:clap:

The states best recruit is Allen Lazard. Unless you mean the 2nd ranked guy who was verbally committed to Iowa before switching to Alabama, and would have been their top recruit.

i don't blame Texas at all. A&M is cleaning up in recruiting and would kick the crap out of them on the field as well.

Texas made A&M their bitch for the entire history they played. Even the most popular player in A&M history is a Longhorn fan.

You can't own more hard than that.

MU-KU had a 50-50 split in football and KU thoroughly dominated in basketball.

It really wasn't a rivalry.

Dude, give it up. Your schtick gets old.

Great rivalries involve both teams playing at a high level. With the exception of 2007-08 when exactly was KU-MU a rivalry?

Your right, one year KU played at a high level. Good post keep it up :thumb:

If you guys were worth a shit it would have been a great one, but unfortunately KU sucked & still does.

Dude you have to be the dumbest poster on the Planet.

Tell us again about the 28 Shreveport Bowls Mizzou has played in.

one year is all it took to accomplish more then Missouri ever has.

What does it say about Missouri when Kansas sucked so hard and its still only 50 - 50 split? ROFL

It says: It's a rivalry game. It also is the second most-played series in college football. Both teams spent the start of the modern era being awful, which hurts the perception overall. That is also the only measure you can use that makes them look anything like even. Missouri dominates the other measures (Bowl Appearances, major bowl appearances, conference titles, division titles, bowl wins, winning percentage).

Kansas obviously got the better end of the basketball series, but let me know when another Big 12 has as many wins against Kansas as Missouri does. Should only take KSU about another decade to get the 4 wins it needs to tie Missouri for wins against Kansas.

Missouri might not be a program on equal footing with Kansas all-time, but it has had more success against the Jayhawks than other former or current Big 8/12 program. And during Norm Stewart's coaching career, the series WAS nearly even (he was 30-34 in the regular season against KU).

It's fading a bit now, for many of the more casual fans, because they aren't playing. Time will tell how the hate survives... but only revisionist history can claim it was not a rivalry.

wow. This post destroys. And it's not even 9am!

Your greatest year in school history and Mizzou beat you and ended up with a higher ranking...This has been covered.

Yes, it's lack of factual accuracy is pretty devastating...

They beat us in the number of years the school was paying for the ticket guarantees used to purchase their bowl berth.

Too bad this post is not true. Only PB and Hypocritson would believe a statement so fundamentally stupid.

I read all of Bambi's posts in a Simple Jack voice.

Instead of saying I'm wrong why can't you prove it? How many bcs bowls has Missouri ever won?

Missouri has won both an Orange Bowl and a Sugar Bowl.

Missouri has appeared in the Orange Bowl 4 times, the Sugar Bowl 2 times, and the Fiesta Bowl once.

Each of those appearances coincided with actually winning the conference in which Missouri played.

BCS bowls are now a distinction of the past, just like the Bowl Alliance berths. The only thing that remains are the bowls themselves.

Challenging Duncan to prove something typically won't work out the way you want.

Why that means nothing, according to the BCS KU was one of the best teams that's why they got invited to a BCS game. It's all fine and dandy that MU has been to all those bowls. Was the orange bowl when they went there a top bowl game?

Mizzou and Navy were both in the top five when they played in '61, and Penn State was #2 and undefeated when they beat Mizzou in '70. In other words, yes, it was a major bowl at that time.

Not that more evidence is needed, but you should throw the Cotton Bowls in there as well. The history and distinction of the bowl is on par with the others, in my opinion. And they were essentially runner up to MNC games.

Mizzou football doesn't "dominate" jack shit compared to Kansas. Their all time win % is marginally better (it was 7th among the Big 12 schools while Kansas was 8th, big whoop). They split head to head. They didn't ever win the conference either. The only thing they dominated in was Shreveport Bowl appearances. Congrats.


When Gary Pinkel is being discussed as worthy of a freakin statue outside your stadium, folks will never take your program all that serious.

Seriously?

Yes. The Rose, Orange and Sugar have pretty much always been major, prestigious bowls.

Start-up periods in the great depression aside.

The big issue with your own sentence here is the "got invited" part. Had you automatically qualified by winning your conference, your argument with have slightly more weight.

So if you're adding all those in how many national championships does KU have in basketball?

Keep ignoring the facts. It's cute.

The head-to-head is the only situation in which Kansas is on close to even ground. Everywhere else, it is significantly separated.

All time winning percentage, bowl appearances, major bowl appearances, bowl wins, major bowl wins, conference titles, division titles all skew heavily in Missouri's favor.

Mock Pinkel all you want. He's a top 25-30 coach in college football and has had a strong, steady program that has won 43 games over the past 5 years and 93 over the past 10.

His first recruiting class graduated in 2005. In the 8 seasons since, he has won 73 games.

Dude clearly sucks, right?

Looks like Bambi and PB have a comrade in arms. Congrats on proving yourself worthy of that illustrious group.

The word "dominate" means significant gap, which of course does not remotely exist in the two program histories. Using that word in your description is false and just pathetic. In the 80s you had about 10k fans at some games. I know, I was there. You had losing seasons almost the entire 1980s and 1990s. So by that measure yes, Gary Pinkel has been a miracle worker there. (By that measure only).

Lmao I'm just doing some friendly trash talking, mu football is a marginally better program then KU.

Mizzou winning more bowl games than KU has appeared in the last 100 years is a significant gap.

Winning percentage: .549 vs. .496
Bowl apperances: Missouri has appeared in 2.5 times as many bowl games as Kansas
Bowl wins: Missouri has won 2 times as many bowls as Kansas
Major bowl appearances: Missouri has made 2.3 times as many major bowl appearances as Kansas (not even counting Cotton, which takes this to 3.3 times as many and will be counted by future generations as a major bowl as "major bowl" thinking expands to top 6-8 rather than top 4)
Major bowl wins: Missouri has won 2 times as many major bowls as Kansas (4 times as if you include Cotton)
Conference titles: Missouri has nearly 2 times as many (15 vs. 8)
Division titles: Missouri has 4 times as many (giving each credit for a tie)

Missouri was 7th in all time win % and Kansas was 8th among Big 12 schools. They tied all time head to head. They both have 2 top-10 finishes since man walked on the moon. Congrats on the extra Shreveport Bowls. I will give Pinkel due credit for making Mizzou a good team nationally since he's been there.

TCU granted membership into the Big 12 after a night of drinking with Texas' AD:



(TCU Athletic Director) Del Conte admitted, “the pressure of the entire institution was on my shoulders” to join the Big 12. He worked the phones, calling every Big 12 contact he knew. Support within the Big 12 was growing, including at Oklahoma where good friend Joe Castiglione had been encouraging. But Del Conte knew if he didn't have Texas, he didn't have a chance.

“I've got one shot,” he recounted, “to go see DeLoss.”

It was a quite a visit. Del Conte grabbed a car, a driver and a bunch of reference material, binders, extolling the advantages of TCU and Fort Worth.

“I get up at 8 o'clock in the morning and drive to Darrell K. Royal Stadium. I get to [Dodds'] office. Nine comes around, 10 comes around. I've got a GA [graduate assistant] outside waiting for me, by the way. I tell him, ‘Just wait 10 minutes I'll be back.' Pretty soon it's 3:30.

“[DeLoss] comes out and says, ‘Who are you?' Chris Del Conte, Texas Christian U. He doesn't hear ‘Chris.' he hears ‘Del'. ‘Del, let's go get ourselves a drink and discuss it.'

“We went to a restaurant and had a little libation at 3:30. By the time 8:30 rolls around, we were [into it] pretty good but we got ourselves in a situation. I kept trying to give him my [binders]. He said, ‘I've heard enough, Del' and just walked away.”

The Big 12 ADs had a conference call the next day.

“The next morning I got up. Joe [Castiglione] goes, ‘I don't know what you did but it worked.' We got the vote. The Frogs are in,' Del Conte said.....

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...eing-in-big-12

Keep clinging to that Big 12 sample size. I'll keep talking about the historical reach of the programs.

Missouri is at top 40 major program all-time. KU is top 60-75.

Missouri is a top 15-20 program over the past 10 years. Kansas is maybe a top 75 program in that history.

The all-time head-to-head is close. Football programs are measured by bowl appearances, major bowl appearances, bowl wins, major bowl wins, conference titles, division titles, and, of course, national titles.

I'd don't know why you take issue with calling being 2x to 4x as good in those metrics "domination." But it seems like a pretty apt word for it.

Who hasn't hooked up with an ugly chick after a hard night of drinking only to regret it later?

Because he doesn't have a rational comeback for it, and it lessens his arguments against MU not being better than KU.

I don't call being 7th vs 8th "2-4x as good". You need remedial math if you think that.

Dude got even dumber over night. So much fail by PB

Right now MU has better talent in their program but all I saw when I check my Super Bowl program this year were KU names.

So they were used to blow outs then.

Yes, KU has CLEARLY done a much better job of churning out NFL talent over the last 10 years than Mizzou . . . .

You guys win.

:rolleyes:

What is the point here? Last year Missouri had Justin Smith and Aldon Smith.

re-watch party?
 

Once thought to be impossible, Mizzou may have just hit an all-time low in pathetic:



Retweeted by The Antlers
Charles Gutierrez ‏@_CharlesGuti Feb 5
@The_Antlers Re-watch party for the 2012 Mizzou-kU basketball game at 7pm this Friday, February 7th in Conservation Auditorium #MIZ
Collapse Reply Retweet Favorite More

RETWEETS
3
FAVORITES
7

TimmystevenJgrantEℓizabeth SoℓomonAutumn. ∞Austen McGranahanAlex FosterMissouriPrincess
2:20 PM - 5 Feb 2014 · Details:doh!::doh!::doh!::doh!::doh!::doh!:

And right on queue...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200...de-the-numbers

I agree, it is pretty stupid.

Completely irrelevant, and it's been pointed out to you that neither of them even touched the field.


I'm sure this one will bring crickets from the KU clowns. Or maybe they'll say something about how getting invited to the combine means nothing. Which is correct, if you're talking about how good an entire team since wins and losses are how we judge teams...not individual accomplishments. But it also speaks to how completely inept of a football program they have. Seriously. Not one single player is good enough to get showcased to the pros?? Not a good look for your school. And not something an 18yo kid with hopes of playing on Sundays would want in a program he chooses.

Do other SEC fanbases know you're showing old re-runs of wins over KU?

Who cares? A friday night when it is 15 below zero and a bunch of Mizzou fans get together somewhere warm, watch an old game, and drink a bunch of beer.....

Not sure why anyone would even give a shit about that. Mizzou fans certainly do not give a shit every time KU fans watch the 2007 Orange Bowl that the school probably still owes money on......

Not any sadder than you fools bringing up that fraud fruit bowl

:popcorn:

Yeah mo difference at all in the football programs the last decade ROFL ****ing buffoons

Crazy Sims didn't get invited to the combine

They shoulda broadcast it at Mizzou Arena, so you could finally draw some fans.

Fyp

You'd think KU fans would get tired of constantly getting shitted on ITT, but still they come back every day for more.

That's the funny thing though, it's basketball season and we could be shitting on everyone but we don't. The King doesn't need to mention he's king.

Everytime I look at the pics below your main sig, this is my thought process:

"Mmhmm," then "Sure," then "**** you," then "Makes sense," and finally "People claim to be Mets fans?"

Yep, Crickets are out on this one from the KU trolls. Funny how they troll this topic and facts are presented and they quickly disappear like roaches when the light is turned on. Interesting how the same article mentions KU is the only school in the 5 major conferences not to have a representative and how it mentions Mizzou is 1 of 13 schools with at least 6 (7).
I don't care to bag on KU, but these two bozos make it their life mission to be a dead fly on Mizzou fans' windshields. Stop worrying about us, Mizzou will continue to push forward. Be happy in your basketball program doing good things this year and stop worrying about your relevance in the minds of Mizzou fans.

I don't think Chris Harris and Steven Johnson were invited to the combine either.

And they made the Super Bowl.

I have no doubt Sims will be joining them next season.

Chris Harris is a good NFL regular. He and Talib are the only two players of note in the NFL from KU, the latter much more than the former.

Steve Johnson had 6 tackles this year...meaning he RARELY even touched the field.

I'm not positive, but an educated guess leads me to believe they "made" the Super Bowl due to the fact they played on a team that had the best offense in the history of the NFL. One of these guys is a special teamer and the other plays corner, in case you were unaware what these two did other than have Kansas in their bio on espn.com.

Harris is garbage and nobody even knows who Stevie is

Sticker isn't great, but he's not bad. I don't know if that makes him "of note."

Pillow fight in here....

Our basketball program does good things EVERY year. Mizzou relevance in anything is a fleeting prospect year to year.

Troll fail.

Relevance in anything?... Just won the SEC east and Cotton bowl and finished #5 in the country? I get it, Mizzou is your rival/former rival so it's hard to admit anything positive, but don't go full reerun like the other trolls or you will be thrown in the same aids fire that they are in.

This seems to be the trend post SEC move. Most Mizzou fans acknowledge that KU is a very good/great bball team with a fantastic coach...but KU fans for the life of them cannot admit that Mizzou is good at anything at all. Win the SEC East? Be one game away from the national championship game? Nah. Finish in the top 5? Nah.

I think it is safe to assert that MU fans have moved on and are focused on the future in the SEC....KU fans are stuck in the mud, even though they would never, ever, admit it.

So how was the re-run of 2012s game? Anyone a student here, anyone who went last night? How was the "vibe"? (Busts out laughing)

Some of the cry babies in here fit that description completely.

Yet MU fans are the one crying about how KU won't play you.

Not crying so much. Laughing is more like it.

Two sides of this coin for me. On one side I'd rather MU get its gimme non-conference win in the Border War than against Indiana. But on the other side it is hilarious to watch kU both be too scared to play us and be left in the past as an irrelevant former rival in conference that is basically the MWC + OU & Texas.

No crying involved, it's a win/win for MU either way.

Missouri doesn't border Indiana...

Correct, just using them as an example of a replaceable non-conference game against a crap team from a power conference that's all.