ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Science Science is Cool.... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259769)

Fish 09-21-2016 08:45 PM

Holy shit you guys...

http://i63.tinypic.com/2hd6r8k.jpg

NASA to Hold Media Call on Evidence of Surprising Activity on Europa

NASA will host a teleconference at 2 p.m. EDT Monday, Sept. 26, to present new findings from images captured by the agency’s Hubble Space Telescope of Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa.

Astronomers will present results from a unique Europa observing campaign that resulted in surprising evidence of activity that may be related to the presence of a subsurface ocean on Europa. Participants in the teleconference will be:
  • Paul Hertz, director of the Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington
  • William Sparks, astronomer with the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore
  • Britney Schmidt, assistant professor at the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta
  • Jennifer Wiseman, senior Hubble project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland

To participate by phone, media must contact Dwayne Brown at 202-358-1726 or dwayne.c.brown@nasa.gov and provide their media affiliation no later than noon Monday.

Audio of the teleconference will stream live on NASA’s website at:

http://www.nasa.gov/live

For information about NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/hubble

-end-

Discuss Thrower 09-21-2016 08:56 PM

The Chinese have lost control of Tiangong-1 and it will crash into the planet in about a year's time.

Fish 09-21-2016 09:01 PM

Yeah, that's true, but that has nothing to do with the above announcement...

CONFIRMED: China's Space Station Is Out Of Control And Currently Crashing Towards Earth

After few months of doubt and suspicion, China has just now confirmed their first space station is travelling towards the Earth and is completely out of control. A senior official of the Chinese space program publicized at a press conference just last week that the Tiangong-1 space station is expected to descent to Earth by 2017, Xinhua News Agency reports. They also said that it's presently unbroken and orbiting at a height of around 370 kilometers (230 miles).

http://i65.tinypic.com/2m4vl3b.jpg

Wu Ping, deputy director of China's manned space engineering office, during the recent press conference, said:

"Based on our calculation and analysis, most parts of the space lab will burn up during falling"

Chinese officials publicized that the space agency will carry on to follow the route of Tiangong-1 and will issue an update on its probable time of arrival if essential.

Tiangong-1, which means “Heavenly Palace," is about 10.3-meter-long (34-foot-long). It was launched back in 2011 as China’s first manned space station. It finished its mission in March this year. Nevertheless, since then, many astronomers pointed out that the space station seemed to be purposelessly drifting out of control and heading for Earth. The quietness by the Chinese government only intensified doubts about the control of the space station.


China has also launched a new investigational space station, Tiangong-2, just last week, and are currently planning to send a well-developed space station in the start of next decade.

GloryDayz 09-21-2016 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12441437)
Holy shit you guys...

http://i63.tinypic.com/2hd6r8k.jpg

NASA to Hold Media Call on Evidence of Surprising Activity on Europa

NASA will host a teleconference at 2 p.m. EDT Monday, Sept. 26, to present new findings from images captured by the agency’s Hubble Space Telescope of Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa.

Astronomers will present results from a unique Europa observing campaign that resulted in surprising evidence of activity that may be related to the presence of a subsurface ocean on Europa. Participants in the teleconference will be:
  • Paul Hertz, director of the Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington
  • William Sparks, astronomer with the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore
  • Britney Schmidt, assistant professor at the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta
  • Jennifer Wiseman, senior Hubble project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland

To participate by phone, media must contact Dwayne Brown at 202-358-1726 or dwayne.c.brown@nasa.gov and provide their media affiliation no later than noon Monday.

Audio of the teleconference will stream live on NASA’s website at:

http://www.nasa.gov/live

For information about NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/hubble

-end-

Prairie Dogs on Europa?

http://33.media.tumblr.com/c5a57e457...y8efo3_500.gif

Fish 09-21-2016 09:06 PM

There are 12 dots present in this pic, but your brain will not let you see them all at one viewing angle.

http://geekologie.com/2016/09/12/12-dots.jpg

Nickhead 09-21-2016 09:20 PM

i can, ctrl - :D

GloryDayz 09-21-2016 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12441463)
There are 12 dots present in this pic, but your brain will not let you see them all at one viewing angle.

http://geekologie.com/2016/09/12/12-dots.jpg

More fun stuff.. (watch full screen)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3P8q_dCU3RI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Gadzooks 09-21-2016 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12441463)
There are 12 dots present in this pic, but your brain will not let you see them all at one viewing angle.

http://geekologie.com/2016/09/12/12-dots.jpg

The most I can do is 5 dots at a time.
http://www.imageleech.net/wp-content...ed-up-eyes.jpg

stumppy 09-21-2016 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12441463)
There are 12 dots present in this pic, but your brain will not let you see them all at one viewing angle.

http://geekologie.com/2016/09/12/12-dots.jpg

What the....but they're there. But I can't see all of them....but......OMG...WITCH....WITCH....HE'S A WITCH, BURN HIM, BURN HIM NOW!

:D

Fish 09-22-2016 09:09 AM

https://i.imgur.com/ltzWHQf.gif

https://i.imgur.com/JjcjorP.png

Fish 09-27-2016 08:39 PM

http://i66.tinypic.com/2ypc48l.png

Fish 09-27-2016 08:40 PM

https://i.imgur.com/UoZMp5Y.gif

Fish 09-27-2016 08:42 PM

http://i65.tinypic.com/2s7f0wm.jpg

Fish 09-27-2016 08:44 PM

http://i67.tinypic.com/4rvkhj.jpg

LMAO...

Rain Man 09-27-2016 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12453648)

It doesn't seem like that long, but I'm moving.

GloryDayz 09-28-2016 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12453650)

Cool gif of the day award (so far)... Rep applied..

GloryDayz 09-28-2016 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12453652)

Having spent a lot of my youth in Rome, it's hard to believe we've not converted.

Beef Supreme 09-28-2016 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12453818)
Having spent a lot of my youth in Rome, it's hard to believe we've not converted.

We converted in 1980. They made a huge deal about it and everything. The end result was we got the 2-liter bottle.

GloryDayz 09-28-2016 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 12454024)
We converted in 1980. They made a huge deal about it and everything. The end result was we got the 2-liter bottle.

Sad, huh?

Rain Man 09-28-2016 01:14 PM

If I remember right, the metric conversion in the U.S. was halted due to large numbers of deaths eating meter-long hot dogs.

ptlyon 09-28-2016 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12454452)
If I remember right, the metric conversion in the U.S. was halted due to large numbers of deaths eating meter-long hot dogs.

Damn ROFL

ptlyon 09-28-2016 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 12453818)
Having spent a lot of my youth in Rome, it's hard to believe we've not converted.

When in Rome, did you do what the other youths did?

Discuss Thrower 09-28-2016 01:27 PM

""Times are bad. Children don't listen to their parents, and everyone is writing a book."

Easy 6 09-28-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 12454024)
We converted in 1980. They made a huge deal about it and everything. The end result was we got the 2-liter bottle.

LMAO I remember when my school started the big push to make it happen, then one day it just kinda stopped...

ptlyon 09-28-2016 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12454486)
LMAO I remember when my school started the big push to make it happen, then one day it just kinda stopped...

Because they finally figured out that "give them a millimeter and they'll take a kilometer" just doesn't sound right

Easy 6 09-28-2016 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12454501)
Because they finally figured out that "give them a millimeter and they'll take a kilometer" just doesn't sound right

Heh, indeed it does not

Fish 09-28-2016 03:31 PM

Science, bitches!

NASA-Supported Collision Avoidance System Saves Unconscious F-16 Pilot In Fourth Confirmed Rescue

Two pilots who credit a NASA-supported technology with saving one of their lives during a May training exercise mishap paid a visit to NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, to meet with some of the very engineers responsible for its development.

A United States Air Force Major and F-16 flight instructor, and a foreign Air Force pilot student, spent an afternoon at the NASA center, as guests during the center’s 2016 NASA Honor Awards.

<iframe width="985" height="764" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aSzXqlnT7nQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The pilots spent the day with NASA Armstrong center director David McBride, project manager Mark Skoog, and several other engineers and managers responsible for developing and advancing the Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System, or Auto-GCAS. Both pilots say that without the system, developed in part by NASA, one of them would not be alive today.

Auto-GCAS is an aircraft software system that activates upon detecting a collision course with the ground. It warns the pilot, and if imminent collision with the ground is determined, it locks the pilot controls and performs an automatic recovery maneuver, returning full control back to the pilot once the aircraft has cleared the terrain.

“There have been numerous accident reports over the years where it’s been pilot error,” explained the flight instructor, who graduated from pilot training in 2007 and now teaches young pilots how to fly F-16s. “That’s one of the things that frames my discussion with a lot of the young students that I teach, is that your chances of dying in combat are up there, it’s a dangerous thing. But most F-16 pilots over the years die in training accidents.”

The Tucson Air National Guard had been conducting a standard training scenario, known as basic fighter maneuvers, or BFM, in F-16s. For the student, it was his first high-aspect BFM flight. In essence, the scenario was designed for the student to fly a head-on pass with the instructor, with both aircraft flying directly at each other initially. Then, once they pass, or “merge,” each pilot tries to out-maneuver the other. The exercise is meant to train pilots in maneuvers necessary for aerial combat, and requires three dimensional maneuvering under high g.

Following the pass, the student banked his F-16 and began maneuvering, pulling more than 8 g. It was at this time that he experienced what’s known as a g-induced loss of consciousness, or G-LOC, and fell unconscious.

The aircraft, meanwhile, continued to bank, rolling to approximately 135 degrees, allowing the nose to start slicing and causing a steep dive toward the ground. The situation was especially perilous since the student, having intended to maneuver with high gravitational force, had advanced his throttle to “full afterburner” and significantly increased his aircraft’s thrust.

Continuing to accelerate, the aircraft began to plummet toward the ground, eventually reaching supersonic speed at Mach 1.12.

Meanwhile the instructor had noticed the anomaly, and began calling for his student to “recover, recover.” With no response, it was clear that the pilot was in a G-LOC situation. The instructor maneuvered to fly behind the distressed aircraft. However, the student’s F-16, flying at supersonic speed, pulled away and beyond visual line of sight.

“By the final ‘recover’ call, I’m basically just hoping that he recovers, because I’d lost sight of him at that point,” the instructor said. “I was really hoping I wasn’t going to see any sort of impact with the ground.”

Just as the instructor made his third and final “recover” call, the Auto-GCAS in the student’s aircraft activated, rolling the aircraft to a safe, upright position, and performed an automatic, stabilizing pull-up.

The pilot regained consciousness and promptly pulled back his throttle to “idle” speed.

“My memory is that I started the fight and then I could see my instructor and the next thing I remember is just waking up,” the pilot recalled. “It feels weird because I think I’m waking up from my bed. In my helmet, I can hear him screaming ‘recover, recover’ at me and when I open my eyes I just see my legs and the whole cockpit. It doesn’t really make sense.

“I got up over the horizon pretty fast again. It’s all thanks to the Auto-GCAS system, which got me out of the roll and started the recovery for me.”

Ultimately, the aircraft recovered at approximately 3,000 feet above the ground. This is high for where Auto-GCAS would have normally performed the recovery, but the system, assuming the throttle would remain at its current position with full afterburner, and that the pilot would remain unconscious, calculated an increase in the amount of altitude required for recovery.

“About maybe 30 seconds to a minute after I had gotten everything under control again,” remembered the student. “The first thing I thought about was my girlfriend, and then my family, and then my friends back home, and the thought of them basically getting a call (that I had perished).”

Following the potentially tragic incident, the student followed specific instructions from his instructor, was able to land his aircraft safely, and was promptly attended to by medical personnel.

The development of Auto-GCAS goes back over 30 years, first flying at Edwards Air Force Base as a collaboration between NASA, the Air Force Research Lab, AFRL, and Lockheed Martin. The program was originally included as a test safety system to allow for other requested testing to take place. Testers quickly took note of the potential of Auto-GCAS, and agreed that it may hold broader-reaching ramifications than the primary test systems.

However, Skoog, who has worked with autonomous systems since the beginning of his career, says that the system was met with initial opposition including from the fighter pilot community.

“There were some instances where we saw families of pilots who’d been lost in mishaps and we knew that it could be prevented,” Skoog said. “It was very challenging. There’s a personal burden and a clear moral responsibility to get the message out to the decision makers so that they can properly administrate funds to bring this kind of potential life-saving technology forward.”

Auto-GCAS was eventually incorporated into the Fighter Risk Reduction program and was subsequently fielded on the F-16 in September of 2014. Since then, the system has prevented at least four confirmed aircraft situations that could have resulted in loss of life.

“After having gone through so much initial resistance from the pilot community, to now, where just weeks after its implementation there was a complete reversal in pilot opinion,” Skoog said. “They are finally seeing what we in the test community saw for a long time.”

For the student, the system, he says, made all the difference in his life.

“This was an isolated incident for me, but, from the bottom of my heart, I just want to say thank you to everyone who has been a part of developing the Auto-GCAS system,” he said. “It’s everyone, not just engineers, but politicians and people just trying to get the ball rolling on having the Air Force use it. They are the reason that I am able to stand here today and talk about it. I’m able to continue to fly the F-16, and I’m able to go home and see my family again. So thank you, so much.”

Rain Man 09-28-2016 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12454501)
Because they finally figured out that "give them a millimeter and they'll take a kilometer" just doesn't sound right

Now that I think about it, drug dealers use metric weights, right? Maybe that's because they work internationally or something.

SAUTO 09-28-2016 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12454862)
Now that I think about it, drug dealers use metric weights, right? Maybe that's because they work internationally or something.

Only with certain drugs. Pounds isn't metric is it?

Ounces? Grams?

Rain Man 09-28-2016 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12454921)
Only with certain drugs. Pounds isn't metric is it?

Ounces? Grams?

Maybe it's only the imports like cocaine. Domestics like marijuana may still use the english system. No wonder drug addicts always seem confused.

GloryDayz 09-28-2016 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12454457)
When in Rome, did you do what the other youths did?

Yes.

Sent from my phone using Tapatalk (so spelling be damned!!!)

SAUTO 09-28-2016 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12454987)
Maybe it's only the imports like cocaine. Domestics like marijuana may still use the english system. No wonder drug addicts always seem confused.

Even cocaine is broken down into grams and ounces at some point

Pants 09-28-2016 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12455030)
Even cocaine is broken down into grams and ounces at some point

An 8-ball is an 8th of an ounce. I'm not sure, but I believe that's the standard amount of cocaine one usually obtains for personal use.

An "eighth" is a also the standard amount of marijuana one would usually procure for personal use.

These are obviously not metric. However, I do believe when it comes to distributing these sort of things, the standard unit of measure of cocaine is a "key," which, of course, is a kilogram. Conversely, marijuana is usually counted by pounds.

Rain Man 09-28-2016 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 12455278)
An 8-ball is an 8th of an ounce. I'm not sure, but I believe that's the standard amount of cocaine one usually obtains for personal use.

An "eighth" is a also the standard amount of marijuana one would usually procure for personal use.

These are obviously not metric. However, I do believe when it comes to distributing these sort of things, the standard unit of measure of cocaine is a "key," which, of course, is a kilogram. Conversely, marijuana is usually counted by pounds.

Somewhere along the line, it appears that some guy is accepting shipments in kilograms and then repackaging in ounces. If you can convince that guy to keep using metric on the outbound side, I bet the metric system would gain some traction, at least among investment bankers and strippers.

Nickhead 09-29-2016 01:56 AM

Solar storm heading towards Earth threatening to break your Sky TV and mobile phones

http://www.express.co.uk/news/scienc...-mobile-phones

Quote:

Modern-day Britain could go into meltdown after scientists forecast the solar storm to hit between now and Friday which could wreak havoc with technology.

Solar storms affect Earth’s technology as radiation is thrown at the planet from the Sun.

While humans are protected from the radiation by the atmosphere, the rays can heat the outer atmosphere, causing it to expand which can affect satellites in orbit. That could lead to a lack of GPS navigation, mobile phone signal and satellite TV such as Sky.
<iframe src='http://players.brightcove.net/2540076170001/4kfqgmETl_default/index.html?videoId=3707784872001' allowfullscreen frameborder=0></iframe>

BigRedChief 09-29-2016 05:33 AM

I'm totally convinced that when Quantum computing combines with this, our human evolution is not going to be fast tracked but light speed evolution is going to occur.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Room-temp superconductors could be possible <a href="https://t.co/daYcmwYaCr">https://t.co/daYcmwYaCr</a></p>&mdash; Phys.org (@physorg_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/physorg_com/status/781451175233196032">September 29, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" style="position: static; visibility: visible; display: block; width: 500px; height: 534.2px; padding: 0px; border: medium none; max-width: 100%; min-width: 220px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" data-tweet-id="781451175233196032" title="Twitter Tweet" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<script async="" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" frameborder="0"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Huffmeister 09-29-2016 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 12455401)
I'm totally convinced that when Quantum computing combines with this, our human evolution is not going to be fast tracked but light speed evolution is going to occur.

I've begun to wonder if this is the answer to the Fermi Paradox.

If there's a natural progression to the advancement of all civilizations in the universe (biological evolutions, stone age, mathematics, harnessing the power of the atom, information age, space travel, harnessing quantum mechanics, etc), then maybe the answer to Fermi's question of "Where is everyone?" is that there's a certain point in that natural progression in which intelligent life evolves into something else completely. Maybe a higher dimension?

This definitely isn't a new idea. It's been explored by most sci-fi writers, including legends like Asimov and Clarke. I just feel like it's a plausible answer to Fermi's Paradox.

Of course, it could also be that the reason that we have heard from anyone is because space is big and interstellar distances are the biggest barrier.

O.city 09-29-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huffmeister (Post 12455695)
I've begun to wonder if this is the answer to the Fermi Paradox.

If there's a natural progression to the advancement of all civilizations in the universe (biological evolutions, stone age, mathematics, harnessing the power of the atom, information age, space travel, harnessing quantum mechanics, etc), then maybe the answer to Fermi's question of "Where is everyone?" is that there's a certain point in that natural progression in which intelligent life evolves into something else completely. Maybe a higher dimension?

This definitely isn't a new idea. It's been explored by most sci-fi writers, including legends like Asimov and Clarke. I just feel like it's a plausible answer to Fermi's Paradox.

Of course, it could also be that the reason that we have heard from anyone is because space is big and interstellar distances are the biggest barrier.

I had never heard of Fermi's quesiton. Thanks for that. I checked it out. Very interesting.

I'm thinking it's more of a we don't know what we're listening for and it's too far away, plus we're still infants in universe years.

FlintHillsChiefs 09-29-2016 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12455763)
I had never heard of Fermi's quesiton. Thanks for that. I checked it out. Very interesting.

I'm thinking it's more of a we don't know what we're listening for and it's too far away, plus we're still infants in universe years.

My thinking is that life as we know it is rarer than we think. We used to think that "okay, so as long as the ball of rock is close to the same size as ours, and is far enough away from its sun, but not too far, then viola!"

The truth is it is much more complicated than that.

Here are some factors that I think most people don't consider.

1) It takes about 3-4 generations of stars to get the necessary heavy metals we need for life (iron, high enough concentration of carbon, sodium, calcium, zinc, etc) to exist in a meaningful abundance. That means that life probably wasn't possible in the universe until about 6-9 billion years ago.

2) In addition to a solar system based Goldilocks zone, there is also a galaxy wide Goldilocks zone. Too close to the center, the chances of you getting hammered with radiation from nearby stars going supernova or getting sucked into a blackhole are much higher. The probability of going the necessary hundres of millions or billions of years without a catastrophic event are next to nil. That means the best places for live to form and thrive in a galaxy are going to be along it's outer arms.

3) Earth is lucky in that it has a Jupiter. Solar systems that don't have a Jupiter-like planet on the opposite side of the sun from the earth-like planet are not going to be likely to have life. Jupiter not only shields us from asteroid impacts, but it also helps stabilize Earth's axis of rotation. Without Jupiter, our axis of rotation would eventually flop over towards the Sun. It also helped stabilize the rotations of the planets in the solar system into their stable orbits we see now.

4) Plate Tectonics. Thinking goes that plate tectonics are essential to keep a planet at equilibrium. Plate Tectonics sequester carbon, etc. Venus is a "bottle-cap" planet, in which it has no plate tectonics, and billions of years ago, Venus had a runaway greenhouse gas problem, which is why it is as hellish as it is now.

5) Earth-Gaia collision. A while back, Earth collided with a Mars sized planet, which gave us two things. First, we got an unusually large core. The molten core is what emits the magnetosphere, which protects us from the Sun's radiation. Secondly, we got a huge moon compared in respect to the size of our planet. The tidal interactions between our earth and the moon may have been essential to the formation of life.

So, in conclusion, I would say that the most common estimates for intelligent life in the galaxy (around 10,000) is way too high. I'd say its most likely that there are 100 at most. My personal guess is there are probably no more than 20 intelligent civilizations in the Milky Way.

BigRedChief 09-29-2016 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huffmeister (Post 12455695)
I've begun to wonder if this is the answer to the Fermi Paradox.

If there's a natural progression to the advancement of all civilizations in the universe (biological evolutions, stone age, mathematics, harnessing the power of the atom, information age, space travel, harnessing quantum mechanics, etc), then maybe the answer to Fermi's question of "Where is everyone?" is that there's a certain point in that natural progression in which intelligent life evolves into something else completely. Maybe a higher dimension?

This definitely isn't a new idea. It's been explored by most sci-fi writers, including legends like Asimov and Clarke. I just feel like it's a plausible answer to Fermi's Paradox.

Of course, it could also be that the reason that we have heard from anyone is because space is big and interstellar distances are the biggest barrier.

I hadn't thought about that. Interesting thought. It is a big sky.

I've always assumed that as civilization advances their ability to perform long range scans will improve. But, even if that is a truism, maybe more advanced civilizations find us but don't bother trying to contact us for many reasons.

I'm still of the same opinion as Hawking, there is a greater chance of our first contact to not being a pleasant one. They will indeed be hostile.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-29-2016 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 12456446)
I hadn't thought about that. Interesting thought. It is a big sky.

I've always assumed that as civilization advances their ability to perform long range scans will improve. But, even if that is a truism, maybe more advanced civilizations find us but don't bother trying to contact us for many reasons.

I'm still of the same opinion as Hawking, there is a greater chance of our first contact to not being a pleasant one. They will indeed be hostile.


If we can just introduce them to Bacon they will be friendly. They will bow to us and give us all their technology and I will be their God.

GloryDayz 09-29-2016 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12456478)
If we can just introduce them to Bacon they will be friendly. They will bow to us and give us all their technology and I will be their God.

He who controls the bacon is the God...

ptlyon 09-29-2016 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12456478)
If we can just introduce them to Bacon they will be friendly. They will bow to us and give us all their technology and I will be their God.

Or hootie's ass

Fish 09-30-2016 11:10 PM

http://i66.tinypic.com/1z6z246.jpg

Fish 09-30-2016 11:13 PM

http://i63.tinypic.com/2qvrz34.png

DaFace 10-01-2016 07:31 AM

This has probably been posted at some point, but in the same vein as the above...

<iframe src='https://gfycat.com/ifr/CookedKindlyBlowfish' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' width='640' height='354' allowfullscreen></iframe>

BigRedChief 10-06-2016 07:23 AM

Graphene about to get a lot cheaper.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">New efficient and low-cost method for hydrogenation of graphene with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/visiblelight?src=hash">#visiblelight</a> <a href="https://t.co/Vu1GvuC20l">https://t.co/Vu1GvuC20l</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/UU_University">@UU_University</a></p>&mdash; Phys.org (@physorg_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/physorg_com/status/784017521359847424">October 6, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Fish 10-06-2016 07:44 AM

Get yer goddamn political Youtube vid out this forum, please sir!

BigRedChief 10-06-2016 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12468707)
Get yer goddamn political Youtube vid out this forum, please sir!

sorry sir. thought I fixed it

Nickhead 10-07-2016 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12458114)

i dont care what any of us believe, that is just awesome :D

my place of work is owned by a brethren sect. it is very difficult for me to keep a straight face (and my job), when they say the earth is 6000 years old.

Fish 10-07-2016 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12469958)
i dont care what any of us believe, that is just awesome :D

my place of work is owned by a brethren sect. it is very difficult for me to keep a straight face (and my job), when they say the earth is 6000 years old.

You misspelled "Cult."

Sorry to hear you work for dummies.

GloryDayz 10-07-2016 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 12470017)
You misspelled "Cult."

Sorry to hear you work for dummies.

Why the hate man? At least they're not dummy enough to believe in the global warming bullshit, and that it was/is going to end mankind or the earth...

ThaVirus 10-07-2016 10:01 PM

GloryDayz is a legitimate loon

GloryDayz 10-08-2016 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12471412)
GloryDayz is a legitimate loon

Let the rage go man... Hey, it wasn't me predicting doom by now, that was your goofy group of scientists keeping food on their tables.

I know it's tough to deal with having been wrong, but let the rage go. And if you must use-up some energy, make a meal for some of those scientists so they're less likely to stay on the take.

sd4chiefs 10-13-2016 08:14 PM

There are 10 times more galaxies in our universe than we'd estimated.

Turns out we were wrong; there aren't 200 billion galaxies in the universe.

It's more like 2 trillion.

Yes, TRILLION!

That's the latest from NASA, which announced Thursday the number of galaxies in our observable universe is 10 times higher than previously projected.
This revelation was possible, thanks to that font of discovery -- the Hubble Space Telescope.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/health...rnd/index.html

Rain Man 10-13-2016 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sd4chiefs (Post 12481983)
There are 10 times more galaxies in our universe than we'd estimated.

Turns out we were wrong; there aren't 200 billion galaxies in the universe.

It's more like 2 trillion.

Yes, TRILLION!

That's the latest from NASA, which announced Thursday the number of galaxies in our observable universe is 10 times higher than previously projected.
This revelation was possible, thanks to that font of discovery -- the Hubble Space Telescope.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/health...rnd/index.html

That's 286 galaxies for every person on earth. They should start selling ownership of them. I'd pay $25 to NASA to officially own my own galaxy.

mr. tegu 10-13-2016 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12482010)
That's 286 galaxies for every person on earth. They should start selling ownership of them. I'd pay $25 to NASA to officially own my own galaxy.

I think a star runs you about $25 or more. I think a galaxy would cost you a bit more.

Rain Man 10-13-2016 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 12482019)
I think a star runs you about $25 or more. I think a galaxy would cost you a bit more.

Supply and demand. I think the market for galaxies tanked today.

redfan 10-14-2016 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 12482019)
I think a star runs you about $25 or more. I think a galaxy would cost you a bit more.

Best I could do is $8.
I got a buddy who's an expert in celestial objects and he tells me they just aren't that valuable anymore. If youda sold ten days ago, then sure I coulda given $25, but not today.

Baby Lee 10-14-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redhed (Post 12482727)
Best I could do is $8.
I got a buddy who's an expert in celestial objects and he tells me they just aren't that valuable anymore. If youda sold ten days ago, then sure I coulda given $25, but not today.

Thing is, I gotta pay out for this galaxy, then wait around for the off chance someone's looking for just that galaxy.

'til then, it's just gathering dust on my shelves.

It's kind of a one-off, tough to resell, you understand.

TimeForWasp 10-14-2016 09:26 AM

But these are not all cookie cutter galaxies. Some have a lot of custom work done to them. There needs to be different price ranges for them.

Rain Man 10-14-2016 11:09 AM

Sure, some galaxies are custom. Galaxies vary widely. But your basic spiral galaxy will work just fine for most people, is aesthetically pleasing, and with this new discovery they're going for pennies on the dollar. You simply shouldn't pay very much for a basic spiral galaxy these days.

stumppy 10-14-2016 11:13 AM

I really want one of those sombrero galaxies. One that's been customized with little dingle ball solar systems dangling all the way around the brim. I wonder what one of those would cost ?

Rain Man 10-14-2016 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12482875)
I really want one of those sombrero galaxies. One that's been customized with little dingle ball solar systems dangling all the way around the brim. I wonder what one of those would cost ?

Those might run a little extra. I suspect that things like sombreros and horseheads are probably more in demand, while galaxies with supermassive black holes and quasars probably go pretty cheap.

chefsos 10-17-2016 05:14 PM

SpaceX has its own thread, but Orbital is doing stuff too. There's a launch to the ISS at 7:40 EDT (about 30 minutes from now) from Wallops Island VA. The last one didn't go so well last year (think, boom)...

I'll probably be able to see this from home!

Quote:

Coverage of the Launch of the Orbital/ATK OA-5 Antares/Cygnus Mission to the ISS (Launch scheduled at 7:40 p.m. ET) Starts at 6:45p.m.)
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html#public

DaFace 10-17-2016 05:36 PM

Fingers crossed. There have been way too many rockets blowing up lately.

DaFace 10-17-2016 05:52 PM

Well, not exactly the production values and camera angles of a SpaceX launch...

http://i.imgur.com/HjZvZvo.jpg

But everything looks like a smooth launch. :thumb:

Mr. Plow 10-19-2016 07:20 AM

http://i.imgur.com/Xs6NdMC.gif


ExoMars aerodynamic test

DaFace 10-19-2016 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 12492688)

Sadly, it's looking likely that the mission this test was designed to inform wasn't successful. The orbiter is there and is in good shape, but they lost signal to the lander and are trying to figure out what's going on.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/20/sc...rs-lander.html

Baby Lee 11-10-2016 01:08 AM

Love this

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WIyTZDHuarQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fish 11-22-2016 08:39 AM

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RtBtD0_KZ9o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fish 11-22-2016 08:47 AM

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xS...ZN3MYw/200.gif

DaFace 12-08-2016 04:17 PM

They've suspected that dinosaurs were covered in feathers for a while now. Now we have proof.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2...ma-cretaceous/

http://i.imgur.com/WOZjfbc.jpg

Buehler445 12-08-2016 04:24 PM

That's REALLY ****ing cool.

Easy 6 12-08-2016 04:30 PM

Its well past time they extracted the DNA out of that amber, blend it with an emu egg and finally recreate a dinosaur

hometeam 12-08-2016 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12603702)
They've suspected that dinosaurs were covered in feathers for a while now. Now we have proof.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2...ma-cretaceous/

http://i.imgur.com/WOZjfbc.jpg

knew it~

Role Models was right

Baby Lee 12-09-2016 04:24 AM

Hey guys, had you heard.

We found a dinosaur feather preserved in amber, reinforcing the dinosaur-->bird hypothesis.

EDIT: Well **** me


They now think Parkinson's originates in gut flora, not the brain.

http://www.sciencealert.com/new-evid...g-to-the-brain

GloryDayz 12-09-2016 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12608108)
Hey guys, had you heard.

We found a dinosaur feather preserved in amber, reinforcing the dinosaur-->bird hypothesis.

EDIT: Well **** me


They now think Parkinson's originates in gut flora, not the brain.

http://www.sciencealert.com/new-evid...g-to-the-brain

Wow.. Whoda thunk?

ThaVirus 12-09-2016 10:10 AM

I've been reading about microbes in our digestive tract a lot lately.

Apparently that shit has everything to do with everything, probably even mental health.

Baby Lee 12-20-2016 01:20 PM

Objectivity's 100th episode is here!!


Avert your eyes to the title and just watch. Real tears at :35

Note, it's not an earthshaking new thing. Just a firsthand look at an earthshaking old thing you were aware of.

Spoiler!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.