![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Might as well play devil's advocate.
Let's get off our high horse, morality police. Are we to say that drinking and driving is definitively more dangerous than sober driving at 75-80 mph on crowded highways? Driving drunk AND driving at high speeds? Yes, of course... but what about driving drunk on 35 mph roads? What then? Especially in regard to fatalities. Which is more dangerous? I know what we are wired to believe, but if we really are trying to protect our fellow American citizens, why not take away the convenience of high speed? Set the max limits at 35-40MPH. I guess it's because we can rationalize one convenience and not the other. |
Quote:
What the ****? |
You must be quite the idiot. First you thought to yourself, "I am blowing a .10. I know that is above the legal limit, but that is okay I am going to drive anyways."
THEN you come on here and start a thread to raise the legal limit? Did you really think that would go over well? I can't figure out which action was a more stupid decision. :shrug: At least when you were buzzed your judgment was impaired. Not sure what the excuse is for this thread. |
People tolerate it differently. .08 is about the only compromise available. You may be fine @ .10, but a 98 lb female will be plastered at a .10. You just never know.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
how come I was successfully able to handle a car at .10 then ?
|
Quote:
Crashes among drunk drivers, on the other hand, are relatively common. Roughly one-fourth of all fatality accidents in the U.S. involve a drunk driver. So unless you're arguing that one-fourth of all drivers are drunk, then it's pretty obvious that speeding isn't as dangerous as driving drunk. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are you drunk, RIGHT NOW? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.