ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Let’s talk about rd 2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=338108)

BWillie 04-30-2021 09:27 AM

WR who can actually run routes please.

Edge rusher wouldn't be end of world either.

Couch-Potato 04-30-2021 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15653011)
Trembles blocking is amazing. Brevin Jordan ran the 40 like an offensive lineman.

The blocking is the big plus from Tremble for me, imagine adding him and a solid OC... our OL would be complete for years with high-end top quality pass protection.

Couch-Potato 04-30-2021 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653012)
Carlos Basham DE Wake Forest

6’3” 270 33 inch arms

Longest active streak in CFB for a TFL with 23 consecutive games. 16 sacks in last 20 games on a team with little NFL talent so he was the headliner and still produced

Looked awesome at the Senior Bowl. Looked good both inside and outside rushing

Feels like he is becoming sort of the consensus wish pick, but I'm willing to bet the rest of the leagues fanbase is eyeballing him just the same. Praying he falls to us, I want an impact pass rusher!

RunKC 04-30-2021 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15653001)
When will people understand that forcing a pick based on need is a terrible idea?

It’s entirely possible that somebody like Ossai, Perkins, or Basham falls to us, but if not, you don’t need to panic at all.

I don’t believe it’s forcing a pick. Veach always talks about pockets. Nothing wrong with getting a guy you believe in.

It’s like you guys forgot that we have the most aggressive GM in football. The guy tried to get Trent Williams month ago, has made 5 trades all being trade up’s and has traded his first rd pick for a veteran in 2 of the last 3 years.

You guys act like this guy is ****ing Chris Ballard LMAO

The Franchise 04-30-2021 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653022)
I don’t believe it’s forcing a pick. Veach always talks about pockets. Nothing wrong with getting a guy you believe in.

It’s like you guys forgot that we have the most aggressive GM in football. The guy tried to get Trent Williams month ago, has made 5 trades all being trade up’s and has traded his first rd pick for a veteran in 2 of the last 3 years.

You guys act like this guy is ****ing Chris Ballard LMAO

He also traded up for Speaks and Hardman. Let’s not act like he’s hitting on everything here.

staylor26 04-30-2021 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653022)
I don’t believe it’s forcing a pick. Veach always talks about pockets. Nothing wrong with getting a guy you believe in.

It’s like you guys forgot that we have the most aggressive GM in football. The guy tried to get Trent Williams month ago, has made 5 trades all being trade up’s and has traded his first rd pick for a veteran in 2 of the last 3 years.

You guys act like this guy is ****ing Chris Ballard LMAO

Huh? I’m not saying don’t trade up for one. I’m saying if you sit at 58 you don’t “have” to go DE. You don’t ever pick based solely on need.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15652965)
Or Spags and our staff are a difference maker but know we need to move up to get him. Trade up for 58 and a 63/3rd rd swap so we still have a 3rd and can get value at IOL, corner or WR

Move up to get who?

There really aren't that many guys left that are going to fall far enough. Are you wanting to trade up into the 30's?

htismaqe 04-30-2021 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15652977)
This is Brett ****ing Veach. 5 trades in 3 years. All traded UP.

We didn’t have a 1st. I would bet they’re looking for a top guy on their board, DE or another position.

Doesn’t mean we are giving up a pick to move up

Yep, traded up for Breeland Speaks. And he said it was because the DE class started getting really thin and he felt like he had to. Let's do that again. He said he learned his lesson from that so let's hope he was telling the truth.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 15652985)
I feel like adding a Center like Humphrey makes our O line completely overhauled and a TOP line in the league.

This to me is THE priority. Adding an edge is important but we can get by with a FA, same with CB.

We could absolutely SOLVE one of our most important weakness or add a rotational player to the defense.

I say Get that center and feel good about having the Oline Patrick deserves in front of him. Then go BPA or WR if they really feel like thats the next hole.

We don't need a center THAT bad. Already spent almost our entire free agency on the offensive line. We have other needs.

O.city 04-30-2021 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653037)
We don't need a center THAT bad. Already spent almost our entire free agency on the offensive line. We have other needs.

We've had 1 year bandaids and shitty players there for a few years. If he's there and you can fill it with that type of dude for 3 or 4 years, do it.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 09:46 AM

If Humphrey or Meinerz are one of the guys on the top of their list at 58 or 63.....then sure.....take him.

**** Landon Dickerson though.

Bronco_buster2 04-30-2021 09:47 AM

What I love about Veach and company.......aside from QB, I have no problem at this point with any position we select at 58 and 63. Whatever “needs” are not addressed after the draft, the Chiefs will use their resources to find.

The “needs” at this point are not so glaring that we have to reach.

Who I would like? Creed Humphrey, Dickerson, Gabril Cox, Perkins, Onwuzurike, Marshall, Barmore, if any fall that far.

Who ‘probably’ will be available I would like? Werner, Tremble, Melifonwu, Cosmi, Ossai, Tufele

MahomesMagic 04-30-2021 09:48 AM

Yeah, so many teams ahead of us not going to get my hopes up until we are 5 players away and I can see multiple guys I like still on the board.

RunKC 04-30-2021 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653031)
Move up to get who?

There really aren't that many guys left that are going to fall far enough. Are you wanting to trade up into the 30's?

Not advocating for moving up to early rd 2. You can easily do a trade that he did in 2018 with a pick swap.

Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade.

And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB.
Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well

kccrow 04-30-2021 09:50 AM

If Veach wanted to get up in the 30's he might be able to package both 2nds for a pick there and a high 4th.

I don't think he will, but it's something to consider. I really think he's content this year seeing how the board falls though.

Could make a slight move with Washington and go to 51 and get 74 in the 3rd.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653056)
Not advocating for moving up to early rd 2. You can easily do a trade that he did in 2018 with a pick swap.

Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade.

And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB.
Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well

Dude. Breeland Speaks didn’t work out and Mecole Hardman is the reason why we need a WR right now.

And Veach didn’t trade up for Mahomes.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 09:51 AM

And I’d be just fine with the Washington trade if they want someone 8 spots up.

kccrow 04-30-2021 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653056)
Not advocating for moving up to early rd 2. You can easily do a trade that he did in 2018 with a pick swap.

Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade.

And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB.
Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well

Ha, was typing the same thing while I was on the phone. It could work

MahomesMagic 04-30-2021 09:53 AM

The thing that bothered me about the Mecole pick is the belief KC had that they could teach him how to run routes better.

Draft what you see. Tyreek is a unicorn that improved. Maybe Steve Smith and Tyreek are the only guys I can think of that dramatically improved from college to the pros like that.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653056)
Not advocating for moving up to early rd 2. You can easily do a trade that he did in 2018 with a pick swap.

Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade.

And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB.
Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well

Dude, Basham is probably the first DE off the board tonight. If it's not him, then it's probably Perkins.

After that, there's like NOBODY. Ojulari doesn't really fit. Are you planning on trading up in the 2nd for a guy like Elerson Smith, who probably has a late 3rd round grade?

That's what I'm saying.

OF COURSE, if we could trade up 6 spots and get one of the better DE's left, we could do it. But that's not likely to happen at all. We'd be moving up for a guy that we could stay put and get.

There's just not a lot of value left at DE. We'd be better off going with another position and taking a couple later.

RealSNR 04-30-2021 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653044)
We've had 1 year bandaids and shitty players there for a few years. If he's there and you can fill it with that type of dude for 3 or 4 years, do it.

If he's the top guy available on the Chiefs' board, then yes, absolutely.

This draft should be BPA all the way. No exceptions. Don't even think about going, "Ehh... but we REALLY could use _____ position!"

We'll be fine at just about any position. And if you trade up, do it because you really want that particular player and you think he'll be amazing, not because he plays a certain position and you're worried there won't be any good guys like him available to you at your spot.

TEX 04-30-2021 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653012)
Carlos Basham DE Wake Forest

6’3” 270 33 inch arms

Longest active streak in CFB for a TFL with 23 consecutive games. 16 sacks in last 20 games on a team with little NFL talent so he was the headliner and still produced

Looked awesome at the Senior Bowl. Looked good both inside and outside rushing

Great choice! FWIW, I have Carlos "Boogie" Bashman along with Terrance Marshall Jr. as out picks.

RunKC 04-30-2021 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15653060)
Dude. Breeland Speaks didn’t work out and Mecole Hardman is the reason why we need a WR right now.

And Veach didn’t trade up for Mahomes.

Hardman is not a bust though. 10 receiving TD’s and 2 ST’s return TD’s in 2 years is worth his draft pick.

Yes it sucks that he regressed but there was no offseason for him to get better due to covid.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653078)
Hardman is not a bust though. 10 receiving TD’s and 2 ST’s return TD’s in 2 years is worth his draft pick.

Yes it sucks that he regressed but there was no offseason for him to get better due to covid.

Never said he was a bust. But he’s not a WR2. At least not right now.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 15653077)
Great choice! FWIW, I have Boogie along with Terrance Marshall Jr. as out picks.

Basham would be a dream pick IF he falls far enough.

He won't. But it would be great if he did.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15653074)
If he's the top guy available on the Chiefs' board, then yes, absolutely.

This draft should be BPA all the way. No exceptions. Don't even think about going, "Ehh... but we REALLY could use _____ position!"

We'll be fine at just about any position. And if you trade up, do it because you really want that particular player and you think he'll be amazing, not because he plays a certain position and you're worried there won't be any good guys like him available to you at your spot.

Exactly. Too many needs, too much talent available, to get tunnel vision. Go get BPA and make the whole team better.

BigChiefFan 04-30-2021 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15652911)
ROFL

I think this article has taken enough of a beating now.

Lmao. For as much shit as we all take around here, that one sticks out like a sore thumb. Gotta love it. Go Chiefs.

kccrow 04-30-2021 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15653074)
If he's the top guy available on the Chiefs' board, then yes, absolutely.

This draft should be BPA all the way. No exceptions. Don't even think about going, "Ehh... but we REALLY could use _____ position!"

We'll be fine at just about any position. And if you trade up, do it because you really want that particular player and you think he'll be amazing, not because he plays a certain position and you're worried there won't be any good guys like him available to you at your spot.

Pretty well what Veach said in his presser. "Outside of QB, anything is on the table."

He's not locked in. It "sounds" like he's most focused on DE, CB, and LB in listening to him overall the past few weeks but he doesn't seem zeroed in on a guy or a position.

RealSNR 04-30-2021 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653056)
Not advocating for moving up to early rd 2. You can easily do a trade that he did in 2018 with a pick swap.

Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade.

And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB.
Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well

Rationale for trading up for Speaks: "There weren't going to be any good DEs left if he went off the board"

Rationale for trading up for Mahomes: "Because he's ****ing awesome"

See the difference?

The Hardman trade up is difficult to speculate on and I won't get into it, particularly because the board is decidedly divided on whether or not he can continue to improve.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653070)
Dude, Basham is probably the first DE off the board tonight. If it's not him, then it's probably Perkins.

After that, there's like NOBODY. Ojulari doesn't really fit. Are you planning on trading up in the 2nd for a guy like Elerson Smith, who probably has a late 3rd round grade?

That's what I'm saying.

OF COURSE, if we could trade up 6 spots and get one of the better DE's left, we could do it. But that's not likely to happen at all. We'd be moving up for a guy that we could stay put and get.

There's just not a lot of value left at DE. We'd be better off going with another position and taking a couple later.

I think I'd probably try to bandaid the DE spot up this year and look for the DE early next years draft. Those dudes that you need go early anyway.

TRR 04-30-2021 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653081)
Basham would be a dream pick IF he falls far enough.

He won't. But it would be great if he did.

Agreed. He’s a good fit for a Spags defensive end. Solid in both the run and pass. He would most likely already be gone if it weren’t for the failed drug test that kept him out of multiple games.

MahomesMagic 04-30-2021 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15653085)
Pretty well what Veach said in his presser. "Outside of QB, anything is on the table."

He's not locked in. It "sounds" like he's most focused on DE, CB, and LB in listening to him overall the past few weeks but he doesn't seem zeroed in on a guy or a position.

Tons of good linebackers and edge rushers with a 2nd round grade left.

WR's are probably going to make some happy and some upset.

I don't see too many players at WR that will be universally loved here.

RunKC 04-30-2021 10:04 AM

Today is the day OL depth really comes into focus. Lot of these guys are gonna be flying off the board in the early and mid rd 2.

Great news for us

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I absolutely love what&#39;s left on the OL for Rounds 2-3 tomorrow. The top players left on my OL board with a day 2 or better grade: <a href="https://t.co/jFa5WHW1sK">pic.twitter.com/jFa5WHW1sK</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1387985259153788929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

smithandrew051 04-30-2021 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653081)
Basham would be a dream pick IF he falls far enough.

He won't. But it would be great if he did.

He’s my draft crush for sure. Seems like such a natural fit opposite Clark.

I wouldn’t mind moving up if he starts to slip.

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653098)
Today is the day OL depth really comes into focus. Lot of these guys are gonna be flying off the board in the early and mid rd 2.

Great news for us

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I absolutely love what&#39;s left on the OL for Rounds 2-3 tomorrow. The top players left on my OL board with a day 2 or better grade: <a href="https://t.co/jFa5WHW1sK">pic.twitter.com/jFa5WHW1sK</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1387985259153788929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

LMAO

Watch them somehow come away with Walker Little.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 15653086)
Rationale for trading up for Speaks: "There weren't going to be any good DEs left if he went off the board"

Rationale for trading up for Mahomes: "Because he's ****ing awesome"

See the difference?

The Hardman trade up is difficult to speculate on and I won't get into it, particularly because the board is decidedly divided on whether or not he can continue to improve.

And this is why I mentioned Speaks.

Not because Speaks was a bust but because the rationale for trading up was that the DE's were running out and we HAD to get one.

It's the same rationale being floated here for trading up and it's a BAD idea.

If a DE falls to us great. If not, go LB, DB, IOL, whatever. There's no need to fixate on DE.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15653103)
LMAO

Watch them somehow come away with Walker Little.

I said it last night - after trading for Brown it sure was interesting to see the OT class basically fall off the cliff. Several guys that people thought might be 1st rounders are still out there. Sure glad we didn't trade up.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15653094)
Tons of good linebackers and edge rushers with a 2nd round grade left.

WR's are probably going to make some happy and some upset.

I don't see too many players at WR that will be universally loved here.

I don't see a ton of good edge rushers left at all. I see 2 or 3 really. At least guys that are realistically 2nd rounders.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:13 AM

I'm not taking another LB'er in the 2nd after just doing it last year.

WR, CB, IOL woudl be the areas I'd focus on.

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653124)
I'm not taking another LB'er in the 2nd after just doing it last year.

.

Doubt that has any bearing on anything.

Stryker 04-30-2021 10:16 AM

I would be happy with any two of these players:

Creed Humphrey
JOK
Terrace Marshall Jr
Kelvin Joseph
Jabril Cox

O.city 04-30-2021 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15653127)
Doubt that has any bearing on anything.

Why wouldn't it?

An off ball LB'er isn't that valuable and the one you took last year needs playing time. It would be a waste.

chiefforlife 04-30-2021 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15653127)
Doubt that has any bearing on anything.

Right! Its not like LBr is solved. Still a huge need.

kccrow 04-30-2021 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653116)
I don't see a ton of good edge rushers left at all. I see 2 or 3 really. At least guys that are realistically 2nd rounders.

There's a slew of teams that need them at the top of the round as well...

Jaguars
Jets
Falcons
Bengals
Cowboys
Chargers

to name a few...

The chances of us having a quality DE prospect fall in our laps, and especially Basham, is probably zero.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653124)
I'm not taking another LB'er in the 2nd after just doing it last year.

WR, CB, IOL woudl be the areas I'd focus on.

I wouldn't focus on LB but if a BPA guy falls, you need to look at him.

I mean if for some reason JOK were to be within reach, you take that guy. He's a utility player, not just a LB. Cox is a coverage LB unlike anybody currently on the team. He'd be a consideration as well because those guys wouldn't necessarily come off the field in passing situations.

staylor26 04-30-2021 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653116)
I don't see a ton of good edge rushers left at all. I see 2 or 3 really. At least guys that are realistically 2nd rounders.

Really not sure why you think Ojulari isn’t a fit. He’s good against the run and he has some freakishly long arms. He can absolutely play 4-3 DE.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:18 AM

They don't play with 3 LB'ers on the field much at all. You've got Gay and Hitchens in there this season.

If there's someone you could take to replace HItchens I guess go for it, but that seems a bit redundant.

chiefforlife 04-30-2021 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 15653129)
I would be happy with any two of these players:

Creed Humphrey
JOK
Terrace Marshall Jr
Kelvin Joseph
Jabril Cox

I like this list, would add Tommy Tremble.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-30-2021 10:18 AM

Our O line depth is actually pretty solid as in. Allegretti, Wylie, LDT, Remmers. And Schwartz could come back. Honestly I don’t see us taking an OL.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15653133)
There's a slew of teams that need them at the top of the round as well...

Jaguars
Jets
Falcons
Bengals
Cowboys
Chargers

to name a few...

The chances of us having a quality DE prospect fall in our laps, and especially Basham, is probably zero.

Exactly. I just don't see enough depth at DE for one to get to us. Too many guys went at the end of round one.

RunKC 04-30-2021 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653116)
I don't see a ton of good edge rushers left at all. I see 2 or 3 really. At least guys that are realistically 2nd rounders.

Yeah there’s a handful of LB’s and DE’s. The value of today is at corner and OL though.

I feel really good about a receiving weapon falling to us though. Tremble, Freiermuth, Brown or Marshall. I think one of them makes it to our range

The Franchise 04-30-2021 10:19 AM

We don’t need a LB?

Who the **** can play the position outside of Gay and Hitchens? If one of those dudes is injured then we’re down to Darius Harris or Ben Niemann.

Yes....we still need a LB.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653135)
I wouldn't focus on LB but if a BPA guy falls, you need to look at him.

I mean if for some reason JOK were to be within reach, you take that guy. He's a utility player, not just a LB. Cox is a coverage LB unlike anybody currently on the team. He'd be a consideration as well because those guys wouldn't necessarily come off the field in passing situations.

JOK would theoretically play the Sorenson role, which would make sense.

But if we're talking about an off ball LB'er? Nah, I'd look for one of those later.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-30-2021 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653138)
They don't play with 3 LB'ers on the field much at all. You've got Gay and Hitchens in there this season.

If there's someone you could take to replace HItchens I guess go for it, but that seems a bit redundant.

So you’re okay with Ben “better than Devin White per PFF” Niemann on the field then?

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653130)
Why wouldn't it?

An off ball LB'er isn't that valuable and the one you took last year needs playing time. It would be a waste.

Because as it stands right now Ben ****ing Neiman is set to see significant playing time.

And we'll see how valuable you think that position is when you're cursing his name every Sunday.

And where they allocated a pick to that position has nothing to do with anything.

Hey, we'll have two 2nd round LB's. Cool.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15653144)
We don’t need a LB?

Who the **** can play the position outside of Gay and Hitchens? If one of those dudes is injured then we’re down to Darius Harris or Ben Niemann.

Yes....we still need a LB.

If that's the way we're approaching this, then there are about 6 spots we "need". Who's your LT if Brown goes down?

We aren't gonna have depth everywhere.

Start looking at upgrades instead of depth.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15653136)
Really not sure why you think Ojulari isn’t a fit. He’s good against the run and he has some freakishly long arms. He can absolutely play 4-3 DE.

He's light. He plays well against the run as a penetrator but when an OL gets their hands on him, he's often done. He doesn't have the bend or push to actually set the edge and win matchups.

I'm just not as high on him as others are I guess. I see him more as a 3-4 OLB.

chiefforlife 04-30-2021 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653138)
They don't play with 3 LB'ers on the field much at all. You've got Gay and Hitchens in there this season.

If there's someone you could take to replace HItchens I guess go for it, but that seems a bit redundant.

And if either one of those guys is hurt? The cubbard is BARE.

RunKC 04-30-2021 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653145)
JOK would theoretically play the Sorenson role, which would make sense.

But if we're talking about an off ball LB'er? Nah, I'd look for one of those later.

I don’t think the ND kid is gonna be there for us. Good news is that Jabril Cox is a very similar type of player with really good athleticism and coverage.

He could cover TE’s for us

staylor26 04-30-2021 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653149)
He's light. He plays well against the run as a penetrator but when an OL gets their hands on him, he's often done. He doesn't have the bend or push to actually set the edge and win matchups.

I'm just not as high on him as others are I guess. I see him more as a 3-4 OLB.

Absolutely disagree. He doesn’t get pushed around in the running game. He’s not Dee Ford. He can play 4-3 DE too.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15653147)
Because as it stands right now Ben ****ing Neiman is set to see significant playing time.

And we'll see how valuable you think that position is when you're cursing his name every Sunday.

And where they allocated a pick to that position has nothing to do with anything.

Hey, we'll have two 2nd round LB's. Cool.

The one they drafted last year hasn't even played much yet.

They rarely play with 3 on the field. So it woudl be more of a depth pick at this point.

But whatever. I'm cool with whoever.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653143)
Yeah there’s a handful of LB’s and DE’s. The value of today is at corner and OL though.

I feel really good about a receiving weapon falling to us though. Tremble, Freiermuth, Brown or Marshall. I think one of them makes it to our range

Yep, I really think we're looking at a CB and IOL with these 2 picks.

O.city 04-30-2021 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 15653151)
And if either one of those guys is hurt? The cubbard is BARE.

What if Kelce gets hurt? What if one of the CB's goes down? What if Mathieu gets hurt?

KChiefs1 04-30-2021 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653098)
Today is the day OL depth really comes into focus. Lot of these guys are gonna be flying off the board in the early and mid rd 2.

Great news for us

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I absolutely love what&#39;s left on the OL for Rounds 2-3 tomorrow. The top players left on my OL board with a day 2 or better grade: <a href="https://t.co/jFa5WHW1sK">pic.twitter.com/jFa5WHW1sK</a></p>&mdash; Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1387985259153788929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

If they went Meinerz I wouldn't complain eventhough there are bigger needs.

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 15653141)
Our O line depth is actually pretty solid as in. Allegretti, Wylie, LDT, Remmers. And Schwartz could come back. Honestly I don’t see us taking an OL.

Agreed. I don't think we need IOL depth. The line, all of a sudden, has plenty of depth.

I mention Walker Little, but if they draft him there's a log jam on the OL. It's still be awesome, but i bet it would also mean they're dumping LDT.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-30-2021 10:23 AM

Let’s just go full LSU today.... Cox and Marshall. Maybe a CB if there is a good one still there

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15653152)
I don’t think the ND kid is gonna be there for us. Good news is that Jabril Cox is a very similar type of player with really good athleticism and coverage.

He could cover TE’s for us

Yep. Cox isn't the specimen JOK is but he's still in that hybrid LB/DB mold that can stay on the field in nickel packages. He'd be useful.

staylor26 04-30-2021 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 15653162)
Let’s just go full LSU today.... Cox and Marshall. Maybe a CB if there is a good one still there

Former LSU Tiger Kelvin Joseph.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-30-2021 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653159)
What if Kelce gets hurt? What if one of the CB's goes down? What if Mathieu gets hurt?

If Kelce gets hurt we got the Belldozer!!! Luckily for health Kelces durability is phenomenal

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-30-2021 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15653167)
Former LSU Tiger Kelvin Joseph.

I wouldn’t hate that pick either

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15653153)
Absolutely disagree. He doesn’t get pushed around in the running game. He’s not Dee Ford. He can play 4-3 DE too.

Outside of the injuries, I personally think Ford was a better 4-3 prospect that Ojulari.

He really struggles to get off blocks. In fact, I saw a quote from an AFC scout that said something like "sometimes you'd swear he was made of velcro".

Fat Elvis 04-30-2021 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653159)
What if Kelce gets hurt? What if one of the CB's goes down? What if Mathieu gets hurt?

Eh, Kelce could pose a problem. With Mahomes behind a stout O-line, if our defense totally collapses, well, let Mahomes be Mahomes....

The Franchise 04-30-2021 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653159)
What if Kelce gets hurt? What if one of the CB's goes down? What if Mathieu gets hurt?

Ummmmm all guys I’ve advocated getting depth for. I’m not saying that we HAVE to take a LB in the 2nd round. I’m not eliminating it entirely like you are.

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15653176)
I’m not saying that we HAVE to take a LB in the 2nd round. I’m not eliminating it entirely like you are.

Right.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15653155)
The one they drafted last year hasn't even played much yet.

They rarely play with 3 on the field. So it woudl be more of a depth pick at this point.

But whatever. I'm cool with whoever.

Again, with JOK and Jabril Cox, you'd be looking at having Hitchens and Gay on the field WITH them. They could easily line up in a big DB spot and cover TE's or whatever. They're not traditional LB's.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 10:26 AM

Think the Bucs are pissed they have two LBs that cost them a first and second round pick?

ToxSocks 04-30-2021 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15653181)
Think the Bucs are pissed they have two LBs that cost them a first and second round pick?

People seem to have to taken on this idea that because the Chiefs don't currently use their LB's a lot that they're not important.

I think it's more like, they play a 3rd safety often because they don't have LB's that they can trust in coverage. Gay is suppose to be that guy, but he's raw. Maybe he becomes that guy.

But if the Chiefs have two stud LB's, they're not gonna park one on the sideline. They're going to get his ass on the field and adjust their scheme accordingly.

The Franchise 04-30-2021 10:30 AM

DE, LB, S, CB, IOL, TE and WR are all positions that could use an upgrade or quality depth on day two. I’m not eliminating any of those positions.

htismaqe 04-30-2021 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15653187)
People seem to have to taken on this idea that because the Chiefs don't currently use their LB's a lot that they're not important.

I think it's more like, they play a 3rd safety often because they don't have LB's that they can trust in coverage. Gay is suppose to be that guy, but he's raw. Maybe he becomes that guy.

But if the Chiefs have two stud LB's, they're not gonna park one on the sideline. They're going to get his ass on the field and adjust their scheme accordingly.

Exactly.

We're not talking about taking a 250-lb MLB here. We're talking about guys that could legitimately play in passing sets and get Sorenson off the field.

The reason for doing that is that you're better against the run even when you're in nickel buck.

staylor26 04-30-2021 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15653173)
Outside of the injuries, I personally think Ford was a better 4-3 prospect that Ojulari.

He really struggles to get off blocks. In fact, I saw a quote from an AFC scout that said something like "sometimes you'd swear he was made of velcro".

No ****ing way.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.