Can't.........breath................call.........................91..................uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh

Darth CarlSatan

Why should we draft him? Is it his consistency? His leadership?

I bet JD Booty is pissed that the Pete Carroll magic didn't rub off on his draft status.

LMAO! I've noticed throughout this whole thread this is all you've been doing. Is it because you're merely just a bandwaggon fan of Sanchez and cant come up with any arguments by yourself? What you heard Sanchez was a good player and you just started riding his nuts huh? But when it comes to debating with others, you'd rather just make these comments and leave the actual debates to people with brains.

What about our 1st and 2nd for Anderson?

He has even more starting experience in the NFL than Castle. This should be worth more.

I'd be pissed too. He should have came out after his 2006 season. He had almost identical numbers to what sanchez had. His one year of college experience was enough to warrant him a top 3 pick huh? But what do you know, he fell off the next year which could happen to Sanchez.

I want to see a qb do good for more than one year before I give him 70 million dollars and the reigns to an NFL team.

Exactly. He says focusing on "glamour positions" is stupid because you're missing pieces, yet it's smart to focus solely on the o-line until it's completely invincible. That's not even possible.

Build the team AS A TEAM.

Thanks for the insults but quite honestly, I've stated my case for Sanchez and Stafford numerous times in this forum and I'm pretty sure that most people are sick of me reiterating myself at every turn.

I know I am.

So in brief, never pass on a potential franchise QB. Sanchez is extremely accurate and smart, has ideal size and athleticism and despite your "one year" claim, he was at USC for four full years. Furthermore, the guy was like the #1 overall player his recruiting year. He has the tools and the brains to be a franchise player.

In that case, there is no possible reason to pass on him. If you think Cassel's good after NEVER starting at USC, then you wait until Sanchez hits the NFL.

Lights out.

Not arguing with you. It is a good call to pick a qb in the first round......if he deserves to be drafted there. Sanchez cannot be the third player selected in a football draft. I refuse to believe he is worthy. Maybe a mid first, but never a 3rd pick. One year shouldn't get you that far.

Well gee. Maybe it's not all about college stats?

:doh!: He's only had one season starting on the football team. Sorry I have to clear it up for you, I thought you'd be smart enough to figure it out. And yeah, he's been at USC for 4 years, yet never started until this year. After you're redshirted, you should start your redshirt freshman year.

I believe that Scott Pioli is probably working on a way to bring Matt Cassell to KC to be our QB.

I dont care what anybody says, New England was a dangerous team to play at the end of the year, it took them time to adjust to Matt.

Yeah, I'm sure he's a leader and will make this offense the #1 offense. Hell, he'll probably switch up and be D end on defensive series!! Sanchez is superman!!

You've missed the point. I mentioned Leinart because HE RETURNED TO USC FOR ANOTHER YEAR. How much did that extra year of experience help him?

You post over at WPI....don't you.

Not at USC.

And as for Leinart, he was drafted by Dennis Green to play in the West Coast offense. He was fired and the new offense is a vertical offense, not Leinart's strong point.

The Cardinals should not have drafted him if they thought there was a chance they'd fired Dennis Green. Square peg, round hole.

Leinart will still be a productive, if not highly successful NFL QB.

I believe that as always, you are incorrect.

He started three games in 2007 and played in several others, also.

What ever helps you sleep at night mr sarcastic. Why is Sanchez so highly rated? I understand Stafford, but Sanchez? Why?

LMAO

I dont know? I'm sure it didn't hurt him though. I'm sure it bettered him.

ROFL

BECAUSE HE CAN PLAY. BECAUSE HE IS A BALLER YOU CAN FIELD ON DAY ONE.
BECAUSE HIS MECHANICS BLOW THE LIVING **** OUT OF ANYONE WHO WILL APPEAR IN THE NFL DRAFT NEXT YEAR AND QUITE POSSIBLY THE YEAR AFTER THAT.
BECAUSE HE IS ACCURATE AND CAN THREAD DOUBLE COVERAGE LIKE A MOTHER****ER.
BECAUSE HIS MISDIRECTION SKILLS MAKE CHRIS ANGEL JIZZ HIS ****ING PANTS!
BECAUSE WHEN HE HAS TO RUN, HE DOES IT BETTER THAN ANYONE I'VE EVER SEEN.
BECAUSE HE CAN DELIVER THE ROCKET OR THE SOFT TOUCH WITH EQUAL PRECISION, AND BECAUSE HIS LEADERSHIP AND THE RESPECT HE GET'S FROM HIS PLAYERS SAY LOUD AND ****ING CLEAR,
"DRAFT ME SCOTT PIOLI, AND I WILL TAKE YOUR TEAM TO THE ****ING SUPER BOWL IN TWO YEARS MINIMUM"!
:cuss:

Glad to know 3 games make a season. Thanks.

Good grief, DCS. Stop that shit.

If you're talking to me..no. I dont even have an account over there.

The only difference it made is that it cost him millions of dollars.

When they don't listen, YOU HAVE TO INCREASE THE DECIBEL LEVEL JUST LIKE YOU WERE TALKING TO THE OLD FOLKS!

Glad to know that you have no clue what the **** you're talking about.

You're a Bradford fan....aren't you?

So... you think that he should have came out a year earlier so he could suck..but have more money...than come a year later and suck but with less money?

No, not really. I am a Stafford fan. If Detroit ****s up and doesnt draft him, we should take him.

First off, he doesn't "suck".

Secondly, Yes.

You don't listen very well...do you?

Leinart is only on the bench because he's in an offensive system that doesn't play to his strengths. He's not going to stretch the field like Warner does. He would be a better fit in a WC offense.

So your worried more about his money than his play? Why?

I'm saying it didn't make any difference regarding his performance in the NFL. None.

You said he never started until this season.

You were wrong.

Well, tough. We should trade BC to Patriots. His strong arm should be great for their offense.

Apples and Oranges.

You dont know that LMAO! You dont know what he would have done if he would have come out a year earlier. He may have been practice squad for all you know. We do know it didnt make him worse.

:spock: :rolleyes:

How is that Apples and Oranges? Leinart was drafted into a WC offense. When that offense was scrapped for a new one.....he didn't perform as well....hence why he's on the bench.

Go to the eye doctor. I said I didnt say he never started. I said he had only one season tarting.

Riiiight. He was a consensus top 5 pick before he went back.

This has to be some kind of stupid joke.

Looks like KcChiefsKing's ride is here.

http://meetthewebers.com/wp-content/.../short-bus.jpg

Okay. Whatever.

:doh!: So? He's better than Sanchez never the less. And to have two damn near hall of fame WRs on your squad, you better be able to play in any offense.

You don't know football.....do you?

You are an idiot of epic proportions.

Welcome, n00b.

Haha! Nice one :clap:

Why? If you had Boldin and Fitzy on either side of you, shouldnt you succeed? I refuse to believe that if you took Tom Brady from the Patriots offense and made him play in a WC offense that he would be bad.

Back on topic, why do you think Sanchez is so great. What have you seen from him to see that he is worth the #3 pick? Surely it isnt his consistency.

Other news, Matt Cassell has been franchised. So I dont think we'll get him.

Getttttttttttttt your groove-on!

Getttttttttttttt your groove-on!

Get your groove-on! Get your groove-on!

Get yo-horrrrr groove on!


<object width="425" height="344">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nnHksDFHTQI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>

Why would you want him?

I'm beginning to think that you're a dupe.

It's the one where Michael Phelps won the medals in right?

He has to be.

Yeah, 3200 yards, 34 TD's and 10 INT's - along with a 164 rating is WILDLY inconsistent...

http://i40.tinypic.com/301ex5f.jpg

See post #182.

Why would you want Sanchez?

I'm beginning to think that you're a dupe.

Both of them had ONE good year.

So....you would rather stick with Thigpen as our QB then? What has he proven?

Good thing he did that year to year or else I wouldnt want him.

And what do stats have to do with consistency? LMFAO! You posting his season stats indicates that he did it year to year. If you wanted to say that he was consistent last year, you should have posted his game stats. Better luck next time.

Yeah, I've got nearly 12,000 posts but I'm a dupe.

:rolleyes:

Good lord. What'll you n00bs think of next.

I dont really know what we should do with our qb position, but I do know that we shouldn't pick Sanchez at 3. Pick Stafford if he's there. But not Sanchez.

Question, what makes Sanchez so much better than Cassell?

What does post count have to do with you being a dupe? Im sure Pioli is a dupe because as far as I can see, his post cound on here is ZERO. So is Clarks.

:spock:

And I think Claythan has about 40 thousand posts...yeah Im sure he's not a dupe. LOL! You're really equating being a dupe to post count.

So let's hear it there n00b. If Stafford is gone at #3......who do we draft.

I'm either going to hear Curry, an OT, a DE or trade down. I'm just waiting for it.

:doh!:

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

Uh, I don't think you understand the meaning of "dupe".

Duplicate account.

But if there WERE two Scott Pioli's, he's so secretive that no one would ever know.

Maybe you're onto something there, n00b.

A DE or trade down. Lol. Thanks for the choices.

Marty, is that you?

Oh sorry ROFL didnt know dupe meant that..

Even Marty's smarter than that

Wow.

You have to be a dupe. You're definitely a dope.

I think Corky from "Life Goes On" has a higher Football IQ than you.

So name a DE that is worthy of the #3 pick.

And if we should trade down.....then lets hear your awesome trade scenarios that are realistic.

Why is Sanchez worth the number 3 pick? You guys keep coming at me, yet you have yet to explain picking Sanchez at 3.

Realistic?

Have you read this reerun's posts?

Good luck with that request...

Why? Because he's probably the best or second best QB coming out this year.

Arakpo or Johnson. I'm not the GM so I dont know how exactly the trades would play out. But still I would call a team in the 12-18 range and see if there are any willing to trade. Im not acting like it's easy to trade, just that we should pursue it.

Why is Sanchez worth the 3rd pick?

Weak qb class.

Man this Sanchez bullshit has been stuffed so far up you guys asses that you are starting to believe the bullshit that comes out of your mouths.

ROFL

:Lin:

Dane McCloud, why Sanchez at 3?

I guess that's a "no", pestilenceaf.

It's been explained 100's of times in the past week alone - and many times in this thread alone.

But since you lack the basic skills of most human beings, I'll do your dirty work and post one of the answers posted to this question.