![]() |
We all know that Veach isn't going to hamstring us with a deal, so I'm not worried about the money. He'll get a semi-friendly deal out of Trey or he'll let him walk.
If this is accurate, the thinking is likely keeping DJ and having him compete with Kingsley. I can't imagine they are going to give up on him after one season. This year's cap hit would be minimal for Trey, and Thuney and Taylor are off the books when the hit increases. At least then your interior is rock solid, and if DJ/Kingsley don't work out you address it. Otherwise they don't work out and you have 4/5 OL spots to figure out in 2026. |
Quote:
|
Whoever gets Trey gets their fans riled up. We weakened the Chiefs! So pay more
|
If true it sure says a lot about Veach’s concerns over all the OL he’s drafted in the last few drafts that haven’t amounted to much aside from Creed and Trey. Which will say a lot about his inability to draft OL, among other areas.
Hope this isn’t the case. |
I'm fine with it, even though I don't prefer it, you just better get a solid LT on a rookie/cheap deal then...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You people are ****ing exhausting. Kingsley was a 21 year old rookie. Morris and Niang were taken in the late 3rd. The problem is OT, and its investment and draft position, not an inability to draft one altogether. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This team has zero issues finding starting IOL on day 3. Just look at Trey Smith and Allegreti for recent examples that easily disprove your BS narrative about the entire OL. Again, the issue has been OT, no need to paint an entire narrative about the OL. |
Quote:
“He can’t draft OT” would be more accurate, although that’s hard to when you’re picking 32 every year |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.