ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Would you trade LJ to the Texans/Raiders/Lions for a 1st and 3rd rounder? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=155266)

ptlyon 12-29-2006 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC
The term "NEXT YEAR".

"I don't have any dreams left to dream..."

http://www.i-mockery.com/shorts/rudolph16/14.jpg

CupidStunt 12-29-2006 10:18 AM

Hell fucking yes I would.

Archie Bunker 12-29-2006 10:22 AM

This offense without LJ would be Raider-like.

Keep him and build around him through FA and the draft. IMO the Chiefs are only a LT and WR away from being Top 10 again.

ptlyon 12-29-2006 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
IMO the Chiefs are only a LT and WR away from being Top 10 again.

ROFL

BigRedChief 12-29-2006 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon
"I don't have any dreams left to dream..."

http://www.i-mockery.com/shorts/rudolph16/14.jpg

http://dorkafork.com/myimages/waronxmas/yalta.jpg

BigRedChief 12-29-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
This offense without LJ would be Raider-like.

Keep him and build around him through FA and the draft. IMO the Chiefs are only a LT and WR away from being Top 10 again.

So we are set at DT?

Archie Bunker 12-29-2006 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief
So we are set at DT?

I was only addressing the offense. Of course we need a DT.

Redrum_69 12-29-2006 10:28 AM

MAKE THE TRADE!!

Runningbacks who get the ball 400+times a year are a dying breeed

If Larry would ever take those damn diapers off then maybe he would be able to block better

Archie Bunker 12-29-2006 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon
ROFL

With improved OL play I don't think it's that much of a stretch.

BigRedChief 12-29-2006 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
I was only addressing the offense. Of course we need a DT.

And those grow on trees? The draft is the safest place to get a stud DT. Free agent DT almost always don't work out.

ptlyon 12-29-2006 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archie Bunker
With improved OL play I don't think it's that much of a stretch.

While losing your line?

What color is the sky in your world?

DMAC 12-29-2006 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief
The draft is the safest place to get a stud DT.

Yep, just like Ryan Sims.

Archie Bunker 12-29-2006 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief
And those grow on trees? The draft is the safest place to get a stud DT. Free agent DT almost always don't work out.

Never said the Chiefs shouldn't draft one. I just wouldnt trade away our entire offense for one.

BigRedChief 12-29-2006 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC
Yep, just like Ryan Sims.

Thats on DV, King Carl and Bunting's word. This has been discussed several times. I'm sure a thread search would find it. The end results were that FA DT bomb more than they hit and DT's taken in the top 15 hit good about 70% of the time.

ck_IN 12-29-2006 10:35 AM

I wouldn't make the trade with the Raiders just on general principle. But I would make it with the other teams.

This team is going to need some major work and by the time it's anywhere near ready LJ will be a FA and signing with an east coast team. Trading him now will give us draft picks to work with and eliminate the franchise tag/poutfest I see looming with LJ.

In no particular order over the next few years we're going to need: DT, CB, LB, OL, WR, QB. If we can get the OL first then Bennett/Holmes/draftee will do fine. LJ draft picks would give us the bullets to get the OL.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.