of the two that can play the DE position effectively in the 3-4. And I don't want us to go to a ****ing 4-3, we don't have the players to do it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 9272395)
I would prefer we stayed with the 3-4 (more agressive, of course), but our defense isn't good enough for me to be too bothered if we switched to a 4-3.

This, minus the switching part.

jd1020 01-03-2013 01:16 AM

Are you guys surprised by the lack of intelligence from a person who thinks the Chiefs should draft a ILB #1 just because he's the "consensus best ILB?"

FloridaMan88 01-03-2013 01:17 AM

Exoter's argument for why McCluster is a good player: He has less turnovers than Matt Cassel.

That is quite funny.

Sorter 01-03-2013 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9272403)
Eat a bag of dicks inbred.



No, Tamba is the only one of the two that can play the DE position effectively in the 3-4. And I don't want us to go to a ****ing 4-3, we don't have the players to do it.



This, minus the switching part.

What in the ****ing ****? No he can't. He isn't a 5, 4, and 3 tech player. He's a 7/9 off the edge as an OLB. He can't be a 3-4 DE. LMAO

DaWolf 01-03-2013 01:18 AM

Looks like Ron Wolf is advising Spanos on his hires in San Diego. Perhaps if they are interested in Reid, it is because of Wolf:

Quote:

Wolf oversaw Green Bay when Mike Holmgren and Mike Sherman were hired as head coaches.

He said the key to make the best hire is interviewing as many candidates as possible, waiting for the one who steps in and "just knocks your socks off."

"That happened to me a couple of times," Wolf said. "It should have happened to me one more time. I had the guy right there, and I was too stupid to realize what I was hearing."

The guy?

Former Eagles coach Andy Reid.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/...ers-gm-search/

Exoter175 01-03-2013 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9272399)
ROFL So your argument is that because McCluster has a better TD to TO ratio than Matt Cassel this year, McCluster is a "playmaker" and a keeper?

The only way you can spin McCluster as a "playmaker" is to compare him to Matt Freaking Cassel? Why don't you compare him to Mark Sanchez??

ROFLROFLROFL

And for the record McCluster had 1 TD and 2 Turnovers this year.

That would again be consistent with his career ratio of having twice the # of turnovers as TD's.

Another fail on your part.

No, I'm not using the comparison to Cassel as my basis, I didn't even use TD:TO ratios as a basis for comparison.

TD:TO comparisons aren't even a measurable science for a guy in his position, the only measurable is how he's used, when he's used, and what he does with the ball when he's used. A 1:2 TD:TO ratio this year isn't tragic considering the state of the Chiefs which you idiots seem to keep forgetting he plays for. I mean, how many TD's did we score this year all total that weren't rushing TD's?

LAUGHABLE, yet you guys have yet to compare McCluster to the rest of the Chiefs like I asked you to.

Scared?

RealSNR 01-03-2013 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9272407)
What in the ****ing ****? No he can't. He isn't a 5, 4, and 3 tech player. He's a 7/9 off the edge as an OLB. He can't be a 3-4 DE. LMAO

Is this a Blackbob mult? Confirmed?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.