ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs We have a new GM and his name is Brett Veach (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308670)

RunKC 07-11-2017 07:45 AM

Clark didn't like the way Dorsey communicated. FFS Dorsey's voicemail to Maclin is clearly what sent everyone over the edge.

Terez has a new video out and he said that word around the Chiefs and the league (so the Eagles) is that Veach is a very good communicator.

penbrook 07-11-2017 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12952085)
Clark didn't like the way Dorsey communicated. FFS Dorsey's voicemail to Maclin is clearly what sent everyone over the edge.

Terez has a new video out and he said that word around the Chiefs and the league (so the Eagles) is that Veach is a very good communicator.

Let's hope he can manage the cap. It'll be Interesting after this season if he decides to keep or cut Alex Smith

Tribal Warfare 07-11-2017 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12952085)
Clark didn't like the way Dorsey communicated. FFS Dorsey's voicemail to Maclin is clearly what sent everyone over the edge.

Terez has a new video out and he said that word around the Chiefs and the league (so the Eagles) is that Veach is a very good communicator.

Teresa also said his talent evaluating ability is on par in comparison to Dorsey.

Eleazar 07-11-2017 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 12952075)
I hate stupid stuff like this.

What does not having the proper dress code have anything to do with his abilities as a gm?

This is an example of one exercising their authority way to far.

Goes back a long way - passing on people who don't necessarily fit the profile, the image that the Hunts want to project. How Dorsey got Hill in here we'll never know.

Projecting the desire image I guess is an important thing on the list of important things, apparently behind money, but before winning a super bowl.

penbrook 07-11-2017 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12952184)
Goes back a long way - passing on people who don't necessarily fit the profile, the image that the Hunts want to project. How Dorsey got Hill in here we'll never know.

Projecting the desire image I guess is an important thing on the list of important things, apparently behind money, but before winning a super bowl.

We got Hill here because Clark agreed that he could come here. Dorsey asked Clark prior to the draft if they could take him and Clark agreed with it. Hill is here because Clark wanted him here.

Eleazar 07-11-2017 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952195)
We got Hill here because Clark agreed that he could come here. Dorsey asked Clark prior to the draft if they could take him and Clark agreed with it. Hill is here because Clark wanted him here.

Even by your own version of events, it's because Dorsey advocated for him.

Tribal Warfare 07-11-2017 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12952200)
Even by your own version of events, it's because Dorsey advocated for him.

The Hill/Peters picks were most likely a group decision with Dorsey,Reid, and scouts to bring to Clark and Family due to said damage control. It's not just Clark making the decisions behind the scenes he's the face of the Hunt family

penbrook 07-11-2017 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12952226)
The Hill/Peters picks were most likely a group decision with Dorsey,Reid, and scouts to bring to Clark and Family due to said damage control. It's not just Clark making the decisions behind the scenes he's the face of the Hunt family

No but he will be the deciding factor. The Peters pick was all Reid. The Hill pick could of been both, we don't know. But what we do know is that Clark isn't a bitch. Before he would only be okay if draft picks were captains of there teams, now it's I don't give a **** if you've punched your pregnant gf or got kicked out of school, if you can play you belong on the Chiefs

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952285)
No but he will be the deciding factor. The Peters pick was all Reid. The Hill pick could of been both, we don't know. But what we do know is that Clark isn't a bitch. Before he would only be okay if draft picks were captains of there teams, now it's I don't give a **** if you've punched your pregnant gf or got kicked out of school, if you can play you belong on the Chiefs

The Peters pick was Chris Ballard.

Ryne Nutt heavily scouted Hill and Jones.

It's a collaborative process.

Tribal Warfare 07-11-2017 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952285)
No but he will be the deciding factor. The Peters pick was all Reid. The Hill pick could of been both, we don't know. But what we do know is that Clark isn't a bitch. Before he would only be okay if draft picks were captains of there teams, now it's I don't give a **** if you've punched your pregnant gf or got kicked out of school, if you can play you belong on the Chiefs

Just remember he was the only one who wanted Pioli to return among the Hunt Family.

ptlyon 07-11-2017 10:28 AM

May he step up and grab this franchise by the pussy and win us a championship

Color Red 07-11-2017 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12950905)
And people think this wasn't a Reid power play?

Tell me: why does anyone around here think they would bring in someone that Reid would knock heads with? Of course Reid is the point, and of course anyone on the "team" has to fit with him. I hope he is blue chip in player relations, contract business, and scouting talent.

RunKC 07-11-2017 10:30 AM

I feel comfortable with Rynne Nutt, Brett Veach Mike Borgonzi along with Andy and his staff, but they have big shoes to fill.

God it was awesome having an all star staff with Ballard and Dorsey. There were so many talented people in one room with the ability to closely monitor every prospect. I'm worried that the quality will go down due to losing those 2 of our best men.
I'm not saying we're going to shit, but those bargain bin guys and late round picks were huge for this team and you've got to think that Dorsey's job wasn't too difficult bc he had a damn good evaluator at every region of the country.

Quesadilla Joe 07-11-2017 11:41 AM

Spoiler!

RunKC 07-11-2017 11:44 AM

Quit spamming fake twitter profiles Knowmo

staylor26 07-11-2017 11:45 AM

Who the **** is that?

New World Order 07-11-2017 11:45 AM

Hey, we now know Knowmo's Twitter handle!

Quesadilla Joe 07-11-2017 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12952490)
Quit spamming fake twitter profiles Knowmo

That's not a fake twitter profile. Actual scouts/people in the scouting community have vouched for that twitter account and @AngryScout.

The Bad Guy 07-11-2017 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12952200)
Even by your own version of events, it's because Dorsey advocated for him.

Ballard is really the one who advocated for Hill and did the most work on him during the process. This was put out there last April after the draft.

SAUTO 07-11-2017 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12952323)
Just remember he was the only one who wanted Pioli to return among the Hunt Family.

I think this happened BECAUSE of the pioli situation.

I'm on the road but ill explain later

Titty Meat 07-11-2017 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12952315)
The Peters pick was Chris Ballard.

Ryne Nutt heavily scouted Hill and Jones.

It's a collaborative process.

Ballard should have been the GM. Clark messed this up.

The Bad Guy 07-11-2017 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12952541)
Ballard should have been the GM. Clark messed this up.

Yes, absolutely.

If Clark had the slightest thought about not wanting to extend Dorsey back in January, he should have cut ties the day after the playoff loss and kept Ballard.

JakeF 07-11-2017 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 12950972)
Clark Hunt clearly had his reasons.

Yes, Hunt wanted to sign Reid to a new contract and Andy wouldn't agree to one unless Dorsey was fired. That's why the weird timing and letting Ballard go, the firing happening on the same day that Reid is signed, Reid's little buddy hired to replace Dorsey. JMO.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 12952551)
Yes, Hunt wanted to sign Reid to a new contract and Andy wouldn't agree to one unless Dorsey was fired. That's why the weird timing and letting Ballard go, the firing happening on the same day that Reid is signed, Reid's little buddy hired to replace Dorsey. JMO.

:facepalm:

Lex Luthor 07-11-2017 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 12952062)
Considering that it has been speculated that one of the reasons Clark became uncomfortable with Dorsey was because he didn't dress professionally (i.e. preferring to wear a sweatshirt rather than a suit/tie), it is interesting the photo of Veach the Chiefs have on their website in the official press release announcing his promotion to GM...

http://prod.static.chiefs.clubs.nfl....veachgm-cp.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 12952075)
I hate stupid stuff like this.

What does not having the proper dress code have anything to do with his abilities as a gm?

This is an example of one exercising their authority way to far.

Or it's an example of people taking speculation far too seriously.

ct 07-11-2017 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic (Post 12950964)
JFC he's younger than me. Time to reevaluate my life decisions.

says the guy named PunkinDrublic

:D

TEX 07-11-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 12952549)
Yes, absolutely.

If Clark had the slightest thought about not wanting to extend Dorsey back in January, he should have cut ties the day after the playoff loss and kept Ballard.

This

staylor26 07-11-2017 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12952541)
Ballard should have been the GM. Clark messed this up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 12952549)
Yes, absolutely.

If Clark had the slightest thought about not wanting to extend Dorsey back in January, he should have cut ties the day after the playoff loss and kept Ballard.

100%

Hopefully Veach is good enough for us not to regret it.

BlackOp 07-11-2017 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 12952551)
Yes, Hunt wanted to sign Reid to a new contract and Andy wouldn't agree to one unless Dorsey was fired. That's why the weird timing and letting Ballard go, the firing happening on the same day that Reid is signed, Reid's little buddy hired to replace Dorsey. JMO.

Dorsey forced the Maclin release by signing Logan...and didn't keep Reid in the financial/salary cap loop. It sounds like the release was delayed as long as possible then handled in a very awkward way...like he didnt know exactly how to break it to Andy/Hunt that they were out of $$. He would HAVE to know that would piss Reid off. Keeping Maclin at OTAs while knowing they couldn't afford him was strange...motivated potentially by not wanting to cut him during his wedding? My initial thought when I heard he was let go..was "that's a "dick" move, he could have been injured." Dorsey milked it as long as he could before the cap deadline.

One question is did Andy have no prior knowledge that Maclin was a potential cap casualty? Its a really bad look for Reid (from the player's perspective)...to be at his wedding and acting like everything is great...knowing he was about to be released. Gives the impression of being underhanded...and dishonest. Dorsey hung him out to dry...if that was the case.

It would explain the abrupt firing while already letting Ballard go. It wasn't a planned, premeditated thing..it's not the only reason he was fired but it was possibly the straw that broke it.

a previous article stated that Dorsey started doing things without consulting others...maybe because of how the real power structure tied his hands?

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952595)
Dorsey forced the Maclin release by signing Logan.

Nonsense.

penbrook 07-11-2017 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12952315)
The Peters pick was Chris Ballard.

Ryne Nutt heavily scouted Hill and Jones.

It's a collaborative process.

Reid is the one who went down to Washington prior to draft day and talked to
him one in one

staylor26 07-11-2017 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952615)
Reid is the one who went down to Washington prior to draft day and talked to
him one in one

Ballard did too IIRC

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 12952549)
If Clark had the slightest thought about not wanting to extend Dorsey back in January, he should have cut ties the day after the playoff loss and kept Ballard.

From all of the reports, Clark was concerned about Dorsey and had a cold relationship with him for at least 2 years. But, since the Chiefs were winning and drafting well, he overlooked the situation.

After Ballard was hired by the Colts, it became glaringly evident that Dorsey was a mess. He was unorganized, not a good communicator and made baffling decisions on his own. After the Maclin debacle, he pulled the trigger and fired Dorsey.

I think the entire situation is a Catch-22. Clark obviously wasn't fond of Dorsey the person or his management style but the Chiefs have had the type of success that he and the fans have yearned for since the early 90's. I'm sure it was difficult to reconcile his dislike of Dorsey while simultaneously, the Chiefs were experiencing great success.

Reportedly, Clark was able to overlook those issues until Ballard left, which exposed the dysfunction. In many ways, it sounds as if Ballard was covering Dorsey's tracks, per se. I'm just happy that Veach wasn't hired by Buffalo, as the Chiefs might be in real trouble after losing their #1, #2 and #3 guy.

All that said, people have accused (myself included) Lamar Hunt from having a "Hands Off" policy, as evidenced by a 15 year playoff drought and the final 10 years of Carl Peterson's tenure. Now, the Chiefs have a more "Hands On" owner and it appears that Clark will continue, if not expand, his role in the organization.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952615)
Reid is the one who went down to Washington prior to draft day and talked to
him one in one

Ballard scouted the **** out of him.

Who gives a shit about one interview?

Eleazar 07-11-2017 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 12952549)
Yes, absolutely.

If Clark had the slightest thought about not wanting to extend Dorsey back in January, he should have cut ties the day after the playoff loss and kept Ballard.

I agree totally. If Hunt had been planning to fire Dorsey back then, it makes no sense to let Ballard walk away for nothing. The contract situation coming up was no surprise, and Hunt is no fool. That's why the official story smells, and Reid being extended simultaneously also carries a similar fishy scent.

BlackOp 07-11-2017 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12952610)
Nonsense.

So the guaranteed 8 million for Logan didn't result in them being over the cap? OK. You cant just sign every FA with a flagrant disregard for its limits.

Where exactly were they expecting to make up this money?

I'm not saying a run stuffing DT wasn't a higher priority...but KC didnt have the $$$.

Maclin was cut to get under the cap....and Dorsey knew his contract allowed for it.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12952621)
I agree totally. If Hunt had been planning to fire Dorsey back then, it makes no sense to let Ballard walk away for nothing. The contract situation coming up was no surprise, and Hunt is no fool. That's why the official story smells, and Reid being extended simultaneously also carries a similar fishy scent.

Obviously, he wasn't planning to fire him in January.

Duh.

And the contract situation wasn't "coming up", as Dorsey had another year on his deal. He could have remained under employ for the 2017 League Year and would have had plenty of time to discuss an extension with his agent.

Your rampant uninformed speculation is tiring.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952624)
So the guaranteed 8 million for Logan didn't result in them being over the cap? OK. You cant just sign every FA with a flagrant disregard for its limits.

Where exactly were they expecting to make up this money?

I'm not saying a run stuffing DT wasn't a higher priority...but KC didnt have the $$$.

JFC, he signed Eric Berry to a $13 million dollar per year deal as well. He cut Jaye Howard, which gave them cap relief, too.

Declining to sign Poe and signing Logan had absolutely nothing to do with Maclin's release, as Maclin stated that the Chiefs didn't even discuss renegotiating his contract.

BlackOp 07-11-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12952630)
JFC, he signed Eric Berry to a $13 million dollar per year deal as well. He cut Jaye Howard, which gave them cap relief, too.

Declining to sign Poe and signing Logan had absolutely nothing to do with Maclin's release, as Maclin stated that the Chiefs didn't even discuss renegotiating his contract.

Word is Hunt signed Berry...and his hit is only $5 million this season.

Logan's 8 million had everything to due with being over the cap...he was the only expensive FA signed this year that wasn't already on the team.

They were already up against the cap without Poe...hence moving Berry's real money to 2018/2019 and releasing Howard..

Dorsey didn't want to move Maclin's money around...they are going to have cash problems next season too. He wasn't worth his contract and it offered an out with minimal long-term damage. It was the right move...handled poorly. If Maclin wasn't Reid's surrogate son...it wouldn't have been such a big deal. IMO.

booger 07-11-2017 01:58 PM

Tim Terry is an interesting hire when they had the shake up in May. Obviously well known by Dorsey from working in GB. When Dorsey getting let go I wondered if Terry might have some regrets accepting with Dorsey being basically the only person he worked with before.

But Terry also started off in player development/engagement helping players deal with all sorts of things on and off field. Terry himself also has his masters, his being in management. So all of his education and roles in GB it's safe to assume he himself is a strong communicator fitting very well with Veach and possibly climbing the ladder quickly. Borgonzi I could see getting promoted. Only positions above his current one would be VP of player personnel, Director of Football operations ( Ballards last title in KC) or asst GM.

Still wouldn't be surprised to see a Tom Gamble or even Grigson type come in as the short term #2 or #3

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952649)
Word is Hunt signed Berry...and his hit is only $5 million this season.

Clark Hunt didn't "sign" Eric Berry. He reached out to him and made him comfortable, so that he'd sign.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952649)
Logan's 8 million had everything to due with being over the cap...he was the only expensive FA signed this year that wasn't already on the team.

Bullshit. This is complete and utter bullshit. Logan was signed on March 13th. If Dorsey felt that they weren't going to be Cap Compliant, he would have cut Maclin in March and given him a June 1 Designation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952649)
They were already up against the cap without Poe...hence moving Berry's real money to 2018/2019 and releasing Howard.

No. Howard failed his physical, plain and simple. They weren't even sure he'd latch on with another team. Fortunately, the Bears signed him and the Chiefs received another $2.5 million in cap relief.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952649)
Dorsey didn't want to move Maclin's money around...they are going to have cash problems next season too. He wasn't worth his contract and it offered an out with minimal long-term damage. It was the right move...handled poorly. If Maclin wasn't Reid's surrogate son...it wouldn't have been such a big deal. IMO.

Again, no. Where the **** are you getting this nonsense?

If the Chiefs intended to cut Maclin for salary cap space, they could have done so on the 1st Day of the new League Year.

There's absolutely NO WAY that Dorsey said to himself on March 13, "I'm going to sign Bennie Logan for $8 million, then next month, I'm going to cut Jaye Howard to gain $4-5 million more in cap space and on June 2nd, I'm cutting Maclin, take a Dead Money hit and create more Cap Space".

No way.

Also, the Chiefs are currently $11 million under the salary cap, so if Dorsey had approached Maclin and asked him to restructure to what he received in Baltimore ($6 million per), the Chiefs would STILL be $5 million under the cap.

Your "theory" is complete and utter rubbish.

King_Chief_Fan 07-11-2017 02:11 PM

This promotion appears to be the handy work of Andy.

Andy is pulling the strings and this feels very similar to the last couple of years in Philly....When Andy and Brett where running the show and the team won only 6 six games back to back years.

Maybe they learned their lesson on not signing a bunch of free agents...I don't know. But, the eye for talent that Dorsey had will be hard to beat by anyone.

raybec 4 07-11-2017 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12952595)
Dorsey forced the Maclin release by signing Logan...and didn't keep Reid in the financial/salary cap loop. It sounds like the release was delayed as long as possible then handled in a very awkward way...like he didnt know exactly how to break it to Andy/Hunt that they were out of $$. He would HAVE to know that would piss Reid off. Keeping Maclin at OTAs while knowing they couldn't afford him was strange...motivated potentially by not wanting to cut him during his wedding? My initial thought when I heard he was let go..was "that's a "dick" move, he could have been injured." Dorsey milked it as long as he could before the cap deadline.

One question is did Andy have no prior knowledge that Maclin was a potential cap casualty? Its a really bad look for Reid (from the player's perspective)...to be at his wedding and acting like everything is great...knowing he was about to be released. Gives the impression of being underhanded...and dishonest. Dorsey hung him out to dry...if that was the case.

It would explain the abrupt firing while already letting Ballard go. It wasn't a planned, premeditated thing..it's not the only reason he was fired but it was possibly the straw that broke it.

a previous article stated that Dorsey started doing things without consulting others...maybe because of how the real power structure tied his hands?

Yeah man, that makes tons of sense that the Head Coach and the Owner had less knowledge of the Chiefs cap situation than we do on CP. Your theories are completely unpossible.

SAUTO 07-11-2017 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12952615)
Reid is the one who went down to Washington prior to draft day and talked to
him one in one

No. Reid and Ballard went to Oakland to meet him and his family, iirc

raybec 4 07-11-2017 02:21 PM

I love how all the dudes with no more insight into the Chiefs front office than my ****ing 4 year old grand daughter have all the answers-

This was a Reid power play

Dorsey scouted every draft pick personally

Dorsey didn't follow the dress code

Let's at least make up something good. Dorsey was running a white slavery ring and selling local teenage girls into sexual slavery from his office at 1 Arrowhead. He kidnapped Clark's daughter and Clark wanted to give him a three week head start before he went all Liam Neeson on his ass.

Eleazar 07-11-2017 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12952724)
This promotion appears to be the handy work of Andy.

Andy is pulling the strings and this feels very similar to the last couple of years in Philly....When Andy and Brett where running the show and the team won only 6 six games back to back years.

Maybe they learned their lesson on not signing a bunch of free agents...I don't know. But, the eye for talent that Dorsey had will be hard to beat by anyone.

Pretty much how I feel.

Hunt seems to be so in love with Reid that he has all but handed the reins over to him, by getting rid of a GM that may have been a moderating influence and installing one from Reid's 'tree' that seems certain to be weaker than Dorsey or to not really be Reid's peer.

In Philadelphia, Reid also got a GM partway through his run, in 2006, after he'd gone from a Super Bowl loss to 6-10. That GM was also one of Reid's people promoted from within. Heckert did not have the final say in player personnel, Reid still did, which is hopefully not what is developing in KC.

The Eagles had a losing record in the postseason thereafter in Reid's run and never really contended again, although it took 6 more years for them to clean house.

staylor26 07-11-2017 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12952724)
This promotion appears to be the handy work of Andy.

Andy is pulling the strings and this feels very similar to the last couple of years in Philly....When Andy and Brett where running the show and the team won only 6 six games back to back years.

Maybe they learned their lesson on not signing a bunch of free agents...I don't know. But, the eye for talent that Dorsey had will be hard to beat by anyone.

LMAO wtf?

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952893)
LMAO wtf?

he spent years as reid's assistant ...in philly...

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952911)
he spent years as reid's assistant ...in philly...

Yea but he said Brett and Reid were "running the show"

That is certainly not the case

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952914)
Yea but he said Brett and Reid were "running the show"

That is definitely not the case

dude you are seriously wanting to argue about stupid shit liek this all the time

reid was running the show in 2007

he made veach his assistant

so they were runnign shit...together

stop being a ****ign asshole for once stop just trying to argue every little semantic thing and proving what badass you are, you make yourself look like a ****ing tool

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952916)
dude you are seriously wanting to argue about stupid shit liek this all the time

reid was running the show in 2007

he made veach his assistant

so they were runnign shit...together

stop being a ****ign asshole for once stop just trying to argue every little semantic thing and proving what badass you are, you make yourself look like a ****ing tool

If you don't see the inaccuracy of that statement then you're a ****ing moron. Veach started his career in Philly as an assistant at the bottom of the latter. He was hardly running the show like this guy is making it sound.

The only person looking like a tool is you. Your argument yesterday was just as stupid and uninformed.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952920)
If you don't see the inaccuracy of that statement then you're a ****ing moron. Veach started his career in Philly as an assistant.


whose assistant was he you ****ing cock smoker?

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952923)
whose assistant was he you ****ing cock smoker?

That has nothing to do with what I'm saying.

He said Brett was "running the show" with Reid.

That is simply not true.

He was at the bottom of the latter starting his career.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952928)
That has nothing to do with what I'm saying.

He said Brett was "running the show" with Reid.

That is simply not true.

He was at the bottom of the latter.


wtf are you babbling about

Reid was runnign shit. Veach was his assistant.....THEY were running shit...do you know what THEY means...

the only bottom here is you, you bossy bottom

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:21 PM

Also you changed what he said to make yourself sound less like a piece of shit

he said Andy and Brett...not Brett and andy...and you tried to say he was just 'an assistant' instead of ANdy's assistant....so I mean for a pedantic salami smuggler who likes to nit pick the **** out of everyone you sure cut yourself a ton of slack

Deberg_1990 07-11-2017 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12952724)
This promotion appears to be the handy work of Andy.

Andy is pulling the strings and this feels very similar to the last couple of years in Philly....When Andy and Brett where running the show and the team won only 6 six games back to back years.

Maybe they learned their lesson on not signing a bunch of free agents...I don't know. But, the eye for talent that Dorsey had will be hard to beat by anyone.

I thought Dorsey was a 'Reid guy' from his Green Bay days? Andy was the guy who went out and recommended him to Hunt.

Why would he make a power play and screw him over?

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952931)
wtf are you babbling about

Reid was runnign shit. Veach was his assistant.....THEY were running shit...do you know what THEY means...

the only bottom here is you, you bossy bottom

When you're nothing but an assistant with very little say you aren't running anything at all.

Why the **** do you make simple shit so difficult? Are you ****ing reeruned?

He said that as if Reid was the HC and Veach the GM. He wasn't even second or third in command in the personnel department. It's innacurate and deserving of being corrected. Shut the **** up.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:27 PM

x

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952943)
Youre a ****ing imbecile they didnt have a GM in 2007 you dipshit

Reid was the HC & GM and Veach was his assistant you ****ing fool

stop running your ****ing cock holster and moving your drooling reerun lips

JFC you really believe that Veach's role was essentially an assistant GM don't you?

His role was much smaller than you think you ****ing idiot.

booger 07-11-2017 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12952739)
No. Reid and Ballard went to Oakland to meet him and his family, iirc

Ballard for sure was in Oakland and met his parents and other people close to MP. Reid very well may have made a trip out there too. Reid knew Sarkesian and the UW staff that recruited Marcus and knew Chris Peterson and the current UW staff that kicked MP off the team. Ballard has a knack for DBs. How players will fit in certain position groups and the coaches who would be coaching him. If there was attitude issues could that particular coach reach him and get the best out of him. Lovie Smith wanted him as GM for reasons like that cause he was with Ballard several years and knew those strengths of him being a good judge of character and whether or not a kid is the right fit for the people he would spend the most time with or whether to grade a guy saying he's too much risk to take unless it's late rounds or undrafted or even at all. Hopefully Veach Borgonzi and others took good notes

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952950)
JFC you really believe that Veach's role was essentially an assistant GM don't you?

His role was much smaller than you think you ****ing idiot.

yes he had a tiny role.....

thats why reid has brought him over from the eagles and now he is GM

JFC

besides that isnt even the point

the point is you nitpicking a statement because of shit YOU read into it...that isnt even what he said.....you are just over reacting and being pedantic

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952954)
yes he had a tiny role.....

thats why reid has brought him over from the eagles and now he is GM

JFC

Yea he climbed the latter. Even here. Now he's "running the show" with Reid. He wasn't doing that in Philly.

Yet you think he was essentially second in command after Reid when he wasn't even close to that.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952959)
Yea he climbed the latter. Even here. Now he's "running the show" with Reid. He wasn't doing that in Philly.

Yet you think he was second in command after Reid when he wasn't even close to that.

again, YOU keep changing what people are saying then arguing with it

no one said he was second in command....except you....

feel free to keep spewing menstrual juice over the phrase 'running the show' though and pretending like you know what Veach did from 2007-2010 so well you can throw a hissy fit over it

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952959)
Yea he climbed the latter.

its ****ign LADDER jesus christ...I dont even normally care about spelling but you have clearly used 'latter' multiple times and its annoying.


L A D D E R

say it slowly

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952966)
again, YOU keep changing what people are saying then arguing with it

no one said he was second in command....except you....

feel free to keep spewing menstrual juice over the phrase 'running the show' though and pretending like you know what Veach did from 2007-2010 so well you can throw a hissy fit over it

If you're going to say Reid was "running the show" with Brett you might as well name every single front office member and assistant coach to the list too. It was a ****ing stupid way to try to give Brett blame for their failures when his role simply doesn't justify it.

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952969)
its ****ign LADDER jesus christ...I dont even normally care about spelling but you have clearly used 'latter' multiple times and its annoying.


L A D D E R

say it slowly

You're right, I'm an idiot for that brain fart. I think it's because I'm stooping to your level and arguing about something that you're clearly wrong about again, and it's infuriating how stupid you can possibly be.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952974)
If you're going to say Reid was "running the show" with Brett you might as well name every single front office member and assistant coach to the list too. It was a ****ing stupid way to try to give Brett blame for their failures when his role simply doesn't justify it.

i completely 100% disagree

Veach was Reid's assistant not some random special teams assistant another 'front office guy'

I mean look at where he is now, that should clue you in as to what Reid thinks of him

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952976)
You're right, I'm an idiot for that brain fart.

If it was just one toot I wouldnt have pointed it out but you kept sharting it out like you had some taco truck pulled pork that you left sitting out all night and ate for breakfast

staylor26 07-11-2017 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12952978)
i completely 100% disagree

Veach was Reid's assistant not some random special teams assistant another 'front office guy'

I mean look at where he is now, that should clue you in as to what Reid thinks of him

LMAO

He was much further down the list than you think man. He wasn't even particularly a personel guy. He was orginigally hired as an assistant coach and just kind of grew into that role. He had very little say in the big picture, and was basically in charge of special projects from the sounds of it.

Just like you thinking Sutton was a candidate as a future HC at 66 years old after already saying he wasn't himself, you're wrong again.

Ming the Merciless 07-11-2017 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12952985)
LMAO
Just like you thinking Sutton was a candidate as a future HC at 66 years old after already saying he wasn't himself, you're wrong again.

I didn't really say that....but youre just a dishonest person, and you have to use straw man style tactics to 'win' every conversation you have. I was just wondering out loud what would happen if he got offered big bucks to go somehwere else....be it HC or DC or whatever...I freely admit I don't know if he would take a nother job or not, and I will take your word for it that he wouldnt...But 66 isnt THAT old and money talks, that was my thought.....but hey you keep on picking those nits..and changing around what people say so you can 'win'....

What I actually said was Reid's real Powerhouse at philly was JJ, and thats similar to this situation with Reid and sutton....and yet you ignore my main point (that you actually agree with probably) and would like to argue about all kinds of other things....

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12952724)
This promotion appears to be the handy work of Andy.

Andy is pulling the strings and this feels very similar to the last couple of years in Philly....When Andy and Brett where running the show and the team won only 6 six games back to back years.

Maybe they learned their lesson on not signing a bunch of free agents...I don't know. But, the eye for talent that Dorsey had will be hard to beat by anyone.

Clearly, you haven't read a single article pertaining to the firing of Dorsey.

Reid had absolutely nothing to do with it.

BlackOp 07-11-2017 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12952715)
Also, the Chiefs are currently $11 million under the salary cap, so if Dorsey had approached Maclin and asked him to restructure to what he received in Baltimore ($6 million per), the Chiefs would STILL be $5 million under the cap.

Your "theory" is complete and utter rubbish.

Your spin is equally full of shit.

Mahomes will still eat at least $4 million...and there is no guarantee that Maclin would have accepted a 40% pay cut... and even if he had there is no way KC (Dorsey) enters training camp with only 1 million of cap to maneuver. It's why they had Monday competing with Colquitt...until Dorsey got sacked. My guess he was on the ($5 million dollar punter) chopping block...

Your numbers are wishful math...Maclin took what he could get, on short notice, from the Ravens...it's an entirely different negotiation when you already have a contract and the HC is your 2nd father.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953040)
Your spin is equally full of shit.

Uh, no, you butt****ing moron. I didn't "spin" anything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953040)
Mahomes will eat at least $4 million

So? That still leaves $7 million.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953040)
and there is no guarantee that Maclin would have accepted a 40% pay cut... and even if he had there is no way KC enters training camp with only 1 million of cap to maneuver.

First off, you're speculating. Maclin signed a 2 year deal for $6 million per year. Why wouldn't he have renegotiated with the Chiefs?

He stated implicitly that the Chiefs didn't even ASK him!

And furthermore, being $1 million over going into camp is no big deal. They're not making any big free agent signings and if anything, cutting Jah Reid saves $2.8 million, Demetrious Harris and Albert Wilson, neither of which are a lock to make the 53, would save another $3 million.

So right there, another $6 million in savings.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953040)
Your numbers are wishful math

The **** are you talking about? I listed REAL NUMBERS, you ****ing BOZO.

The Chiefs signed Eric Berry and Daniel Sorenson before they announced a deal with Logan.

Your stupid ****ing theory about Logan "putting them over the cap" is complete and utter nonsense.

Chiefnj2 07-11-2017 05:49 PM

Brett Veach is the best hire and best chance to salvage the asinine firing of Dorsey. Hunt wasn't going to fire Dorsey if he didn't have an in house guy to fill the position. It is pretty much universally agreed that it was Veach's job from the get go which is why some candidates refused to interview.

You can bet Andy had a good idea Dorsey wouldn't be around and that Veach would be the replacement.

Even if Andy didn't orchestrate the firing, he is a huge beneficiary in terms of power. Andy took Veach under his wing in Philly and was his mentor. He brought him to KC and helped his career. Veach isn't a GM at this young age without Andy. Veach must look up to Andy and I'm certain he still values Andy's views and opinions. He will likely defer to Andy at times.

If you are Hunt and have this alleged setup where GM and coach directly report to you, who do you decide in favor of when there is a difference of opinion ? The experienced head coach you just extended, or the first year pupil?

Andy plays the role of the friendly, aww shucks big guy, but he has come out on the winning side with more power with two different organizations, and it isn't by accident.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953040)
Mahomes will eat at least $4 million

Nope, wrong again.

According to Forbes, the #10 selection in the 2017 NFL draft will have a cap hit of $2.97 million.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkay.../#587e213a534c

Wanna try again?

jallmon 07-11-2017 06:18 PM

Just speculation, but Clark and Dorsey may have been having troubles for quite some time. Maybe Clark (and the Hunt family) were thinking that they may have to get rid of Dorsey before long, and because of the conflicts didn't want a Dorsey friend (Chris Ballard) as the heir-apparent to the GM position.

Knowing Chris Ballard was seen as an up and coming GM candidate, the Hunts may well have let him go to clear the decks for getting rid of Dorsey. Now, once Dorsey leaves, the heir-apparent is Brett Veach, who is not a Dorsey person. We know Veach is a Reid person (see below). Additionally, Reid is explicitly kept out of the GM interview process, which is run by Clark and possibly Donovan.

Chris Ballard was a friend of Dorsey's before coming to KC:

http://www.chiefs.com/news/article-2...7-6294a893f69a

Brett Veach was hired by Andy Reid in 2004 as an intern with the Eagles.

http://www.si.com/nfl/2017/07/10/chi...ch-john-dorsey

As an aside, Mike Borgonzi was with the Chiefs since 2010, so he pre-dates both Reid and Dorsey here in KC and doesn't seem to have any prior connections to either one.

Again, this is just speculation, but it could explain the facts we are seeing.

HemiEd 07-11-2017 06:26 PM

shocked I tell ya

BlackOp 07-11-2017 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12953054)

The **** are you talking about? I listed REAL NUMBERS, you ****ing BOZO.

The Chiefs signed Eric Berry and Daniel Sorenson before they announced a deal with Logan.

Your stupid ****ing theory about Logan "putting them over the cap" is complete and utter nonsense.

No..you said Berry was getting $13 million..numbnuts. He's getting $5 million. I know KC signed them first...which reinforces the fact he knew, in advance, Logan was going to cause cap issues down the road... and some player(s) were going to have to go. It's why Berry's first year is ridiculously cheap. Chiefs were strapped. They were at $3.5 prior to releasing him...and couldn't sign Mahomes (who still isn't signed).

Maclin was the logical choice as he underperformed, had the largest hit and Hill emerged. Cutting him saved around $10 million....and after signing Mahomes they will be at around $6 million....

Bottom line is Dorsey planned to get rid of Maclin (and his bloated salary) a while ago. He was shopping him this winter...the question is did Reid know about the cap situation/ Dorsey's plan?

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953114)
which reinforces the fact he knew, in advance, Logan was going to cause cap issues down the road.

Then it was a stupid signing and Dorsey deserved to be fired (although I don't agree with your assessment).

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953114)
Maclin was the logical choice as he underperformed, had the largest hit and Hill emerged. Cutting him saved around $10 million

Cutting him saved about $9 million but costs them $2.4 million this year and $4.8 million next year.

I was a horrible, horrible decision. He should have asked to renegotiate, so that the dead money wouldn't have been so large.


Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953114)
....and after signing Mahomes they will be at around $6 million....

No. Didn't you read the link? Mahomes will count less than $3 million against the cap.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12953114)
Bottom line is Dorsey planned to get rid of Maclin (and his bloated salary) a while ago. He was shopping him this winter...the question is did Reid know about the cap situation/ Dorsey's plan?

Who cares if Reid knew? Dorsey's the GM and made the decision. But it's how he made the decision that was the final straw for Clark Hunt.

DaneMcCloud 07-11-2017 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 12953111)
shocked I tell ya

It's probably for the best.

Continuity and all that.

Plus, the league sees Veach as a rising star. Now, he just has to live up to those expectations.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.