ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Frazod 06-11-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6815368)
Ok, whatever, carry on.

It just seems like a bit of an overreaction considering there are possibly four more spots to be filled.

It was an honest question. Make me believe this time will be different.

DJ's left nut 06-11-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6815374)
Mizzou isn't going to the SEC.

It just absolutely will not be happening.

If they get offered, they should.

It's not a bad geographic fit and while they'd get gangraped in football, they'd immediately be one of the stronger basketball programs in the conference.

****...I'm resigned to talking like a Beaker now.

I hate you so much, Jim Delaney.

kstater 06-11-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6815353)
That's too bad i've grown to like you Mizzou fans. And Columbia doesn't look like a third world country like Manhattan.

Something tells me you've neither been to Manhattan nor a 3rd world country.

KcMizzou 06-11-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6815379)
It was an honest question. Make me believe this time will be different.

You know I can't do that.

alnorth 06-11-2010 05:31 PM

That didn't take long. ESPN is now confident enough to say that Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State will go to the PAC 10 as soon as an offer is made.

Texas A&M is still deciding between the PAC 10 or the SEC, and they will be given only 72 hours after they get an offer. (as reported earlier, others elsewhere have said that if aTm chooses the SEC, then the PAC-10 will offer to Utah or Kansas)

Frazod 06-11-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6815382)
If they get offered, they should.

It's not a bad geographic fit and while they'd get gangraped in football, they'd immediately be one of the stronger basketball programs in the conference.

****...I'm resigned to talking like a Beaker now.

I hate you so much, Jim Delaney.

I think if somebody asked me where I was from tonight, I'd say Arkansas.

FML

DeezNutz 06-11-2010 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6815358)
Why not just add TCU (better than Nebraska... academics and sports) and Houston (better than CU except in academics but is heading that way)

Move OU and Ok St to the North Division and call it a day. Or do we need to have a 16 team league to compete?

And allow Texas to form the Texas Network and all the North Division teams will get screwed just a bit harder.

It will be ****ing awesome! All TX, all the time!

DeezNutz 06-11-2010 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6815382)
If they get offered, they should.

It's not a bad geographic fit and while they'd get gangraped in football, they'd immediately be one of the stronger basketball programs in the conference.

****...I'm resigned to talking like a Beaker now.

I hate you so much, Jim Delaney.

**** that. I'd rather go to the Big East; it's a stronger academic conference.

teedubya 06-11-2010 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6815378)
<a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://img37.imageshack.us/i/jamaica.gif/'><img src='http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2037/jamaica.gif' border='0'/></a>

Uploaded with <a target='_blank' href='http://imageshack.us'>ImageShack.us</a>

WTF is that? Jesus... you can see the adults clapping in the background laughing.

DJ's left nut 06-11-2010 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6815388)
I think if somebody asked me where I was from tonight, I'd say Arkansas.

FML

I'd consider Iraq.

Not a good day. Not a good day.

|Zach| 06-11-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6815382)
If they get offered, they should.

It's not a bad geographic fit and while they'd get gangraped in football, they'd immediately be one of the stronger basketball programs in the conference.

****...I'm resigned to talking like a Beaker now.

I hate you so much, Jim Delaney.

Oh, I don't disagree with that. However it doesn't change that it will never ever happpen.

the Talking Can 06-11-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6815394)
WTF is that? Jesus... you can see the adults clapping in the background laughing.

i don't know, but i had to use it...

Titty Meat 06-11-2010 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6815383)
Something tells me you've neither been to Manhattan nor a 3rd world country.

I've been to Manhattan it was a dump and i've been to Mexico. The only difference is people in Manhattan don't beg for money.

Frazod 06-11-2010 05:38 PM

:shake:

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_...atory-missouri

Get used to purgatory, Missouri
<hr width="100%" noshade="noshade" size="1"> By David Ubben
ESPN.com

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany followed his protocol, placing a call to Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe on Friday morning to notify him that they would be accepting Nebraska's application into the Big Ten.

Beebe had no further comments on Nebraska's departure, calling it "disappointing."

But Delany didn't mention another team looking for inclusion to the Big Ten, Missouri.

"My understanding is there aren't any other conference members considered by the Big Ten," Beebe said.

That's a big uh-oh in Columbia for a school that's turned the Forgotten Four into the Forlorn Five over the course of the past week. Missouri may end up getting a Big Ten invite when the conference makes its next move toward expansion, something Delany said could happen in the future. But Delany, altering his previously stated timeline, shows just how badly he wanted the Huskers in his league.

"We were ready to move more quickly when this opportunity arose,” he said.

But it also shows that Missouri won't be placed on the fast track for membership. And if five Big 12 South teams split for the Pac-10 next week, Missouri's position in the league will only become more awkward. With the Big Ten still in play, don't expect Missouri to fully commit to the other four teams whose best bet include a partnership with the Mountain West Conference, Conference USA, or obliterating the Big 12 for a move to the Big East.

"When 'the dust settles,' Mizzou will be in a strong position nationally," athletic director Mike Alden said in a statement. "We don't know the timeline of all of these activities, so your patience and commitment is appreciated."

Alden has a lot of faith, and he should. As the head of the athletic department, he has to. He didn't place any qualifiers on that statement. But the second half is more telling: Missouri may still have to abide by the Big Ten's original timeline.

In short, Missouri's future could be in limbo through 2010 and into next year. How far -- and if it ends -- is up to Delany.

Delany apologized on Friday for leaving schools unsure of their future. Clearly, Missouri falls under that umbrella.

Nebraska chancellor Harvey Perlman pointed to comments from Missouri "not fully supportive of the Big 12" as a reason for leaving, and it was a good one. That's not going to change until an opportunity to join the Big Ten is completely off the table.

Missouri deserves a good amount of blame in a Big 12 breakup, too, but unlike Kansas and Kansas State, they can't fully commit to a cleanup -- however that ends up looking.

If Missouri spends the next six to 12 months riding the fence between committing to the remaining members of the Big 12 and positioning itself for an invitation to the Big Ten, its relationship with schools like Kansas and Kansas State will only splinter further. And unless that invitation to apply arrives in the end, Missouri better get used to a whole lot of awkwardness.

DJ's left nut 06-11-2010 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6815402)
i don't know, but i had to use it...

It's like a rorschach test - people see in it what they want to see.

I see a pretty damn good reason to never vote Democrat, myself.

But that's just me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.