ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Bambi 06-12-2010 03:24 AM

PAC 10 West:

USC
UCLA
Stanford
Washington
Washington St.
Oregon
Oregon St.
California

PAC 10 East:

Kansas
Texas
Colorado
Oklahoma
Oklahoma St.
Arizona
Arizona St.
Texas Tech


One word............




























Leet

Fairplay 06-12-2010 03:27 AM

In

Bambi 06-12-2010 03:29 AM

Big 10 West:

Iowa
Nebraska
Missouri
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Michigan
Michigan St.
Illinois

Big 10 East:

Indiana
Penn St.
Ohio St.
Purdue
Syracuse
Rutgers
Notre Dame
Northwestern



good, but second tier

Bambi 06-12-2010 03:32 AM

SEC West:

Alabama
Arkansas
LSU
Auburn
Mississippi St.
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Texas A&M

SEC East:

Florida
Florida St.
Miami
Tennessee
South Carolina
Kentucky
Georgia
Georgia Tech

Pushead2 06-12-2010 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6816108)
Big 10 West:


Michigan


Big 10 East:


Ohio St.


Honestly, that's all that matters in the Big 10.

Bambi 06-12-2010 03:41 AM

ACC North:

Boston College
Duke
Maryland
Connecticut
Pittsburgh
West Virginia
Louisville
Cincinnati

ACC South:

Clemson
North Carolina
North Carolina St.
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
South Florida
Kansas St.

Bambi 06-12-2010 03:44 AM

Iowa St., Baylor are unfortunately out...

Fairplay 06-12-2010 03:46 AM

In

007 06-12-2010 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6816101)
PAC 10 West:

USC
UCLA
Stanford
Washington
Washington St.
Oregon
Oregon St.
California

PAC 10 East:

Kansas
Texas
Colorado
Oklahoma
Oklahoma St.
Arizona
Arizona St.
Texas Tech


One word............




























Leet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6816114)
ACC North:

Boston College
Duke
Maryland
Connecticut
Pittsburgh
West Virginia
Louisville
Cincinnati

ACC South:

Clemson
North Carolina
North Carolina St.
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
South Florida
Kansas St.

Swap KU and KSU.

Fairplay 06-12-2010 04:23 AM

I agree

DaKCMan AP 06-12-2010 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6816112)
SEC West:

Alabama
Arkansas
LSU
Auburn
Mississippi St.
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Texas A&M

SEC East:

Florida
Florida St.
Miami
Tennessee
South Carolina
Kentucky
Georgia
Georgia Tech

It is extremely unlikely that Miami gets an invite to the SEC. It's most likely a combination of Texas A&M, Florida State, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Clemson, and Georgia Tech.

Personally, I'd prefer the SEC add A&M and VT and call it a day at 14 teams. Still better in football than any of the 16-team conferences. If they had to get to 16 then any of the remaining teams above would be ok, I guess.

HolyHandgernade 06-12-2010 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6816188)
It is extremely unlikely that Miami gets an invite to the SEC. It's most likely a combination of Texas A&M, Florida State, Virginia Tech, Virginia, Clemson, and Georgia Tech.

Personally, I'd prefer the SEC add A&M and VT and call it a day at 14 teams. Still better in football than any of the 16-team conferences. If they had to get to 16 then any of the remaining teams above would be ok, I guess.

It depends if the new PAC-16 gets two auto bids or not for the BCS. If they do, SEC will go to 16 faster than the Big 10 will, but I agree with you they don't need to right now. I don't know if its true or not, but I've heard initial feelers are that Va Tech isn't interested in leaving the ACC. Florida doesn't want another Florida team, but that might get overridden if FSU wants to join, but as of now FSU is luke warm to that idea as well. The general feeling is that Clemson and Ga Tech don't add a significant amount of viewers the SEC doesn't already claim with S. Carolina and Georgia. That's why A&M is someone they want, and they might be willing to add one more to round out the conference. The desire is to add new territory to the SEC and if neither of the big Virginia schools are interested, your most likely candidates are Maryland and Missouri.

DomerNKC 06-12-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6816108)
Big 10 West:

Iowa
Nebraska
Missouri
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Michigan
Michigan St.
Illinois

Big 10 East:

Indiana
Penn St.
Ohio St.
Purdue
Syracuse
Rutgers
Notre Dame
Northwestern



good, but second tier

One problem, Notre Dame is not joining a conference.

DaKCMan AP 06-12-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 6816247)
It depends if the new PAC-16 gets two auto bids or not for the BCS. If they do, SEC will go to 16 faster than the Big 10 will, but I agree with you they don't need to right now. I don't know if its true or not, but I've heard initial feelers are that Va Tech isn't interested in leaving the ACC. Florida doesn't want another Florida team, but that might get overridden if FSU wants to join, but as of now FSU is luke warm to that idea as well. The general feeling is that Clemson and Ga Tech don't add a significant amount of viewers the SEC doesn't already claim with S. Carolina and Georgia. That's why A&M is someone they want, and they might be willing to add one more to round out the conference. The desire is to add new territory to the SEC and if neither of the big Virginia schools are interested, your most likely candidates are Maryland and Missouri.

I agree that A&M would be a big get. As far as VT, what I've heard is it's the same deal as KU/KSU and UT/A&M in that VT/UVA might be a package deal. I'd be ok with adding both of them, A&M and then either FSU/Clemson/Ga Tech.

The Pac-10 wont get 2 auto-bids unless 4 16-team conferences are formed. They especially wont get 2 auto-bids as a 16-team conference with no conference championship game. Talk about a big group of 16 pansy schools scared to have a true conference champ.

bango 06-12-2010 09:37 AM

The big problem is that the Big Ten, and the Pac 10 are going to try to hard to look like they aren't doing anything wrong. In this game there are not going to be any good guys, and the finger pointing is going to be pointless. Many fans, and media are going to dwell on what will turn out wrong on these deals. The Big Ten started this, but is going to try to blame Mizzou, Colorado, and/or the Pac 10. The Pac 10 will turn around, and try to blame the Big Ten. The Big Ten will then try to blame Notre Dame. I think these are the reasons that this is just starting instead of just wrapping up. The Big East, and The Big XII are the newer Leagues, and I know that is just in legal terms. There was a Big Eight that added an even larger Texas Four. There were a group of indies that play one another for years, and most of them just decided that it would be for the best to come together as a new league. There are going to be enough angry people around to look for someone to blame. The Two Tens will try to say that it was the other one. The Big Ten could be the Con that gets messed over the most. They will pretend that they care as they sit in a backroom counting all of the money. The SEC, and ACC do not care, and can make the most out of al of this. They can say that they were just trying to protect themselves. Notre Dame doesn't have to join up with anyone. They could earn more if they did. Notre Dame, and Texas want to be the largest rooster in the coop that they are in. I think that is why Texas would like nothing to do with the SEC. They would have way too much competition from Florida, and others. It would make the most sense for the two larger Tex Schools, and the OK Schools to just make the jump to the SEC. It would make the most sense if the main BCS Leagues would just raid all of the minor ones. Instead they are going to cause so many problems by going after one another. I am just going to follow it, enjoy it, and laugh when all of the crying starts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.