ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 104.3 the Fan here in Denver reporting (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200488)

Logical 01-16-2009 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 5398664)
WB, Jim.

Thanks I plan to be around more, especially if Herm is replaced.

Thanks again

DeezNutz 01-16-2009 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRONUS (Post 5398662)
A proven winner and Pioli would make me one very happy fan.

Back to the topic of this thread:

I'm not sure what to think about the Rat possibly coming to KC. I've despised the Donkeys of so long...

Nonetheless, if this were to happen, I'm struggling to think of another organization that would have made two front office moves during one off-season of the magnitude of the ones we're discussing.

KcMizzou 01-16-2009 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRONUS (Post 5398671)
Thanks I plan to be around more, especially if Herm is replaced.

Thanks again

Excellent.

Your return might get buried a bit in this particular thread...lol

DeezNutz 01-16-2009 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 5398685)
Excellent.

Your return might get buried a bit in this particular thread...lol

If you crazy kids would stop using confusing acronyms, others might be able to interact with you. WB?

WTF? NTTAWWT. JK.

(subsequent responses provided the needed context)

007 01-16-2009 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 5398685)
Excellent.

Your return might get buried a bit in this particular thread...lol

By design I'm sure. heh

Hammock Parties 01-16-2009 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397751)

Kansas City's not beyond saving...

Larry Johnson can be the outcast.

alanm 01-16-2009 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5398227)
I still don't like this, but the idea of a million shitsucking douchebag Bronco fans squealing in unison if it happens is enough to not make me hate it entirely.

You'd enjoy it for the pain it would inflict alone. You're decently evil at times. :evil:

Direckshun 01-17-2009 12:04 AM

I'll say this.

If this actually happens, and we end up hiring Shanahan, we will be hiring an amoral cheater who has not accomplished anything outside of Elway, whom I've sworn to always hate and disrespect, as our decision-maker on the field.

Basically, I will hate it.

wazu 01-17-2009 12:17 AM

No. Don't want Shanahan. Might as well hire Satan.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-17-2009 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Chief Homer (Post 5397950)
ROFLROFL


meh...... if it gets rid of Herm I'll settle for the 32nd pick in the draft:D

I'd rather have one, or the other. That's for sure.

KCrockaholic 01-17-2009 12:17 AM

you guys that think Shanahan is a good coach is just ammusing to me. I hate Herm, but i would rather keep him than ever have that slim ball p.o.s. Shanahan as coach. Hes probably the most overrated coach in NFL history. Its just sad.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 5397965)
Exited? You aren EXCITED about that idea?...or is that CP lingo?

I don't blame him. When I see the possibility of Rat Face McCheese-Eater being coach of the Chiefs, "exited" is a perfectly acceptable brain fart.

Allow me to demonstrate:

"When Shanahan became head coach of the Chiefs, my lunch exited my mouth via projectile-vomit".

"I exited the grassy knoll after blowing Shanahan's brains to hell with a sniper-rifle".

"After pissing in Shanahan's face during his presser at the Stram Theatre, I exited stage left".

kysirsoze 01-17-2009 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 5398856)
No. Don't want Shanahan. Might as well hire Satan.

Is he available?:evil:

Baby Lee 01-17-2009 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5398687)
If you crazy kids would stop using confusing acronyms, others might be able to interact with you. WB?

WTF? NTTAWWT. JK.

(subsequent responses provided the needed context)

UR V8K8SH1 iz baqon

Fritz88 01-17-2009 07:25 AM

the rat..not too shabby.

mlyonsd 01-17-2009 08:42 AM

I think Pioli knows Shanahan likes to meddle in the personnel stuff so I don't think he'll be given much consideration.

warrior 01-17-2009 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 5399107)
I think Pioli knows Shanahan likes to meddle in the personnel stuff so I don't think he'll be given much consideration.

This---------------next rumor

Mr. Flopnuts 01-17-2009 10:56 AM

Is it just me, or is this thread missing it's entire burst?

OnTheWarpath15 01-17-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5399249)
Is it just me, or is this thread missing it's entire burst?

LMAO

Mr. Flopnuts 01-17-2009 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5399251)
LMAO

Seriously. When I went to bed last night, this thread, umm, "Shook", all night long.

kstater 01-17-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5399252)
Seriously. When I went to bed last night, this thread, umm, "Shook", all night long.

ROFL


Alright, back to the fooball portion of the thread. I'd be Ok, with Shannahan, but he's far from my first choice. I just see him wanting more control several years down the road.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5399271)
ROFL


Alright, back to the fooball portion of the thread. I'd be Ok, with Shannahan, but he's far from my first choice. I just see him wanting more control several years down the road.

Yep. If Shanahan could hold is ego in check, I'd love to have him.

jAZ 01-17-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5397773)
I'm not surprised.

Clearly Clark Hunt was swayed by my column recommending Shanahan as head coach.

Your article is the #1 result on Google for "shanahan chiefs".

Mr. Flopnuts 01-17-2009 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5399271)
ROFL


Alright, back to the fooball portion of the thread. I'd be Ok, with Shannahan, but he's far from my first choice. I just see him wanting more control several years down the road.

Depending on Shanahan's outlook on coaching the Chiefs, he could easily be my first choice. If he's willing to allow Scott to bring in a D coordinator for him, I don't see a better option. If we're going to draft a franchise quarterback, who better to develop him?

Chief Faithful 01-17-2009 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 5398823)
I'll say this.

If this actually happens, and we end up hiring Shanahan, we will be hiring an amoral cheater who has not accomplished anything outside of Elway, whom I've sworn to always hate and disrespect, as our decision-maker on the field.

Basically, I will hate it.

He was an amoral cheater only because he was in Denver. In KC and with the help of Pioli I'm sure his cheater days will all be in his past.

:)

milkman 01-17-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5399286)
Depending on Shanahan's outlook on coaching the Chiefs, he could easily be my first choice. If he's willing to allow Scott to bring in a D coordinator for him, I don't see a better option. If we're going to draft a franchise quarterback, who better to develop him?

I think there are some positives that Shannahan would bring, but I just can't wrap my mind around the idea of the rat in KC.

The fact is, I still don't believe in retreads that have won SBs elsewhere.
They seem to do well with the next team, but they never quite achieve the same kind of success that they enjoyed with thier SB teams.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-17-2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399320)
I think there are some positives that Shannahan would bring, but I just can't wrap my mind around the idea of the rat in KC.

The fact is, I still don't believe in retreads that have won SBs elsewhere.
They seem to do well with the next team, but they never quite achieve the same kind of success that they enjoyed with thier SB teams.

I could live with him winning us 1 Super Bowl instead of 2. Especially if we beat Denver in the AFC Championship.

milkman 01-17-2009 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5399325)
I could live with him winning us 1 Super Bowl instead of 2. Especially if we beat Denver in the AFC Championship.

I'm talking about guys that didn't go on to win SBs with a second team.

Hank Stram, Mike Ditka, Bill Parcells, Dick, Mike Holmgren.

All guys that won a SB with one team who never won another with a another team.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 12:03 PM

Thinking about this a little more.....

Pioli is used to working with a powerful coach. Actually, Belichick had more power than Pioli, but each guy had a veto power on personnel. I think something similar could work here with Shanahan.

I have bigger doubts about the money. If Shanahan got all of his money owed as a going away present, it could work. But if Bowlen's payments to Shanahan decline at one to one rate with a new HC job, Shanahan will be working for free, and he won't do that. [Maybe something creative could be worked out with backloading or something?] And even if Shanny did get all his money, would he demand $7 million here, too? I don't think Clark is going to pay out over $20 million next year for GM and coaches (including Edwards' and Peterson's salary).

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399332)
I'm talking about guys that didn't go on to win SBs with a second team.

Hank Stram, Mike Ditka, Bill Parcells, Dick, Mike Holmgren.

All guys that won a SB with one team who never won another with a another team.

Isn't Grandpa the only coach to win a SB with a second team, after having won one with his original team?

Chiefshrink 01-17-2009 12:10 PM

No way this happens if Shannahan wants personnel control which I'm sure by now Shanny has learned his lesson of wearing too many hats in the previous org. Shanny the GM got Shanny the Coach fired.

Hands down Shanny is the best X's and O's guy 'offensively' and not to mention the best QB teacher(ala-could improve Thigpen tremendously) in the NFL. Pioli and Shanny have great admiration for one another and Shanny has always wanted to work with Gunther because he greatly respects him. Shanny really likes the Chiefs young core of talent coming up (Flowers,Carr,Bowe,Dorsey). Shanny I would think at this point would think I can just be a football coach and leave all the other stuff(GM,personnel) to somebody else and I have 45mil under the cap, Pioli,Gunther, good core of young talent and Arrowhead stadium.

I don't want him if he wants personnel control though.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399320)
I think there are some positives that Shannahan would bring, but I just can't wrap my mind around the idea of the rat in KC.

The fact is, I still don't believe in retreads that have won SBs elsewhere.
They seem to do well with the next team, but they never quite achieve the same kind of success that they enjoyed with thier SB teams.

I think these guys buy into their own hype, and demand full control at the next stop. Turns out most of them are good coaches and shitty GMs.

milkman 01-17-2009 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5399347)
Isn't Grandpa the only coach to win a SB with a second team, after having won one with his original team?

No.

He lost one with Philly.

He won his first with the Rams.

DeezNutz 01-17-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399354)
No.

He lost one with Philly.

He won his first with the Rams.

Right, of course. I ****ed that up.

Having gone to the SB with his original team, I believe he's the only coach to have won one with his second.

Sorry. Cluster**** of an original post.

This doesn't mean much b/c there's a relatively small sample size, but it is interesting to note that even very good coaches aren't usually as successful in their second stops...

milkman 01-17-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5399351)
I think these guys buy into their own hype, and demand full control at the next stop. Turns out most of them are good coaches and shitty GMs.

Bill Parcells is actually a pretty good personnel guy, but he never brought the Pats, the Jets or the Boys a SB win.

Holmgren was a shitty personnel man, but he still hasn't achieved the same kind of success on the field, even after giving up personnel control, that he enjoyed in Green Bay.

I don't believe the others had GM responsibilities.

Frankie 01-17-2009 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5398435)
Yea, I am sure Shanny really thinks his 2 rings are tarnished... ROFL

I don't care what he thinks. I care what I think.

Frankie 01-17-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399320)
I think there are some positives that Shannahan would bring, but I just can't wrap my mind around the idea of the rat in KC.

I've said it before. The only positive is that he will REALLY prepare to beat Denver and Oakland every year. That's 4 important games a year to try to win.

Agent V 01-17-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5399401)
I've said it before. The only positive is that he will REALLY prepare to beat Denver and Oakland every year. That's 4 important games a year to try to win.

I'm sure he'll try equally hard to win every game.

milkman 01-17-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief103182 (Post 5399408)
I'm sure he'll try equally hard to win every game.

Agreed.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5399320)
I think there are some positives that Shannahan would bring, but I just can't wrap my mind around the idea of the rat in KC.

The fact is, I still don't believe in retreads that have won SBs elsewhere.
They seem to do well with the next team, but they never quite achieve the same kind of success that they enjoyed with thier SB teams.

Yep.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5399401)
I've said it before. The only positive is that he will REALLY prepare to beat Denver and Oakland every year. That's 4 important games a year to try to win.

Hiring the Rat just to watch Donko fans squirm when the Chiefs play them is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Go to the Minge and see how many people are truly upset about his firing.
It's close statistic-wise to the number of Chiefs fans that want to keep Herm.

Keep the Rat's Epic Stale the hell away from my team.

RedThat 01-17-2009 01:47 PM

I know a lot of people don't like him, but I think Shanahan would be great.

Give him a good gm to work with and outstanding ppl in the pro player personnel dept and I'll bet he'll easily be one of the best coaches in the league.

Given the fact we have Pioli, Im welcomed to having Shanahan as HC.

MahiMike 01-17-2009 01:57 PM

Bring him in! Especially if Spagnuolo is gone now. Blessing in disguise IMO.

Mile High Mania 01-17-2009 02:07 PM

I'd be shocked ... you guys just brought on Pioli, and that likely isn't appealing to Shanny. And, on the flipside of that... Shanny wants more control and power than your normal HC, and Pioli just left that type of situation in NE.

The Cowboys are going to lose Garrett as OC... they fired their DC and their ST coach... Wade is sitting there thinking "Hmmmm, what's up Jerry". I don't know if they'll pull that trigger, but Shanahan in Dallas would make sense. Granted, you have Jerry not wanting to give up control, but stranger things have happened.

I think Mike sits out a year, unless something wild happens in Dallas.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 5399622)
I'd be shocked ... you guys just brought on Pioli, and that likely isn't appealing to Shanny. And, on the flipside of that... Shanny wants more control and power than your normal HC, and Pioli just left that type of situation in NE.

The Cowboys are going to lose Garrett as OC... they fired their DC and their ST coach... Wade is sitting there thinking "Hmmmm, what's up Jerry". I don't know if they'll pull that trigger, but Shanahan in Dallas would make sense. Granted, you have Jerry not wanting to give up control, but stranger things have happened.

I think Mike sits out a year, unless something wild happens in Dallas.


Yes! This! To the Cowgirls with him!

Brock 01-17-2009 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 5399622)
I'd be shocked ... you guys just brought on Pioli, and that likely isn't appealing to Shanny. And, on the flipside of that... Shanny wants more control and power than your normal HC, and Pioli just left that type of situation in NE.

I don't know that Shanahan really wants all that much power anymore. I think he probably just wants to coach and to win some more championships.

Mile High Mania 01-17-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5399627)
I don't know that Shanahan really wants all that much power anymore. I think he probably just wants to coach and to win some more championships.

Well, looking at the last few years... what makes you think this is what he wants to do now?

Brock 01-17-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 5399683)
Well, looking at the last few years... what makes you think this is what he wants to do now?

Because look where all that power got him.

Mile High Mania 01-17-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5399688)
Because look where all that power got him.

Ok, but I just don't see that changing much. I think it would have to be the right scenario and I think that would be a team like Dallas more than KC. It will be interesting to see what happens.

bowener 01-17-2009 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 5397737)
that Pioli is in negotioans with Mike Shanahan

For OC or HC?

melbar 01-17-2009 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5399575)
I know a lot of people don't like him, but I think Shanahan would be great.

Give him a good gm to work with and outstanding ppl in the pro player personnel dept and I'll bet he'll easily be one of the best coaches in the league.

Given the fact we have Pioli, Im welcomed to having Shanahan as HC.

I'm sorry, was he not in a good situation in Denver? Did I miss something? Good players good front office, good owner...

no championship since Elway left.

Mile High Mania 01-17-2009 02:43 PM

Yeah, RedBull types as if Mike was coaching in Detroit... he called all the shots in Denver and had an owner that let him do as he pleased.

RustShack 01-17-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5399731)
I'm sorry, was he not in a good situation in Denver? Did I miss something? Good players good front office, good owner...

no championship since Elway left.

No Championship since he gained GM responsibilities.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5399627)
I don't know that Shanahan really wants all that much power anymore. I think he probably just wants to coach and to win some more championships.

Backing Pioli as the GM was the smart choice in terms of talent AND name, but as far as Coaches are concerned; I'd MUCH rather see a young up and coming guy with fresh ideas who can bring kind of a "We are Marshall" trip to the Chiefs.

Only Carl, Herm, Dickie, Gun, and Krummy die in the plane crash though.

melbar 01-17-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5399743)
No Championship since he gained GM responsibilities.

OK, but other than having a Running game, putting vasoline on players uniforms, cut blocking, and watching Elway pull inhuman throws out of his arse, what great coaching feat did he complete before taking over GM responsibilities?

RustShack 01-17-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5399752)
OK, but other than having a Running game, putting vasoline on players uniforms, cut blocking, and watching Elway pull inhuman throws out of his arse, what great coaching feat did he complete before taking over GM responsibilities?

Winning two Super Bowls?

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5399746)
Backing Pioli as the GM was the smart choice in terms of talent AND name, but as far as Coaches are concerned; I'd MUCH rather see a young up and coming guy with fresh ideas who can bring kind of a "We are Marshall" trip to the Chiefs.

Only Carl, Herm, Dickie, Gun, and Krummy die in the plane crash though.


ADDENDUM:

Said plane crashes in to Shanahan's new digs, taking him out as well.

It's for your own good Chiefs Nation.

melbar 01-17-2009 03:37 PM

Because of that great team and a HOF QB. His teams have been less than inspiring since. The tactics of his sb teams 10 yrs ago taint that imho.

CrazyHorse 01-17-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 5399694)
Ok, but I just don't see that changing much. I think it would have to be the right scenario and I think that would be a team like Dallas more than KC. It will be interesting to see what happens.


You say he wants power. Only on the raiders do you have less power as HC than Dallas. Jerry Jones runs everything on that team.

Hammock Parties 01-17-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5399752)
what great coaching feat did he complete before taking over GM responsibilities?

Winning a shit-ton of games?

Where do people get off talking like Shanahan is a mediocre coach?

alanm 01-17-2009 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportsshrink (Post 5399349)
No way this happens if Shannahan wants personnel control which I'm sure by now Shanny has learned his lesson of wearing too many hats in the previous org. Shanny the GM got Shanny the Coach fired.

Hands down Shanny is the best X's and O's guy 'offensively' and not to mention the best QB teacher(ala-could improve Thigpen tremendously) in the NFL. Pioli and Shanny have great admiration for one another and Shanny has always wanted to work with Gunther because he greatly respects him. Shanny really likes the Chiefs young core of talent coming up (Flowers,Carr,Bowe,Dorsey). Shanny I would think at this point would think I can just be a football coach and leave all the other stuff(GM,personnel) to somebody else and I have 45mil under the cap, Pioli,Gunther, good core of young talent and Arrowhead stadium.

I don't want him if he wants personnel control though.

I would be OK with Gun coming back if a new HC would let Gun run HIS attack style defense instead of the shitty hybrid cover 2 shit that Herm made him run. If the abortion of a _efense that was unveiled on the field this past fall was all Guns doing and not mandated by Herm, then I want Gunther's head on a platter.

Fritz88 01-17-2009 04:05 PM

not too shabby.

alanm 01-17-2009 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5399482)
Yep.



Hiring the Rat just to watch Donko fans squirm when the Chiefs play them is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Go to the Minge and see how many people are truly upset about his firing.
It's close statistic-wise to the number of Chiefs fans that want to keep Herm.

Keep the Rat's Epic Stale the hell away from my team.

It was and is still about 50/50 over the Rat being fired. The Pro side being lead mostly by Taco.
I think he's a good coach who should of stayed focused on coaching and stayed away from personnel.
That and he needs to stay away from defense.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 04:17 PM

You know what? **** this; it's time to get serious. I was hoping someone would hit on this but since there are no takers present, I'm gonna' do the job.

When the Chiefs won the Super Bowl, they came back the next year, moved in to a new stadium, and haven't seen a Super Bowl since.

When Denver won their 2nd title, the same thing happened.

When you have a Championship Franchise, you don't sit on your ass in the off season and hope for another repeat. We've hired a guy who's only purpose in life is to build that Championship Team, and keep the roster moving along through the years so that a backslide is avoided.

Mike Shanahan does NOT know how to do this. And I don't think for a NY-Minute that he's going to just sit back and be happy with whatever players Pioli sends his way.
The guy couldn't control Cutler to keep that Douche from embarrassing himself and the franchise either.
It's also obvious he doesn't know how to get his players fired-up either.

His "burst" is G-O-N-E. Shanahan to KC? I'd rather drink cat-piss.

Taco John 01-17-2009 04:18 PM

I personally think Shanahan was building a Superbowl team in Denver. It's true that he's let the defense go while he focused his efforts on offense - especially the last two years when he liquidated Jake Plummer and started to build a team around Jay Cutler. But right now the Broncos have a powerful young offense and we're moving into this offseason with more cap money and draft picks than we've had in a decade to spend primarily on defense... And at that, Shanahan's personnel guy (Goodman) has done a superb job the last two years - probably better than anyone in the league. You'll note that while Shanahan was fired, we kept his personnel guy - effectively making him the team's GM.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400095)
I personally think Shanahan was building a Superbowl team in Denver. It's true that he's let the defense go while he focused his efforts on offense - especially the last two years when he liquidated Jake Plummer and started to build a team around Jay Cutler. But right now the Broncos have a powerful young offense and we're moving into this offseason with more cap money and draft picks than we've had in a decade to spend primarily on defense... And at that, Shanahan's personnel guy (Goodman) has done a superb job the last two years - probably better than anyone in the league. You'll note that while Shanahan was fired, we kept his personnel guy - effectively making him the team's GM.

Why in your opinion was he fired?

OnTheWarpath15 01-17-2009 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400095)
I personally think Shanahan was building a Superbowl team in Denver. It's true that he's let the defense go while he focused his efforts on offense - especially the last two years when he liquidated Jake Plummer and started to build a team around Jay Cutler. But right now the Broncos have a powerful young offense and we're moving into this offseason with more cap money and draft picks than we've had in a decade to spend primarily on defense... And at that, Shanahan's personnel guy (Goodman) has done a superb job the last two years - probably better than anyone in the league. You'll note that while Shanahan was fired, we kept his personnel guy - effectively making him the team's GM.

I agree, TJ.

Taco John 01-17-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5400103)
Why in your opinion was he fired?


Basically because Pat got impatient.

I've heard a few insider type things, but most of it is speculation.

At the end of the day, Shanahan wasted a lot of time trying to find a franchise quarterback to run his offense, and in that time, the defense has suffered. Shanahan probably could have kept his job if the Broncos went to the playoffs this season - but with 7 runningbacks on IR, the best he could do was .500.

Them's the breaks.

FringeNC 01-17-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400123)
Basically because Pat got impatient.

I've heard a few insider type things, but most of it is speculation.

At the end of the day, Shanahan wasted a lot of time trying to find a franchise quarterback to run his offense, and in that time, the defense has suffered. Shanahan probably could have kept his job if the Broncos went to the playoffs this season - but with 7 runningbacks on IR, the best he could do was .500.

Them's the breaks.

Our meltdown against SD cost Carl and Shanahan's jobs, and soon to be Herm's. Tampa's loss to Oakland cost Gruden his, and allowed Philly to do what they've done. The doormats of the AFC West had a big impact on this NFL season.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5400137)
Our meltdown against SD cost Carl and Shanahan's jobs, and soon to be Herm's. Tampa's loss to Oakland cost Gruden his, and allowed Philly to do what they've done. The doormats of the AFC West had a big impact on this NFL season.


Hooray for Epic Suck!!!:doh!:

Mile High Mania 01-17-2009 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400095)
I personally think Shanahan was building a Superbowl team in Denver. It's true that he's let the defense go while he focused his efforts on offense - especially the last two years when he liquidated Jake Plummer and started to build a team around Jay Cutler. But right now the Broncos have a powerful young offense and we're moving into this offseason with more cap money and draft picks than we've had in a decade to spend primarily on defense... And at that, Shanahan's personnel guy (Goodman) has done a superb job the last two years - probably better than anyone in the league. You'll note that while Shanahan was fired, we kept his personnel guy - effectively making him the team's GM.

It's definitely going to be odd not seeing him on the sideline, but I am fine with the change. Shanahan built a nice offense, but the defense... man, that has been a big pile of stink for years and ultimately that is why I'm fine with the change.

It's interesting that they are keeping Dennison and Tuner - good for them, but I really hope they focus a bulk of that cap space and draft on the defense this offseason.

I'm tired of the FA misses on guys like Robertson, let's try something new.

Offensively, let's focus on that primary RB once again and keep a number of the guys we have now as insurance.

It's going to be interesting and I think it will be good. A lot of key pieces to the puzzle are there, now fix the defense.

RUSH 01-17-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5400137)
Our meltdown against SD cost Carl and Shanahan's jobs, and soon to be Herm's. Tampa's loss to Oakland cost Gruden his, and allowed Philly to do what they've done. The doormats of the AFC West had a big impact on this NFL season.

And the Chiefs ruined the Patriots title hopes.

Hammock Parties 01-17-2009 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400123)
Shanahan wasted a lot of time trying to find a franchise quarterback to run his offense, and in that time, the defense has suffered.

Please, man. You act like Shanahan wasn't even trying to fix the defense. The truth you don't seem to want to accept is that he ****ing failed horribly at it. The minute he fired Coyer it all went downhill.

Fortunately, with Pioli to hold his hand in Kansas City, we won't have that problem. :evil:

penchief 01-17-2009 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 5400034)
I would be OK with Gun coming back if a new HC would let Gun run HIS attack style defense instead of the shitty hybrid cover 2 shit that Herm made him run. If the abortion of a _efense that was unveiled on the field this past fall was all Guns doing and not mandated by Herm, then I want Gunther's head on a platter.

He had the defense under Vermeil and sucked. IMO, he's incompetent. Scheme aside, it's frustrating watching the defense repeat the same deficiencies every season.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief (Post 5400523)
He had the defense under Vermeil and sucked. IMO, he's incompetent. Scheme aside, it's frustrating watching the defense repeat the same deficiencies every season.

Yep, his usefulness has past.

Hammock Parties 01-17-2009 09:04 PM

Satan! GET BEHIND ME!

FloridaMan88 01-17-2009 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 5400034)
I would be OK with Gun coming back if a new HC would let Gun run HIS attack style defense

I can't believe there are people STILL defending Goonther.

The Chiefs' defense started faltering during Goonther's final season as the Chiefs head coach... that had nothing to do with a "hybrid Cover 2" you are describing in your post.

Goonther's defenses were mediocre and kept the Chiefs out of the playoffs during Vermeil's final season in KC... and that had nothing to do with a "hybrid Cover 2".

CrazyHorse 01-17-2009 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5400123)
Basically because Pat got impatient.

I've heard a few insider type things, but most of it is speculation.

At the end of the day, Shanahan wasted a lot of time trying to find a franchise quarterback to run his offense, and in that time, the defense has suffered. Shanahan probably could have kept his job if the Broncos went to the playoffs this season - but with 7 runningbacks on IR, the best he could do was .500.

Them's the breaks.

That's ridiculous. The Broncos rescources have been spent primarily on defense for the last sevaral years. Hell, was it 2 years ago he spent 8 picks on three players on the defense?

That was just the year before last. You call that good dratfting? You're easy to please.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-17-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon (Post 5397749)
Anything is better than Herm

No MIA, no it's not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 5397750)
Pioli + Shanny = DREAM TEAM


It would not shock me at all.

I don't dream of having my dick cut off and my asshole sewn shut, buy hey; to each his own.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker (Post 5397753)
:)

I'd love to have him groom Stafford or Sanchez. Let Pioli pick the DC and it's potentially dominant front office.

This would be my jizz my pants hire.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5397759)
My head is spinning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397762)
No shit.

The last hour has been bat-shit crazy.

What the **** did you two drink today?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5397763)
****ing awesome!

Offfffffffffff course; why am I NOT surprised.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 5397764)
I love the idea, the key to the whole thing is who would become the next defensive coordinator under Shanny.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5397773)
I'm not surprised.

Clearly Clark Hunt was swayed by my column recommending Shanahan as head coach.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 5397781)
Excellent.

It's not DaVinci, but it IS an Epic Rendering that so beautifully depicts the brain-power of the True Fan/Full reerun Chiefs fan who would support the hiring of Mike Shanahan.
TO THE SMITHSONIAN!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5397805)
I hate to be a pimp, but Mike Shanahan news has been hitting our premium boards for over a week.

Of course this tidbit was free in the article I wrote 12 days ago if any of you had bothered to pay attention:

http://kan.scout.com/2/827395.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5397806)
Nice.

If true, he gets to groom Sanchez or Stafford and Jam Culter and the Donks twice a year!

Hooah!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5397882)
Shanahan would be great for Thigpen

Quote:

Originally Posted by allen_kcCard (Post 5397895)
I would like Shanny just for the sheer "ass in thier face" every time we beat the donks with him standing on the sidelines in red.

All of the negatives about him will be gone as long as he really isn't looking for sole control of the roster and Pioli can get a solid D coord in place to take care of that side of the ball. Chan is a good fit with him already and I like him to stay with or without the rat.

He also has the experience to be something like what they had in NE with Pioli as far as a football mind to be a partner with, but in this case it would be Scott with the final say instead of BB.

It would be hard to forget the flash of disgust when I see his face, but I would like him (eventually) if he were ours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5397897)
If he brings Jeremy Bates to be the OC, and lets Pioli have input on the DC, then I'm all for it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5397900)
as long as shannarat doesn't have full control .... i'm good with it.


keep him around for 5 years or so and we should be completely rebuilt and can start looking for his replacement. Hopefully shannarat cries when we fire him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5397901)
dont forget shannahan's hatred for the raiders also, thats one thing that would be AWESOME!!! a HC who actually hates the other teams in our division as much as most of us fans(totally unlike perm)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Chief Homer (Post 5397919)
Im not sure how I feel about this,all the years of distain for the guy and now he could be our new coach.


Herm or Shannahan.......:hmmm:........Shannahan or Herm...........:hmmm:


Bye Herm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5397923)
Pioli+Shanahan
Pioli+Gruden
Pioli+Marty
Pioli+Any of the 3= CHAMPIONSHIPS!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5397932)
The way i look at is this ........ if i'm gonna hate our head coach, i might as well hate a good one.

:shrug:


carl
vermeil
herm
gunther


omg ...... bring on the rat!!


i've been separating my love on the team from my feelings bout the head coach ever since Marty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 5397939)
Woah. Probably just rumor but I seriously can't think of a better pair of talent when you think of Pioli & Shanahan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Chief Homer (Post 5397950)
ROFLROFL


meh...... if it gets rid of Herm I'll settle for the 32nd pick in the draft:D

Yes, I've always thought the SUPER-SIZE Shit Sandwich tasted MUCH better than the regular one. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5397973)
I like the idea of Shanahan as the Head Coach, I just didn't want him, if he was going to be calling the shots on player personnel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief103182 (Post 5398014)
I'd take him in a heartbeat. Him and Pioli could build something here.

Isn't ONE Hindenburg tragedy enough? I'm sure people in the old west thought the outhouse was pretty nifty before indoor plumbing, yes?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5398522)
In talks with Shanahan ay?
Wow... I wouldn't have a problem with that AT ALL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne (Post 5398545)
The Rat is OK by me.

We were SO close. There was some respect however minuscule starting to happen. And now this. :shake:

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5398564)
Shanahan is a good coach, especially on offense. Put him under a good GM like Pioli and it should be a dynamic combination.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRONUS (Post 5398662)
A proven winner and Pioli would make me one very happy fan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5399271)
ROFL


Alright, back to the fooball portion of the thread. I'd be Ok, with Shannahan, but he's far from my first choice. I just see him wanting more control several years down the road.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5399274)
Yep. If Shanahan could hold is ego in check, I'd love to have him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5399286)
Depending on Shanahan's outlook on coaching the Chiefs, he could easily be my first choice. If he's willing to allow Scott to bring in a D coordinator for him, I don't see a better option. If we're going to draft a franchise quarterback, who better to develop him?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportsshrink (Post 5399349)
No way this happens if Shannahan wants personnel control which I'm sure by now Shanny has learned his lesson of wearing too many hats in the previous org. Shanny the GM got Shanny the Coach fired.

Hands down Shanny is the best X's and O's guy 'offensively' and not to mention the best QB teacher(ala-could improve Thigpen tremendously) in the NFL. Pioli and Shanny have great admiration for one another and Shanny has always wanted to work with Gunther because he greatly respects him. Shanny really likes the Chiefs young core of talent coming up (Flowers,Carr,Bowe,Dorsey). Shanny I would think at this point would think I can just be a football coach and leave all the other stuff(GM,personnel) to somebody else and I have 45mil under the cap, Pioli,Gunther, good core of young talent and Arrowhead stadium.

I don't want him if he wants personnel control though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull (Post 5399575)
I know a lot of people don't like him, but I think Shanahan would be great.

Give him a good gm to work with and outstanding ppl in the pro player personnel dept and I'll bet he'll easily be one of the best coaches in the league.

Given the fact we have Pioli, Im welcomed to having Shanahan as HC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 5399607)
Bring him in! Especially if Spagnuolo is gone now. Blessing in disguise IMO.

http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/n...r/Walken-1.jpg

melbar 01-17-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5398369)
Marty?ROFL

Seriously what is all the hatred for Marty? He made us the 2nd winningest franchise in the 90's. his last job he went 13-3. Some bad coaching and a lot of bad luck in the playoffs ya, but he's one of the best coaches in the history of the NFL period. His day will come.

Why do so many hate a guy that did so many great things for this Team? He turned this team around from being a turd to a perenial playoff team. Dont want him back if you like, but to laugh at him like he's a joke is ridiculous.

FloridaMan88 01-17-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5400674)
Seriously what is all the hatred for Marty? He made us the 2nd winningest franchise in the 90's. his last job he went 13-3. Some bad coaching and a lot of bad luck in the playoffs ya, but he's one of the best coaches in the history of the NFL period. His day will come.

Why do so many hate a guy that did so many great things for this Team? He turned this team around from being a turd to a perenial playoff team. Dont want him back if you like, but to laugh at him like he's a joke is ridiculous.


Maybe because we know how the story ends with Marty... regular season success followed by a flameout in the playoffs.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.