ChiefsPlanet - Football ****Official 2022 Free Agency Megathread****

Cooks has missed 4 games the last 5 years and has been a 1k receiver in 6 of the last 7 seasons.

How could you not want that for cheap? Pretty sure he’s $13 million this year

These arguments are not without merit but I don't trust someone his size, his age, and with his concussion history.

The Franchise

03-29-2022 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16222164)

Trade Tyreek bc he wants too much.
Get draft picks.
Give up high draft pick (a) foe Metcalf
Metcalf wants to be highest paid WR next Spring

What are we doing here?

I've gone on record against trading for Metcalf. I think McLaurin would be cheaper and cost less when it comes to draft picks.

OnTheWarpath15

03-29-2022 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16222164)

Trade Tyreek bc he wants too much.
Get draft picks.
Give up high draft pick (a) foe Metcalf
Metcalf wants to be highest paid WR next Spring

What are we doing here?

Metcalf isn't getting $30M.

And if he told Seattle he was expecting that type of money, he'd already have been traded.

FloridaMan88

03-29-2022 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16221557)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">ESPN's <a href="https://twitter.com/diannaESPN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@diannaESPN</a> reported on SportsCenter this morning that the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> are actively making phone calls to try and trade for another top wide receiver. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a></p>— Devon Clements (@DevclemNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/DevclemNFL/status/1508782151633940483?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'd rather the Chiefs aggressively use their draft capital to trade up in the first round and draft one of those stud WR's... there are like SIX WR's projected to go in the first round of the draft.

The only other veteran WR free agent I think the Chiefs should add is someone to help provide depth that is cheap... someone like a Sammy Watkins.

TwistedChief

03-29-2022 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16222164)

Trade Tyreek bc he wants too much.
Get draft picks.
Give up high draft pick(s?) for Metcalf
Metcalf wants to be highest paid WR next Spring

What are we doing here?

We are doing nothing but dreaming and speculating on things that are probably <10% probability.

Veach is kicking ALL tires as he should be doing as a GM.

Reports are reporting.

That's all.

O.city

03-29-2022 11:05 AM

One of these WR's going early will end up being really good. Maybe 2. Which ones? Who knows.

I don't think the Chiefs should trade the capitol to go up and get one.

OnTheWarpath15

03-29-2022 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16222184)

We are doing nothing but dreaming and speculating on things that are probably <10% probability.

Veach is kicking ALL tires as he should be doing as a GM.

Reports are reporting.

That's all.

Yep.

ToxSocks

03-29-2022 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16222152)

Cooks has missed 4 games the last 5 years and has been a 1k receiver in 6 of the last 7 seasons.

How could you not want that for cheap? Pretty sure he’s $13 million this year

Does not fit the Chiefs Way.

Too old, too much mileage. He'll be 29 when the season starts, which, for the Chiefs, is old.

The Franchise

03-29-2022 11:06 AM

And everyone is looking at guys like Metcalf....but that's not what the report said.

chiefforlife

03-29-2022 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16222175)

I've gone on record against trading for Metcalf. I think McLaurin would be cheaper and cost less when it comes to draft picks.

DK would be awesome but it makes NO SENSE. After trading Tyreek away we would have to give up the picks we got for him. After playing a season with Mahomes, DK would probably get MORE money than Tyreek.

This is why Franchise is saying no and everyone has to see this.

OnTheWarpath15

03-29-2022 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16222186)

One of these WR's going early will end up being really good. Maybe 2. Which ones? Who knows.

I don't think the Chiefs should trade the capitol to go up and get one.

Exactly.

Go take a look at WR draft history in R1 and see how many were actually worth it.

Hint: Not many.

Archie Bunker

03-29-2022 11:06 AM

Probably for Bradberry I’d assume.

ToxSocks

03-29-2022 11:07 AM

If the Chiefs stay put and draft a WR with one of those 1sts, i'm reaaaally starting to warm up to Christian Watson. That dude is freaky.

The Franchise

03-29-2022 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16222199)

If the Chiefs stay put and draft a WR with one of those 1sts, i'm reaaaally starting to warm up to Christian Watson. That dude is freaky.

You spelled Treylon Burks wrong.

ToxSocks

03-29-2022 11:09 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahawks</a> HC Pete Carroll said the team “intends” for DK Metcalf to be with them next season. <br><br>Carroll used the same word to describe Russell Wilson’s future at the Combine. <br><br>Metcalf is entering the final year of his contract and the WR market has �� in the last couple weeks.</p>— Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1508783471900123146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Page 320 of 488

320

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page