![]() |
Foles makes the most sense short term, then draft a QB with the first round pick I dont care if it is a reach hopefully getting Ehinger, Bailey, Mauga and Howard back will feel like draft picks. Draft a WR in the Second.
Invest in this offense |
you do not package picks for qb's.
name the last time it worked? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since you can't, other than, "That's just emotion," I'll acknowledge your tapout. Go drown in the ocean, beach bum |
out of the options listed in the OP, I really don't know.
|
Quote:
Bonus Clip: The play-action where Alex's arm gets hit, was most likely a TD.
Spoiler!
|
I don't put that last one on Smith. The first clip was bad though he's a pussy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sam Darnold, USC Josh Rosen, UCLA Lamar Jackson, Louisville Josh Allen, Wyoming Mason Rudolph, OKState Jake Browning, Washington There's a lot to like there. You might have a Manning-Rivers-Roethlisberger situation out of that group. And as an added bonus, ditching Smith's $20M cap hit in 2018 and replacing it with a rookie QB contract will allow you to spend more money on the re-ups that will be due players going into their second contracts. God knows what Peters is going to want. |
Quote:
jjchiefsfan put a well argued explanation in this thread of ALL the reasons we lost, not just simplemindedly blaming only the QB like you: http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305286 |
Mahomes the kid is a Russell Wilson type with a Colin Kaepernick arm.
|
I think we should let Dorsey pick the QB. CP has a very poor record on QB selection.
|
Quote:
Then if you end up with a bunch of picks and can't get the move done for a QB - presuming your guy is there - then you are stuck with picks and spending those resources on lower impact players. That strategy carries a lot of risk. If there is a guy you think you can make work, you do it. The age of sure fire QBs is over. I'd probably say Peyton Manning was the last one. Maybe Luck but he's floundering in the worst division in football (not necessarily all his fault). If there is a guy you can work with, get him. You need a guy that can do the following: 1. Take the easy stuff. 2. Make a handful of difficult throws a game. Other than Rodgers who is doing ridiculous things with a criminally bad supporting cast. That's all these guys are doing. They aren't throwing it into tight windows 45 times a game. They take the easy stuff, which Reid can scheme for, and then they have to press in some bad situations. If a guy can make the correct reads and accurately navigate a few bad situations, he can be successful. We don't need an all world guy, just a competent one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
May want to tap the brakes a bit there, hoss. |
Someone compared Mahomes to Culpepper last week. I could see that
|
Quote:
Culpepper would just stand there with fur flying around him, look over the line, bounce a blitzer off him and wing it downfield. Mahomes won't be able to do that. Eh, still pretty bummed that Falk and Rudolph stayed. Not even because I really wanted either of them but because it would've made the class much deeper. Allen would have as well. Get Falk, Rudolph and Allen in there and there would have been at least a team or two that would've fallen in love with them and perhaps pushed another guy down. In this class I really only see Kizer, Trubisky and Mahomes as potential franchise guys with Watson just being way too raw for my tastes (though he may fit with what Andy likes due to his mobility). The class falls to absolute shit after those 3 (with an asterisk at 4; shit for many, might fit for some). That's going to make the odds of a reasonable trade-up pretty long. Those top 3 could all easily be gone by 10 and I'm not inclined to pay a premium to move up to 20 for Watson. So just restructure Foles and come to the table ready to move next year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can't say the dude is like one of the most mobile, intelligent quarterbacks in football (Wilson) and would possess the strongest arm in football (Kaepernick) in a pretty perfect QB frame (Mahomes has nice height/build) and then get indignant when it's pointed out that you've just combined the traits that yield a Hall of Fame quarterback. |
Quote:
IMO, the Chiefs should renegotiate Foles contract to something like 3 years, $22 million ($7 million or so per), then do whatever it takes to draft Mahomes, whether it's giving up all of their Comp Picks or a pick next year along with their #1 this year. After the draft, trade or release Alex Smith. Go into TC with Foles and Mahomes as the #1 & #2, with Bray or someone else competing for the #3 spot. At this point, after seeing Foles against Indy and Jax, while spending a full year with Reid, Nagy and Childress, I don't know how his performance would differ from another season of Alex Smith. It's time to ****ing move on. |
Quote:
Never said Elway you're putting words in my mouth |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Link to the tantrum I threw? I pretty much threw my arms up and said, "Whatever. Enjoy your slight upgrade over Matt Cassel, Chiefs." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not giving up 1/2 my picks this, let alone this and next years for a true 2nd rounder. I don't see trading for someone else's retread, either. Foles is a back up, period.
|
Quote:
You said he's like Russell Wilson with Kaepernick's arm - yes? Russell Wilson is among the more intelligent, mobile QBs in football - yes? Colin Kaepernick has among the strongest arms in football - yes? Mahomes has a much better QB build than Wilson - yes? Of course you didn't say he was Elway, but what you described IS a similar prospect to Elway - smart, mobile, good leadership intangibles, cannon of an arm, good build. I'm pointing out that saying "he's Russell Wilson with Colin Kaepernick's arm" is an incredibly stupid thing to say and the fact that you're trying so desperately to parse words here shows that you know it. You overplayed your hand something awful. Mahomes is a fine prospect but you just started with a player that's on a HoF career track and then took his two worst problems (arm strength and physical stature) and not only mitigated them, but made them obvious strengths. That's absurd. |
Quote:
If you read the article you understand the comparison. The kid has a baseball pedigree , the arm, and athletic ability like Kaepernick and Wilson. His disposition is like Wilson's. If he can adapt quickly in a conducive situation like the Chiefs then yes he'll succeed. |
Quote:
My ENTIRE point is not that you said Elway, it's that you described him. You absolutely called the third highest rated quarterback in a mediocre class "Russell Wilson with Colin Kaepernick's arm" which is just stupid on its face. No, he is not Russell Wilson with Kaepernick's arm because if he WERE, he'd be John Elway. Have I broken this down enough for you? I'm saying your comparison is absurd because you've just about built the perfect quarterback by combining Wilson and Kaepernick and no, Pat Mahomes is not the perfect quarterback. |
Quote:
You're justbeing combative |
Fisher is good enough, he will continue to get stronger as he gets older. He will fall for those cheap moves less and less. He just happened to be shafted by the refs at exactly the wrong time.
Those bastard refs let them play in the trenches the entire game and then suddenly decided to pay attention in the last minute of the game. Chiefs ... the only team in the NFL that doesn't get home field refing |
Fisher was the LT for one of the best pass-blocking teams in the game this year. And our struggles in the run game had little do to with the stretch plays, etc... that he would've been heavily involved in.
Fisher was a big time asset this season and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. He was the clear best choice for 1.1 and the extension he got will be a bargain for every season he plays under it. Fisher is making lemons into lemonade. Shit draft year, but Dorsey did a damn fine job with the cards he was dealt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NFL officials are ass-hats, and the first to be offended when the use of technology is suggested to help "fill in the gaps" they choose to not be looking at. I hope Karma has them all catch AIDS! Oh, "the game would be too long." Yeah, lord knows more commercial breaks is the last thing those money-grubbing whores want a chance at. |
Quote:
Eh....I think we just saw his last great year because he didn't have to go a full season and he pretty much spent all of 2015 on the bench. That gave that knee plenty of time to rest and firm up. But if you're signing him to a sizeable deal, you're rolling with him as the starter and I think you're going to get seriously diminishing returns. I'd rather see another mid-rounder (4thish) allocated to OG. Fulton has plateaued (at best) and it's probably time to upgrade there if at all possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which is probably his death knell with Reid. |
Can somebody explain to me the benefit of keeping Foles and cutting Smith?
I understand bringing in a highly drafted rookie to redshirt, but why Foles? He's as much a known commodity as Smith is, and simply isn't as good. |
Also, it perfectly encapsulates the impotent rage of ChiefsPlanet that their most popular ideas of how to improve at QB is to "get rid of Smith," followed by "I have no idea."
|
Quote:
Even if he's as good as Smith, Foles has a $10 million dollar clause in his contract that pretty much forces the Chiefs to renegotiate his deal. Foles won't be cheap next year unless the FA market forces him to be cheap. Mostly it's just the nuts who think Smith is terrible and want anyone but him. |
Quote:
Smith has started 136. He's not even in the same stratosphere as far as "known commodities" go. And to be honest, his first 36 games shit all over Smith's first 36 games. You want to see what you truly have in Foles and save a bunch of money at the QB position before drafting a kid in 2018? Go with Foles. **** it. You have nothing to lose. This team doesn't have a shot at the SB next season, and Foles looked fine in relief duty last year. He had the highest QB rating, highest YPA, highest TD%, lowest INT% on the team. |
Also, **** Brad Kaaya. I don't want anything to do with that asshole
|
Quote:
|
After his first 36 starts, Alex Smith had a 32-38 TD-INT ratio and a 69 QB rating and a 13-23 record.
He improved to "second only to Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers" 100 starts later. But Nick Foles, who is standing at 56-27/88.1/20-16 in the same categories...can't improve. Just admit you have an unhealthy obsession with game managers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You want to post Matt Flynn's numbers next? |
The reality of Alex Smith at QB is better than the constant bitching about it.
The team seems to have done everything they could to produce a winner. I will gladly take the Dorsey years over the Pioli years. At least we keep getting better. GO CHIEFS!!! |
Quote:
This is the greatest post in your entire history here at CP... I almost brought me to tears... I wish I could rep this post every second of the every day for the rest of the year... I officially now love you DaneMcCloud! :hump: |
Quote:
Alex isn't a terrible QB, but you could pay any Rookie QB to come in and make Low Risk 3 yard passes and bubble screens and end up with a minimal amount of INT's and possibly a good Win % as long as the defense keeps the game in reach (like they have for most of Smith's tenure). |
Quote:
We don't know that Foles can duplicate what Smith did, he certainly didn't appear to be able to when he started for us a game this year. Keep Smith for another year, draft a replacement. We should have been pushing for Alex Smith's replacement as soon as we acquired him. Sorry, but Reid is content with Smith or we would have been displayed more urgency in drafting a replacement for him. |
Quote:
You want move forward at the QB position, save money, and see what you have on the roster so you can make a decision in 2018? Cut Smith, start Foles. You want to tread water and pay through the nose to do so? Stand pat. |
Quote:
They can easily move on from him. Quote:
|
A 7th round 2nd year player put up similar stats to Alex Smith this year.
I'm pretty sure they could cut him and get atleast 80 percent of his production from a rookie cheap QB. |
Garapolo or Mahomes.
Just cause I'd like to say he's ma homeys.... |
Quote:
Setting up the punter, and Hidden TD's. |
Quote:
I don't really get why some are against it. It would allow you to put better players around said QB while he develops. Basically, what Seattle did. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NE Backup / San Fran Reject... Same as it ever was... |
Quote:
Brilliant!!!! This is just more of "the grass is always greener", even when it isn't. |
Quote:
Which is ****ing ridiculous, but hey, we are talking about the dumbest fanbase in the NFL. EDIT: See above, Post 228. Exhibit A. |
Quote:
If Garapolo were something special, would New England be foolish enough to let him go knowing that Brady can and will turn into Manning/Favre within the next few years? Or is everyone convinced the BB is so smart that he can turn any JAG into a GOAT? Behind every great QB is a coach ready to take the credit. |
Quote:
Jesus christ. The grass is greener when you can get the same production from a QB youre paying cheaply vs one youre paying alot too. |
If I had this answer, I'd be making a hell of a lot more money...
|
I'd look to try and trade Smith (unlikely). If thats not happening, keep him and draft a guy to sit under him I guess.
I think with the current weapons we have, plus another year of FA and the draft, a rookie Qb could come in and be successful. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They can win with a rookie qb. |
Quote:
DJ is probably done for even if he tries to come back from a second achilles pop. The other ILB spot is jag. Houston cannot stay healthy, Hali is done and Ford only shows up against garbage OL talent. Poe is probably walking and the DL is thin once you get past Jones. Berry might walk in FA as well (though I wouldn't put money on it.) Secondary is all right but it's not the back end of the Legion of Boom by any stretch. Offensively, a Maclin replacement would be warranted in the draft or perhaps a TE that's substantially better than Harris/O'Shaughnessy/Travis in the first 100 picks and there'll probably be an OG taken to insure against Ehinger not coming back / replacing LDT in the future. 2017 might feel a lot like 2014. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.