![]() |
WR who can actually run routes please.
Edge rusher wouldn't be end of world either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It’s like you guys forgot that we have the most aggressive GM in football. The guy tried to get Trent Williams month ago, has made 5 trades all being trade up’s and has traded his first rd pick for a veteran in 2 of the last 3 years. You guys act like this guy is ****ing Chris Ballard LMAO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There really aren't that many guys left that are going to fall far enough. Are you wanting to trade up into the 30's? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If Humphrey or Meinerz are one of the guys on the top of their list at 58 or 63.....then sure.....take him.
**** Landon Dickerson though. |
What I love about Veach and company.......aside from QB, I have no problem at this point with any position we select at 58 and 63. Whatever “needs” are not addressed after the draft, the Chiefs will use their resources to find.
The “needs” at this point are not so glaring that we have to reach. Who I would like? Creed Humphrey, Dickerson, Gabril Cox, Perkins, Onwuzurike, Marshall, Barmore, if any fall that far. Who ‘probably’ will be available I would like? Werner, Tremble, Melifonwu, Cosmi, Ossai, Tufele |
Yeah, so many teams ahead of us not going to get my hopes up until we are 5 players away and I can see multiple guys I like still on the board.
|
Quote:
Example: Chiefs trade picks 58 and 63 to WFT for picks 52 and 74. That would be a great fair trade. And please stop bringing up Breeland Speaks. He didn’t work out. So what? We traded up for Mecole Hardman and he started the spark to get our win over the Texans and go to the SB. Also traded up for some guy named Patrick Mahomes. That seemed to work out well |
If Veach wanted to get up in the 30's he might be able to package both 2nds for a pick there and a high 4th.
I don't think he will, but it's something to consider. I really think he's content this year seeing how the board falls though. Could make a slight move with Washington and go to 51 and get 74 in the 3rd. |
Quote:
And Veach didn’t trade up for Mahomes. |
And I’d be just fine with the Washington trade if they want someone 8 spots up.
|
Quote:
|
The thing that bothered me about the Mecole pick is the belief KC had that they could teach him how to run routes better.
Draft what you see. Tyreek is a unicorn that improved. Maybe Steve Smith and Tyreek are the only guys I can think of that dramatically improved from college to the pros like that. |
Quote:
After that, there's like NOBODY. Ojulari doesn't really fit. Are you planning on trading up in the 2nd for a guy like Elerson Smith, who probably has a late 3rd round grade? That's what I'm saying. OF COURSE, if we could trade up 6 spots and get one of the better DE's left, we could do it. But that's not likely to happen at all. We'd be moving up for a guy that we could stay put and get. There's just not a lot of value left at DE. We'd be better off going with another position and taking a couple later. |
Quote:
This draft should be BPA all the way. No exceptions. Don't even think about going, "Ehh... but we REALLY could use _____ position!" We'll be fine at just about any position. And if you trade up, do it because you really want that particular player and you think he'll be amazing, not because he plays a certain position and you're worried there won't be any good guys like him available to you at your spot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes it sucks that he regressed but there was no offseason for him to get better due to covid. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He won't. But it would be great if he did. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's not locked in. It "sounds" like he's most focused on DE, CB, and LB in listening to him overall the past few weeks but he doesn't seem zeroed in on a guy or a position. |
Quote:
Rationale for trading up for Mahomes: "Because he's ****ing awesome" See the difference? The Hardman trade up is difficult to speculate on and I won't get into it, particularly because the board is decidedly divided on whether or not he can continue to improve. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
WR's are probably going to make some happy and some upset. I don't see too many players at WR that will be universally loved here. |
Today is the day OL depth really comes into focus. Lot of these guys are gonna be flying off the board in the early and mid rd 2.
Great news for us <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I absolutely love what's left on the OL for Rounds 2-3 tomorrow. The top players left on my OL board with a day 2 or better grade: <a href="https://t.co/jFa5WHW1sK">pic.twitter.com/jFa5WHW1sK</a></p>— Brandon Thorn (@BrandonThornNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrandonThornNFL/status/1387985259153788929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
I wouldn’t mind moving up if he starts to slip. |
Quote:
Watch them somehow come away with Walker Little. |
Quote:
Not because Speaks was a bust but because the rationale for trading up was that the DE's were running out and we HAD to get one. It's the same rationale being floated here for trading up and it's a BAD idea. If a DE falls to us great. If not, go LB, DB, IOL, whatever. There's no need to fixate on DE. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not taking another LB'er in the 2nd after just doing it last year.
WR, CB, IOL woudl be the areas I'd focus on. |
Quote:
|
I would be happy with any two of these players:
Creed Humphrey JOK Terrace Marshall Jr Kelvin Joseph Jabril Cox |
Quote:
An off ball LB'er isn't that valuable and the one you took last year needs playing time. It would be a waste. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jaguars Jets Falcons Bengals Cowboys Chargers to name a few... The chances of us having a quality DE prospect fall in our laps, and especially Basham, is probably zero. |
Quote:
I mean if for some reason JOK were to be within reach, you take that guy. He's a utility player, not just a LB. Cox is a coverage LB unlike anybody currently on the team. He'd be a consideration as well because those guys wouldn't necessarily come off the field in passing situations. |
Quote:
|
They don't play with 3 LB'ers on the field much at all. You've got Gay and Hitchens in there this season.
If there's someone you could take to replace HItchens I guess go for it, but that seems a bit redundant. |
Quote:
|
Our O line depth is actually pretty solid as in. Allegretti, Wylie, LDT, Remmers. And Schwartz could come back. Honestly I don’t see us taking an OL.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I feel really good about a receiving weapon falling to us though. Tremble, Freiermuth, Brown or Marshall. I think one of them makes it to our range |
We don’t need a LB?
Who the **** can play the position outside of Gay and Hitchens? If one of those dudes is injured then we’re down to Darius Harris or Ben Niemann. Yes....we still need a LB. |
Quote:
But if we're talking about an off ball LB'er? Nah, I'd look for one of those later. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And we'll see how valuable you think that position is when you're cursing his name every Sunday. And where they allocated a pick to that position has nothing to do with anything. Hey, we'll have two 2nd round LB's. Cool. |
Quote:
We aren't gonna have depth everywhere. Start looking at upgrades instead of depth. |
Quote:
I'm just not as high on him as others are I guess. I see him more as a 3-4 OLB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He could cover TE’s for us |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They rarely play with 3 on the field. So it woudl be more of a depth pick at this point. But whatever. I'm cool with whoever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mention Walker Little, but if they draft him there's a log jam on the OL. It's still be awesome, but i bet it would also mean they're dumping LDT. |
Let’s just go full LSU today.... Cox and Marshall. Maybe a CB if there is a good one still there
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He really struggles to get off blocks. In fact, I saw a quote from an AFC scout that said something like "sometimes you'd swear he was made of velcro". |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Think the Bucs are pissed they have two LBs that cost them a first and second round pick?
|
Quote:
I think it's more like, they play a 3rd safety often because they don't have LB's that they can trust in coverage. Gay is suppose to be that guy, but he's raw. Maybe he becomes that guy. But if the Chiefs have two stud LB's, they're not gonna park one on the sideline. They're going to get his ass on the field and adjust their scheme accordingly. |
DE, LB, S, CB, IOL, TE and WR are all positions that could use an upgrade or quality depth on day two. I’m not eliminating any of those positions.
|
Quote:
We're not talking about taking a 250-lb MLB here. We're talking about guys that could legitimately play in passing sets and get Sorenson off the field. The reason for doing that is that you're better against the run even when you're in nickel buck. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.