ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Mods and Tiggerupperuncle (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=304680)

Pasta Little Brioni 12-24-2016 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 12638872)
I didn't realize the coksucker is a n00b fan of 2 years.

That explains so much it's almost comical.

Check back with us in 10 years and tell us again how you like Dink'N'Dunk Game Managers.

blackbob has been here longer than 2.

Easy 6 12-24-2016 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12638875)
blackbob has been here longer than 2.

I have it on very good authority that tigertwat actually may not be boob

ChiefsCountry 12-24-2016 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 12638872)
I didn't realize the coksucker is a n00b fan of 2 years.

That explains so much it's almost comical.

Check back with us in 10 years and tell us again how you like Dink'N'Dunk Game Managers.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...6&postcount=80

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-24-2016 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12638829)
Because TU is doing the same shit that got GoChiefs and Reerun banned yet isn't facing any sort of punishment?

And what is it that I've done that the instigating party isn't guilty of? The accusations of derailing and trolling is a butthurt way of saying you don't like Smith and any supporter of the QB/team should be banned.

Morons who want to dish the heat but can't handle it when a little bit of it is thrown back at them.

As Gonzo said in SNRs ban TU thread, quit being butthurt.

splatbass 12-24-2016 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 12638872)
I didn't realize the coksucker is a n00b fan of 2 years.

That explains so much it's almost comical.

Check back with us in 10 years and tell us again how you like Dink'N'Dunk Game Managers.

Almost 50 years for me, and I'm ok with Smith.

ChiefsCountry 12-24-2016 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12638883)
I have it on very good authority that tigertwat actually may not be boob

Doing some checking on DraftPlanet. That's probably correct. Still the uncle dick sucking jokes play well on that loser as well.

splatbass 12-24-2016 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12638889)

Morons who want to dish the heat but can't handle it when a little bit of it is thrown back at them.

.

Truth. They don't even like it if someone says something positive against Smith, much less when you give them back what they give. Happens to me all the time too. If you don't hate Smith they hate you.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-24-2016 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12638895)
Truth. They don't even like it if someone says something positive against Smith, much less when you give them back what they give. Happens to me all the time too. If you don't hate Smith they hate you.

Yep. It's pathetic

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-24-2016 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12638756)
Take it from me, someone that has been on the receiving end of his shit many times, Talking Can is one of the biggest douchebags here. His "usual" comments are NOT innocuous or harmless. If he was on the other side of the argument from you then you might see it.

In your opinion perhaps. But the fact remains; the man's post activity bordered on lurking. And I might be able to see your side of things if it weren't for two very important factors:

1) Your hyper-sensitivity to anything Chiefs-related.

2) Your inability to read between the lines and/or differentiate between a serious comment and an off the cuff, meaningless comment.

New World Order 12-24-2016 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12638895)
Truth. They don't even like it if someone says something positive against Smith, much less when you give them back what they give. Happens to me all the time too. If you don't hate Smith they hate you.


If a "fan" started making excuses for Foles's excellent play, what would you call him?

Bowser 12-24-2016 10:45 PM

What is this dicksuckery going on in here?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-24-2016 10:45 PM

Meanwhile the real blackbob is out there reading all this shit

SAUTO 12-24-2016 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12638902)
What is this dicksuckery going on in here?

We were actually all waiting on you.

splatbass 12-24-2016 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12638900)
If a "fan" started making excuses for Foles's excellent play, what would you call him?

Batshit crazy because Foles hasn't been playing.

Bowser 12-24-2016 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12638915)
We were actually all waiting on you.

http://img.uterodemarita.com.s3.amaz...com-371896.gif

Reerun_KC 12-24-2016 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12638942)

Still waiting?

Bowser 12-24-2016 11:08 PM

I think that gif was supposed to shoot the screen or something, lol

Mr. Laz 12-24-2016 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12638900)
If a "fan" started making excuses for Foles's excellent play, what would you call him?

a fan? :shrug:


I went through this with Trent Green.

But man, it's a completely different level nowadays.

I used to say that Trent's arm 'wasn't that strong' and got blasted for it. LMAO

I can't imagine was would have happened if i said all that shit that gets posted now.

threebag 12-24-2016 11:12 PM

Hopefully Santa drops a few boxes of Kotex in your stockings.

Merry Christmas and have a Happy and Safe Holiday

Reerun_KC 12-24-2016 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12638957)
Hopefully Santa drops a few boxes of Kotex in your stockings.

Merry Christmas and have a Happy and Safe Holiday

Will you show me how to use them?

Merry Christmas buddy!! Enjoy your time with family!

threebag 12-24-2016 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12638962)
Will you show me how to use them?

Merry Christmas buddy!! Enjoy your time with family!

I have sausage fingers but i promise i won't go past my first knuckle

Reerun_KC 12-24-2016 11:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12638968)
I have sausage fingers but i promise i won't go past my first knuckle

.

DaFace 12-24-2016 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12638762)
You do understand that I was referring to bans from the GDTs only not from the site as a whole.
Bob Dole said specifically that he banned Clay for wishing injury on Smith. I seen the post myself. No I can't remember the thread but Pest can repeatedly do the same thing and.....nothing. I am not saying Bob was right or wrong for what he did. I will say that if one poster can or does get banned for something then any and all posters that do the same behavior should be treated the same/equally.

I think people underestimate how much of Bob Dole's moderating is largely him just getting irritated and not giving a shit.

chiefzilla1501 12-24-2016 11:46 PM

I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.

DaneMcCloud 12-24-2016 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12638762)
I seen the post myself

Well holy ****ing shit.

You seen it.

Genious.

New World Order 12-25-2016 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12638930)
Batshit crazy because Foles hasn't been playing.


He played well against Indy and Tigerbob starting making excuses as to why he played well.

He's only for the Chiefs if Alex is on the field.

RealSNR 12-25-2016 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12639003)
I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.

Nobody turned against staylor. Or splatbass. Or anybody else. Why would they?

Tiger is a douchebag. He's always been a douchebag. He always will be a douchebag whether he liked Alex Smith or not.

splatbass 12-25-2016 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12639013)
He played well against Indy and Tigerbob starting making excuses as to why he played well.

He's only for the Chiefs if Alex is on the field.

He didn't look good against the Jags. One TD and four FGs. You would have crucified Smith for that.

New World Order 12-25-2016 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639030)
He didn't look good against the Jags. One TD and four FGs. You would have crucified Smith for that.


It's not much different than what we see each week with Alex.

But that wasn't really the point.

kccrow 12-25-2016 12:41 AM

And so it... continues...

One guy gets banned for excessive negativity towards a player, posting stats that very adequately prove most of his points. Another gets a pass for excessive positivity, posting stats that don't back it up. Both annoy other people and troll. So why is it that one is banned again?

I think that's kind of the point. I don't think either should be banned. Having and arguing different points of view is not the end of the world. There are far more people somewhere in the middle. There is definitely good and bad about Alex, but I'm not going to get into that here. I think its wrong to ban either person for having a viewpoint.

As for the excessive trolling, well, that's been a CP tradition for as long as I can remember. I read posts on here for damn near a decade before I joined. Nothing has changed, ever. Banning over it now seems a bit redundant.

splatbass 12-25-2016 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12639041)
It's not much different than what we see each week with Alex.

But that wasn't really the point.

Your double standard was my point.

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 12:47 AM

It's not just Smith haters that think he is derailing the threads. But I also thought tatoo needed to be reined in a few weeks ago as well as a few other bashers repeating themselves. I'm also in the camp that clay is more harm than good.

I'm not a big ban guy though. I would prefer people ignore this guy because it makes it worse. Let him or whatever poster created him get his desperate attention somewhere else. He absolutely is worse than what neutral people are comparing him to but this could have been tucked away by people ignoring him and it became this. He is one of the most disruptive posters I've seen here but the board made it worse by taking his bait. And bait out absolutely is.

splatbass 12-25-2016 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12639057)
It's not just Smith haters that think he is derailing the threads. But I also thought tatoo needed to be reined in a few weeks ago as well as a few other bashers repeating themselves. I'm also in the camp that clay is more harm than good.

I'm not a big ban guy though. I would prefer people ignore this guy because it makes it worse. Let him or whatever poster created him get his desperate attention somewhere else. He absolutely is worse than what neutral people are comparing him to but this could have been tucked away by people ignoring him and it became this. He is one of the most disruptive posters I've seen here and others have made it even worse.

I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639061)
I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

Tiger is one of 3 I've ever put on ignore. What you just described is exactly what I feel right now. I can't get away from him because he is constantly quoted and posts three times in a row.

Reerun_KC 12-25-2016 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639061)
I don't think putting Clay on ignore would have worked. Too many people quoting him, you could never avoid seeing his posts. That is the problem with ignore, and it would be exacerbated x1000 with Clay.

Swap Tiggerupperuncle for Clay and that's exactly how many feel.

One is banned the other going full Clay. Same as it ever was.

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 01:00 AM

If clay is responsible for people constantly quoting him and derailing, and I'm not sure he is, then so is tiger.

There has been a lot of talk about the haters not seeing it from the other side with clay. Perhaps the same is happening with the homers not seeing it from the other side with tiger. As usual the reality is probably somewhere in the middle. Ironically where the truth of Alex Smith lies imo.

splatbass 12-25-2016 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12639065)
Swap Tiggerupperuncle for Clay and that's exactly how many feel.

One is banned the other going full Clay. Same as it ever was.

Tiger isn't in the same league as Clay. When has Tiger rooted for the Chiefs to lose? When has Tiger wished a player got a torn ACL? Clay's infractions are far worse, and it amazes me his supporters can't - or won't - see it.

Reerun_KC 12-25-2016 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639072)
Tiger isn't in the same league as Clay. When has Tiger rooted for the Chiefs to lose? When has Tiger wished a player got a torn ACL? Clay's infractions are far worse, and it amazes me his supporters can't - or won't - see it.

I'm rooting for you to have snow in the morning....

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639072)
Tiger isn't in the same league as Clay. When has Tiger rooted for the Chiefs to lose? When has Tiger wished a player got a torn ACL? Clay's infractions are far worse, and it amazes me his supporters can't - or won't - see it.

That may be accurate. He does however watch games and twist results with an agenda like clay and disrupts the board to promote it. Clay had it coming but I think you aren't seeing the other side as clearly as you want others to see yours. I'm no clay supporter and I'm no Alex basher. Sure I'm not his biggest fan but I don't think it's hopeless.

splatbass 12-25-2016 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12639075)
I'm rooting for you to have snow in the morning....

You are probably going to be disappointed.

Reerun_KC 12-25-2016 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639094)
You are probably going to be disappointed.

Because chiefs?

eDave 12-25-2016 01:44 AM

I'll be a mod. And Tiger stays.

New World Order 12-25-2016 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639072)
Tiger isn't in the same league as Clay. When has Tiger rooted for the Chiefs to lose? When has Tiger wished a player got a torn ACL? Clay's infractions are far worse, and it amazes me his supporters can't - or won't - see it.


He's worse, as indicated in Reerun's poll.

cabletech94 12-25-2016 06:55 AM

to quote a popular holiday movie:

"shitters full".

merry xmas!!!

Bob Dole 12-25-2016 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 12637985)
It would probably be directly dependent on how many beverages he has had. :D

Everyone can rest assured, Bob Dole has better things to do than call members about anything other than grabbing a beer. What a ridiculous ****ing idea.

Merry ****ing Christmas.

Bwana 12-25-2016 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 12639176)
Everyone can rest assured, Bob Dole has better things to do than call members about anything other than grabbing a beer. What a ridiculous ****ing idea.

Merry ****ing Christmas.

What you said.

http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/...-fun-facts.jpg

Dinny Bossa Nova 12-25-2016 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 12639176)
Everyone can rest assured, Bob Dole has better things to do than call members about anything other than grabbing a beer. What a ridiculous ****ing idea.

Merry ****ing Christmas.

So.

Are ya takin' calls or ain't ya?

Dinny

Dinny Bossa Nova 12-25-2016 08:07 AM

This thread's got a good beat.

Easy to dance to........

I'll give it.........4 Pooties.

Solid 4 Pootie thread.

Dinny

BigRedChief 12-25-2016 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12639099)
I'll be a mod. And Tiger stays.

your life will be over. Your GF will leave you. Forced to move to the Phillipines to find peace. AND it turns you into a vegetarian.

Sandy Vagina 12-25-2016 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12638737)
pretty much, just from the opposite side of the coin

The side that doesn't bug you.

Ask yourself this, if Tiger was doing the same thing he's doing now only it was about umm ... let's say Chris Conley. He was pimping Chris Conley nonstop, would anyone even notice not to mention care about it?

No, it's only because it's the dreaded and hated Alex Smith that fuels all this shit.

People can't stand Alex Smith, just like they couldn't stand Matt Cassel and just like they won't be able to stand the next QB or the next.

Until we have a stud like Aaron Rodger, people around here will be hating the QB of the Kansas City Chiefs.

Right on target, no surprise.. well done. I seriously think Laz would make a good mod, if looking for another...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12638745)
I seriously doubt that had anything to do with tigertwat

Bob Dole doesnt like excessive negativity in game threads, it was probably him... personally, I feel the same way about game threads

I mean, everyone bitches in games threads myself included... but extended, multi-post harangues can kinda kill the game thread experience IMO

Agreed. As a KC fan with blood pumping hard during games, the last thing I want to read is post after post from the same people about how the Chiefs suck, will lose, etc. That's just pissing on everyone's parade.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12638818)
New fans are great, but dont be a 2 year Chiefs fan and come in here expecting to berate people who've been fans since the 60s 70s and 80s without some serious pushback

Because that aint gonna fly

Been very guilty of this, and have tried to learn from it. It's hard to always instantly find that fine line between stating opinion from my point of view while also taking into account why , conversely, others can be so beaten down from past experience.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12639003)
I've never called for a banning. I won't here either. But nobody is calling for Sandy Cheeks being banned, and he is a much bigger Alex homer. Take that however you'd like. Lets not act like it's just critics turning against fans.

I have been pointed at many times as someone to be banned.. though half the time, I probably was getting a bit too dickish. That's how CP rolls though. If I were being my normal self, yet a 40 year KC fan and hating on Smith.. there would never be an issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 12639072)
Tiger isn't in the same league as Clay. When has Tiger rooted for the Chiefs to lose? When has Tiger wished a player got a torn ACL? Clay's infractions are far worse, and it amazes me his supporters can't - or won't - see it.

They really won't acknowledge this distinction. It's amazing.

Chief Roundup 12-25-2016 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12638979)
I think people underestimate how much of Bob Dole's moderating is largely him just getting irritated and not giving a shit.

Well then someone should do something about that.

Chief Roundup 12-25-2016 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12639006)
Well holy ****ing shit.

You seen it.

Genious.

Nice input. I have grown to expect nothing of importance from you. It is just how you roll.

RealSNR 12-25-2016 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12638737)
pretty much, just from the opposite side of the coin

The side that doesn't bug you.

Ask yourself this, if Tiger was doing the same thing he's doing now only it was about umm ... let's say Chris Conley. He was pimping Chris Conley nonstop, would anyone even notice not to mention care about it?

No, it's only because it's the dreaded and hated Alex Smith that fuels all this shit.

People can't stand Alex Smith, just like they couldn't stand Matt Cassel and just like they won't be able to stand the next QB or the next.

Until we have a stud like Aaron Rodger, people around here will be hating the QB of the Kansas City Chiefs.

We have weirdos like that all the time. Ever heard of ScanFan? StartCroyle? Weirdos who stick up for random players?

People notice that shit and mention it, but it's usually to make fun of people and have a good time, because it's usually kind of ridiculous.

Alex Smith is a polarizing QB.

"But he's a nice guy!"

We don't know him as Alex Smith the nice guy. We know him as Alex Smith the dweebazoid with the soft punchable pouty face who goes, "oooodoooooohhhhh" whenever he takes one of his 5000 sacks per game with a clean pocket or throws a pass away when he has a guy streaming wide open downfield. We also know him as Alex Smith the guy who only ever has the same tired ****ing cliches written about him from national media and even posters on this very forum. "He's not the prettiest QB, but he'll get the job done..." or "He is what he is." God that one pisses me the **** off. "He is what he is." You know who else is what they are? Every ****ing thing that ****ing exists in this universe of ours.

It's completely different from Tiger championing Chris Conley and you know the **** why.

milkman 12-25-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12639195)



They really won't acknowledge this distinction. It's amazing.

I find questioning the fandom of long suffering fans every bit as irritating and douchey as Claythan's indiscretions.

Who the **** are you (not you specifically) to question my fandom when I have been a fan for longer than your dumb ass has been alive.

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12639217)
I find questioning the fandom of long suffering fans every bit as irritating and douchey as Claythan's indiscretions.

Who the **** are you (not you specifically) to question my fandom when I have been a fan for longer than your dumb ass has been alive.

While I agree they have a point about what clay openly roots for, they also are not being honest themselves in their distinction between what tu is trying to do on the board vs other chief fans. Sandy vs tu gets brought up. It isn't even close. Sandy doesn't have an ego or an agenda like this guy. Let him stay, fine with me. But don't ask others to be objective and pretend you are not seeing what he is.

unlurking 12-25-2016 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12639211)
We have weirdos like that all the time. Ever heard of ScanFan? StartCroyle? Weirdos who stick up for random players?

...

Heh. Was getting nostalgic for days gone by. 'member scanlon? I 'member!

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=117821

DaFace 12-25-2016 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12639204)
Well then someone should do something about that.

Eh, it's not like inconsistent moderating is new to CP.

unlurking 12-25-2016 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12639219)
While I agree they have a point about what clay openly roots for, they also are not being honest themselves in their distinction between what tu is trying to do on the board vs other chief fans. Sandy vs tu gets brought up. It isn't even close. Sandy doesn't have an ego or an agenda like this guy. Let him stay, fine with me. But don't ask others to be objective and pretend you are not seeing what he is.

I have them both on iggy. Along with most of the barnacles that came here clinging to Alex's ass. TU is the only one that get's quoted regularly, but is still is easy to skip by. Although I will admit that if someone quotes him and I do read it, I tend to attach a positive/negative opinion of that poster based on their response to TU. That's pretty much the only difference between TU and the other trolls for me.

stumppy 12-25-2016 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12638737)
pretty much, just from the opposite side of the coin

The side that doesn't bug you.

Ask yourself this, if Tiger was doing the same thing he's doing now only it was about umm ... let's say Chris Conley. He was pimping Chris Conley nonstop, would anyone even notice not to mention care about it?

No, it's only because it's the dreaded and hated Alex Smith that fuels all this shit.

People can't stand Alex Smith, just like they couldn't stand Matt Cassel and just like they won't be able to stand the next QB or the next.

Until we have a stud like Aaron Rodger, people around here will be hating the QB of the Kansas City Chiefs.

Seriously ? Do you not read peoples replies when asked about why they're are sick of ATTENTIONBITCHs trolling ? Alex Smith is just a tool ATTENTIONBITCH uses.
Also, do you really think if that idiot starting making threads about how Conley so great and when members called him on his bullshit he went on and on with the fair weather fan shit, you know nothing about football shit, and not last or least you should be banned they would respond the same way ?
I'm sure some of the problem is Alex Smith but it's only a small part.
Alex Smith has been pissing on our leg, the problem is ATTENTIONBITCH continually tells everyone it's lemonaide, drink up or find another team.

stumppy 12-25-2016 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12639217)
I find questioning the fandom of long suffering fans every bit as irritating and douchey as Claythan's indiscretions.

Who the **** are you (not you specifically) to question my fandom when I have been a fan for longer than your dumb ass has been alive.

****ing A right.

Sandy Vagina 12-25-2016 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12639217)
I find questioning the fandom of long suffering fans every bit as irritating and douchey as Claythan's indiscretions.

Who the **** are you (not you specifically) to question my fandom when I have been a fan for longer than your dumb ass has been alive.

Not sure what you are basing this post on. You quoted a post that was me pointing out the distinction between a fan that supports the team, and a fan that wants injuries and losses for the team.

As to your direct quote, yes.. I have just explained this.. and really can not change what has happened in the past. All I can and will do is try to appreciate the long-time suffering, beaten down mentality of others more in the future.. before I post a response out of frustration.

Quote:

Been very guilty of this, and have tried to learn from it. It's hard to always instantly find that fine line between stating opinion from my point of view while also taking into account why , conversely, others can be so beaten down from past experience.
People evolve into differing perspectives due to their past experiences. Maybe I too would be constantly miserable and defeated, had I suffered as much team suckage over my football decades. Can't say.

Not sure it's a good idea to justify it like this. Wouldn't this be like a wife-beater pointing to his abused childhood in order to justify why he beats his wife?

.. but no, we are not talking something so serious and vicious here, of course. Just a similar defense mechanism in play.. but if it is.. what is.. then so be it.

Hope KC can break the cycle...

Dinny Bossa Nova 12-25-2016 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12639204)
Well then someone should do something about that.

King shit of four stars mountain like mushroom.

Will not sta

threebag 12-25-2016 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12639063)
Tiger is one of 3 I've ever put on ignore. What you just described is exactly what I feel right now. I can't get away from him because he is constantly quoted and posts three times in a row.

It's the same people quoting Clay to bash Alex that are quoting TigerUppercut to bash him.

Clay needs removed perm.

We see who starts tigeruppercut bash threads. Same posters sucking clays dick.

Simply put those posters have created the problem on both sides. To further they agenda

Sandy Vagina 12-25-2016 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12639235)
It's the same people quoting Clay to bash Alex that are quoting TigerUppercut to bash him.

Clay needs removed perm.

We see who starts tigeruppercut bash threads. Same posters sucking clays dick.

Simply put those posters have created the problem on both sides.

Truth.

.. which really makes me wonder what CP would be like if Alex Smith retires in the offseason.

Would this new QB bring harmony to CP?

stumppy 12-25-2016 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12639235)
It's the same people quoting Clay to bash Alex that are quoting TigerUppercut to bash him.

Clay needs removed perm.

We see who starts tigeruppercut bash threads. Same posters sucking clays dick.

Simply put those posters have created the problem on both sides.

Calling bullshit on that. There are plenty of people who think both should be gone.

RealSNR 12-25-2016 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12639240)
Truth.

.. which really makes me wonder what CP would be like if Alex Smith retires in the offseason.

Would this new QB bring harmony to CP?

I have a sinking feeling that you'll get a bunch of immature losers (people who defended Alex Smith) who don't want to be wrong about being cautious towards QBs drafted with high picks. Sure, it will start with a lot of fanfare, but the rookie will struggle the way 99.9% of all rookie QBs do, and you'll start to see signs bashing and doubting taking place very soon into the guy's first season. It will start a whole 'nother cycle of QB drama, only this time with the sides reversed.

Of course, that's just a prediction. I have no proof or evidence that this will take place. But I know how CP posters operate. Somebody who was attacked for years for an opinion gets uppity and goes on the attack when it's their turn to see their opinion take a backseat to the plans of the Chiefs. It's the life cycle. Except the drafturbators haven't even had a ****ing turn since 1983. That's the uncertainty surrounding it.

If we trade for a veteran backup after Alex, I think you'll see the current QB climate get even ****ing worse.

Dinny Bossa Nova 12-25-2016 09:38 AM

Since nobody has been wondering what I think, I'm finally gonna break down and tell ya.

I don't mind Sandy or T-Up being around. By themselves they are not so bad. But.....

I couldn't stand them or ANY of the 49er fans who brought their Kaepernick vs Alex wars over here. IMO those ****ers needed their own sub-forum. I don't miss that bullshit at all.

Dinny

Sandy Vagina 12-25-2016 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12639243)
I have a sinking feeling that you'll get a bunch of immature losers (people who defended Alex Smith) who don't want to be wrong about being cautious towards QBs drafted with high picks. Sure, it will start with a lot of fanfare, but the rookie will struggle the way 99.9% of all rookie QBs do, and you'll start to see signs bashing and doubting taking place very soon into the guy's first season. It will start a whole 'nother cycle of QB drama, only this time with the sides reversed.

Of course, that's just a prediction. I have no proof or evidence that this will take place. But I know how CP posters operate. Somebody who was attacked for years for an opinion gets uppity and goes on the attack when it's their turn to see their opinion take a backseat to the plans of the Chiefs. It's the life cycle. Except the drafturbators haven't even had a ****ing turn since 1983. That's the uncertainty surrounding it.

If we trade for a veteran backup after Alex, I think you'll see the current QB climate get even ****ing worse.

Yeah, my concern specifically will be the "excuses" versus "legit reasons".

This will be the next divisive issue for the QB.

People that hate Alex call everything from playcalling to player injuries excuses. People that like or are open minded call these same things legit reasons.

So once Smith is gone, will the same rules apply to the next QB?

Pretty sad to say.. I doubt it. The next guy.. so long as he isn't another instantly hated retread.. will be allowed every excuse.. which from my point of view would likely be fair (as it's consistent with my prior QB view).. but so obviously inconsistent from those unwilling to give all QBs the same courtesy.

Sandy Vagina 12-25-2016 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dinny Bossa Nova (Post 12639247)
Since nobody has been wondering what I think, I'm finally gonna break down and tell ya.

I don't mind Sandy or T-Up being around. By themselves they are not so bad. But.....

I couldn't stand them or ANY of the 49er fans who brought their Kaepernick vs Alex wars over here. IMO those ****ers needed their own sub-forum. I don't miss that bullshit at all.

Dinny

:thumb:.. Merry Christmas.

RealSNR 12-25-2016 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12639255)
Yeah, my concern specifically will be the "excuses" versus "legit reasons".

This will be the next divisive issue for the QB.

People that hate Alex call everything from playcalling to player injuries excuses. People that like or are open minded call these same things legit reasons.

So once Smith is gone, will the same rules apply to the next QB?

Pretty sad to say.. I doubt it. The next guy.. so long as he isn't another retread.. will be allowed every excuse.. which from my point of view would likely be fair (as it's consistent with my prior QB view).. but so obviously inconsistent from those unwilling to give all QBs the same courtesy.

For a young rookie QB? Absolutely, you're definitely right. That's totally fair.

threebag 12-25-2016 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12639241)
Calling bullshit on that. There are plenty of people who think both should be gone.

? Wasn't talking about being gone except Clay should be banned perm. Maybe bolded the wrong part?

Regardless the catalyst has been removed and the board is better for it.

SAUTO 12-25-2016 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12639241)
Calling bullshit on that. There are plenty of people who think both should be gone.

Raises hand.


Both posters are terrible

NJChiefsFan 12-25-2016 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12639243)
I have a sinking feeling that you'll get a bunch of immature losers (people who defended Alex Smith) who don't want to be wrong about being cautious towards QBs drafted with high picks. Sure, it will start with a lot of fanfare, but the rookie will struggle the way 99.9% of all rookie QBs do, and you'll start to see signs bashing and doubting taking place very soon into the guy's first season. It will start a whole 'nother cycle of QB drama, only this time with the sides reversed.

Of course, that's just a prediction. I have no proof or evidence that this will take place. But I know how CP posters operate. Somebody who was attacked for years for an opinion gets uppity and goes on the attack when it's their turn to see their opinion take a backseat to the plans of the Chiefs. It's the life cycle. Except the drafturbators haven't even had a ****ing turn since 1983. That's the uncertainty surrounding it.

If we trade for a veteran backup after Alex, I think you'll see the current QB climate get even ****ing worse.

People looking for any excuse to say "I told you so"? I think you have a pretty damn good chance of being right.

threebag 12-25-2016 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12639243)
I have a sinking feeling that you'll get a bunch of immature losers (people who bash Alex Smith).

No shit

stumppy 12-25-2016 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12639265)
? Wasn't talking about being gone except Clay should be banned perm. Maybe bolded the wrong part?

Regardless the catalyst has been removed and the board is better for it.

Yes I did, sorry.
What I said still stands. There are many members, long time members who put both in the same category.
For people on here to continually say it's just the people who agree with Meat Peeker that want ATTENTIONBITCH gone is bullshit.
As many members have already said. They're two side to the same coin.

GoChargers 12-25-2016 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12639255)
Yeah, my concern specifically will be the "excuses" versus "legit reasons".

This will be the next divisive issue for the QB.

People that hate Alex call everything from playcalling to player injuries excuses. People that like or are open minded call these same things legit reasons.

So once Smith is gone, will the same rules apply to the next QB?

Pretty sad to say.. I doubt it. The next guy.. so long as he isn't another instantly hated retread.. will be allowed every excuse.. which from my point of view would likely be fair (as it's consistent with my prior QB view).. but so obviously inconsistent from those unwilling to give all QBs the same courtesy.

Alex Whiff is 32 years old and has been in the league for 12 seasons. The fact that you're holding him to the same standards as a hypothetical rookie QB speaks volumes.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-25-2016 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 12639289)
Alex Whiff is 32 years old and has been in the league for 12 seasons. The fact that you're holding him to the same standards as a hypothetical rookie QB speaks volumes.

Don't you have anything better to do than lurk on our boards and talk constant shit? Oh that's right , your team ain't playing for shit in January

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-25-2016 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12639241)
Calling bullshit on that. There are plenty of people who think both should be gone.

Merry Christmas, sweet cheeks.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-25-2016 10:30 AM

This thread is classic example of CP more concerned about bleeding all over this place rather than actually discussing football

pr_capone 12-25-2016 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12639255)
Pretty sad to say.. I doubt it. The next guy.. so long as he isn't another instantly hated retread.. will be allowed every excuse.. which from my point of view would likely be fair (as it's consistent with my prior QB view).. but so obviously inconsistent from those unwilling to give all QBs the same courtesy.

Why would we give an 8 year vet, like Alex was before coming here, the same rope (read: courtesy) with which to hang himself as we would a rookie QB in his first year in the league?

That is not being inconsistent... that is expecting an 8 year vet to know some shit the rookie doesn't.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.