ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Pablo 06-08-2010 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6807673)
Wrestling is an awesome sport. One-on-one, strength against strength, conditioning and mental fortitude.
I understand many did not grow up around it and so don't enjoy it but if you could have been with me when 15000 screaming fans were making the field house shake as it came down to the last match in an Iowa-Iowa State or Iowa-Oklahoma meet I bet you would see it differently.

I've heard the same about hockey. The reality is that if it doesn't show well on TV I probably won't give a damn.

Frazod 06-08-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6807673)
Wrestling is an awesome sport. One-on-one, strength against strength, conditioning and mental fortitude.
I understand many did not grow up around it and so don't enjoy it but if you could have been with me when 15000 screaming fans were making the field house shake as it came down to the last match in an Iowa-Iowa State or Iowa-Oklahoma meet I bet you would see it differently.

I can see how watching guys roll around on the floor would appeal to your nature.

Brock 06-08-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6807671)
It's a coin toss.

Is that good?

Brock 06-08-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6807673)
Wrestling is an awesome sport. One-on-one, strength against strength, conditioning and mental fortitude.
I understand many did not grow up around it and so don't enjoy it but if you could have been with me when 15000 screaming fans were making the field house shake as it came down to the last match in an Iowa-Iowa State or Iowa-Oklahoma meet I bet you would see it differently.

I watched Wrestlemania when I was 11.

vailpass 06-08-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6807679)
I can see how watching guys roll around on the floor would appeal to your nature.

Beats the hell out of having to roll a girl around in flour to find the wet spot.

vailpass 06-08-2010 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 6807678)
I've heard the same about hockey. The reality is that if it doesn't show well on TV I probably won't give a damn.

I hear you, to each his own. Wrestling is a noble sport, I just wanted to make note of that.

Brock 06-08-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6807684)
Beats the hell out of having to roll a girl around in flour to find the wet spot.

Uh, no. It really doesn't.

Frazod 06-08-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6807684)
Beats the hell out of having to roll a girl around in flour to find the wet spot.

Is Carlos teaching your kids to speak Spanish?

KChiefs1 06-08-2010 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6807476)
Leave it to the Beakers to make this about college basketball.

It's all they have.

Brock 06-08-2010 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6807715)
It's all they have.

Well, that and beating MU at football every other year.

KChiefs1 06-08-2010 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6807535)

History Awaits

Tactical Funky 06-08-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6807715)
It's all they have.

All we have is one of the best basketball programs in history? I'll take it.

alanm 06-08-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Funky (Post 6807608)
Yeah, let's just ignore over 100 years of history, a storied coaching tree, and the guy who freakin' invented the sport of basketball due to TV contracts and money grubbing. To think that KU is irrelevant due to a wholly recent development is asinine and misinformed.

Question: When was the last time the university you support won a National Championship?

Which sport? Men or Women?

Tactical Funky 06-08-2010 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6807767)
Which sport? Men or Women?

LMAO

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Funky (Post 6807730)
All we have is one of the best basketball programs in history? I'll take it.

No offense, but I hope you enjoyed the first 115 (or so) years, because if there actually is a fire creating all this smoke, your BB program changes dramatically - and not for the good.

That's what a lot (not all) of KU fans refuse to acknowledge.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-08-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6807576)
Oh, and since Metrolike said it's OK for us to gloat, I'll go ahead and leave this right here...

http://i47.tinypic.com/20p7d4i.jpg

Meh. You look like odd man out. Put Missouri in there and remove Nebraska, and you've got a nice, tight, geographical display.

You're screwing the geography, brah; beat it. :D

SPATCH 06-08-2010 05:57 PM

Even if none of this shit goes down....... this has just been ****ing great.

Watching all these Jayhawk fans sweat this thing out has been quite a treat. The nervous, desperate posts; the mental gymnastics. Priceless.

That being said, the prospect of Kansas landing in the Mountain West conjures conflicting emotions. Strangely enough, I think that I would feel bad... I've really enjoyed the rivalry and it would be sad for it to completely dissolve.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-08-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6807823)
Even if none of this shit goes down....... this has just been ****ing great.

Watching all these Jayhawk fans sweat this thing out has been quite a treat. The nervous, desperate posts; the mental gymnastics. Priceless.

That being said, the prospect of Kansas landing in the Mountain West conjures conflicting emotions. Strangely enough, I think that I would feel bad... I've really enjoyed the rivalry and it would be sad for it to completely dissolve.

100%

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6807823)
Even if none of this shit goes down....... this has just been ****ing great.

Watching all these Jayhawk fans sweat this thing out has been quite a treat. The nervous, desperate posts; the mental gymnastics. Priceless.

That being said, the prospect of Kansas landing in the Mountain West conjures conflicting emotions. Strangely enough, I think that I would feel bad... I've really enjoyed the rivalry and it would be sad for it to completely dissolve.

Yep.

But I still really want this to happen. Mizzou to the Big Ten anyway... after that, I don't care.

-King- 06-08-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6807645)
Get out the mother****ing goollldddssss!

http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009...rspoon_400.jpg

Or break these puppies out again http://image3.examiner.com/images/bl...rocombat_1.jpg

Tactical Funky 06-08-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6807778)
No offense, but I hope you enjoyed the first 115 (or so) years, because if there actually is a fire creating all this smoke, your BB program changes dramatically - and not for the good.

That's what a lot (not all) of KU fans refuse to acknowledge.

I realize this.

There is a glimmer of hope in that Notre Dame is currently in negotiations with the Big 10. If ND takes the offer, well, the Big XII likely stays as is with perhaps a team like Colorado leaving and the Big XII scooping up, say, TCU.

teedubya 06-08-2010 06:18 PM

If this goes down... I'm bringing an Uzi to the bash. LMAO

Brianfo 06-08-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6807679)
I can see how watching guys roll around on the floor would appeal to your nature.

Boy, that's an original post. Wrestling is the most grueling sport that there is. You probably wouldn't understand.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Funky (Post 6807865)
I realize this.

There is a glimmer of hope in that Notre Dame is currently in negotiations with the Big 10. If ND takes the offer, well, the Big XII likely stays as is with perhaps a team like Colorado leaving and the Big XII scooping up, say, TCU.

ND isn't going to the B10 unless they are at least the 14th-16th team.

They aren't going alone.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-08-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6807854)

**** Yizzle!

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6807870)
ND isn't going to the B10 unless they are at least the 14th-16th team.

They aren't going alone.

I tend to agree. If the 4 16 team Super Conference thing is really coming, (and it sure looks that way) ND would certainly want to be a part of it.

If not, they'd just stay independent.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-08-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brianfo (Post 6807869)
Boy, that's an original post. Wrestling is the most grueling sport that there is. You probably wouldn't understand.

Shut up Garp.

Frazod 06-08-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brianfo (Post 6807869)
Boy, that's an original post. Wrestling is the most grueling sport that there is. You probably wouldn't understand.

I'll bet you like soccer, too.

007 06-08-2010 06:29 PM

Christ this thread is getting idiotic.

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 06:29 PM

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...5816071.column
Quote:

Who should be in, out in Big Ten expansion
Teddy Greenstein

Notre Dame, Rutgers and Nebraska are the snug fits that would benefit all; forget all others

Teddy Greenstein
5:45 p.m. CDT, June 8, 2010

Jim Delany receives a packet of clips each morning that contain the latest speculation, opinions, breaking news and attempted breaking news regarding conference expansion.

The Big Ten commissioner reads them. All of them.

"Just an immense amount of information," he said Sunday.

And now I'm adding to it. With the prospect of expansion taking shape next week (thanks to a Big 12 ultimatum), here's my take on what's best for the league of Bo and Woody: Expand to 14 with Notre Dame, Rutgers and Nebraska.

Get the Chicago Tribune delivered to your home for only $1 a week >>

I don't like 16 because it could lead to cumbersome four-team pods, and schools could go a decade or more without playing each other. That's one way to kill the conference cohesion Delany brags about.

So why Notre Dame, Rutgers and Nebraska?

Let's start with a school not on my list, Texas. I think there's a better chance Delany strikes oil in Chicago than the Longhorns agree to come under his wing. It makes no sense because of all the travel (and cost) involved, the so-called "Tech problem" (the Big Ten has no interest in taking stepchild Texas Tech) and the fact the Big Ten is a crummy baseball league.

Notre Dame, meanwhile, would fit like a hot dog into a poppy-seed bun. As one Big Ten source told me, if the league really is determined to get the Big Ten Network onto expanded basic in New York, Notre Dame (which plays Army at Yankee Stadium on Nov. 20 trumps Rutgers.

The geographic fit is perfect. The academic fit is ideal. So what will it take to convince the school's Board of Trustees finally to take the plunge? If the Big East implodes and Irish officials fear the potential loss of an automatic BCS bowl qualification (currently top eight in the standings, that might be enough to end this interminable courtship.

Sources are split on what path Notre Dame will take.

There's no doubt that Rutgers would love to join, if for no other reason than the revenue gap between the Big Ten ($20 million per school) and Big East ($6.3 million). Rutgers is a giant, public institution that dominates its state (think Ohio State, Wisconsin, Iowa and Minnesota). Nearly 9 million people live in New Jersey, a fertile recruiting ground (hello, Ron Dayne and Corey Wootton that's a river's crossing to New York and Philadelphia.

Rutgers recently poured $102 million into its 52,454-seat football stadium and has a yet-to-be-financed proposal in place to go north of 70,000. It also can play occasionally at the new Jets/Giants Stadium that will seat around 82,500.

Rutgers is a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities (like all 11 Big Ten schools) and its football team posts elite APR (Academic Progress Rate) numbers because coach Greg Schiano recruits willing students and insists they sit in the first three rows of class.

True, the Scarlet Knights lack the football tradition of Nebraska. Rutgers beat Princeton in the first college game ever played, in 1869, and then basically disappeared until 2006. But this decision, in Delany's words, is about the next "50-100 years" — not the past.

And speaking of Nebraska, who would not want to be associated with a program of Heisman Trophy winners (Johnny Rodgers, Mike Rozier, Eric Crouch) legendary coaches (Bob Devaney and Tom Osborne and rabid fans, 77,936 of whom flocked to 2010 spring game, second only to Alabama's 91,312?

Nebraska would give the BTN a boost by creating a new slate of marquee football games: Nebraska-Iowa, Nebraska-Wisconsin, Nebraska-Ohio State, etc. Yes, it's a state of just 1.8 million people, but big markets are not the only way to expand the reach of the BTN. Compelling programming is another weapon.

So who's not here?

Pittsburgh does not add much TV value, and there's lingering ill will from old-school Penn Staters. Syracuse is in a tiny market with bad football facilities and a basketball coach, Jim Boeheim, who has said he does not see a fit "with Iowa and Illinois." I agree.

Missouri is decent in every criteria (football, academics, geography), spectacular in none. Adding the Kansas City TV market and fortifying St. Louis should not be enough to prompt another Big Ten revenue pie-cutting.

Connecticut is not an AAU member and drew 2,500 for its last spring football game. Maryland's pull in Washington, D.C., and Baltimore is intriguing, but that's where the appeal ends.

Notre Dame, Rutgers and Nebraska are the "hr" picks, in my world. That's "home run," in Delany's.
So what would happen to Mizzou in this scenario?

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6807899)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...5816071.column


So what would happen to Mizzou in this scenario?

They stay in the B12.

The B12 only breaks down if two teams go to the B10.

If only one goes, they'll just invite a team to play in the B12. Texas ain't moving unless they absolutely have to.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-08-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6807899)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...5816071.column


So what would happen to Mizzou in this scenario?

This is pathetic. Can you at least try?

Bearcat 06-08-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6807823)
Even if none of this shit goes down....... this has just been ****ing great.

Watching all these Jayhawk fans sweat this thing out has been quite a treat. The nervous, desperate posts; the mental gymnastics. Priceless.

That being said, the prospect of Kansas landing in the Mountain West conjures conflicting emotions. Strangely enough, I think that I would feel bad... I've really enjoyed the rivalry and it would be sad for it to completely dissolve.

It's been equally entertaining on this end, watching Mizzou fans who normally make it well known that they're jumping on their high horse and heading to the high road at any sign of adversity join in the mudslinging, even though nothing has actually happened, and if it does, it'll have nothing to do with anything Mizzou did besides sign on the dotted line. It's quite a confusing complex some have with these rivalries.

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 6807911)
This is pathetic. Can you at least try?

Try what? I'm trying to have a decent conversation. There is enough idiots on both sides throwing out stupid shit that I thought this was interesting to know what Mizzou fans think about it.

Bugeater 06-08-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6807899)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...5816071.column


So what would happen to Mizzou in this scenario?

http://thematadorsports.com/blog/wp-...abric-logo.gif

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 06:44 PM

So whats this thread about at this point?

Reaper16 06-08-2010 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 6807896)
Christ this thread is getting idiotic.

Getting?

Bugeater 06-08-2010 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6807942)
So whats this thread about at this point?

It's about 2,400 posts of rival fans hammering on each other, and about 30 posts of Big 10 expansion.

Mr. Plow 06-08-2010 06:48 PM

Have we moved onto basketball yet?


No?


Sorry to bother you. (backs out slowly)

007 06-08-2010 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6807946)
Getting?

Heh, true.

Christ this thread is idiotic.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 06:59 PM

Have we considered inviting Notre Dame into the Big XII so that they could get a piece of the enormous basketball pie?

Mr. Plow 06-08-2010 07:01 PM

Why isn't anyone talking about what this does to college golf? It's COLLEGE GOLF for Godsakes!!!

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Chancellor meets with members of KU athletic department

Gray-Little emphasizes efforts being made to keep Big 12 together

By Matt Tait

Kansas University Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little met with athletic department officials Tuesday afternoon for what university spokesperson Lynn Bretz deemed a “show of support.”

The meeting, which lasted about 15 minutes, was called to assure that everyone at the school was on the same page regarding the latest challenge facing the university.

Advertisement

“The Chancellor wanted to stop by to express support of the staff of Kansas Athletics,” Bretz said. “She talked to them about topical things like the Big 12 realignment concerns and all that, and she acknowledges that it’s been a challenging year for the Kansas Athletics staff and that it was unfortunate that a very small number of people’s actions had harmed the reputation of an entire department.”

Bretz continued: “Their work has been very successful this year and (Gray-Little) just wanted them to know that she appreciated them and that they did not go unnoticed.”

KU athletic director Lew Perkins did not attend the meeting but associate atheltic director Jim Marchiony, who was in the room, said Perkins had planned to attend.

“He was supposed to be there but he got called away at the last minute and didn’t make it back before the meeting ended,” Marchiony said.

When asked what came up that drew Perkins away, Marchiony responded with: “He’s dealing with a lot of things right now, not the least of which is Big 12 realignment. But I know he had planned to be there.”

The meeting, no matter how minor, illustrates just how great the task at hand is for KU officials. While the rumor mill continues to crank on a daily basis, Kansas administrators constantly have been asked to address the future of the Big 12, with expansion threats involving both the Big Ten and Pac-10 looming.

“She reassured them that she was doing everything she could to help keep (the Big 12) together,” Bretz said. “She said that she supported Lew’s efforts to keep the Big 12 together and that she knew he was well-known for his knowledge and experience and connections and all of these were being put to good use right now.”

Bretz said Perkins and Gray-Little met briefly after the meeting so that she could fill him in on what was discussed.
http://www2.kusports.com/news/2010/j...ic-department/

I think Perkins' days are numbered.

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6807985)
Have we considered inviting Notre Dame into the Big XII so that they could get a piece of the enormous basketball pie?

They are probably going to go independent in basketball too, since they have the juice to do that. Probably make way more money that way anyway. Who needs conferences.
Posted via Mobile Device

Bugeater 06-08-2010 07:06 PM

mmmmmmm.....basketball pie

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6808004)
http://www2.kusports.com/news/2010/j...ic-department/

I think Perkins' days are numbered.

I say if Perkins can keep KU in a BCS conference he will have earned the right to stay. Else......
https://jspivey.wikispaces.com/file/...guillotine.gif

boogblaster 06-08-2010 07:08 PM

Well is any college leaving ... or is it a stunt too get more TV monies ....

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6808013)
mmmmmmm.....basketball pie

How about cake?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3352/...c72823eb67.jpg

Saul Good 06-08-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6807548)
Just posted on ESPN...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5265439

KU may be without major conference

LAWRENCE, Kan. -- For the Kansas Jayhawks and their proud basketball heritage, all this could not be more demeaning.

All of a sudden, Kansas' status as a major player in college athletics has been placed in the hands of Nebraska and -- humiliation of humiliations -- archrival Missouri.


While those two decide whether to abandon the Big 12 for the more lucrative Big Ten, Kansas sits and sweats. A pullout by the Huskers and Tigers could result in the collapse of the Big 12 and strip Kansas, Kansas State and Iowa State of the safety and privileges of membership in a Bowl Championship Series conference.

What about the Jayhawks' attractive basketball program, with three national championships

3 National Championships? You mean only Kansas counts the Helms championships as actual championships? This can't be. I mean, yes, the Helms foundation wasn't even created until 2 decades after the 1922 and 1923 seasons, and yes, subsequent analysis of the 1921-22 season showed that Missouri, not Kansas, would have won the championship based on the baseline information that the Helms foundation used to determine a champion, but I digress...


Rank Team Rec.
1 Missouri 16-1
2 Kansas 16-2
3 Army 17-2
4 Idaho 19-1
5 Oregon St. 21-2
6 Wabash 21-3
7 Holy Cross 14-3
8 Purdue 15-3
9 Michigan 15-4
10 CCNY 10-2
11 Butler 23-4
12 Princeton 20-5
13 Illinois 14-5
14 Wisconsin 14-5
15 Pennsylvania 24-3
16 Texas A&M 18-3
17 Navy 15-3
18 Wooster 14-1
19 Beloit 12-0
20 Texas 20-4

Mr. Plow 06-08-2010 07:10 PM

Sorry to interrupt, but.......


http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/201...usspor00000002


Big Ten, Notre Dame Are Talking ... Again


Notre Dame is officially on the clock.

According to sources, the Big Ten officials and Notre Dame officials have entered into talks that could drastically alter the realignment talk which has dominated headlines in recent days. One insider told FanHouse on Tuesday that the two sides are talking about the nation's biggest independent joining one of the most influential conferences to give the Big Ten its desired 12 members.

The source said the talks "could not necessarily" be described as negotiations but said if Notre Dame can be convinced to give up its long standing independence that things could move rather quickly. Another source familiar with the back-and-forth between Notre Dame and the Big Ten over the years believes all of the Big Ten expansion talk which began with commissioner Jim Delany's announcement last December has always been aimed at getting the Irish to join the conference.

The realization that the Big Ten's threat to add five members could trigger a reaction that would create four super 16-team conferences, and effectively put the squeeze on Notre Dame scheduling, has convinced Irish officials to again sit down at the table with the Big Ten. Earlier this decade the two sides explored the possibility of Notre Dame joining the Big Ten, but in the end the Irish opted to remain independent and enjoy a lucrative television deal with NBC.

Since then, the major conferences have shifted away from giving Notre Dame a full conference share of any BCS game it participates in and, in order to get to the national title game, the Irish have to go undefeated during the regular season.

"Now Notre Dame has to be asking themselves who will they schedule in a four-conference,16-team (per conference) environment?" the source said. "They can maybe schedule the WAC, the MAC and Sun Belt Conference. The questions are: Is that less than what NBC bargained for and will those schools get to a BCS national championship game? I'd say no."

Meanwhile, there is a strong belief that if the Big Ten is successful in luring Notre Dame that it would no longer be interested in expanding from 11 to 16 teams. Currently, the Big Ten's expansion threat has leagues such as the Big 12 and Big East in complete disarray.

The Big 12 could be looking at dissolution soon if the Big Ten is able to lure Nebraska and Missouri, which would then cause a chain reaction that will see Texas, Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech and Baylor or Colorado join the Pac-10 schools to form a 16-team conference. The Big East, in which Notre Dame's other sports compete, also likely would implode with Rutgers, Syracuse and Pitt also being targeted for Big Ten expansion.

Most experts agree that the formation of four 16-team conferences would be good only for television partners and fattening the pockets of those leagues. Geographically, there would be major issues plus the cost of travel -- especially for the non-revenue producing sports -- would shoot up significantly.

"The same thing has been stated by the SEC commissioner, the ACC commissioner and myself, that we'd hate to see the landscape change," Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe said last week of the possibility of 16-team leagues. "We think 12 is an optimum number. We are prepared in case we need to change our membership but I think that is the number that works.

"Those of us who have been around the business for a long time feel like that's the number that works. I think it's a huge disservice to the student athlete if it grows to a bigger number where they have to go further and not have as much chance to win championships and have as much access to national championships."

Those worries all go away for now if Notre Dame and the Big Ten are able to come to an agreement.

The addition of Notre Dame would give the Big Ten and the Big Ten Network a football program with a global draw while also giving the league 12 members -- which allows for a lucrative conference championship game.

A phone message for Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick was not returned.

Notre Dame joining a conference also seems to resolve some of the issues that it will face down the road, chief among them are scheduling. Inside a conference, scheduling would not be a problem. And the conference payout of between $20 and $22 million in the Big Ten would be a significant bump from the exclusive NBC deal.

The key for Notre Dame is deciding if joining the Big Ten is worth giving up the mystique of independence.

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogblaster (Post 6808024)
Well is any college leaving ... or is it a stunt too get more TV monies ....

It could just be the Big 10's ploy to get ND in their conference.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6807985)
Have we considered inviting Notre Dame into the Big XII so that they could get a piece of the enormous basketball pie?

ROFL

teedubya 06-08-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6808027)

Made of KUpcakes. How fitting.

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6808030)
3 National Championships? You mean only Kansas counts the Helms championships as actual championships? This can't be. I mean, yes, the Helms foundation wasn't even created until 2 decades after the 1922 and 1923 seasons, and yes, subsequent analysis of the 1921-22 season showed that Missouri, not Kansas, would have won the championship based on the baseline information that the Helms foundation used to determine a champion, but I digress...


Rank Team Rec.
1 Missouri 16-1
2 Kansas 16-2
3 Army 17-2
4 Idaho 19-1
5 Oregon St. 21-2
6 Wabash 21-3
7 Holy Cross 14-3
8 Purdue 15-3
9 Michigan 15-4
10 CCNY 10-2
11 Butler 23-4
12 Princeton 20-5
13 Illinois 14-5
14 Wisconsin 14-5
15 Pennsylvania 24-3
16 Texas A&M 18-3
17 Navy 15-3
18 Wooster 14-1
19 Beloit 12-0
20 Texas 20-4

Missouri got ****ed again?

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6808034)
It could just be the Big 10's ploy to get ND in their conference.

Right. They in no way would even think of adding those two schools. I am sure the idea of plundering three markets and all those football viewers from the Big 12 is just utterly unappealing.

They probably were just feigning interest... so ND would get jealous.

Riiiight.

This sounds like a very troubling time for you... :-)
Posted via Mobile Device

ArrowheadHawk 06-08-2010 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 6808044)
Right. They in no way would even think of adding those two schools. I am sure the idea of plundering three markets and all those football viewers from the Big 12 is just utterly unappealing.

They probably were just feigning interest... so ND would get jealous.

Riiiight.

This sounds like a very troubling time for you... :-)
Posted via Mobile Device

Wow, talk about an extreme overreaction to my post. I did say "could". You must be in the meeting room with Big 10 officials. Sorry. Please forgive me.

Bearcat 06-08-2010 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6808030)
3 National Championships? You mean only Kansas counts the Helms championships as actual championships? This can't be. I mean, yes, the Helms foundation wasn't even created until 2 decades after the 1922 and 1923 seasons, and yes, subsequent analysis of the 1921-22 season showed that Missouri, not Kansas, would have won the championship based on the baseline information that the Helms foundation used to determine a champion, but I digress...

No. 1952, 1988, 2008.

The article isn't even from a KU website.

hawkchief 06-08-2010 07:19 PM

It would be the most poetic justice of all, should Notre Dame say yes to the Big Ten and Mizzou would have completely shat themselves. They would then be the black sheep of the Big XII, with nowhere to go. For a school with so little to offer, MU has hung itself out on a very weak limb.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6808053)
It would be the most poetic justice of all, should Notre Dame say yes to the Big Ten and Mizzou would have completely shat themselves. They would then be the black sheep of the Big XII, with nowhere to go. For a school with so little to offer, MU has hung itself out on a very weak limb.

LMAO. The black sheep?

If ND "saves" the Big XII, things will return to normal, and we'll all resume being Texas's Sat. Night girl.

teedubya 06-08-2010 07:21 PM

The Mizzou Shatbags here have spewed lots of venom. For it to blow up in there face, would be poetic.

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6808053)
It would be the most poetic justice of all, should Notre Dame say yes to the Big Ten and Mizzou would have completely shat themselves. They would then be the black sheep of the Big XII, with nowhere to go. For a school with so little to offer, MU has hung itself out on a very weak limb.

And we could all live happily ever after under Texas' thumb.

Fwiw, Mizzou hasn't said shit about all this other than, "We're a proud member of the Big XII" All they've done is make it known that they're unhappy that all members aren't treated equally. And if a conference comes calling where they are? You're damn right they'll listen.

Mizzou's being painted as the villian in all this, but that's way off base.

Reaper16 06-08-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6808057)
The Mizzou Shatbags here have spewed lots of venom. For it to blow up in there face, would be poetic.

LMAO This post reads like an Ed Hardy shirt looks.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6808057)
The Mizzou Shatbags here have spewed lots of venom. For it to blow up in there face, would be poetic.

LMAO KU fans do the same year in and year out. For once basketball can't save KU and their fans.

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6808050)
Wow, talk about an extreme overreaction to my post. I did say "could". You must be in the meeting room with Big 10 officials. Sorry. Please forgive me.

Actually, I know someone who probably knows something but of course when I am dying for info he's on vacation.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6808064)
And we could all live happily ever after under Texas' thumb.

Fwiw, Mizzou hasn't said shit about all this other than, "We're a proud member of the Big XII" All they've done is make it known that they're unhappy that all members aren't treated equally. And if a conference comes calling where they are? You're damn right they'll listen.

Mizzou's being painted as the villian in all this, but that's way off base.

Exactly...the big 12 created this shit by not giving a ****

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6808055)
LMAO. The black sheep?

If ND "saves" the Big XII, things will return to normal, and we'll all resume being Texas's Sat. Night girl.

Exactly.

Mizzou's just evil because they're not lining up to blow Texas, I guess.

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6808057)
The Mizzou Shatbags here have spewed lots of venom. For it to blow up in there face, would be poetic.

You can't blame them for getting it all out while they can - it is generally seen as weak to bang on mid major teams too much.
Posted via Mobile Device

hawkchief 06-08-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6808055)
LMAO. The black sheep?

If ND "saves" the Big XII, things will return to normal, and we'll all resume being Texas's Sat. Night girl.

Mizzou's been flashing their nasty vagina at the Big Ten for a few years now. If Notre Dame picks the Big Ten, Mizzou will be college-non-grata in the Big XII immediately - they already are. Like pretty-boys Mike Alden and Quin Snyder, Mizzou athletics is nothing more than form over substance. You better pray ND stays Independent, or the Tiggers might be the ones outside, looking in.

ChiTown 06-08-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6808062)
LMAO This post reads like an Ed Hardy shirt looks.

ROFL

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6808075)
Mizzou's been flashing their nasty vagina at the Big Ten for a few years now. If Notre Dame picks the Big Ten, Mizzou will be college-non-grata in the Big XII immediately - they already are. Like pretty-boys Mike Alden and Quin Snyder, Mizzou athletics is nothing more than form over substance. You better pray ND stays Independent, or the Tiggers might be the ones outside, looking in.

Good luck with that.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6808075)
Mizzou's been flashing their nasty vagina at the Big Ten for a few years now. If Notre Dame picks the Big Ten, Mizzou will be college-non-grata in the Big XII immediately - they already are. Like pretty-boys Mike Alden and Quin Snyder, Mizzou athletics is nothing more than form over substance. You better pray ND stays Independent, or the Tiggers might be the ones outside, looking in.

LMAO

Tactical Funky 06-08-2010 07:29 PM

Despite all of the back-and-forth between the Big XII fanbases in this thread, the real culprit is mother****ing Dan Beebe. Seriously. What the **** has he been paid to do the past three years? Sit with his thumb up his ass?

**** you very much, Dan.

Crush 06-08-2010 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6808075)
Mizzou's been flashing their nasty vagina at the Big Ten for a few years now. If Notre Dame picks the Big Ten, Mizzou will be college-non-grata in the Big XII immediately - they already are. Like pretty-boys Mike Alden and Quin Snyder, Mizzou athletics is nothing more than form over substance. You better pray ND stays Independent, or the Tiggers might be the ones outside, looking in.


Have fun in the Mountain West.

baitism 06-08-2010 07:30 PM

So are you saying KU wouldn't have done the same thing in MU's shoes? I am confused...

KcMizzou 06-08-2010 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Funky (Post 6808083)
Despite all of the back-and-forth between the Big XII fanbases in this thread, the real culprit is mother****ing Dan Beebe. Seriously. What the **** has been paid to do the past three years? Sit with his thumb up his ass?

**** you very much, Dan.

Exaaaactly. The Big XII is broken as it stands now. Mizzou's just lucky enough to possibly have a better option. It's really that simple.

It's not traitorous... it's common sense.

teedubya 06-08-2010 07:33 PM

Yeah, Dan Beebe has less competence that Allard Baird, Dayton Moore and Carl Peterson combined.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6808090)
Exaaaactly. The Big XII is broken as it stands now. Mizzou's just lucky enough to possibly have a better option. It's really that simple.

It's not traitorous... it's common sense.

If this was determined by basketball MU would be ****ed /uninformed ku fan

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6808094)
Yeah, Dan Beebe has less competence that Allard Baird, Dayton Moore and Carl Peterson combined.

I still think it's unfair to put baird there

Bearcat 06-08-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6808064)

Mizzou's being painted as the villian in all this, but that's way off base.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6808072)
Exactly.

Mizzou's just evil because they're not lining up to blow Texas, I guess.

And just like the city who's television market would send MU to the Big 10, Mizzou fans find a way to have both superiority and inferiority complexes.

Seriously though, who's calling Mizzou the bad guy? The articles I've read are about other schools pleading with MU and NU to stay... I don't think I've seen anything that says Mizzou is screwing over the Big 12 teams, that they should stay (outside of the benefit of those who want them to stay), etc.

Hell, based on what I've read, I don't think Mizzou plays a huge part in things... it's much more about Texas, and then Nebraska. If Texas leaves, it's taking half the conference with it. If Nebraska leaves, I've heard there's a better chance Texas leaves. If Mizzou and only Mizzou leaves, the Big 12 stays. :shrug:

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Funky (Post 6808083)
Despite all of the back-and-forth between the Big XII fanbases in this thread, the real culprit is mother****ing Dan Beebe. Seriously. What the **** has been paid to do the past three years? Sit with his thumb up his ass?

**** you very much, Dan.

It's he and Texas to blame ultimately for the conference's demise... true. It's not like KU/KSU/etc can help what's going on. And the movers just happen to be in the right place at the right time to move up.
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.