ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Glazer: KC called Cleveland regarding Quinn. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192142)

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 09-21-2008 10:39 AM

It doesn't matter who we bring in as a QB as long as Herm and Dick Curl are here.

How hard is it to hand off up the middle twice, throw a swing pass and go sit on the bench as the punter trots out onto the field?

kcxiv 09-21-2008 10:39 AM

Leave it up to Hootie for something crazy.

BigChiefFan 09-21-2008 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039528)
older?! Haha. He's what, 25??

Yeah, we'll get a top pick and if we use it on a QB we're going to commit $40M guaranteed...

I'll take Quinn and his 5 year, $9M contract and potential to be a franchise QB over our #1 overall and a 3rd round pick.

We could have Sam Bradford and a quality RG instead. You don't rebuild giving up draft picks for a 25 year old QB with just as many question marks as a rookie, IMO, especially behind this O-Line.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:40 AM

What does this franchise need more than anything? A QB.

If we land the #1 overall (which is likely), who will we draft? Probably Stafford.

Do you guys really like Stafford ($40M guaranteed) more than Quinn (5 years, $9M)...?

Not me. They have similar potential if you ask me. Quinn has learned what life is like in the NFL for two years and is a hell of a QB...I'd be ecstatic if we got him for a 1st and a 2nd...

He is the most logic piece for this franchise...nothing makes more sense than doing anything possible to acquire Brady Quinn.

ArrowheadHawk 09-21-2008 10:41 AM

I just don't see see it no way is quin worth a number one pick to a rebuilding franchise.

banyon 09-21-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039529)
There is no difference between LJ and Jamal Lewis...other than the fact Jamal Lewis might be better.

I was thinking LJ was younger than Jamal, but he's really not. I forgot how early Jamal came out from Tennessee.

Of course LJ does have less wear on the tire and has not been to federal prison, so there are some differences for you.

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 10:41 AM

The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

kcxiv 09-21-2008 10:41 AM

I rather have Rey Mualuaga.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5039538)
We could have Sam Bradford and a quality RG instead. You don't rebuild giving up draft picks for a 25 year old QB with just as many question marks as a rookie, IMO, especially behind this O-Line.

We could pay a QB like Tom Brady that has the same potential as Brady Quinn and hold on to that 3rd round pick and draft Brad Cottam.

Yaaay.

kcxiv 09-21-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5039544)
The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

The thing is they will. If Derrick Anderson is a stud. They will want to get something from Quinn. Why would they have their number 1 pick just sit there and rott? in the end it hurts them more then anything else.

Skip Towne 09-21-2008 10:43 AM

Letting Dick Curl coach a top flight QB is like letting Hootie work on your Maserati.

ArrowheadHawk 09-21-2008 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5039544)
Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

Yes, either this or we could trade back up into the first to get a QB about the spot where Quin or Rodgers dropped to.

banyon 09-21-2008 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5039544)
The Browns aren't giving this guy up for less than they paid.

They gave up a #1 to get him.

If you want him, you have to go above that 1.

Just so I'm clear, do all the anti-Quinn people want to spend that #1 that they wouldn't spend on Quinn on a QB?

I understand that they want a #1, but not THE #1, which is probably what we'll have. Maybe we need to package some of our other picks or players and get a mid 1st rounder to trade.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039541)
I just don't see see it no way is quin worth a number one pick to a rebuilding franchise.

I only agree if our rebuilding franchise doesn't plan on drafting a QB with our top 5 pick.

If we take Oher, I'm fine with passing on Quinn and taking a QB in 2009.

If we take Stafford, or Bradford, or Sanchez or whoever in the top 5...and pay them like Tom Brady...if we had a CHANCE at Quinn and passed because we wanted one of these guys instead I won't be happy.

BigChiefFan 09-21-2008 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039540)
What does this franchise need more than anything? A QB.

If we land the #1 overall (which is likely), who will we draft? Probably Stafford.

Do you guys really like Stafford ($40M guaranteed) more than Quinn (5 years, $9M)...?

Not me. They have similar potential if you ask me. Quinn has learned what life is like in the NFL for two years and is a hell of a QB...I'd be ecstatic if we got him for a 1st and a 2nd...

He is the most logic piece for this franchise...nothing makes more sense than doing anything possible to acquire Brady Quinn.

I'm not sold that Stafford will be the first QB taken next year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.