ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports BREAKING NEWS: Chicago White Sox to put up netting all the way to foul poul (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=323476)

Frazod 06-18-2019 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 14313462)
And why is it irresponsible?

It's more annoying than anything else. Like a kid that young is going to understand what's going on anyway. There should be a minimum age limit for kids. If you can afford to go to a game, you can afford a babysitter.

I don't like it when assholes bring little kids to the theater and **** up my movie experience. I absolutely wouldn't like it if I dropped a few hundred on seats and ended up stuck next to somebody's unruly screaming brat all day.

Al Bundy 06-18-2019 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14313466)
LMAO Scho got triggered real quick.

No shit...

DaFace 06-18-2019 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14313478)
It's more annoying than anything else. Like a kid that young is going to understand what's going on anyway. There should be a minimum age limit for kids. If you can afford to go to a game, you can afford a babysitter.

I don't like it when assholes bring little kids to the theater and **** up my movie experience. I absolutely wouldn't like it if I dropped a few hundred on seats and ended up stuck next to somebody's unruly screaming brat all day.

Maybe Coors Field is just weird. I see tons of people around with young kids, and they seem to be having a good time with their family.

But I'll admit that Coors is a pretty laid back park, and that's the only stadium I've been in for 20 years. It's always in the top 10 league wide for attendance, and the Rockies are almost never a true contender. I'd guess fewer than 25% of people at a game on any given night are there to pay close attention.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-18-2019 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14313326)
Well this is shit and completely a pussy move supported by Kevin Keitzman, a complete cvck! :shake:

I'm sure your fat ass would be able to snag a screamer off the bat without injury.

bricks 06-18-2019 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 14313333)
Nobody wants to go see that shit


It’s like screwing with a condom. Safer yes but Only losers do that

What a terrible example.

So if you screw w/o a condom you’re not a loser but yet if you contract a disease then you’re at fault b/c if you wore the condom the disease would’ve been preventable loser!!!

Deberg_1990 06-18-2019 05:24 PM

This is why the NBA and soccer are the new National Pastime

EPodolak 06-18-2019 05:24 PM

Do any Royals hit hard enough to cause injury?

scho63 06-18-2019 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14313497)
I'm sure your fat ass would be able to snag a screamer off the bat without injury.

And I bet your perfect model body with 2% body fat and 10" penis would be able to bend over and take it in the ass like a true Social Justice Warrior and defender of fans rights.

BigRedChief 06-18-2019 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 14313333)
Nobody wants to go see that shit


It’s like screwing with a condom. Safer yes but Only losers do that

have you sat behind the new netting? You can hardly tell it’s there. Your eyes adjust to the foreground and background. They experimented with many versions. I’ve sat behind it in two minor league parks. It was fine. Not a distraction.

chiefzilla1501 06-18-2019 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14313335)
How many people have been killed by a foul ball?

How many people have become incapacitated from a foul ball?

How many SERIOUS injuries since 1950 have occurred in MLB from foul balls?

This is a ****ing joke and if you support it, YOU AIN'T AN ALPHA, OR A BETA, YOU ARE A CVCK!

I bet there has been 25,000,000 foul balls in the last 50 years and probably 10 serious injuries.

What a great rate of success and safety!

1,750

Its a small % but way too big of a number.

Baseball needs to take this assumed risk bullshit out of the language. Stadiums call if they want to install netting. But if someone gets hurt on something preventable with netting, the stadium should assume liability. Totally ridiculous that a fan should assume full risk for a flying bat hitting them in the head.

chiefzilla1501 06-18-2019 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 14313552)
have you sat behind the new netting? You can hardly tell it’s there. Your eyes adjust to the foreground and background. They experimented with many versions. I’ve sat behind it in two minor league parks. It was fine. Not a distraction.

I went once and fans didn't mind it. They actually had fun not having to keep their head on a swivel constantly. And more kids there having a good time. Plenty of positives to go with the negatives.

TribalElder 06-18-2019 06:52 PM

If they games weren't so ****ing boring people would be watching

might as well put up plexiglass like hockey arenas

Al Bundy 06-18-2019 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14313497)
I'm sure your fat ass would be able to snag a screamer off the bat without injury.

It would break his face right open.

Jewish Rabbi 06-18-2019 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14313497)
I'm sure your fat ass would be able to snag a screamer off the bat without injury.

He’d pay a hooker to catch it for him.

Rain Man 06-18-2019 06:55 PM

I bet the netting is intended to deflect bullets from the crowd.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.