Not aruing, but that is how it was reported

Well, that's the reasoning that was given by the team to their local media.

So what? He played 0-1 tech in Indy. He obviously can do both. He’d be a good add. More upside than Logan and younger. Money and term are the factors, not the fit nor the ability...

It just goes to show that Ballard has no idea what he’s doing in Indy.

He signed a bunch of guys last year that didn’t help the team, hired Josh McDaniels, only to be spurned by him, and couldn’t sign any impact players in free agency again this year.

Indy is looking toxic.

You may have misinterpreted my post.

I’d take him on a 2 year deal but it’s silly to believe that he was cut because they moved from 3-4 to a 4-3, when they signed him coming from a 4-3.

There must be something else about the player that Ballard doesn’t like.

No argument from me there. So far this off-season has been pathetic for them outside of the Jets trade.

And if the Jets acquire a true Franchise QB and Andrew Luck doesn’t return to form, he’ll probably be fired inside two years

Just what I saw on Twitter

No clue if true

I totally get why no one wants Sorenson starting, but dang man... he is actually pretty good depth

Restructuring him would be fine, but we cant completely gut this secondary... we need to actually field a team this year

Do agree about Bailey though, he is atleast serviceable for now

What?

What?

Johnathan Hankins was PFF's #3 graded DL on run defense last season. Bennie Logan was 60th. While he wasn't great as a pass rusher he graded out higher than Logan and RNR there too. He's 25.

Pay. This. Man. - @LyleGraversen

Guy can play. He’d be a great answer at our 1-Tech.

O. City is just referencing the scheme change in Indy.

Do it.

Getting Hankins would mean Tanoh is just a wasted draft pick.