ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Cassel > Cutler by Mel Kiper Jr. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=204008)

vailpass 03-11-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5572895)
He may be right about Cutler, but that doesn't exuse the fact that he's telling other people how wrong they were when Leinart has done nothing and Vince Young is a train wreck- both of whom he claimed were better. If he wants to bash Cutler, that's cool, but for him to be deriding other people because they liked him is ridiculous. Look in the mirror, Mel. As far as Leinert yet to be determined- he couldn't earn his way onto the field so I don't see any way anyone could claim he's anywhere near Cutler yet.

Leinart hasn't displayed the motivation or commitment to do much more than hold a clip board and knock back beer bongs. I live in Phoenix, I see and hear the reports. Don't be surprised to see Matty continue to accept the back-up role behind Kurt instead of trying to force a trade so he can play. Matty knows when he has it good.

htismaqe 03-11-2009 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 5572937)
A young all-pro QB being a hot head? Who ever heard of such a thing? Cutler, like a lot of twenty-something ultra-competitve athletes, needs to grow into his role. He is a smart guy that doesn't appreciate the new kid-coach ****ing with him and isn't afraid to say so.
Is that the mature thing to do? No. But I bet it feels good.

Him being a hot head isn't the issue, it's a symptom. He's had mental lapses, on and off the field, since high school. I fully understand where you're coming from, but it's not out-of-the-question to wonder if the kid has what it takes upstairs to take his game to the next level. It was plastered all over his scouting reports.

Kerberos 03-11-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5572890)
I can't completely rule it out, no.

But he actually seems to be regressing, so to say I've seen anything to even suggest that he might be able to turn the corner would be exaggerating.

I just don't see him being anything more than he is today - a very good QB with a great arm that won't ever win anything of significance.


Jake Plummer Part II ??

vailpass 03-11-2009 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5572943)
Him being a hot head isn't the issue, it's a symptom. He's had mental lapses, on and off the field, since high school. I fully understand where you're coming from, but it's not out-of-the-question to wonder if the kid has what it takes upstairs to take his game to the next level. It was plastered all over his scouting reports.

I see what you mean. We're on opposite sides of the fence here so we see the same thing differently. I feel like you can coach poise in the pocket and progression reads but you can't coach a cross-body 45 yard laser.
We'll see what happens with him. If he stays, losing B-Marsh is not going to help.

So far I think the kid-coach McDaniels has had a great run in the FA market but has pissed me off.
Wanting Cassell is just plain stupid. He only wanted him because he was a Patsy. McKid also cut our long-snapper and locker room leader so he could sign NE long-snapper.
I hate that shit.

vailpass 03-11-2009 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerberos (Post 5572951)
Jake Plummer Part II ??

You must have missed the part where he said "great arm".

talastan 03-11-2009 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 5572965)
You must have missed the part where he said "great arm".

I think he was comparing the general attitude of both players.

Garcia Bronco 03-11-2009 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5572775)
I think Cutler is an overrated whiner, but Kiper is trying to make himself look good. He (I'm almost positive) said Matt Leinart was the steal of that year's draft, and that Cutler was the third best QB prospect behind Vince Young and Leinart. So he can toot his own horn about Cutler if he wants, but so far Cutler is still far better than Vince Young or Matt Leinart.
He's saying people have egg on their face. Mel has egg on his face more than they do, he needs to shut his pie hole.

Exactly. This is nothing more and the 3rd article in the past week about Kiper slamming into Cutler who has nothing to do with the upcoming draft. Kiper is a sad little man.

htismaqe 03-11-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 5572961)
I see what you mean. We're on opposite sides of the fence here so we see the same thing differently. I feel like you can coach poise in the pocket and progression reads but you can't coach a cross-body 45 yard laser.
We'll see what happens with him. If he stays, losing B-Marsh is not going to help.

So far I think the kid-coach McDaniels has had a great run in the FA market but has pissed me off.
Wanting Cassell is just plain stupid. He only wanted him because he was a Patsy. McKid also cut our long-snapper and locker room leader so he could sign NE long-snapper.
I hate that shit.

You can coach poise and progression to a certain extent, but only to a guy that CAN and WANTS to learn. It remains to be seen if Cutler is that guy or not.

We really don't see it all that differently on the surface. The difference is that you're a Bronco fan so you hope he pans out. I'm a rival so I hope he doesn't. It's that slight emotional color in the argument that causes the difference in viewpoints.

Garcia Bronco 03-11-2009 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5572980)
It remains to be seen if Cutler is that guy or not.

You'd be incorrect about that. Cutler until his vacation started was at Dove Valley everyday pouring over his performance from the prior season. He gets better every year.

vailpass 03-11-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5572980)
You can coach poise and progression to a certain extent, but only to a guy that CAN and WANTS to learn. It remains to be seen if Cutler is that guy or not.

We really don't see it all that differently on the surface. The difference is that you're a Bronco fan so you hope he pans out. I'm a rival so I hope he doesn't. It's that slight emotional color in the argument that causes the difference in viewpoints.

That's what I was trying to say but didn't state so clearly.

Just curious: Assuming you like all the changes (upgrades) that KC has made in HC/Front Office personnel: When was the last pre-season year you were as optimistic about the direction of your Chiefs as you are this year?

Kerberos 03-11-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 5572965)
You must have missed the part where he said "great arm".

Plummer didn't have a ROCKET for an arm but he could deliver the ball down field at times. Especially when he played the Chiefs. :cuss:

Quote:

Originally Posted by talastan (Post 5572968)
I think he was comparing the general attitude of both players.

Pretty much.

I think htismaqe has been dead on with most of his assessment so far IMO.

vailpass 03-11-2009 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerberos (Post 5573001)
Plummer didn't have a ROCKET for an arm but he could deliver the ball down field at times. Especially when he played the Chiefs. :cuss:



Pretty much.

I think htismaqe has been dead on with most of his assessment so far IMO.

It seemed to me Plummer had an al dente noodle for an arm compared to Cutler. If he found a gun against KC it was only once a year and if you think that's bad try having your team lose to a team whose HC is Goonther ****ing Cunningham. Christ how embarassing.

EyePod 03-11-2009 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5572895)
He may be right about Cutler, but that doesn't exuse the fact that he's telling other people how wrong they were when Leinart has done nothing and Vince Young is a train wreck- both of whom he claimed were better. If he wants to bash Cutler, that's cool, but for him to be deriding other people because they liked him is ridiculous. Look in the mirror, Mel. As far as Leinert yet to be determined- he couldn't earn his way onto the field so I don't see any way anyone could claim he's anywhere near Cutler yet.

The thing is, it's not his job to evaluate talent at the NFL level. I"ts his job to evaluate prospects and teams looking at prospects. He has to try and predict where players will go and when. That's it. And with this, he does a pretty decent job.

htismaqe 03-11-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 5572992)
That's what I was trying to say but didn't state so clearly.

Just curious: Assuming you like all the changes (upgrades) that KC has made in HC/Front Office personnel: When was the last pre-season year you were as optimistic about the direction of your Chiefs as you are this year?

Honestly, I can't remember far enough back to be able to answer that.

I think they've done just about everything they could have so far.

blaise 03-11-2009 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 5573026)
The thing is, it's not his job to evaluate talent at the NFL level. I"ts his job to evaluate prospects and teams looking at prospects. He has to try and predict where players will go and when. That's it. And with this, he does a pretty decent job.


But he's inviting the further conversation, and how well his forecasts panned out by bringing the topic up and beating his chest about how right he was, while at the same time ignoring his own errors.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.