ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 8 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Log jam at RB (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=298811)

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter (Post 12125127)
Yeah, I really don't know shit about the back end of football. That's what message boards are for. :D
I mean, it would be amazing, IMO, to be able to move Charles for a 2nd round pick and dump his $5 million salary this year and $7 million next year, off the books. The Chiefs could definitely upgrade their CB, S or DT/DE positions with an additional two. I'm a fan of the Chiefs, not individual players.

But running backs just don't have any value these days.

Red Dawg 03-10-2016 08:01 PM
We have 4 backs that have proven they can play when needed. One of them can flat out kick your ass if he gets a crack of daylight.

No problem at RB. I would t even draft one in any round at all.

Red Dawg 03-10-2016 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12125148)
I mean, it would be amazing, IMO, to be able to move Charles for a 2nd round pick and dump his $5 million salary this year and $7 million next year, off the books. The Chiefs could definitely upgrade their CB, S or DT/DE positions with an additional two. I'm a fan of the Chiefs, not individual players.

But running backs just don't have any value these days.
JC STAYS! You got that you mugger sucker! We are not trading him!

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12125161)
JC STAYS! You got that you mugger sucker! We are not trading him!
The Chiefs couldn't trade him for a six pack of Old Style

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12125156)
We have 4 backs that have proven they can play when needed. One of them can flat out kick your ass if he gets a crack of daylight.

No problem at RB. I would t even draft one in any round at all.
Knile Davis sucks ass and is directly responsible for the loss at NE

Deberg_1990 03-10-2016 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12125156)
We have 4 backs that have proven they can play when needed. One of them can flat out kick your ass if he gets a crack of daylight.

No problem at RB. I would t even draft one in any round at all.
We have 3. Davis can GTFO

You can NEVER have too many good RBs

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 12125189)
We have 3. Davis can GTFO

You can NEVER have too many good RBs

In 1985

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-10-2016 08:44 PM
Count up all the money we are paying this season to keep all 4. That's why we can have all of them.

threebag 03-10-2016 08:47 PM
Finger jam at CP

Willie Lanier 03-10-2016 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12125108)
Charles and Ware

West as relief for Charles


It would really be nice if West could return kicks and punts
This is exactly my line of thinking, I REALLY like Ware, West is a good backup

But Jamaal is the man, and he's pivotal to this offense... Sprinkle in some carries for Ware and use West if needed due to injury...

And get rid of Davis I had such high hopes for him, but he has zero vision

ToxSocks 03-10-2016 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12125045)
We have three rock-toting RBs.

That's not a ****ing logjam. It's not a "good problem." It's not a problem, period.

It would be a problem if we had Charles coming off his injury and jack shit behind him.
heh.

This.

TimBone 03-10-2016 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125098)
Because....
Because he's almost thirty, and coming off of his second acl tear. Teams aren't gonna be lining up to give up much for him.

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Lanier (Post 12125289)
This is exactly my line of thinking, I REALLY like Ware, West is a good backup

But Jamaal is the man, and he's pivotal to this offense... Sprinkle in some carries for Ware and use West if needed due to injury...

And get rid of Davis I had such high hopes for him, but he has zero vision
The Chiefs won as many games this season without Charles as they did in 2013 with Jamaal and won a playoff game to boot.

He's not as "pivotal" as you believe.

O.city 03-10-2016 09:03 PM
With the emergence of West and ware, they need to use Charles more in the Dat type role they've envisioned as well as out of the backfield.

Willie Lanier 03-10-2016 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12125330)
The Chiefs won as many games this season without Charles as they did in 2013 with Jamaal and won a playoff game to boot.

He's not as "pivotal" as you believe.
Well, then call it sentiment...

I would really miss watching him


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.
Page 3 of 8 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.