ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ****Official 2022 Free Agency Megathread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=342942)

RealSNR 03-17-2022 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 16198374)
Could that little Caucasian troll looking dude Cole Beasley help us at all?

I don't like him very much and posted it earlier. He's missing a tooth, and I don't like that about him.

The Franchise 03-17-2022 10:26 PM

**** Cole Beasley.

Simply Red 03-17-2022 10:29 PM

**** - looks like Veach is going to sleep on it.

FloridaMan88 03-17-2022 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16198203)
I don’t understand why we aren’t spending huge money on defensive free agents so we can just bitch about all of the defensive players we have spent huge money on like Justin Houston, Frank Clark, Eric Berry, Tyrann Matheiu and Chris Jones.

I just don’t get it guys. We need to continue the cycle guys or I will seriously be depressed.

Goddamn you Burt. Goddamn you!

I just want a veteran WR and then I am good.

Titty Meat 03-17-2022 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198376)
Speed gives you more than just running verts.

It lets you challenge everywhere on the field. ESPECIALLY when you have a QB with Pats arm talent. And most assuredly when you're running a WCO offense that thrives on using as much of the field as possible.

Think of a base Cover 2 - now tell me what the hell that coverage is supposed to do against a deep out?

Not a lot of teams can use that deep out route because few quarterbacks have the arm strength to challenge the far sideline from the near hash. And if they do have a QB that can do that, few teams have a guy like Hill that will force teams into that shell or a guy like Kelce that can keep them in the middle of the field.

Well the Chiefs have all that. So tell me how a 2-deep shell deals with that guy? Or a good post-corner route? Or as many would recognize it - WASP. You don't run it that deep, but you can take a 10 yard post and cut it out at 15 yards and catch that post-corner about 22 yards downfield. When that safety is starting 18 yards back and hitting his heels as soon as you snap the ball, he's ****ed.

Lord, even a 14 yard dig route - you'll split the safeties if you can make a speed cut and a fast receiver like MVS can.

Speed isn't just about verts. It's why I just don't give one single shit about a guy like Landry and really don't care much about JuJu. If you want to beat the cover 2, the answer is more speed to challenge more of the field. That 1/2 second you gain on the route by having someone who runs 2 strides quicker makes all the difference in the world.

Hardman can't make a speed cut, so he can't run those routes worth a damn. Pringle was demonstrating that he could, that's why he was getting those routes and why the Bears just gave him $6 million.

What we need is a guy that can. THAT'S how you beat the Cover 2. And a RB with the speed to challenge the corners or put the safeties in an impossible situation on a simple arrow route. Moreover, that's how you keep teams out of those Cover 3 looks that can create some headaches for those routes I discussed above (and Hardman on the drags and quick screens will do the same).

The answer isn't possession WRs. It's what we have, but more of it.

I like this. Lots of ifs with this scenario but you sign Smith he somehow generates double digit sacks or produces pressure, sign a bargain bin vet corner to provide depth, snatch a DT with your first. All of a sudden this team is sitting pretty damn good and you've sacrificed nada of your future really.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-17-2022 10:47 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raiders?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raiders</a> have submitted an offer for 5x Pro Bowl FA CB Stephon Gilmore, per source.</p>&mdash; Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) <a href="https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1504680223668801543?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Couch-Potato 03-17-2022 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSBMVP (Post 16198416)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raiders?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raiders</a> have submitted an offer for 5x Pro Bowl FA CB Stephon Gilmore, per source.</p>&mdash; Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) <a href="https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1504680223668801543?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

OK Veach, right about now would be good.

Titty Meat 03-17-2022 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSBMVP (Post 16198416)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raiders?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raiders</a> have submitted an offer for 5x Pro Bowl FA CB Stephon Gilmore, per source.</p>&mdash; Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) <a href="https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/1504680223668801543?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Great. Gilmore is a bum

The Franchise 03-17-2022 10:50 PM

I’ll pass on Gilmore. The Raiders are just bringing in old Patriot players at this point.

The Franchise 03-17-2022 10:53 PM

I’d see how much Rasul Douglas would cost.

BossChief 03-17-2022 10:58 PM

The AFCW trying to sign every 2017-2018 all pro player out there to beat Mahomes.

Couch-Potato 03-17-2022 10:59 PM

I can appreciate the age references, but I think it's also fair to point out that the Rams and Bucs won the last 2 Super Bowls by stacking their teams with aging vets chasing rings.

Couch-Potato 03-17-2022 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 16198429)
I can appreciate the age references, but I think it's also fair to point out that the Rams and Bucs won the last 2 Super Bowls by stacking their teams with aging vets chasing rings.


Julio, Jarvis, OBJ, & JuJu are still out there + MAYBE Michael Thomas.

I certainly wouldn't hate one of those vets being added to our squad.

bigjosh 03-17-2022 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 16198432)
Julio, Jarvis, OBJ, & JuJu are still out there + MAYBE Michael Thomas.

I certainly wouldn't hate one of those vets being added to our squad.


Also, schefter just posted that the rams may potentially deal woods.

Jamison crowder has my interest as well.

Balto 03-17-2022 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 16198432)
Julio, Jarvis, OBJ, & JuJu are still out there + MAYBE Michael Thomas.
I certainly wouldn't hate one of those vets being added to our squad.


Where have you seen Michael Thomas’s name cone up for trade?

DJ's left nut 03-17-2022 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16198407)
I like this. Lots of ifs with this scenario but you sign Smith he somehow generates double digit sacks or produces pressure, sign a bargain bin vet corner to provide depth, snatch a DT with your first. All of a sudden this team is sitting pretty damn good and you've sacrificed nada of your future really.

Spoiling this due to freakish length after seeing Pest quote it:

Spoiler!

The Franchise 03-17-2022 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198444)
So in trying to come up with a 'rape the Cover 2' play here, the simplest example I can come up with is a mirrored post corner/vert package out of 11 personnel. You line up X, Y, TE, Z w/ Hardman in the weak slot, Kelce split off the line into the slot on the strong side, Hill at the Z and let's say MVS at the X.

MVS and Hill run mirrored post-corner routes w/ Hardman and Kelce running mirrored 9 routes. Your fast RB is running a basic arrow route.

So you're going to see a Nickel coverage in all probability (you can't send a dime out there when you see the 11 personnel in the huddle; makes the running game just too easy).

Patrick drops back and as he's dropping the first guy he picks up is the MLB. If he continues to drop, you go over the middle to the RB for an easy 8 yards. Moreover, that RB is man up on the MLB in space and can take it for more. Most likely that MLB doesn't keep dropping and stays at about 8 yard depth to protect the arrow.

So next you move to the FS on Hardman/MVS's side of the field. And this is where they start to have real problems. The FS is watching Hardman's vert and is thinking he may need to shade middle to protect the NCB. He's also seeing Kelce and realizes Kelce's manned up on the SLB so he needs to start moving that direction. While he's heading that way he also sees Hill coming at him on that post route (that isn't a post route). Meanwhile both outside CBs see post routes and pass their guy off because they don't know at the snap that Kelce or Hardman won't be on quick outs so they have to protect their underneath zones.

Now Mahomes watches that FS. If the FS shades middle to protect against Hardman/Kelce, he has MVS getting ready to break that post-corner back to the sideline and he lets it fly to MVS. And MVS got on that FS so fast that he didn't give the FS a chance to recognize what was happening so now he's in a trail position trying to run down a faster MVS who's out there to meet the ball. If the throw is executed, it's an easy 25 yards.

Now as Mahomes is watching that FS, let's say the FS doesn't shade middle. He thinks the NCB has Hardman in check and doesn't stray from MVS - okay, not Mahomes moves over to the SS. The SS is in trouble. He has Kelce vs. a LB so he has a choice to make - continue to play deep and give Kelce a 1v1 matchup about 15-18 yards downfield or come up on that route to take away the throw over the top. Well now he has Hill breathing down his neck and just as he stops going backwards to try to help the LB, Hill makes that speed cut back to the corner on that post-corner. Moreover, both Hill and Mahomes SAW the SS start to set his feet so Hill knows to flatten the route a little and Mahomes knows to put some air under it to let him run under it. Now the SS has the same problem the FS would've had on the other side - He's stuck in a trail position against the fastest man on the field. He's toast and he knows it.

Now put someone at the X that can't run that post-corner route (thy name is Landry or JuJu; let's just say LJ). The FS is never put at a real decision point because LJ is a stride slower and has given him just a little more time/space to wait the play out. And he knows that even if he's in a trail position on those guys, he can still get back in time to break up the pass. So the FS shades middle. When he starts to shade middle, he's now in a position to challenge a throw to Kelce. The SS sees this and knows he can stay over the top off Hill and the FS recognizes that at full speed he can probably undercut the route on Hill anyway.

What unlocks that entire concept is the speed that MVS brings to the table at the X. It freezes the FS and puts him in an impossible position. Whatever he does is going to either leave MVS open or rat-**** the SS. And because you have Hardman in that slot on the vert, the weakside boundary corner has to stay honest on thye underneath zone because he knows that if that becomes an out route and Hardman gets in space, he can simply split the gap between him and the FS and house it. The only thing that could absolutely wreck that whole thing is the boundary corners getting up in press before they drop into zone, whacking the shit out of the X and Z and throwing the timing out of whack. But they can't do that when they know how explosive MVS and Hill can be if they get off that release.

The answer is more speed. More speed at X, more speed at RB. Speed makes it all go.

You throw the ball to MVS and he drops the ball more than 50% of the time.

DJ's left nut 03-17-2022 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16198455)
You throw the ball to MVS and he drops the ball more than 50% of the time.

Still 12.5 yards/target and that's presuming no YAC...

BossChief 03-17-2022 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16198455)
You throw the ball to MVS and he drops the ball more than 50% of the time.

Yup.

247 career targets
123 career catches

In 4 years with a HOF QB.

poolboy 03-17-2022 11:35 PM

I would almost take Sammy back.....nah, nevermind...cant believe I even think that

DJ's left nut 03-17-2022 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16198462)
Yup.

247 career targets
123 career catches

In 4 years with a HOF QB.

8.7 career yards per target.

Even in the year where he was REALLY a problem with his drops (2020) and had 7 against only 33 catches, he went for 11 yards/target with 6 scores, four of which were over 45 yards. 6 scores on 63 targets seems pretty damn good to me.

My point is exactly that - I don't care if he's a possession receiver. Would I like to have a guy that can run a 4.4 and never drops a ball? Sure - those cost about $17 million if you're lucky.

But if my choice is the guy that runs a 4.65 and will drop 5 balls over 100 targets and net 7 yards/target or a guy that runs a 4.40 and will drop 10 balls over 60 targets and net 9 yards/target while putting the defensive backfield in uncomfortable decision scenarios, I'm taking the latter 100% of the time.

It's not even a close question.

You want to get teams out of this goddamn Cover 2, the answer is NOT to play the slice. It's to put someone out there that can force that FS into making uncomfortable decisions.

DJ's left nut 03-17-2022 11:46 PM

From what I can see, he has 13 career drops over 247 targets. So 5% of his targets are drops over his career (he had zero in 55 targets last year, FYI).

Shit, double it, I don't care. Give him 6 drops in 60 targets and give some rando possession WR 1 drop in 80. Doesn't matter if the latter is not forcing hard decisions or doing damage when he brings the ball in.

Moreover, over an equalized sample size the difference between 'bad hands' MVS and 'elite possession WR' Jarvis Landry is, what, 5 catches over the course of a season? Call it 8 if you want - fine. That's a drop every other game that MVS has that Landry wouldn't.

Meanwhile every time he catches it he goes for more yards than Landry would. And every time he runs a route he puts a hell of a lot more pressure on the secondary.

We do NOT need a possession WR. And the fact that possession WRs are getting murdered on the market right now demonstrates that teams know this.

smithandrew051 03-17-2022 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198444)
Spoiling this due to freakish length after seeing Pest quote it:

Spoiler!

Billay, don’t waste your time. The hidden “freakish length” is just words.

DJ's left nut 03-17-2022 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 16198473)
Billay, don’t waste your time. The hidden “freakish length” is just words.

:LOL:LMAOLMAO

Couch-Potato 03-17-2022 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balto (Post 16198439)
Where have you seen Michael Thomas’s name cone up for trade?

Saints say they're keeping him, but I'm pretty sure it was him that wanted out last year.

Couch-Potato 03-17-2022 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh (Post 16198437)
Also, schefter just posted that the rams may potentially deal woods.

Jamison crowder has my interest as well.

I'm not too high on Woods, I wonder what the price is?

Definitely not Crowder.

BossChief 03-17-2022 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198467)
8.7 career yards per target.

Even in the year where he was REALLY a problem with his drops (2020) and had 7 against only 33 catches, he went for 11 yards/target with 6 scores, four of which were over 45 yards. 6 scores on 63 targets seems pretty damn good to me.

My point is exactly that - I don't care if he's a possession receiver. Would I like to have a guy that can run a 4.4 and never drops a ball? Sure - those cost about $17 million if you're lucky.

But if my choice is the guy that runs a 4.65 and will drop 5 balls over 100 targets and net 7 yards/target or a guy that runs a 4.40 and will drop 10 balls over 60 targets and net 9 yards/target while putting the defensive backfield in uncomfortable decision scenarios, I'm taking the latter 100% of the time.

It's not even a close question.

You want to get teams out of this goddamn Cover 2, the answer is NOT to play the slice. It's to put someone out there that can force that FS into making uncomfortable decisions.

I think we disagree wholly on how to counter punch the 2 deep safety looks we’ve gotten from well prepared defenses.

The way to attack them is to attack the intermediate zones with guys that know how to find the soft spots with crisp routes and to run the damn ball. Things that FORCE them to play those safeties closer to the line as a setup for guys like Hill, Hardman and even Kelce to get their deep shots. We just didn’t have the Wars that Mahomes trusted to do that. Later in the year, he started trusting Pringle and Hardman more, but it was always lacking.

It’s why I am still disappointed we didn’t get a deal done with Robinson. He could have made this offense scary good right away in week one. I’m kinda wondering who can come right into this system and produce right away like that that’s left.

Wilson8 03-18-2022 12:07 AM

DJ makes a good case for Marquez Valdes-Scantling, but I'm still not buying bringing him in for the Chiefs.

It will be interesting to see if Green Bay Packers makes a push to try and bring him back to the pack.

"Oh, the agony of not having another WR!"

"Oh, the agony when Marquez Valdes-Scantling doesn't make the catch!"

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16198480)
I think we disagree wholly on how to counter punch the 2 deep safety looks we’ve gotten from well prepared defenses.

The way to attack them is to attack the intermediate zones with guys that know how to find the soft spots with crisp routes and to run the damn ball. Things that FORCE them to play those safeties closer to the line as a setup for guys like Hill, Hardman and even Kelce to get their deep shots. We just didn’t have the Wars that Mahomes trusted to do that. Later in the year, he started trusting Pringle and Hardman more, but it was always lacking.

It’s why I am still disappointed we didn’t get a deal done with Robinson. He could have made this offense scary good right away in week one. I’m kinda wondering who can come right into this system and produce right away like that that’s left.

And for my entire football watching life I would have agreed with you.

Then I saw how teams defended the 2021 Chiefs - they did. not. care.

It's what made CEH largely ineffective even when we gave him the ball. Give him the ball 20 damn times - they didn't care. They weren't going to come up. Let him have 5 - Hill and Kelce are so stinking good that they're STILL not coming downhill. They'll give up that 5 and wait for you to make a mistake before they come downhill and let Hill/Kelce gouge them for 30.

Throw underneath all day - you will not pull those safeties up. Because for about 8 weeks we DID over the latter part of the season and no, they weren't drawing safeties up on us. They were staying in the deep shells. They don't give a rip. They simply won't.

Moreover, I conceded that I'd rather have a do-everything X who can get deep AND run pristine routes over the middle. Of course that's preferable. But you CANNOT spend $16 million on Robinson, $15 million on Kelce, $20+ million on Hill, $20+ million on OBJr and $15 million on Thuney. You've dropped $85+ million on 5 players and haven't paid for your QB yet. That's simply not tenable.

So you have $5 million to spend on your WR2 - tell me what Landry or JuJu are going to do to convince these guys to pull their safeties down. We saw last year - they simply don't care. There isn't a universe where getting beat at 6 yards/pop by a plodding possession WR is going to be less of a worry for teams than getting torched over the top.

Conventionally I absolutely agree with you. But never in a million years did I expect what I saw from teams against this Chiefs team in 2021. I don't think Veach or Reid expected it either or they'd have never drafted CEH. Teams willingness to completely sell out against us because they simply didn't care if we took that short stuff is completely unprecedented. I've never seen anything like it and I said so at the time.

You can't attack what teams are doing against this squad like you would what they're doing against teams that don't have Hill and Kelce. Those 2 are just too damn good to scare teams with guys like Landry as a 'counter'. He'll never begin to tilt the scale in his direction.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wilson8 (Post 16198483)
DJ makes a good case for Marquez Valdes-Scantling, but I'm still not buying bringing him in for the Chiefs.

It will be interesting to see if Green Bay Packers makes a push to try and bring him back to the pack.

"Oh, the agony of not having another WR!"

"Oh, the agony when Marquez Valdes-Scantling doesn't make the catch!"

He's just my example. I'm not married to him.

I AM married to someone with speed and a large enough catch radius to be able to put safeties in an impossible situation. If that's nothing more than praying that Jalen Tolbert or Alec Pierce can come in out of the 3rd round and hit the ground running, so be it.

But I don't want to see money burned on a slower or smaller possession style WR that doesn't present the kind of problems that a bigger, faster option would.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 12:24 AM

Who’d be perfect if he could actually get on the field between suspensions and injuries - Will Fuller.

Man that guy would do SERIOUS damage as the X here.

Wilson8 03-18-2022 12:28 AM

I thought D.J. Chark might be a used for the purpose that you describe (If he can stay healthy)

The contract that the Lions gave him was interesting. It kind of looks like a 1 year, $10 M deal but Lions have $4M for 2022 and then $6M in the void year of 2023.

Eventually it all has to get paid. They just delay $6 M for an extra year.

UChieffyBugger 03-18-2022 05:29 AM

So here is a list of the top wideouts left.

Julio
OBJ
Aj Green
Juju
Landry
Watkins
MVS
Fuller
Washington
Pascal

1. Julio, Watkins, Fuller and Odell would be Injury risks. But getting one of them and drafting A receiver early could a smart move.

2. Aj Green had 848 yards playing alongside Hopkins and Ertz..plus a good running good that had a lot of carries.

3. Washington is only 25 and has had to play with bad QB's over the last two years.

4. Zach Pascal has had his injuries too but has been sneakily productive when he has a run of games and let's be honest his qb's have been poor aswell.

5. Juju and Landry are big names but I'm just not sure slot guys like them would make a drastic difference in our offense tbh.

Coogs 03-18-2022 05:44 AM

I heard an interesting discussion on the way home from work a couple of days ago on NFL Radio Moving the Chains show. They were talking about how all of the defenses now are being built to combat the speed of offenses, and that the counter to this is that the 225+ pound RB's (give or take a few pounds. I can't recall the exact number they stated, but big RB's) are starting to have a field day because most of the back 7 defenders are not built to take the punishment those type of RB's deal out. They had some stats from the past season to back up their hypothesis.

Not sure if there is this type of back in the draft to stick behind out offensive line, but the argument they put forth does make sense.

TEX 03-18-2022 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198487)
Who’d be perfect if he could actually get on the field between suspensions and injuries - Will Fuller.

Man that guy would do SERIOUS damage as the X here.

I get the attraction, but just not worth it. Has nagging injuries all the time.

BryanBusby 03-18-2022 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198487)
Who’d be perfect if he could actually get on the field between suspensions and injuries - Will Fuller.

Man that guy would do SERIOUS damage as the X here.

Yes but man, he makes Sammy Watkins look like iron man in comparison.

Dude's body just Fallin apart.

DaKCMan AP 03-18-2022 06:20 AM

Logan Ryan to the Bucs who keep loading their roster.

Mile High Mania 03-18-2022 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 16198576)
Logan Ryan to the Bucs who keep loading their roster.

Now this is where Blacktop comes in to tell us how the jesuits in the NFL offices are pushing all the talent into the AFC, so that Brady can have the clearest path to the SB in his triumphant return and then he will dismantle one of the AFC 'super teams'.

threebag 03-18-2022 06:41 AM

So, is Mayfield going to go to Seattle?

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 16198562)
I heard an interesting discussion on the way home from work a couple of days ago on NFL Radio Moving the Chains show. They were talking about how all of the defenses now are being built to combat the speed of offenses, and that the counter to this is that the 225+ pound RB's (give or take a few pounds. I can't recall the exact number they stated, but big RB's) are starting to have a field day because most of the back 7 defenders are not built to take the punishment those type of RB's deal out. They had some stats from the past season to back up their hypothesis.

Not sure if there is this type of back in the draft to stick behind out offensive line, but the argument they put forth does make sense.

It was probably that fossil Gil Brandt who hasn’t said anything intelligent, insightful or accurate in 20 years.

ARROW2 03-18-2022 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 16198580)
Now this is where Blacktop comes in to tell us how the jesuits in the NFL offices are pushing all the talent into the AFC, so that Brady can have the clearest path to the SB in his triumphant return and then he will dismantle one of the AFC 'super teams'.



Who knows what the script is this year? Nothing would surprise me after watching the Chiefs lay down and a sorry team like the Bungles get pushed to the SB. I'm gonna speak my mind.

UChieffyBugger 03-18-2022 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 16198562)
I heard an interesting discussion on the way home from work a couple of days ago on NFL Radio Moving the Chains show. They were talking about how all of the defenses now are being built to combat the speed of offenses, and that the counter to this is that the 225+ pound RB's (give or take a few pounds. I can't recall the exact number they stated, but big RB's) are starting to have a field day because most of the back 7 defenders are not built to take the punishment those type of RB's deal out. They had some stats from the past season to back up their hypothesis.

Not sure if there is this type of back in the draft to stick behind out offensive line, but the argument they put forth does make sense.

Only a foolish idiot would deny that getting better running backs wouldn't vastly improve this offense against teams dropping everyone deep. I mean ffs Cinci were dropping eight guys smh.

-King- 03-18-2022 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198484)
And for my entire football watching life I would have agreed with you.

Then I saw how teams defended the 2021 Chiefs - they did. not. care.

It's what made CEH largely ineffective even when we gave him the ball. Give him the ball 20 damn times - they didn't care. They weren't going to come up. Let him have 5 - Hill and Kelce are so stinking good that they're STILL not coming downhill. They'll give up that 5 and wait for you to make a mistake before they come downhill and let Hill/Kelce gouge them for 30.

Throw underneath all day - you will not pull those safeties up. Because for about 8 weeks we DID over the latter part of the season and no, they weren't drawing safeties up on us. They were staying in the deep shells. They don't give a rip. They simply won't.

Moreover, I conceded that I'd rather have a do-everything X who can get deep AND run pristine routes over the middle. Of course that's preferable. But you CANNOT spend $16 million on Robinson, $15 million on Kelce, $20+ million on Hill, $20+ million on OBJr and $15 million on Thuney. You've dropped $85+ million on 5 players and haven't paid for your QB yet. That's simply not tenable.

So you have $5 million to spend on your WR2 - tell me what Landry or JuJu are going to do to convince these guys to pull their safeties down. We saw last year - they simply don't care. There isn't a universe where getting beat at 6 yards/pop by a plodding possession WR is going to be less of a worry for teams than getting torched over the top.

Conventionally I absolutely agree with you. But never in a million years did I expect what I saw from teams against this Chiefs team in 2021. I don't think Veach or Reid expected it either or they'd have never drafted CEH. Teams willingness to completely sell out against us because they simply didn't care if we took that short stuff is completely unprecedented. I've never seen anything like it and I said so at the time.

You can't attack what teams are doing against this squad like you would what they're doing against teams that don't have Hill and Kelce. Those 2 are just too damn good to scare teams with guys like Landry as a 'counter'. He'll never begin to tilt the scale in his direction.

The thing is that CEH will never make them move up because he's simply not good enough no matter how many times we give him the ball. Teams would move their safeties up if he was actually effective the games where he got a lot of carries. But if you're going to run the ball, and still be average at best at it, why would we change the defense?

Also even when we tried the underneath stuff, it was still too heavily dependent on Hill and Kelce. So we were taking away our biggest advantage just so we could take advantage of what the defense was giving up. We needed a guy that could keep Hill going down field and he could command coverage underneath and vice versa. We just had nobody, so defenses didn't have to change anything. Just stay back and force them underneath to Hill and Kelce cause no one else can do anything.

-King- 03-18-2022 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 16198562)
I heard an interesting discussion on the way home from work a couple of days ago on NFL Radio Moving the Chains show. They were talking about how all of the defenses now are being built to combat the speed of offenses, and that the counter to this is that the 225+ pound RB's (give or take a few pounds. I can't recall the exact number they stated, but big RB's) are starting to have a field day because most of the back 7 defenders are not built to take the punishment those type of RB's deal out. They had some stats from the past season to back up their hypothesis.

Not sure if there is this type of back in the draft to stick behind out offensive line, but the argument they put forth does make sense.

What the hell would weight have anything to do with it? You just need good backs. Jamaal Charles was 210 on his fattest day and if you gave him the defenses the chiefs are seeing today, he would average 7 yards a carry. And I'm only barely exaggerating.

No one is going to care about CEH when even if you give up the best blocking and biggest lane ever, he'll only "rip" off a 15 yard run.

ARROW2 03-18-2022 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16198595)
The thing is that CEH will never make them move up because he's simply not good enough no matter how many times we give him the ball. Teams would move their safeties up if he was actually effective the games where he got a lot of carries. But if you're going to run the ball, and still be average at best at it, why would we change the defense?

Also even when we tried the underneath stuff, it was still too heavily dependent on Hill and Kelce. So we were taking away our biggest advantage just so we could take advantage of what the defense was giving up. We needed a guy that could keep Hill going down field and he could command coverage underneath and vice versa. We just had nobody, so defenses didn't have to change anything. Just stay back and force them underneath to Hill and Kelce cause no one else can do anything.




Exactly. Clyde is average at best. Teams don't care about his 4 yard runs. He scares nobody. They don't even care about his occasional 8 yard runs. He never busts off 30-40 at one time. I bet Kareem Hunt could..sigh

threebag 03-18-2022 07:08 AM

CEH isn’t even Greg Hill

Red Dawg 03-18-2022 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 16198591)
Only a foolish idiot would deny that getting better running backs wouldn't vastly improve this offense against teams dropping everyone deep. I mean ffs Cinci were dropping eight guys smh.

getting a better RB would only help if we actually would run the ball. I am not in love with our backs either but since Mahomes took over we throw it and throw it even after Hunt led the league in rushing with Smith. Bengals rushed 3 a lot in both games and we still didn't run the ball nor attempt to run it. Even when we struggle to pass the ball we just keep on passing hoping for the big break through play.

We throw it, that's the Andy way and it's the Mahomes way. Until Mahomes changes his brain we won't run the ball when we should.

In58men 03-18-2022 07:36 AM

Damn ProfootballFocus forgot about us! They didn’t include Wylie

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...2e72ea1304.png


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...8b5caaf19c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

UChieffyBugger 03-18-2022 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16198617)
getting a better RB would only help if we actually would run the ball. I am not in love with our backs either but since Mahomes took over we throw it and throw it even after Hunt led the league in rushing with Smith. Bengals rushed 3 a lot in both games and we still didn't run the ball nor attempt to run it. Even when we struggle to pass the ball we just keep on passing hoping for the big break through play.

We throw it, that's the Andy way and it's the Mahomes way. Until Mahomes changes his brain we won't run the ball when we should.

I believe a top class back would make Reid inclined to run it more. Hunt was great in the games he played with Pat and we need to get a back who can finally take advantage of what this line can do.

bigjosh 03-18-2022 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 16198635)
I believe a top class back would make Reid inclined to run it more. Hunt was great in the games he played with Pat and we need to get a back who can finally take advantage of what this line can do.


Naa, he had westbrook and shady for years and under-utilized them in the run game.

Philly fans biggest gripe with andy besides clock management was his refusal to run the damn ball.

In58men 03-18-2022 07:44 AM

So today is the deadline for Mahomes to restructure?

Kman34 03-18-2022 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16198617)
getting a better RB would only help if we actually would run the ball. I am not in love with our backs either but since Mahomes took over we throw it and throw it even after Hunt led the league in rushing with Smith. Bengals rushed 3 a lot in both games and we still didn't run the ball nor attempt to run it. Even when we struggle to pass the ball we just keep on passing hoping for the big break through play.

We throw it, that's the Andy way and it's the Mahomes way. Until Mahomes changes his brain we won't run the ball when we should.

Yep that’s it.. Mahomes is the problem.. :rolleyes:

Chris Meck 03-18-2022 07:54 AM

everybody just relax. We don't play games in March.

Kman34 03-18-2022 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16198662)
everybody just relax. We don't play games in March.

You are right but it’s General Manager season right now…

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh (Post 16198643)
Naa, he had westbrook and shady for years and under-utilized them in the run game.

Philly fans biggest gripe with andy besides clock management was his refusal to run the damn ball.

It was also incorrect.

We’ve gone over this before.

But keep using mouth-breathing dipshit Philly fans as your barometer for what a one of the most successful football coaches in league history should be doing.

AdolfOliverBush 03-18-2022 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16198628)
Damn ProfootballFocus forgot about us! They didn’t include Wylie

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...2e72ea1304.png


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...8b5caaf19c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Meh, at least two of those guys will end the season on IR. One of the Chargers will probably blow an ACL in training camp.

Chris Meck 03-18-2022 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 16198664)
You are right but it’s General Manager season right now…

We were unlikely to be 'big splash' players in the first wave of FA. I mean, we DID sign Reid, maybe the second best FA safety available, and he's 25 and very likely to play up to or outplay his deal.

We're not in the kind of cap situation to sign a bunch of top tier guys.

We're much more likely to be players in the second wave, and in the late cuts.

It's just the way it goes when you've gone to 4 straight AFCCGs. Retain the guys you want to keep, let the others go, sign one or two expensive guys and the rest is bargain shopping.

We'll be fine. These other teams are trying to BECOME contenders; we already are and just need to keep the train rolling.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16198595)
The thing is that CEH will never make them move up because he's simply not good enough no matter how many times we give him the ball. Teams would move their safeties up if he was actually effective the games where he got a lot of carries. But if you're going to run the ball, and still be average at best at it, why would we change the defense?

Also even when we tried the underneath stuff, it was still too heavily dependent on Hill and Kelce. So we were taking away our biggest advantage just so we could take advantage of what the defense was giving up. We needed a guy that could keep Hill going down field and he could command coverage underneath and vice versa. We just had nobody, so defenses didn't have to change anything. Just stay back and force them underneath to Hill and Kelce cause no one else can do anything.

Absolutely. As I said - need speed at X and at RB.

But they respective analysis are independent of each other. Speed at X won't obviate the need for speed at RB, nor would a faster RB lessen the need for the speed at X.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-18-2022 08:18 AM

So ****ed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Extension talks on Tyreek Hill now must start at $25M. Better player than Davante Adams, but a Yr from Free Agency in the perfect spot with the Franchise Tag inhibiting his ability to get to market.</p>&mdash; Chad Forbes (@NFLDraftBites) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLDraftBites/status/1504615141954007044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-18-2022 08:21 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Report: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raiders?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raiders</a> have submitted an offer to free agent CB Stephon Gilmore, per <a href="https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Schultz_Report</a></p>&mdash; JPA Football  (@jpafootball) <a href="https://twitter.com/jpafootball/status/1504680355151892498?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

AdolfOliverBush 03-18-2022 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16198699)
So ****ed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Extension talks on Tyreek Hill now must start at $25M. Better player than Davante Adams, but a Yr from Free Agency in the perfect spot with the Franchise Tag inhibiting his ability to get to market.</p>&mdash; Chad Forbes (@NFLDraftBites) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLDraftBites/status/1504615141954007044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

As someone who knows jack shit about being an NFL GM, I'd be tempted to refuse to acknowledge the Adams contract in negotiations, because the Raiders front office is so reeruned.

"Adams isn't worth that much, and neither is any other WR."

If that means Hill's days with the Chiefs are numbered, so be it.

In58men 03-18-2022 08:27 AM

So is today the deadline for Mahomes to restructure?

The Franchise 03-18-2022 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16198699)
So ****ed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Extension talks on Tyreek Hill now must start at $25M. Better player than Davante Adams, but a Yr from Free Agency in the perfect spot with the Franchise Tag inhibiting his ability to get to market.</p>&mdash; Chad Forbes (@NFLDraftBites) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLDraftBites/status/1504615141954007044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

You say this with every post.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16198710)
So is today the deadline for Mahomes to restructure?

Yes

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16198699)
So ****ed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Extension talks on Tyreek Hill now must start at $25M. Better player than Davante Adams, but a Yr from Free Agency in the perfect spot with the Franchise Tag inhibiting his ability to get to market.</p>&mdash; Chad Forbes (@NFLDraftBites) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLDraftBites/status/1504615141954007044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Like I said - the rush on Hill was to try to get him signed before Adams re-set the market.

If his agents are coming back to the table with the 're-set' figures in hand, then it's time to walk away from the table and try again next year. There's no rush. He's under contract for the season and you have the tag. Meanwhile the market isn't going to re-reset between now and NEXT March.

And the onus to get the money moved off this year's cap is gone. There's simply nobody out there worth chasing at the moment.

I'd simply break off and head home. If he wants to talk about $22 - $23 million and offer a bit of a team friendly structure to ensure it gets done this year, okay.

There's no incentive for the Chiefs to push the issue anymore. Let Hill and his people come to you.

kcbubb 03-18-2022 08:35 AM

Football is not just x’s and o’s. We lost against the bengals bc mahomes lost his cool. He needs guys around him that make him feel confident and comfortable. There were plenty of wrs running around open in the second half of the bengals game. Getting open isn’t the only issue. MVS dropping balls is not that guy that keeps PM cool. Anticipate more than x’s and o’s. Anticipate pressure and frustration with mvs drops. Lack of trust develops. PM starts getting in his own head and over thinking. Sammy is the cheapest guy that checks the boxes. If he misses time, so be it. When sammy’s healthy PMs is better with Sammy on the field. If Sammy is hurt, next man up. It gives an opportunity for fountain or Gordon, maybe even Powell. As long as Sammy is healthy for the playoffs…

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198471)
From what I can see, he has 13 career drops over 247 targets. So 5% of his targets are drops over his career (he had zero in 55 targets last year, FYI).

Shit, double it, I don't care. Give him 6 drops in 60 targets and give some rando possession WR 1 drop in 80. Doesn't matter if the latter is not forcing hard decisions or doing damage when he brings the ball in.

Moreover, over an equalized sample size the difference between 'bad hands' MVS and 'elite possession WR' Jarvis Landry is, what, 5 catches over the course of a season? Call it 8 if you want - fine. That's a drop every other game that MVS has that Landry wouldn't.

Meanwhile every time he catches it he goes for more yards than Landry would. And every time he runs a route he puts a hell of a lot more pressure on the secondary.

We do NOT need a possession WR. And the fact that possession WRs are getting murdered on the market right now demonstrates that teams know this.


ChiefBlueCFC 03-18-2022 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16198699)
So ****ed

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Extension talks on Tyreek Hill now must start at $25M. Better player than Davante Adams, but a Yr from Free Agency in the perfect spot with the Franchise Tag inhibiting his ability to get to market.</p>&mdash; Chad Forbes (@NFLDraftBites) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLDraftBites/status/1504615141954007044?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Why are we ****ed? Bc Hill wants to be compensated equivalent to his play??

TEX 03-18-2022 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198718)
Like I said - the rush on Hill was to try to get him signed before Adams re-set the market.

If his agents are coming back to the table with the 're-set' figures in hand, then it's time to walk away from the table and try again next year. There's no rush. He's under contract for the season and you have the tag. Meanwhile the market isn't going to re-reset between now and NEXT March.

And the onus to get the money moved off this year's cap is gone. There's simply nobody out there worth chasing at the moment.

I'd simply break off and head home. If he wants to talk about $22 - $23 million and offer a bit of a team friendly structure to ensure it gets done this year, okay.

There's no incentive for the Chiefs to push the issue anymore. Let Hill and his people come to you.

Yep. But there are still WR's out there we need to pursue. I'd focus on JuJu and get it done.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 16198727)
Football is not just x’s and o’s. We lost against the bengals bc mahomes lost his cool. He needs guys around him that make him feel confident and comfortable. There were plenty of wrs running around open in the second half of the bengals game. Getting open isn’t the only issue. MVS dropping balls is not that guy that keeps PM cool. Anticipate more than x’s and o’s. Anticipate pressure and frustration with mvs drops. Lack of trust develops. Sammy is the cheapest guy that checks the boxes. If he misses time, so be it. When sammy’s healthy PMs is better with Sammy on the field.

And again, not married to MVS - just an example case.

PM did trust Watkins, though - I'll grant you that. Ultimately I think Sammy wanted another solid payday and wanted a chance to be a #1 target in Baltimore. Wonder if he got some of that out of his system and would be content coming back to someplace where he can be a Robin and be weird in relative anonymity.

He checks every box, no question.

**** it - bring him in if he's cheap. Bring in a developmental X behind him to get snaps when he inevitably misses 4-5 games. Then hope Sammy is healthy or the rookie is ready come December forward.

Cool - I can live with that plan.

htismaqe 03-18-2022 08:41 AM

Time to find a new team. No way they can win now. :facepalm:

htismaqe 03-18-2022 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198739)
And again, not married to MVS - just an example case.

PM did trust Watkins, though - I'll grant you that. Ultimately I think Sammy wanted another solid payday and wanted a chance to be a #1 target in Baltimore. Wonder if he got some of that out of his system and would be content coming back to someplace where he can be a Robin and be weird in relative anonymity.

He checks every box, no question.

**** it - bring him in if he's cheap. Bring in a developmental X behind him to get snaps when he inevitably misses 4-5 games. Then hope Sammy is healthy or the rookie is ready come December forward.

Cool - I can live with that plan.

I'd be perfectly fine with just about anyone at this point. They need bodies at every level almost, on both offense and defense.

Time to shop the $5 CD bin.

bigjosh 03-18-2022 08:48 AM

****Official 2022 Free Agency Megathread****
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198670)
It was also incorrect.

We’ve gone over this before.

But keep using mouth-breathing dipshit Philly fans as your barometer for what a one of the most successful football coaches in league history should be doing.


Sure.

Westbrook averaged 11.4 carries per game throughout his career.

Mccoy averaged 13 carries per game in all the years he played for andy.

For top level RB talent, that is not enough.

Leaguewide average for a starting rb is between 17-22 carries per game.

I dont know who the “we” is that have gone over it, but andy has always abandoned the run. There is almost 2 decades of proof.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Franchise 03-18-2022 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16198718)
Like I said - the rush on Hill was to try to get him signed before Adams re-set the market.

If his agents are coming back to the table with the 're-set' figures in hand, then it's time to walk away from the table and try again next year. There's no rush. He's under contract for the season and you have the tag. Meanwhile the market isn't going to re-reset between now and NEXT March.

And the onus to get the money moved off this year's cap is gone. There's simply nobody out there worth chasing at the moment.

I'd simply break off and head home. If he wants to talk about $22 - $23 million and offer a bit of a team friendly structure to ensure it gets done this year, okay.

There's no incentive for the Chiefs to push the issue anymore. Let Hill and his people come to you.

The only problem I see with that is that Hill and his agent aren't going to come down in that cooling off period. And if Hill has any kind of a decent year stat wise....it could cause him to go higher. Especially if the cap increases like it should.

Not paying now only increases the chance that you're paying more....or you're getting closer to trading him.

kcbubb 03-18-2022 08:51 AM

How do you rank tyreek? This website has hill at 6th best in the nfl and if we are talking future performance, I’m taking jamarr chase over hill.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...2022-offseason

7. Ja'Marr Chase, Cincinnati Bengals
1 OF 7

Andy Lyons/Getty Images
Remember when Ja'Marr Chase dropped a few passes in the 2021 NFL preseason and panic ensued that someone who had 20 touchdowns at LSU in 2019 had suddenly forgotten how to play?

Good times, folks. Good times.

Reunited with college teammate Joe Burrow in Cincinnati, Chase put together a stellar rookie year. He reeled in 81 passes for a franchise-record 1,455 yards and 13 touchdowns, blending a high-volume role with superb explosiveness at 18.0 yards per reception. Chase ranked third in the league with 651 yards after catch.

Sure, he dropped some passes in the regular season too. This level of production more than atones for an occasional mistake, especially given how reliable Chase was at LSU.

Cincinnati has an unmistakable star in the reigning Offensive Rookie of the Year.

6. Tyreek Hill, Kansas City Chiefs
2 OF 7

David E. Klutho/Getty Images
Even if he's not the fastest player in the league, Tyreek Hill is immensely difficult to contain because of his speed (sub-4.3 40-yard dash).

Through six seasons with the Kansas City Chiefs, he's totaled 479 catches for 6,630 yards and 56 scores. Last year, he tallied a personal-best 111 receptions while providing 1,239 yards and and nine touchdowns. It was his fourth campaign of at least 1,183 yards.

Along with six Pro Bowl trips, Hill is a three-time first-team AP All-Pro, including as a returner in his rookie year.

The 28-year-old Hill's presence is a key reason for Kansas City's ability to stress defenses both vertically and horizontally.

5. Stefon Diggs, Buffalo Bills
3 OF 7

Boston Globe/Getty Images
After five quality seasons on the Minnesota Vikings, Stefon Diggs has reached a new height of performance with the Buffalo Bills.

Josh Allen's rise to prominence, unsurprisingly, has coincided with Diggs' arrival. He posted NFL-high marks of 127 catches and 1,535 yards in 2020 and then collected 103 receptions for 1,225 yards last season. Diggs totaled 18 scores in those two years.

Diggs, 28, is renowned for both his sharp route-running and his propensity for making contested catches, which is a lethal combination. He can create room, yet he doesn't need space to produce either.

Chase will probably be closing the gap in a hurry, but Diggs is the AFC's best receiver heading into 2022.

4. Deebo Samuel, San Francisco 49ers
4 OF 7

Dylan Buell/Getty Images
If any players are more versatile than Deebo Samuel, their roles haven't showed it. Nobody in the NFL is utilized more brilliantly than Samuel in head coach Kyle Shanahan's offense.

Last year, Samuel gathered 77 receptions for 1,405 yards to pace the league with 18.2 yards per reception. The first-team AP All-Pro selection also rushed for 365 yards, averaging 6.2 per carry, and scored eight touchdowns on the ground, with six more as a receiver. He even tossed a 24-yard score.

Get the ball to your best player. Novel concept, right?

Based on where he aligns and how he can contribute, Samuel is the most dynamic wideout in the league.

3. Justin Jefferson, Minnesota Vikings
5 OF 7

Adam Bettcher/Getty Images
Two seasons, two second-team AP All-Pro honors. Decent start for Justin Jefferson.

Chosen with the No. 22 overall pick in the 2020 NFL draft, the LSU product pulled in 88 passes for 1,400 yards and seven touchdowns as a rookie. He followed that up with 108 catches for 1,616 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2021.

The 22-year-old wideout has already notched two of the five most prolific years in franchise history, which is a massive feat for any organization. It's especially true in Minnesota, considering Hall of Famers Randy Moss and Cris Carter both spent the majority of their careers on the Vikings.

Last season, Jefferson (27) finished second only to Kupp (30) in receptions of 20-plus yards.

2. Davante Adams, Green Bay Packers
6 OF 7

Icon Sportswire/Getty Images
If you prefer Davante Adams at No. 1, we're not arguing. This is a strong 1A/1B kind of discussion.

Over the last half-decade, the Green Bay Packers icon has developed into an outrageously precise route-runner who creates separation within three steps. Sure, it helps to have Aaron Rodgers throwing the ball, but Adams is a superstar on his own.

Most notably, Adams just earned first-team AP All-Pro recognition for the second straight year. He made 115 catches for 1,374 yards and an NFL-best 18 touchdowns in 2020 and then set career-high marks of 123 receptions and 1,553 yards with 11 scores in 2021.

Now that Rodgers has announced his plans to return, expect another monstrous season from Adams in Green Bay.

1. Cooper Kupp, Los Angeles Rams
7 OF 7

Jayne Kamin-Oncea/Getty Images
Which part of Cooper Kupp's 2021 campaign was most impressive?

Not only did the fifth-year receiver lead the league in receptions (145), but it also was the second-highest total in history. He also paced the league with 1,947 yards, 846 yards after catch, 30 grabs of 20-plus yards, 16 touchdowns and 89 first downs.

During the postseason, Kupp snagged a touchdown in each of the Los Angeles Rams' four games—including two scores in both the NFC championship and Super Bowl LVI. He ended the playoffs with 33 catches for 478 yards and six touchdowns, which rank first, second and second, respectively, all-time.

Kupp won AP Offensive Player of the Year and Super Bowl LVI MVP, along with finishing third in regular-season MVP voting.

Adams has tenure, yes. Kupp, though, just assembled a legendary season on the heels of consecutive 90-catch years. He's the most dangerous receiver in the game.

Red Dawg 03-18-2022 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16198758)
The only problem I see with that is that Hill and his agent aren't going to come down in that cooling off period. And if Hill has any kind of a decent year stat wise....it could cause him to go higher. Especially if the cap increases like it should.

Not paying now only increases the chance that you're paying more....or you're getting closer to trading him.

Hill is ranked like 5th in the league. Pay him that and he's probably good with it.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 08:53 AM

OTC has our cap space at $1.9 million.

Looking at the Frank Clark numbers.

Cap hit in 2022 of $13.7 million.
Cap hit in 2023 of $28.675 million. Dead cap hit of $9 million. Cutting him would give us $19.6 million.

htismaqe 03-18-2022 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16198770)
OTC has our cap space at $1.9 million.

Looking at the Frank Clark numbers.

Cap hit in 2022 of $13.7 million.
Cap hit in 2023 of $28.675 million. Dead cap hit of $9 million. Cutting him would give us $19.6 million.

Spotrac has a disclaimer that says "POTENTIAL OUT: 2023, YR, $0; $0 DEAD CAP" right before listing his 2023 cap numbers, including the $9M in dead money.

I don't understand how they're just going to make that dead money go away.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/kansas-c...k-clark-16787/

booger 03-18-2022 09:00 AM

https://www.nfl.com/players/Kyle-Van-Noy/stats/

They were interested in bringing back Damion Wilson but he signed with Carolina. He had a very good year last year in Cullen’s D in Jacksonville. Kyle Van Noy will turn 31 later this month and had 5 sacks and 9 (excellent for a LB) passes break ups. Would be a nice Sam with rush ability.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16198774)
Spotrac has a disclaimer that says "POTENTIAL OUT: 2023, YR, $0; $0 DEAD CAP" right before listing his 2023 cap numbers, including the $9M in dead money.

I don't understand how they're just going to make that dead money go away.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/kansas-c...k-clark-16787/

It's weird that Spotrac has his new numbers but hasn't adjusted our salary cap. Where OTC has the updated salary cap numbers but doesn't have that 2023 Out comment.

duncan_idaho 03-18-2022 09:05 AM

That list of top wideouts is funny. I wouldn't take any of those dudes for this offense over Tyreek Hill.

Re: Sammy Watkins, if the price is right I'm OK with the idea of checking him out. It can't be the only move you make at WR, but he does more for this offense, when healthy, than anyone available in free agency besides a healthy Odell Beckham, Jr. or a healthy Julio Jones.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.