ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ****Chiefs vs. Packers Game Thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249321)

DMAC 09-01-2011 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7868378)
yo yo yo gimme a stream yo.

i want to watch the 30th something offense!!

exciting

exciting

exciting

Thanks knowmo

RedThat 09-01-2011 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC (Post 7868643)
Thanks knowmo

you are very welcome lol

Okie_Apparition 09-01-2011 11:10 AM

I am ah feared Stanzi will do the Lambeau leap & they won't let him go

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-01-2011 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7868522)
Its because Cassel is the #1 man. And I think they are going to put Cassel with the first team.

why would they put Stanzi with the first team? It wont make any sense when Cassel is your starter so therefore he will get the first team reps.

Doh...thanks for stating the obvious Redthat

/cp lol:D

You're really boring. I know you think you're all edgy and provocative and actually believe you're some kind of above-it-all shit stirrer... but you're just boring. You aren't even worth putting on ignore because you aren't even bringing anything to the table in any way.

Bowser 09-01-2011 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7869197)
You're really boring. I know you think you're all edgy and provocative and actually believe you're some kind of above-it-all shit stirrer... but you're just boring. You aren't even worth putting on ignore because you aren't even bringing anything to the table in any way.

He's all but admitted that this is the only way he gets attention around here.

Earthling 09-01-2011 11:47 AM

7:00 CST means I get the game at 6:00 ! Ha !! :p

petegz28 09-01-2011 11:57 AM

So are they planning on playing the starters longer than the typical 1 series they usually do in the 4th pre-season game? I am hearing they will and think they should given the circumstances of the off-season.

The starters have got to get in there and get some time executing at game speed. I'd say at least the 1st half which is probably 1 1/2 quarters, if not longer in some cases than you normally would play them.

RedThat 09-01-2011 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7869197)
You're really boring. I know you think you're all edgy and provocative and actually believe you're some kind of above-it-all shit stirrer... but you're just boring. You aren't even worth putting on ignore because you aren't even bringing anything to the table in any way.

hold up, i detect sarcasm...aha! that has to be sarcasm...you said you put me on ignore but are still respondng to my posts. so you had to be sarcastic when you said you were going to put me on ignore before? hmmmm...what else could it be? im trying to figure it out?

if im boring wouldn't it make sense to put me on ignore? i cant exactly grasp everything youre saying. its confusing.

Coogs 09-01-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7868522)
why would they put Stanzi with the first team?

Because last week Haley put Palko in for 1 series with the first string because he said it was vital to know how the backup would perform with the 1st string. And since the backup position is still up for grabs, it makes sense to give Stanzi the same look. Not really rocket science.

RedThat 09-01-2011 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 7869284)
Because last week Haley put Palko in for 1 series with the first string because he said it was vital to know how the backup would perform with the 1st string. And since the backup position is still up for grabs, it makes sense to give Stanzi the same look. Not really rocket science.

thats a good point. never thought of it that way.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-01-2011 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7869266)
hold up, i detect sarcasm...aha! that has to be sarcasm...you said you put me on ignore but are still respondng to my posts. so you had to be sarcastic when you said you were going to put me on ignore before? hmmmm...what else could it be? im trying to figure it out?

if im boring wouldn't it make sense to put me on ignore? i cant exactly grasp everything youre saying. its confusing.

Doesn't surprise me you're confused since you didn't get my last sentence. You're really trying to hard to be interesting but it's not working.

RedThat 09-01-2011 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7869432)
Doesn't surprise me you're confused since you didn't get my last sentence. You're really trying to hard to be interesting but it's not working.

right. so if im interesting you will ignore me. makes sense.

Chris Meck 09-01-2011 12:37 PM

So, Red That's motto is," here and now is what matters"

yet his sig pic is Derrick Thomas.

Hmmn.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-01-2011 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7869442)
right. so if im interesting you will ignore me. makes sense.

LMAO

CrazyPhuD 09-01-2011 12:40 PM

So if we beat them tonight it means we're going to win the super bowl right?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.