ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 19 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Our d-line is just disappointing. Time to start over again. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263465)

Black Bob 09-10-2012 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898106)
What you fail to address is that all of those teams were built around ONE first-round guy (if that).

The Giants got their guys in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. The Pats had Seymour but Wilfork was taken at the back of the first. The Steelers have a couple of guys from the late 1st but nobody in the top 10. And their top passrusher was an undrafted FA. Outside of Freeny at #11 overall, the Colts didn't invest top draft picks in linemen.

What do most of those teams have in common? When they had a top 10 (or even top 5) pick, they took a QUARTERBACK.

We've spent so many top draft picks on linemen that we're woefully thin on top-tier talent elsewhere.
Bad post. Who were we supposed to take with any of those top 10 picks at QB? By your logic, we would have Sanchez and Weeden over Jackson and Poe. That's just not better off imo.

Deberg_1990 09-10-2012 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898120)
Take Sanchez and roll the dice.

No he hasn't looked great to this point but it's also New York - you have no idea how good he would have been here. Hell, he might have been worse.

But at least you tried.
Too risky. We cant sacrifice a potential 7 or 8 win season.

L.A. Chieffan 09-10-2012 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898118)
Romeo stated publicly that if he wasn't hired as the head coach after his 2-1 performance last year, he'd move on and not stay in KC.
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/2904/wellbye.jpg

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898110)
Second, Look at the picks the year Pioli took Jackson. They aren't very good players. maybe we could have taken Raji but he hasn't been that great. Jackson looks pretty good to me when you look at that class. I'm not really sure where you think we were going to get an impact player in that bunch?
Are you mentally challenged?

Brian Orapko, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing, Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman would have been far better selections than Jackson, as would Alex Mack, Jeremy Maclin, Percy Harvin, Eric Wood or Vontae Davis.

Tyson Jackson would have been a good choice in the third round. Number three overall?

Not so much.

L.A. Chieffan 09-10-2012 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898124)
Bad post. Who were we supposed to take with any of those top 10 picks at QB? By your logic, we would have Sanchez and Weeden over Jackson and Poe. That's just not better off imo.
Sanchez aint too bad

htismaqe 09-10-2012 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898124)
Bad post. Who were we supposed to take with any of those top 10 picks at QB? By your logic, we would have Sanchez and Weeden over Jackson and Poe. That's just not better off imo.
What the **** have you missed out on by taking Sanchez?

Just because hindsight tells you we're not better off, what have you lost by taking the chance?

Fans like you are why this franchise is mired in mediocrity. Enjoy your 9-7 season.

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 11:58 AM
back to Sanchez


after one of his good games, of course.


after a bad game, silence

htismaqe 09-10-2012 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898132)
Are you mentally challenged?

Brian Orapko, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing, Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman would have been far better selections than Jackson, as would Alex Mack, Jeremy Maclin, Percy Harvin, Eric Wood or Vontae Davis.

Tyson Jackson would have been a good choice in the third round. Number three overall?

Not so much.
:bravo:

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898124)
Bad post. Who were we supposed to take with any of those top 10 picks at QB? By your logic, we would have Sanchez and Weeden over Jackson and Poe. That's just not better off imo.
You're a ****ing reerun.

Welcome to Chiefsplanet, the second home to many reeruns.

htismaqe 09-10-2012 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898137)
back to Sanchez


after one of his good games, of course.


after a bad game, silence
You do realize that this has nothing to do with Sanchez other than the fact that he was the QB that was obviously available when we took Tyson Jackson, right?

L.A. Chieffan 09-10-2012 11:59 AM
uh oh black bob, you might want to fake an injury real quick

PhillyChiefFan 09-10-2012 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8898091)
Hali will miss one game.

Our secondary needed the most help. We didn't address it at because of that it completely neutered our defense.
Yep. Lack of a pass rush only helped the exposure of an extremely weak secondary.

Atlanta didn't need to focus on Hali. That left Studebaker and a very raw Houston. Atlanta contained Houston and effectively stopped the pass rush altogether.

No pass rush + no secondary = Ryan's field day.

If yesterday showed anything, it is the lack of quality defensive depth, IMO.

KCrockaholic 09-10-2012 11:59 AM
But Mecca would rather rape himself with a toilet brush than draft Brian Orakpo.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898120)
Take Sanchez and roll the dice.

No he hasn't looked great to this point but it's also New York - you have no idea how good he would have been here. Hell, he might have been worse.

But at least you tried.
LMAO Maybe we should have traded for Tebow to?

BossChief 09-10-2012 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898121)
Should have let him go.
Haha

Overreact much?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 AM.
Page 3 of 19 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.