duncan_idaho |
06-04-2013 07:11 AM |
John Lamb watch:
He was hitting 91-92 early in his start last night and faded as the game wore on (was 84-85 by the time his pitch count got into the 80s and got lit up a bit at that point).
Still, a positive sign. If he can HIT that velocity, that just means he has to build up his stamina further as he goes along. Every pitcher and every arm is different.
Best thing all along has been the way he retained his command. If his velocity comes back and he can get to 100 pitches sitting at 91-92, he's in good shape.
Why do I spend so much time blathering about John Lamb?
1) I always thought he was the best of the pitching prospects from the BFSiBH. This is a guy who has the skills to be a Jon Lester sort of pitcher.
2) Lamb, Ventura, Duffy, Zimmer are the key to this team's ability to succeed under the new GM (which I still think happens at the end of the year). If two of those four guys hit, the rebuild window is shortened.
In fact, if you compare the rebuild this GM would be facing and the one Moore faced in 2006... much better shape for the new guy.
Gordon, Butler, Perez, Escobar and Cain are all fairly well to extremely well established as major leaguers. Perez, Butler and Gordon are "pluses" for their positions. Cain and Escobar are, at least, above-average defenders who can hit well enough to stick at those spots.
Hosmer and Moustakas still have the talent that popped off the field at scouts. With better instruction, that talent could be unlocked. It's hard to look at what Hosmer is doing and listen to the Seitzer interview without thinking someone else can get through to him.
Shields and Guthrie are more established than anything Moore had in his rotation in 2006 (and Shields is a better trade chip in 2014 than anything Moore had).
And the young pitching... still a lot of good, controlled guys in the bullpen. Still a lot of high impact guys dotting the minors.
|